We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To assess the inter-method reliability of the Ovarian Cancer in Alberta (OVAL) survey developed to estimate adult vitamin D exposure from sun and diet for every tenth year, against the longer Geraldton Skin Cancer Prevention Survey (the assumed ‘gold standard’). We also estimated total vitamin D exposure using the OVAL survey.
Design
A randomized crossover design to assess the inter-method reliability of sun exposure (OVAL v. Geraldton survey), using intra-class correlation and estimated total vitamin D exposure from sun and diet.
Setting
Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Subjects
Randomly selected women (n 90) aged 40–79 years.
Results
The average lifetime sun exposure of 13 913 h (average 411 h/year) from the Geraldton survey was not significantly different from the 13 034 h (average 385 h/year) from the OVAL survey for periods with sufficient UV radiation to stimulate vitamin D production. The intra-class correlation coefficient for average lifetime sun exposure was 0·77 (95 % CI 0·69, 0·86); the annual average was 0·60 (95 % CI 0·47, 0·74). Estimated vitamin D from diet and supplements increased with age.
Conclusions
Our OVAL survey reliably estimated adult sun exposure relative to the Geraldton survey, suggesting that assessing sun exposure every tenth year is a reliable and efficient method for estimating sun contributions to lifetime vitamin D exposure.
Intake of nutrients may influence the risk of endometrial cancer (EC). We aimed to estimate the association of intake of individual nutrients from food and from food plus supplements with EC occurrence.
Design
A population-based case–control study conducted in Canada (2002–2006).
Setting
Nutrient intakes from food and supplements were assessed using an FFQ. Logistic regression was used to estimate EC risk within quartile levels of nutrient intakes.
Subjects
Incident EC cases (n 506) were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry, and population controls were frequency- and age-matched to cases (n 981).
Results
There existed little evidence of an association with EC for the majority of macronutrients and micronutrients examined. We observed a statistically significant increased risk associated with the highest, compared with the lowest, quartile of intake of dietary cholesterol (multivariable-adjusted OR = 1·51, 95 % CI 1·08, 2·11; P for trend = 0·02). Age-adjusted risk at the highest level of intake was significantly reduced for Ca from food sources (OR = 0·73, 95 % CI 0·54, 0·99) but was attenuated in the multivariable model (OR = 0·82, 95 % CI 0·59, 1·13). When intake from supplements was included in Ca intake, risk was significantly reduced by 28 % with higher Ca (multivariable-adjusted OR = 0·72, 95 % CI 0·51, 0·99, P for trend = 0·04). We also observed unexpected increased risks at limited levels of intakes of dietary soluble fibre, vitamin C, thiamin, vitamin B6 and lutein/zeaxanthin, with no evidence for linear trend.
Conclusions
The results of our study suggest a positive association between dietary cholesterol and EC risk and an inverse association with Ca intake from food sources and from food plus supplements.
The past 15 years have witnessed a dramatic increase in research related to biological control. The current perception that biocontrol will have an important role in commercial agriculture in the future contrasts markedly with previously-held views that biocontrol agents perform too inconsistently, or are too narrow in their spectrum of activity, as compared with chemical pesticides, to be commercially feasible on a large scale. Renewed interest in biological control is in part a response to widespread concern about the potential negative impact of chemical pesticides on public health and the environment. Furthermore, the techniques of molecular biology have revolutionized the field by facilitating the identification of the molecular basis of pathogen suppression and by providing the means for construction of ‘superior’ biocontrol agents. New biocontrol agents resulting from recent intensive research are slowly becoming available to agriculture, and the trend should accelerate throughout this decade. One example is Gliocladium virens, which is being marketed in potting-mix to control Pythium and Rhizoctonia (see Lumsden and Walter, Chapter 25).
This chapter deals with the potential benefits and risks from the introduction of biocontrol agents for the control of root diseases of wheat, as well as the impediments to the application of this technology in commercial agriculture. The focus of the chapter is on biological control of take-all of wheat by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. because it is a model system for the study of the molecular basis of pathogen suppression, root colonization by introduced bacteria and field application of biocontrol agents.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.