Baseline assessment of cognitive performance is common practice under many concussion management protocols and is required for collegiate athletes by the NCAA. The purpose of baseline cognitive assessment is to understand an athlete’s individual uninjured cognitive performance, as opposed to using population normative data. This baseline can then serve as a reference point for recovery after concussion and can inform return-to-play decisions. However, multiple factors, including lack of effort, can contribute to misrepresentation of baseline results which raises concern for reliability during return-to-play decision-making. Measuring effort across a continuum, rather than as a dichotomous variable (good versus poor effort) may provide informative insight related to cognitive performance at baseline.

Collegiate athletes (n = 231) completed the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT) as part of their baseline pre-participation concussion evaluation. ImPACT creates composite scores of Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual-Motor Speed, and Reaction Time. Baseline self-reported symptoms and total hours of sleep the night prior to testing are also collected through ImPACT. ImPACT has one embedded indicator within the program to assess effort, and research has identified an additional three embedded indicators. Athletes were also administered one stand-alone performance validity test, either the Medical Symptom Validity Test (n = 130) or the Rey Dot Counting Test (n = 101), to independently measure effort. Effort was estimated across a continuum (zero, one, two, or three or more failed effort indicators) with both stand-alone and embedded effort indicators. We evaluated the relationship between effort, symptoms, self-reported sleep, Reaction Time composite score and Visual-Motor Speed composite score using a linear regression model.

We found that 121 athletes passed all effort indicators, while 39 athletes failed only one effort indicator, 40 athletes failed two effort indicators, and 31 athletes failed three or four (three+) effort indicators. Self-reported symptoms and total hours of sleep were not related to effort, but Reaction Time and VisualMotor Speed composites were. Specifically, performance on the Visual-Motor Speed composite was significantly worse for athletes who failed two or three+ effort indicators compared to athletes who did not fail any, and performance on the Reaction Time composite was significantly worse only for athletes who failed three+ effort indicators. Additionally, athletes who failed one or more effort indicators and reported less sleep performed worse on both the Visual-Motor Speed and Reaction Time composites, compared to those who reported less sleep and did not fail any effort indicators.

Athletes who failed one effort indicator did not perform significantly worse on Reaction Time and Visual-Motor Speed composites compared to those who passed all effort indicators. However, 31% of athletes failed two or more effort indicators and these athletes performed worse on cognitive tests, likely due to factors impacting their ability to put forth good effort. These results suggest that effort is more complex than a previously used dichotomous variable and highlights the importance of using several indicators of effort throughout baseline assessments. In addition, the importance of sleep should be emphasized during baseline assessments, especially when effort is questionable.

Research identifies a need for expanded therapeutic options for people with mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety disorders treated within the UK National Health Service (NHS). We aimed to examine potential benefits of a Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) based breath intervention delivered in this context.

SKY is a structured programme derived from yoga in which participants are taught relaxation and stress-management techniques including body postures, breathing exercises and cognitive-behavioural procedures. Previous research has demonstrated benefits for patients with clinical and non-clinical depression and anxiety. However, SKY has not yet been evaluated as a therapeutic option for patients accessing NHS primary care mental health services.

We evaluated an existing programme available to NHS patients in South East England. The intervention is community-based and delivered via four weekly ‘stress buster sessions’ (1-h duration), one weekend intensive workshop (2.5 days) and four weekly (90 min) follow-up sessions. Analyses were conducted on existing data [measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (generalised anxiety disorder-7)] collected as part of routine care, at the start of the programme and three follow-up assessments.

Baseline data were available for 991 participants, of which 557 (56.2%) attended at least three weekly workshops, 216 (21.8%) attended the weekend workshop and 169 (17.1%) completed the programme. Statistically significant (P<0.05) improvements in depression and anxiety were observed in all three outcome assessments. Clinically meaningful change was observed for 74.6% of participants completing the programme. Findings indicate that SKY has the potential to benefit patient outcomes and could be offered more widely as a therapeutic option. We recommend further research to explore patients’ experiences of the programme, determine the number of sessions necessary for improvement/ recovery, define the population most likely to respond and examine potential cost savings (e.g., reductions in antidepressant prescribing/referrals to secondary care).

Family education programs (FEPs) target caregiving-related psychological distress for carers of relatives/friends diagnosed with serious mental health conditions. While FEPs are efficacious in reducing distress, the mechanisms are not fully known. Peer group support and greater mental health knowledge are proposed to reduce carers' psychological distress by reducing stigmatising attitudes and self-blame, and strengthening carers' relationship with their relative.

Adult carers (n = 1016) who participated in Wellways Australia's FEP from 2009 to 2016 completed self-report questionnaires at the core program's start and end, during the consolidation period, and at a 6-month follow-up. Those who enrolled early completed questionnaires prior to a wait-list period. We used linear mixed-effects modelling to assess the program's effectiveness using a naturalistic wait-list control longitudinal design, and multivariate latent growth modelling to test a theory-based process change model.

While there was no significant change over the wait-list period, psychological distress, self-blame and stigmatising attitudes significantly decreased, and communication and relationship quality/feelings increased from the core program's start to its end. Changes were maintained throughout the consolidation period and follow-up. Peer group support significantly predicted the declining trajectory of distress. Peer group support and greater knowledge significantly predicted declining levels of self-blame and stigmatising attitudes, and increasing levels of communication.

This is the first study to quantitatively validate the mechanisms underlying the effect of FEPs on carers' psychological distress. Peer group support is key in modifying carers' appraisals of their friend/relatives' condition. Continued implementation of FEPs within mental health service systems is warranted.

To explore, for the first time, whether a modified mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) course has the potential to reduce stress and burnout among National Health Service (NHS) General Practitioners.

There is a crisis of low morale among NHS GPs, with most describing their workload as ‘unmanageable’. MBCT has been demonstrated to improve stress and burnout in other populations, but has not yet been evaluated in a cohort of NHS GPs.

NHS GPs in South East England (n=22) attended a modified version of the MBCT course approved by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for prevention of depressive relapse. This comprised eight weekly 2-h sessions with homework (mindfulness practice) between sessions. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) before (baseline) and then again one month (T2) and three months (T3) after attending the course. We also obtained qualitative data on participants’ experiences of the course.

Compliance with the intervention was very high. All GPs attended at least six sessions and all completed baseline questionnaires. At T2, data were obtained from 21 participants (95%); PSS scores were significantly lower than at baseline (P<0.001), as were MBI emotional exhaustion (P<0.001) and depersonalization scores (P=0.0421). At T3 we obtained data for 13 participants (59%); PSS scores and MBI emotional exhaustion scores were significantly lower (P<0.001; P=0.0024, respectively) and personal accomplishment scores were significantly higher (P<0.001) than at baseline. Participants reported that the course helped them to manage work pressures, feel more relaxed, enjoy their work and experience greater empathy and compassion (for self, colleagues and patients). Findings of this preliminary evaluation are promising. Further research is needed to evaluate this approach within a larger randomized-controlled trial.