Bibliography

Michael Losonsky

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810220.011

Aarsleff, H. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essay on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar

Aarsleff, H. 1994. “Locke's Influence.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Chappell, V., 252–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Abelard, P. 1933. Peter Abelaerds Philosophische Schriften. Ed. Geyer, B.. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, vol. 21, nos. 1–4. MünsterGoogle Scholar

Adams, M. M. 1987. William Ockham. Vol. 1. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1967. An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. London: HutchinsonGoogle Scholar

Anselm of Canterbury. 1998. The Major Works. Ed. Davies, B. and Evans, G. G.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Apel, K. O. 1976. “The Transcendental Conception of Language Communication and the Idea of First Philosophy.” In Parrett 1976, 32–61

Arens, H. 1984. Aristotle's Theory of Language and Its Tradition. Studies in the History of Linguistics, vol. 29. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1978. A Theory of Universals. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Arnauld, A., and Lancelot, C.. 1975. General and Rational Grammar: The Port-Royal Grammar. Trans. J. Rieux and B. Rollin. The Hague: MoutonCrossRef Google Scholar

Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P.. 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Trans. and ed. J. V. Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. 1974. Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: D. ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. 1988. “Traditional Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. and Skinner, Q., 143–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1st ed., 1962CrossRef Google Scholar

Avramides, A. 1998. “Intention and Convention.” In Hale and Wright 1998, 60–86

Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic. 2nd ed. London: Victor GollanczGoogle Scholar

Ayers, M. 1993. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. 2 vols. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Bach, E. 1989. Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Bacon, F. 1968. The Works of Francis Bacon. Ed. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., and Heath, D. D.. 14 vols. New York: Garrett Press. Reprint of London: Longmans, 1857–74Google Scholar

Bacon, F. 2000. The New Organon. Ed. Jardine, L. and Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bacon, F. 2001. The Advancement of Learning. Ed. Gould, S. J.. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar

Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S.. 1984. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Bambrough, R. 1960. “Universals and Family Resemblances.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61: 207–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauch, B. 1918. “Lotzes Logik und ihre Bedeutung im deutschen Idealismus.” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 1–57Google Scholar

Beaney, M. 1996. Frege: Making Sense. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Benacerraf, P., and Putnam, H. (eds.). 1983. Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted 1998Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1962. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. Bowring, J.. 11 vols. New York: Russell and RussellGoogle Scholar

Bird, G. 1995. “Carnap and Quine: Internal and External Questions.” Erkenntnis 42: 41–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, M. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Henry HoltGoogle Scholar

Boehme, J. 1956. Sämtliche Schriften. Ed. Peuckert, Will-Erich. 11 vols. Stuttgart: FrommannGoogle Scholar

Boehme, J. 1963. Die Urschriften. Ed. Buddecke, Werner. 2 vols. Stuttgart: FrommannGoogle Scholar

Bonno, G. 1990. “The Diffusion and Influence of Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding in France before Voltaire's Lettres Philosophiques.” In A Locke Miscellany: Locke Biography and Criticism for All, ed. Yolton, J. S., 75–85. Bristol: Thoemmes PressGoogle Scholar

Boole, G. 1847. The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, Being an Essay toward a Calculas of Deductive Reasoning. London and Cambridge: Macmillan, Barclay and Macmillan. Reprint, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948Google Scholar

Borsche, T. 1981. Sprachansichten: Der Begriff der menschlichen Rede in der Sprachphilosophie Wilhelm von Humboldts. Stuttgart: Klett-CottaGoogle Scholar

Brekle, H. E. 1971. “Die Idee einer Generativen Grammatik in Leibnizens Fragmente zur Logik.” Studia Leibnitiana 3: 141–9Google Scholar

Broadie, A. 1987. Introduction to Medieval Logic. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Burge, T. 1992. “Philosophy of Language and Mind, 1950–90.” Philosophical Review 101: 3–51. Reprinted in Geirsson and Losonsky 1996, 1–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1931. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache.” Erkenntnis 2: 219–41. Trans. A. Pap, “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer, 60–81. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1959

Carnap, R. 1934. Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Julius Springer. Reprint, Vienna: Springer Verlag, 1968CrossRef Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1935. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. London: Kegan Paul. Reprint, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. Trans. A. Smeaton. London: Kegan Paul. Reprint, Chicago: Open Court, 2002Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue International de Philosophie 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Carnap 1956, 205–21Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1968. Problémy Jazyka Vědy. Ed. and trans. Tondl, L. and Berka, K.. Prague: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1968. Preface translated from the Czech by M. Losonsky at www.colostate.edu/~losonskyGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P. 1989. Tractarian Semantics: Finding Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Caton, C. E. 1963. Philosophy and Ordinary Language. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar

Cavell, S. 1989. This New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson and Wittgenstein. Albuquerque: Living Batch PressGoogle Scholar

Cavell, S. 1996. “Notes and Afterthoughts on the Opening of Wittgenstein's Investigations.” In Sluga and Stern 1996, 261–95

Chappell, V. 1994. “Locke's Theory of Ideas.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Chappell, V., 26–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Chierchia, G., and McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1969. “Quine's Empirical Assumptions.” In Words and Objections: Essay on the Work of W. V. O. Quine, ed. Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J., 53–68. Dordrecht: D. ReidelGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1971. Problems of Knowledge and Freedom. New York: Pantheon BooksGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1976. Reflections on Language. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980. “Rules and Representations.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 1–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and the Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Church, A. 1951. “The Need for Abstract Entities.” American Academy of Arts and Sciences Proceedings 80: 100–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, L. J. 1954. “On the Project of a Universal Character.” Mind 63: 49–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Condillac, E. B. de. 1947. Oeuvres philosophiques de Condillac. Ed. Roy, G.. 3 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Condillac, E. B.. 1971. An Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Trans. T. Nugent. Gainesville, FL: Scholars' Facsimiles and ReprintsGoogle Scholar

Condillac, E. B.. 2001. An Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Trans. H. Aarselff. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Condorcet, A.-E.. 1955. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. New York: Noonday PressGoogle Scholar

Conway, G. D. 1989. Wittgenstein on Foundations. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities PressGoogle Scholar

Copenhaver, B. P. 1988. “Translation, Terminology, and Style in Philosophical Discouse.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. B., 77–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Copenhaver, B. P., and Schmitt, C. B.. 1992. Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copi, I. M. 1949. “Language Analysis and Metaphysical Inquiry.” Philosophy of Science 16: 65–70. Reprinted in Rorty 1967, 127–34Google Scholar

Copleston, F. C. 1952. Medieval Philosophy. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Cordemoy, G.. 1972. A Philosophical Discourse Concerning Speech. Delmar, NY: Scholar's Facsimiles and Reprints. Reprint of London: John Martin, 1668. Translation of Discours physique de la parole (Paris: F. Lambert, 1668)Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. 1971. Sprache: Strukturen und Funktionen. Tübingen: Tübingen Beiträge zur LinguistikGoogle Scholar

Coudert, A. 1978. “Some Theories of Natural Language from the Renaissance to the Seventeenth Century.” Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 7: 106–14Google Scholar

Courtine, J.-F. 1980. “Leibniz et la langue adamic.” Revue des Science philosophiques et théologiques 64: 373–91Google Scholar

Couturat, L. 1901. La logique de Leibniz d aprés documents inédits. Paris: J. VrinGoogle Scholar

Crary, A., and Read, R. (eds.). 2000. The New Wittgenstein. New York: RoutledgeCrossRef Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 1997. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

D'Agostino, F. 1986. Chomsky's System of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Dascal, M. 1987. Leibniz: Language, Signs and Thought. Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Dascal, M. 1990. “Leibniz on Particles, Linguistic Form and Comparatism.” In Leibniz, Humboldt, and the Origins of Comparativism, ed. Mauro, T. and Formigari, L., 31–60. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef Google Scholar

Dascal, M. 1993. “The Conventionalization of Language in 17th-Century British Philosophy.” Semiotica 96: 139–47Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1965. “Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages.” In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, ed. Bar-Hillel, Y., 383–94. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1967. “Truth and Meaning.” Synthese 7: 304–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1986. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, ed. Grandy, R. and Warner, R., 157–74. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1990. “The Structure and Content of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 87: 279–328CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, D., and Harman, G.. 1972. The Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, D. and Harman, G. 1975. The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: DickinsonGoogle Scholar

Debus, A. G. 1970. Science and Education in the Seventeenth Century: The Webster-Ward Debate. New York: American ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 1967. “Force et Signification.” In L'ocriture et lu differance, 9–49. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Translated in Derrida 1978, 3–30Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1972. Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Editions de MinuitGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 1976. L'archeologie du frivole: Lire Condillac. Paris: Denoël/Gonthier. English Translation: Archeology of the Frivolous: Reading Condillac, trans. J. P. Leavey (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1977a. “Signature Event Context.” Trans. S. Weber and J. Mehlman. Glyph 1: 172–97. First published in Derrida 1972, 367–93, and reprinted in 1988, 1–23

Derrida, J. 1977b. “Limited Inc abc … ;” Trans. S. Weber. Glyph 2: 1–79

Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 1988. Limited Inc. Trans. S. Weber. Evanston: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar

Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Ed. and trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A.. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Devitt, M., and Sterelny, K.. 1999. Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Dowty, D. R., Wall, R. E., and Peters, S.. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: D. ReidelGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991a. Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991b. Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1995. “The Context Principle: “The Context Principle: Centre of Frege's Philosophy.” In Logik und Mathematik: Frege-Kolloquium, Jena, 1993, ed. Max, I. and Stelzner, W., 2–21. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, G. 1975. “Identity and Predication.” Journal of Philosophy 72: 343–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Feigl, H., and Sellars, W. (eds.). 1949. Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-CroftsGoogle Scholar

Feuerbach, L. 1975. Werke in Sechs Bänden. Ed. Thies, E.. 6 vols. Frankfurt: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. 1981. “Some Note on What Linguistics Is About.” In Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 2, ed. Block, N., 197–207. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1879. Begriffsschrift, Eine der Arithmetischen Nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: Louis NebertGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1882. “Über die Wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 81: 48–56. Reprinted in Frege 1980, 91–7, and translated in Frege 1972, 83–90

Frege, G. 1891. Funktion und Begriff. Jena: Hermann Pohle. Reprinted in Frege 1980, 17–39, and translated in Frege 1952, 21–41, and 1997, 130–48Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50. Translated in Frege 1952, 56–78, and 1997, 181–91Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1904. “Was ist eine Funktion?” In Festschrift: Ludwig Boltzmann gewidmet zum sechzigsten Geburtstag, 20. Februar 1904, ed. Meyer, S., 656–66. Leipzig: A. Barth. Reprinted in Frege 1980, 81–90, and translated in Frege 1952, 107–16Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1918. “Der Gedanke.” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77. Translated in Frege 1997, 325–45Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1949. “On Sense and Nominatum.” Trans. H. Feigl. In Readings in Philosophical Analysis, ed. Feigl, H. and Sellars, W., 85–102. New York: Appleton-Century-CroftsGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1952. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Ed. and trans. Geach, P. and Black, M.. Oxford: Blackwell. 2nd ed., 1970. 3rd ed., 1980Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1972. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Trans. and ed. Bynum, T. W.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1976. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Ed. Gabriel, G., Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., Thiel, C., and Veraart, A.. Hamburg: Felix MeinerGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1978. The Foundations of Arithmentic/Die Grundlagen der Arithmetic. German Text with English translation by J. L. Austin. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. 1st ed., Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner, 1884. Portions translated in Frege 1997, 84–129Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1979. Posthumous Writings. Trans. P. Long and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell. Translation of Frege 1983Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1980. Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. Ed. Patzig, G.. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und RuprechtGoogle Scholar

Frege, G. 1983. Nachgelassene Schriften. Ed. Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F.. 2nd ed. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. 1st ed., 1976Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1984. “Compound Thoughts.” Trans. R. H. Stoothoff. In Collected Papers, ed. B. McGuiness, 390–406. Oxford: Blackwell. Originally published 1923, “Logische Untersuchungern. Dritter Teil: Gedankenfuege.” Beitraege zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 3: 36–51

Frege, G. 1997. The Frege Reader. Ed. Beaney, M.. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Friedlander, E. 2001. Signs of Sense: Reading Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Gabriel, G. 2002. “Frege, Lotze, and the Continental Roots of Early Analytic Philosophy.” In Reck 2002, 39–51

Garver, N. 1994. This Complicated Form of Life: Essays on Wittgenstein. La Salle, IL: Open Court PressGoogle Scholar

Garver, N., and Lee, S.-C.. 1994. Derrida and Wittgenstein. Philadelphia: Temple University PressGoogle Scholar

Gaukroger, S. 2001. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. 1985. The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Geirsson, H., and Losonsky, M.. 1996. Readings in Language and Mind. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Gerl, H.-B. 1974. Rhetorik als Philosophie: Lorenzo Valla. Munich: Wilhelm FinkGoogle Scholar

Glendinning, S. 2004. “Philosophy as Nomadism.” In What Philosophy Is, ed. Carel, H. and Gamez, D., 155–67. London: ContinuumGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Grandy, R. 1973. “Reference, Meaning and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 70: 439–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 1994. “Locke's Philosophy of Language.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Chappell, V., 115–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 2000. “Absolute Idealism and the Rejection of Kantian Dualism.” In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. Ameriks, K., 37–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1981. The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. T. McCarthy. 2 vols. Boston: Beacon Press. Translation of Theorie des komminikativen Handelns (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1981)Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1989. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprint, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1997Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2000. “Was He Trying to Whistle it?” In Crary and Read 2000, 353–88

Hale, B., and Wright, C. (eds.). 1998. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell. 1st ed., 1997Google Scholar

Hamann, J. G. 1993. Vom Magus im Norden und der Verwegenheit des Geistes: Ausgewählte Schriften. Ed. Majetschak, S.. Bonn: ParergaGoogle Scholar

Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Harnish, R. M. (ed.). 1994. Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Harris, J. 1751. Hermes; or, a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Language and Universal Grammar. London: H. WoodfallGoogle Scholar

Harris, R., and Taylor, T. J.. 1997. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western Tradition from Socrates to Saussure. 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Harris, Z. S. 1954. “Transfer Grammar.” International Journal of American Linguistics 20: 259–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Heal, J. 1997. “Radical Interpretation.” In Hale and Wright 1998, 175–96

Heidegger, M. 1944. Erläuterung zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Frankfurt: KlostermannGoogle Scholar

Heinekamp, A. 1972. “Ars Characteristica und natürliche Sprache bei Leibniz.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 34: 446–519Google Scholar

Henry, D. P. 1974. Commentary on De Grammatico: The Historical-Logical Dimensions of a Dialogue of St. Anselm's. Dordrecht: D. ReidelCrossRef Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 1960. Sprachphilosophische Schriften. Ed. Heintel, E.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner VerlagGoogle Scholar

Herder, J. G. 1967. Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Suphan, B.. 33 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. Facsimile of Berlin, 1891Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. 1839. Opera Philosophica Quae Latine Scripsit Omnia. Ed. Molesworth, W.. London: John BohnGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, T. 1996. Leviathan. Ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. 1965. Wilhelm von Humboldts Briefe an Christian Gottfried Körner. Ed. Leitzmann, A.. Vaduz: Kraus Reprints. Reprint of Berlin: Eberling, 1940Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. 1968. Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Leitzmann, A.. 15 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter. Facsimile of Berlin: Behr's Verlag, 1916Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. 1988. Wilhelm von Humboldt's Gesammelte Werke. Ed. Humboldt, A. V. and Brandes, C.. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprint of Berlin: G. Reimer, 1846Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. 1999. On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Ed. Losonsky, M. and trans. P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hume, D. 1996. The Philosophical Works of David Hume. 4 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Reprint of the 1854 editionGoogle Scholar

Jahn, I., and Lange, F. (eds.). 1973. Die Jugendbriefe Alexander von Humboldts. 1787–1799. Berlin: Akademie VerlagGoogle Scholar

Jardine, L. 1974. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jardine, L. 1982. “Humanism and the Teaching of Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. by Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J., 797–807. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Jardine, L. 1988. “Humanistic Logic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Schmitt, C. and Skinner, Q., 173–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Jesseph, D. 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sorrel, T., 86–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Jolley, N. 1999. Locke: His Philosophical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Kanger, S. 1957. Provability in Logic. Stockholm: Almqvist and WiksellGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1904. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Königlich Preuαische Akademie der Wissenschaften. 29 vols. Berlin: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar

Katz, J. J. 1981. Languages and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Katz, J. J. 1984. “An Outline of Platonist Grammar.” In Talking Minds: The Study of Language in Cognitive Science, ed. Bever, T., Carroll, J. M., and Miller, L. A., 3–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Katz 1985, 172–203Google Scholar

Katz, J. J. (ed.). 1985. The Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Kneale, W., and Kneale, M.. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Knowlson, J. 1975. Universal Language Schemes in England and France, 1600–1700. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, N. 1967. “History of Semantics.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edwards, Paul, 7: 358–406. New York: Collier MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, N. 1968. “The Main Thesis of Locke's Semantic Theory.” Philosophical Review 77:175–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1959. “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 24: 1–14CrossRef Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1960. Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. 7 vols. Hildesheim: OlmsGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1962. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. 50 vols. Berlin: Akademie VerlagGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1966. Logical Papers. Trans. and ed. Parkinson, G. H. R.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1970. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Ed. Loemker, L.. Dordrecht: D. ReidelGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1982. New Essays on Human Understanding. Trans. and ed. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1988. Opuscles et fragments inédits. Ed. Couturat, L.. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. 1st ed., Paris: Felix Alcan, 1903Google Scholar

Lenzen, W. 1990. Das System der Leibnizschen Logik. Berlin: de GruyterCrossRef Google Scholar

Lenzen, W. 1992. “Leibinz on Properties and Individuals.” In Language, Truth and Ontology, ed. Mulligan, K., 193–204. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical Papers. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Locke, J. 1976. The Correspondence of John Locke. Ed. Beer, E. S.. 9 vols. Oxford: Clarendon pressGoogle Scholar

Locke, J. 1990. Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Other Philosophical Writings. Ed. Nidditch, P. H. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Losonsky, M. 1989. “Locke on the Making of Complex Ideas.” Locke Newsletter 20: 35–46Google Scholar

Losonsky, M. 1992. “Leibniz's Adamic Language of Thought.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30: 523–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Losonsky, M. 1993. “Passionate Thought: Computation, Thought, and Action in Hobbes.” Pragmatics and Cognition 1: 245–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Losonsky, M. 1994. “Meaning and Signification in Locke's Essay,” In Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context, ed. Rogers, G. A. J., 23–41. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Losonsky, M. 2001. Enlightenment and Action from Descartes to Kant: Passionate Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Loux, M. 1974. “The Ontology of William of Ockham.” In Ockham 1974, 1–21

Łukasiewicz, J. 1935. “Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik.” Erkenntnis 5: 111–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1984. Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Mack, P. 1993. Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Brill: LeidenCrossRef Google Scholar

Magee, N. 1996. “William of Ockham and the Death of Universals.” http://web.syr.edu/~nmagee/ockham.html

Marenbon, J. 1997. The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, R. M. 1952. “On ‘Analytic.’” Philosophical Studies 3: 42–7CrossRef Google Scholar

Martinich, A. P. (ed.). 2001. The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

McDowel, J. 1976. “Truth Conditions, Bivalence and Verificationism.” In Truth and Meaning, ed. Evans, G. and McDowell, J., 42–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. 2002. Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: RoutledgeCrossRef Google Scholar

McRae, R. 1988. “Locke and Leibniz on Linguistic Particles.” Synthese 75: 155–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. “On the Phenomenology of Language.” In Signs, trans. and ed. McCleary, R., 84–97. Evanston: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar

Merquior, J. G. 1986. From Prague to Paris: A Critique of Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Thought. London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1863. System der Deductiven und Inductiven Logik. Trans. J. Schiel. 2nd ed. Braunschweig: Friedriech Vieweg und SohnGoogle Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1974. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Ed. Robson, J. M.. 33 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar

Monfasani, J. 1989. “Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?” Journal of the History of Ideas 50: 309–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1968. “Pragmatics.” In Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey, ed. Klibansky, R., 102–22. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 95–118Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1970a. “Pragmatics and Intensional Logic.” Synthese 22: 69–94. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 119–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1970b. “English as a Formal Language.” In Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, ed. Visentini, B.., 189–224. Milan: Edizioni di Communità. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 188–221Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1973. “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English.” In Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, ed. Hintikka, K. J. J., Moravcsik, J. M. E., and Suppes, P., 221–42. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Reprinted in Montague 1974, 222–46Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Ed. Thomason, R.. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, J. M. 1981. “Frege and Chomsky on Thought and Language.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6: 105–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Mullaly, J. 1945. The Summulae Logicales of Peter of Spain. South Bend: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar

Müller-Sievers, H. 1993. Epigenesis: Naturphilosophie im Sprachdenken Wilhelm von Humboldts. Paderborn: SchöninghGoogle Scholar

Ockham, W. O. 1957. Philosophical Writings. Ed. Boehner, P.. Edinburgh: Thomas NelsonGoogle Scholar

Ockham, W. O. 1970. Opera Philosophica et Theologica. Ed. Brown, Stephen. 2 vols. St. Bonaventure: St. Bonaventure CollegeGoogle Scholar

Ockham, W. O. 1974. Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. Trans. M. J. Loux. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar

Ockham, W. O. 1980. Ockham's Theory of Propositions: Part II of the Summa Logicae. Trans. A. J. Freddoso and H. Schuurman. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar

Parret, H. (ed.). 1976. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Partee, B. H. 1997. “Montague Grammar.” In Handbook of Logic and Language, ed. Benthem, J. and Meulen, A., 5–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Passmore, H. 1966. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. 2nd ed. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar

Pears, D. 1987. The False Prison. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Pécharman, M. 1992. “Le discourse mental selon Hobbes.” Archives de philosophie 55: 553–73Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: MorrowCrossRef Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1995. The Language Instinct. New York: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar

Plato. 1971. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Ed. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Pombo, O. 1987. Leibniz and the Problem of a Universal Language. Münster: Nodus PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Preyer, G., and Peter, G. (eds.). 2002. Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1936. “Truth by Convention.” In Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead, ed. Lee, O. H., 90–124. New York: Longmans, Green. Reprinted in Benacerraf and Putnam 1983, 329–54, and Quine 1976, 77–106Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1949. Methods of Logic. Rev. ed. New York. Henry HoltGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2nd rev. ed., 1980Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Boston: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Rev. and enlg. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1st ed., 1966Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1987. “Indeterminacy of Translation Again.” Journal of Philosophy 84: 5–10CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1989. “Three Indeterminacies.” In Perspectives on Quine, ed. Barrett, R. and Gibson, R., 1–16. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1990. Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O., and R. Carnap. 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Ed. Creath, R.. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Ramberg, B. T. 1989. Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. 1931. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

Reck, E. H. (ed.). 2002. From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Ricken, U. 1994. Linguistics, Anthropology and Philosophy in the French Enlightenment: Language Theory and Ideology. Trans. R. E. Norton. New York: Routledge. Translation of Sprache, Anthropologie, Philosophie in der Französischen Aufklärung (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar

Ricketts, T. 1996. “Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.” In Sluga and Stern 1996, 59–99

Robey, D. (ed.). 1973. Structuralism: An Introduction. Wolfson College Lectures, 1972. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Robins, R. H. 1990. A Short History of Linguistics. 3rd ed. London: Longman. 1st ed., 1967Google Scholar

Robins, R. H. 1976. “Some Continuities and Discontinuities in the History of Linguistics.” In Parret 1976, 13–31

Rogers, G. A. J. 1988. “Hobbes's Hidden Influence.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, ed. Rogers, G. A. J. and Ryan, A., 189–205. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rogers, K. 1997. The Neoplatonic Metaphysics and Epistemology of Anselm of Canterbury. Studies in the History of Philosophy, vol. 45. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen PressGoogle Scholar

Romanos, G. D. 1983. Quine and Analytic Philosophy: The Language of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (ed.). 1967. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (ed.) 1992. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method with Two Retrospective Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Rosch, E., and C. B. Mervis. 1996. “Family Resemblances in the Internal Structure of Categories.” In Geirsson and Losonsky 1996, 442–60

Rossi, P. 1960. Clavis Universalis. Milan: RicciardiGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. 1964. Oeuvres complètes. Ed. Gagnebin, B. and Raymond, M.. 5 vols. Paris: GallimardGoogle Scholar

Rousset, J. 1962. Forme et signification. Paris: José CortiGoogle Scholar

Russell, B. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. London: George Allen and Unwin. 2nd ed., 1937Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14: 479–93. Reprinted in Martinich 2001, 212–27, and Harnish 1994, 161–73

Russell, B. 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. London: Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar

Russell, B. 1988. The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Ed. Slater, J. G.. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar

Russell, B., and Whitehead, A. N.. 1910. Principia Mathematica. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Abridged version of volume 1 in Cambridge Mathematical Library (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Rutherford, D. 1995. “Philosophy and Language in Leibniz.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, ed. Jolley, N., 224–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: HutchinsonGoogle Scholar

Ryle, G. 1963. “The Theory of Meaning.” In Caton 1963, 128–53

Salmon, N. 1991. Frege's Puzzle. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview PressGoogle Scholar

Saussure, F. de. 1955. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., and Riedlinger, A.. 5th ed. Paris: PayotGoogle Scholar

Saussure, F.. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. W. Baskin. New York: Philosophical LibraryGoogle Scholar

Scheman, N. 1996. “Forms of Life: Mapping the Rough Ground.” In Sluga and Stern 1996, 383–410

Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.). 1963. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open CourtGoogle Scholar

Schlick, M. 1930. “Die Wende der Philosophie.” Erkenntnis 1: 4–11. Trans. D. Rynin, “The Turning point in Philosophy,” in Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer (Glencoe, IL: Free Press), 53–9

Schlick, M. 1932. “The Future of Philosophy.” College of the Pacific Publications in Philosophy 1: 45–62. Reprinted in Rorty 1967, 43–53Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, J. (ed.). 1971. The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. 1977. “A Reply to Derrida.” Glyph 1: 198–208Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1987. “Indeterminacy, Empiricism, and the First Person.” Journal of Philosophy 84: 123–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Seidel, S. (ed.). 1962. Der Briefwechsel Zwischen Friedrich Schiller und Wilhelm von Humboldt. 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau VerlagGoogle Scholar

Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W.. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communications. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Q. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Skorupski, J. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, M. M. 1982. Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Sluga, H. 1980. Gottlob Frege. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

Sluga, H., and Stern, D. (eds.). 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Stainton, R. J. 1996. Philosophical Perspectives on Language. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview PressGoogle Scholar

Steiner, P. 1982. The Prague School: Selected Writings, 1929–1946. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1950. “On Referring.” Mind 59: 320–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals. London: MethuenCrossRef Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1933. Pojçcie Prawdy w Jçzykach Nauk Dedukcyjnych. Warsaw. German translation in Tarski 1936 and English translation in Tarski 1956Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1936. “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen.” Studia Philosophica 1: 261–405Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1944. “The Semantic Conception of Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 341–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1956. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics, trans. J. H. Woodger, 152–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1st ed. in Polish, 1933Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1994. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences. Ed. Tarski, J.. Trans. O. Helmer. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1st ed. in Polish, 1936Google Scholar

Tobriner, M. L. 1968. Vives' Introduction to Wisdom: A Renaissance Textbook. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar

Tonelli, G. 1974. “Leibniz on Innate Ideas and the Early Reactions to the Publication of the Nouveaux Essais (1765).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 437–54Google Scholar

Tooke, J. H. 1806. The Diversions of Purley. 2 vols. Philadelphia: W. DuaneGoogle Scholar

Trabant, J. 1990. Traditionen Humboldts. Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar

Trendelenburg, A. 1867. “Über Leibnizes Entwurf einer allgemeinen Charakteristik.” Historische Beiträge zur Philosophie 3: 1–47Google Scholar

Trinkaus, C. 1970. In Our Image and Likeness: Humanity and Divinity in Italian Humanist Thought. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Valla, L. 1934. De Libero Arbitrio. Ed. Anfossi, M.. Florence: OlschkiGoogle Scholar

Valla, L. 1962. Opera Omnia. 2 vols. Turin: Bottega d'ErasmoGoogle Scholar

Valla, L. 1982. Laurentii Valle repastinatio dialecticae et philosophiae. Ed. Zippel, G.. Padua: Editrice AntenoreGoogle Scholar

Vives, J. L. 1964. Opera Omnia. 8 vols. London: Gregg Press. Reprint of Opera Omnia, ed. Majans, G., 8 vols. (Valencia: Benedicti Monfort, 1782–90)Google Scholar

Walker, D. P. 1972. “Leibniz and Language.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 35: 294–307CrossRef Google Scholar

Waswo, R. 1987. Language and Meaning in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Waswo, R. 1989. “Motives of Misreading.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50: 324–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Weyant, R. G. 1971. Introduction. In Condillac 1971, v–ⅹⅹ

Whorf, B. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Ed. Carroll, J. B.. Cambridge, MA: MITGoogle Scholar

Wiggins, D. 1997. “Meaning and Truth Conditions: From Frege's Grand Design to Davidson's.” In Hale and Wright 1998, 3–28

Wilson, C. 1989. Leibniz's Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge. 2nd ed., 1994Google Scholar

Witherspoon, E. 2000. “Carnap and Wittgenstein.” In Crary and Read 2000, 315–49

Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. German and English facing pages. Trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. First published as “Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung,” Annalen der Naturphilosophie 14 (1921): 199–262. 2nd ed., 1933. New translation by D. F. Pears and B. McGuiness (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961, rev. 1963 and 1971)

Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan. 3rd ed., 1958Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Notebooks, 1914–1916. Ed. Wright, G. H. V. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell. 2nd ed., 1979Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value. Ed. Wright, G. H.. Trans. P. Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Wolterstorff, N. 1996. John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Woolhouse, R. S. 1983. Locke. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar

Wright, C. 1997. “The Indeterminacy of Translation.” In Hale and Wright 1998, 397–426

Yablo, S. 1998. “Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol., 72: 229–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Yolton, J. S. 1990. A Locke Miscellany: Locke Biography and Criticism for All. Bristol: ThoemmesGoogle Scholar

Yolton, J. W. 1991. Locke and French Materialism. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Zweig, A. 1967. Kant: Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar