Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:30:50.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Mining Social-Network Graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Jure Leskovec
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Anand Rajaraman
Affiliation:
Milliways Laboratories, California
Jeffrey David Ullman
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

There is much information to be gained by analyzing the large-scale data that is derived from social networks. The best-known example of a social network is the “friends” relation found on sites like Facebook. However, as we shall see there are many other sources of data that connect people or other entities.

In this chapter, we shall study techniques for analyzing such networks. An important question about a social network is how to identify “communities;” that is, subsets of the nodes (people or other entities that form the network) with unusually strong connections. Some of the techniques used to identify communities are similar to the clustering algorithms we discussed in Chapter 7. However, communities almost never partition the set of nodes in a network. Rather, communities usually overlap. For example, you may belong to several communities of friends or classmates. The people from one community tend to know each other, but people from two different communities rarely know each other. You would not want to be assigned to only one of the communities, nor would it make sense to cluster all the people from all your communities into one cluster.

Also in this chapter we explore efficient algorithms for discovering other properties of graphs. We look at “simrank,” a way to discover similarities among nodes of a graph. We explore triangle counting as a way to measure the connectedness of a community. We give efficient algorithms for exact and approximate measurement of the neighborhood sizes of nodes in a graph. Finally, we look at efficient algorithms for computing the transitive closure.

Social Networks as Graphs

We begin our discussion of social networks by introducing a graph model. Not every graph is a suitable representation of what we intuitively regard as a social network. We therefore discuss the idea of “locality,” the property of social networks that says nodes and edges of the graph tend to cluster in communities. This section also looks at some of the kinds of social networks that occur in practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] F. N., Afrati, D., Fotakis, and J. D., Ullman, “Enumerating subgraph instances by map-reduce,” http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/1020
[2] F.N., Afrati and J.D., Ullman, “Transitive closure and recursive Datalog implemented on clusters,” in Proc. EDBT (2012).Google Scholar
[3] L., Backstrom and J., Leskovec, “Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks,” Proc. Fourth ACM Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (2011), pp. 635–644.Google Scholar
[4] P., Boldi, M., Rosa, and S., Vigna, “HyperANF: approximating the neigh-bourhood function of very large graphs on a budget,” Proc. WWW Conference (2011), pp. 625–634.Google Scholar
[5] S., Fortunato, “Community detection in graphs,” Physics Reports 486:3–5 (2010), pp. 75–174.Google Scholar
[6] M., Girvan and M.E.J., Newman, “Community structure in social and biological networks,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (2002), pp. 7821–7826.Google Scholar
[7] Y.E., Ioannidis, “On the computation of the transitive closure of relational operators,” Proc. 12th Intl. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 403–411.
[8] G., Jeh and J., Widom, “Simrank: a measure of structural-context similarity,” Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2002), pp. 538–543.Google Scholar
[9] R., Kumar, P., Raghavan, S., Rajagopalan, and A., Tomkins, “Trawling the Web for emerging cyber-communities, Computer Networks 31:11–16 (May, 1999), pp. 1481–1493.Google Scholar
[10] J., Leskovec, K.J., Lang, A., Dasgupta, and M.W., Mahoney, “Community structure in large networks: natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.1355.
[11] S., Melnik, H., Garcia-Molina, and E., Rahm, “Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching, Proc. Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering (2002), pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
[12] C.R., Palmer, P.B., Gibbons, and C., Faloutsos, “ANF: a fast and scalable tool for data mining in massive graphs,” Proc. Eighth ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2002), pp. 81–90.Google Scholar
[13] J., Shi and J., Malik, “Normalized cuts and image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence” 22:8 (2000), pp. 888–905.Google Scholar
[14] Stanford Network Analysis Platform, http://snap.stanford.edu.
[15] S., Suri and S., Vassilivitskii, “Counting triangles and the curse of the last reducer,” Proc. WWW Conference (2011).Google Scholar
[16] H., Tong, C., Faloutsos, and J.-Y., Pan, “Fast random walk with restart and its applications,” ICDM 2006, pp. 613–622.Google Scholar
[17] C.E., Tsourakakis, U., Kang, G.L., Miller, and C., Faloutsos, “DOULION: counting triangles in massive graphs with a coin,” Proc. Fifteenth ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2009).Google Scholar
[18] P., Valduriez and H., Boral, “Evaluation of recursive queries using join indices,” Expert Database Conf. (1986), pp. 271–293.Google Scholar
[19] U., von Luxburg, “A tutorial on spectral clustering,” Statistics and Computing 17:4 (2007), 2007, pp. 395–416.Google Scholar
[20] J., Yang and J., Leskovec, “Overlapping community detection at scale: a non-negative matrix factorization approach,” ACM Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, 2013.Google Scholar
[21] J., Yang, J., McAuley, J., Leskovec, “Detecting cohesive and 2-mode communities in directed and undirected networks,” ACM Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, 2014.Google Scholar
[22] J., Yang, J., McAuley, J., Leskovec, “Community detection in networks with node attributes,” IEEE Intl. Conf. on Data Mining, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×