We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Individuals with cognitive impairment, whether inborn or acquired as a result of illness or accident, depend on others to manage the financial assets available for their benefit. This chapter examines the latest developments in enduring powers of attorney and special needs trusts (SNT) in Hong Kong as vehicles for financial planning for such individuals. It first examines whether the proposed reform of the enduring power of attorney will bring Hong Kong law in line with other developed jurisdictions, before outlining the advocacy efforts that led to the Hong Kong Government’s decision to launch a territory-wide special needs trust for the benefit of individuals with cognitive impairment. Finally, it examines the challenges in designing the operational framework of such a trust.
This chapter evaluates the operation of Midwest Special Needs Trust (MSNT), an organisation created to establish and administer special needs trusts. A special needs trust is used as a fiduciary tool to serve persons with disabilities so that their assets do not affect the eligibility of means-tested social benefits. It starts with an account of the history of MSNT, and then examines the specific definitions and requirements of MSNT trust accounts, the roles and responsibilities of the Trustee and co-trustees, and the merits of MSNT. This chapter also considers important aspects of the administration of MSNT, such as the establishment and termination of trust accounts, staffing, fees and expenses, data management, and investment policy. Real-life cases are discussed throughout to show how MSNT helps to improve the quality of life of the disabled. This chapter concludes with thoughts on the future development of special needs trusts, including MSNT service enhancements and other financial tools, to assist the population with disabilities.
This chapter reviews legal instruments and avenues available for planning support for people with cognitive impairments in Australia, including adult guardianship, durable powers of attorney, representative payee and nominee appointments, and special needs disability trusts; the associated public institutions such as guardianship tribunals, office of the public advocate, and public trustees; and their interaction with service delivery programs such as the National Disability Insurance Scheme and social security. It is argued that the configuration of planning instruments, and the timing of their introduction, reflects adaption to the architecture of its welfare state, including its somewhat unique combination of extensive access to tightly means-tested income support (and reforms to overcome tax minimisation or avoidance), the absence of any expectation of family support, and acceptance of state responsibility for funding of services for disabled people least able to care for themselves.
This chapter examines adult guardianship and powers of attorney in England and Wales today. Section I considers the origin of modern adult guardianship law in Roman law and traces its development in English common law through to the current legal and institutional infrastructure of mental capacity jurisdiction. It then introduces the procedures of appointing a deputy, and evaluates the safeguards provided by the Office of the Public Guardian. Section II focuses on the policy considerations underpinning the legislation on enduring and lasting powers of attorney, the development of policy and legislation over the past 35 years, and potential developments in the foreseeable future. The author also compares deputyship with attorneyship, and explains the advantages of the former over lasting powers of attorney.
Countries around the world are facing pressing needs to enhance financial planning mechanisms for individuals with cognitive impairment. The book provides the first comparative study of the three most common of such mechanisms in Asia and the West, namely guardianship, enduring/lasting powers of attorney, and special needs trusts. It involves not only scholarly overviews of the mechanisms in the jurisdictions studied, but also thorough, structured and critical reviews of their operational experiences. This book will have broad appeal to scholars, students, law and policy makers and practitioners in the fields of mental disability, healthcare and elder law. It is widely recognised in the field that books like this one are needed. This book will also be of interest to undergraduate and graduate students in mental health, disability law and elder law.
Settlors, particularly Asian settlors, are often reluctant to relinquish control over their assets. After all, it has taken their whole life’s efforts to build their business empire. While they may find reserved power trusts useful in helping them make a leap of faith, there is a multitude of issues arising from such trusts, such as: what are the legitimate reasons for settlor reserved powers, if any; how far would reserved powers render a trust sham or illusory; and in what circumstances are they unable to protect settlors from the claims of their creditors and estranged spouses.
The present chapter seeks to examine these issues critically, and argue that while there are good reasons for having settlor reserved powers trusts, care must be taken to seize the beast by its horns and transform it into a veritable tool for wealth planning. To do so, it will first, examine the settlors’ reasons for reserving powers to himself or a protector; second, consider the legal risks as to validity of the trusts; and third, examine situations in which even if the trust is not declared invalid, it may become ineffective in achieving asset protection for the settlor.