Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T17:20:42.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

48 - Neurocognitive outcomes of term infants with perinatal asphyxia

from Section 6 - Assessing outcome of the brain-injured infant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Neonatal brain injuries represent a group of common yet heterogeneous disorders, which result in long-term neurodevelopmental deficits. A significant proportion is related to hypoxic–ischemic brain injury, either diffuse or focal (e.g., stroke). Neonatal brain injury is recognized clinically by a characteristic encephalopathy that evolves over days in the newborn period. This clinical syndrome includes a lack of alertness, poor tone, abnormal reflex function, poor feeding, compromised respiratory status, and seizures. Neonatal encephalopathy occurs in 1–6/1000 live term births, and is a major cause of neurodevelopmental disability. Up to 20% of affected infants die during the newborn period, and another 25% sustain permanent deficits of motor and also cognitive function. Functional motor deficits are often described as cerebral palsy, a non-progressive disorder of motor function or posture originating in early life. Cognitive deficits include mental retardation or learning disabilities, and impaired executive functions, language skills, or social ability. Other forms of neonatal brain injury, particularly in the term newborn, such as stroke, have an incidence as high as 1/4000 live births. More than 95% of infants with neonatal stroke survive to adulthood, and many have some form of motor or cognitive disability.

Thus, neurocognitive deficits that follow neonatal encephalopathy are serious problems that frequently result in lifelong disability with serious impact for the child, family, and society. In addition, even if neurocognitive deficits are mild, they affect academic achievement and quality of life.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Volpe, JJ. Neurology of the Newborn, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2001.Google Scholar
Miller, SP, Latal, B, Clark, H, et al. Clinical signs predict 30-month neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 93–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vannucci, RC, Perlman, JM. Interventions for perinatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 1004–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, NN, Robertson, CM, Richards, RT, et al. Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy in term neonates: perinatal factors and outcome. J Pediatr 1981; 98: 112–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KB, Lynch, JK. Stroke in newborn infants. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 150–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Wyatt, JS, Azzopardi, D, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia to improve neurodevelopmental outcome following neonatal encephalopathy: the CoolCap study. Pediatr Res 2004; 55: 582A.Google Scholar
Inder, TE, Hunt, RW, Morley, CJ, et al. Systemic hypothermia selectively protects the cortex in term hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 2004; 55: 583A.Google Scholar
Shankaran, S, Laptook, AR, Ehrenkranz, RA, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. N Eng J Med 2005; 353: 1574–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferriero, DM. Neonatal brain injury. N Eng J Med 2004; 351: 1985–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badawi, N, Kurinczuk, JJ, Keogh, JM, et al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case–control study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1554–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badawi, N, Kurinczuk, JJ, Keogh, JM, et al. Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1549–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, F, Rutherford, M, Groenendaal, F, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361: 736–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chau, V, Poskitt, KJ, Sargent, MA, et al. Comparison of computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans on the third day of life in term newborns with neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 319–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Miller, SP, Bartha, A, et al. MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiology 2006; 27: 533–47.Google ScholarPubMed
McKinstry, RC, Miller, JH, Snyder, AZ, et al. A prospective, longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of brain injury in newborns. Neurology 2002; 59: 824–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, RE. Four patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence in primates. Adv Neurol 1975; 10: 223–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Myers, RE. Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112: 246–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, AM, Cornette, L, Ramenghi, , et al. Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 647–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felderhoff-Mueser, U, Rutherford, MA, Squier, WV, et al. Relationship between MR imaging and histopathologic findings of the brain in extremely sick preterm infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1349–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Hope, PL, Gould, SJ, Howard, S, et al. Precision of ultrasound diagnosis of pathologically verified lesions in the brains of very preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1988; 30: 457–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schouman-Claeys, E, Henry-Feugeas, MC, Roset, F, et al. Periventricular leukomalacia: correlation between MR imaging and autopsy findings during the first 2 months of life. Radiology 1993; 189: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Hajnal, BL, Vigneron, D, et al. Prediction of neuromotor outcome in perinatal asphyxia: evaluation of MR scoring systems. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 143–9.Google ScholarPubMed
McQuillen, PS, Ferriero, DM. Selective vulnerability in the developing central nervous system. Pediatr Neurol 2004; 30: 227–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sie, LT, Knaap, MS, Oosting, J, et al. MR patterns of hypoxic–ischemic brain damage after prenatal, perinatal or postnatal asphyxia. Neuropediatrics 2000; 31: 128–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SP, Ramaswamy, V, Michelson, D, et al. Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadian, DG, Aicardi, J, Watkins, KE, et al. Developmental amnesia associated with early hypoxic–ischaemic injury. Brain 2000; 123: 499–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramaswamy, V, Miller, SP, Barkovich, AJ, et al. Perinatal stroke in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Neurology 2004; 62: 2088–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J, Croen, , Backstrand, KH, et al. Maternal and infant characteristics associated with perinatal arterial stroke in the infant. JAMA 2005; 293: 723–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SP, Newton, N, Ferriero, DM, et al. Predictors of 30-month outcome after perinatal depression: role of proton MRS and socioeconomic factors. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 71–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: executive summary. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 780–1.
Gonzalez, FF, Miller, SP. Does perinatal asphyxia impair cognitive function without cerebral palsy?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F454–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, A, Mercuri, E, Rutherford, M, et al. Neurological and perceptual–motor outcome at 5–6 years of age in children with neonatal encephalopathy: relationship with neonatal brain MRI. Neuropediatrics 2002; 33: 242–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, G, Badawi, N, Kurinczuk, JJ, et al. Early developmental outcomes after newborn encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 26–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlow, N, Rose, AS, Rands, CE, et al. Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F380–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moster, D, Lie, RT, Markestad, T. Joint association of Apgar scores and early neonatal symptoms with minor disabilities at school age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86: F16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, CM, Finer, NN, Grace, MG. School performance of survivors of neonatal encephalopathy associated with birth asphyxia at term. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 753–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, TM, Belai, I, Hernandez, P, et al. Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KB, Ellenberg, JH. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurologic disability. Pediatrics 1981; 68: 36–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarnat, HB, Sarnat, MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 696–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, CM, Finer, NN. Long-term follow-up of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 1993; 20: 483–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handel, M, Swaab, H, Vries, LS, et al. Long-term cognitive and behavioral consequences of neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia: a review. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 645–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schie, PE, Becher, JG, Dallmeijer, AJ, et al. Motor outcome at the age of one after perinatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Neuropediatrics 2007; 38: 71–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjellmer, I, Beijer, E, Carlsson, G, et al. Follow-up into young adulthood after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in term and near-term newborn infants. I. Educational achievements and social adjustment. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91: 1212–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindström, K, Lagerroos, P, Gillberg, C, et al. Teenage outcome after being born at term with moderate neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatr Neurol 2006; 35: 268–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viggedal, G, Lundalv, E, Carlsson, G, et al. Follow-up into young adulthood after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in term and near-term newborn infants. II. Neuropsychological consequences. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91: 1218–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badawi, N, Felix, JF, Kurinczuk, JJ, et al. Cerebral palsy following term newborn encephalopathy: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handley-Derry, M, Low, JA, Burke, SO, et al. Intrapartum fetal asphyxia and the occurrence of minor deficits in 4- to 8-year-old children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 508–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kooij, B, Handel, M, Uiterwaal, C, et al. Corpus callosum size in relation to motor performance in 9- to 10-year-old children with neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 2008; 63: 1–6.Google Scholar
Hof-van Duin, J, Mohn, G. Visual defects in children after cerebral hypoxia. Behav Brain Res 1984; 14: 147–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercuri, E, Atkinson, J, Braddick, O, et al. Basal ganglia damage and impaired visual function in the newborn infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 77: F111–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, C, Finer, N. Term infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy: outcome at 3.5 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 473–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankaran, S, Woldt, E, Koepke, T, et al. Acute neonatal morbidity and long-term central nervous system sequelae of perinatal asphyxia in term infants. Early Hum Dev 1991; 25: 135–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercuri, E, Anker, S, Guzzetta, A, et al. Visual function at school age in children with neonatal encephalopathy and low Apgar scores. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Souza, SW, McCartney, E, Nolan, M, et al. Hearing, speech, and language in survivors of severe perinatal asphyxia. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56: 245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, EH, Hill, A, Norman, MG, et al. Selective brainstem injury in an asphyxiated newborn. Ann Neurol 1988; 23: 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunquell, PJ, Glennon, CM, DiMario, FJ, et al. Prediction of outcome based on clinical seizure type in newborn infants. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 707–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clancy, RR, Legido, A. Postnatal epilepsy after EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures. Epilepsia 1991; 32: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellstrom-Westas, L, Blennow, G, Lindroth, M, et al. Low risk of seizure recurrence after early withdrawal of antiepileptic treatment in the neonatal period. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72: F97–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toet, MC, Groenendaal, F, Osredkar, D, et al. Postneonatal epilepsy following amplitude-integrated EEG-detected neonatal seizures. Pediatr Neurol 2005; 32: 241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilenge, ME, Majnemer, A, Shevell, MI. Long-term developmental outcome of asphyxiated term neonates. J Child Neurol 2001; 16: 781–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, CM, Finer, NN. Educational readiness of survivors of neonatal encephalopathy associated with birth asphyxia at term. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1988; 9: 298–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koot, HM. The study of quality of life: concepts and methods. In Koot, HM, Wallander, JL, eds., Quality of Life in Child and Adolescent Illness. Hove: Bunner-Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Thornberg, E, Thiringer, K, Odeback, A, et al. Birth asphyxia: incidence, clinical course and outcome in a Swedish population. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84: 927–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, EH, Poskitt, K, Rodriguez, E, et al. Perinatal hypoxic–ischemic thalamic injury: clinical features and neuroimaging. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, MA, Pennock, JM, Counsell, SJ, et al. Abnormal magnetic resonance signal in the internal capsule predicts poor neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 323–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krageloh-Mann, I, Helber, A, Mader, I, et al. Bilateral lesions of thalamus and basal ganglia: origin and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 477–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strange, E, Saeed, N, Cowan, FM, et al. MR imaging quantification of cerebellar growth following hypoxic-ischemic injury to the neonatal brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 463–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sargent, MA, Poskitt, KJ, Roland, EH, et al. Cerebellar vermian atrophy after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1008–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M, Pennock, J, Schwieso, J, et al. Hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy: early and late magnetic resonance imaging findings in relation to outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 75: F145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Z, Lindstrom, K, Westerberg, H, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging on teenagers, born at term with moderate hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 2005; 58: 936–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M, Counsell, S, Allsop, J, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in term perinatal brain injury: a comparison with site of lesion and time from birth. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1004–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palisano, R, Rosenbaum, P, Walter, S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 214–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, A, Kaufman, N. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1983.Google Scholar
Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd edn. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 2005.Google Scholar
Piper, M, Darrah, J. Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1994.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S, Allen, J, Gillberg, C. Can autism be detected at 18 months? The needle, the haystack, and the CHAT. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 161: 839–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wachtel, RC, Shapiro, BK, Palmer, FB, et al. CAT/CLAMS: a tool for the pediatric evaluation of infants and young children with developmental delay. Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale. Clin Pediatr 1994; 33: 410–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation, 2002.Google Scholar
Henderson, S, Sugden, D. Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edn. Sidcup: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 2007.Google Scholar
Bruininks, R. Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1978.Google Scholar
Largo, RH, Fischer, JE, Rousson, V. Neuromotor development from kindergarten age to adolescence: developmental course and variability. Swiss Med Wkly 2003; 133: 193–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R, Ford, T, Simmons, H, et al. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 534–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th edn. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation, 2003.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. Manual for the Youth Self Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 1991.Google Scholar
Fekkes, M, Theunissen, NC, Brugman, E, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: a health-related quality of life instrument for 1–5-year-old children. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 961–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robitail, S, Simeoni, MC, Erhart, M, et al. Validation of the European proxy KIDSCREEN-52 pilot test health-related quality of life questionnaire: first results. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 596 e1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×