Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Analyzing Federalism: Stylized Models and the Political Economy Reality
- 2 Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990s
- 3 Australia: Central Fiscal Dominance, Collaborative Federalism, and Economic Reform
- 4 The Brazilian Federation: Facts, Challenges, and Perspectives
- 5 Changing with the Times: Success, Failure, and Inertia in Canadian Federal Arrangements, 1945–2002
- 6 Fiscal Federalism and Economic Reform in China
- 7 Indian Federalism, Economic Reform, and Globalization
- 8 Mexico's Decentralization at a Crossroads
- 9 Transfer Dependence and Regional Disparities in Nigerian Federalism
- 10 Conclusions and Lessons for Further Study
- Index
- References
9 - Transfer Dependence and Regional Disparities in Nigerian Federalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Analyzing Federalism: Stylized Models and the Political Economy Reality
- 2 Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990s
- 3 Australia: Central Fiscal Dominance, Collaborative Federalism, and Economic Reform
- 4 The Brazilian Federation: Facts, Challenges, and Perspectives
- 5 Changing with the Times: Success, Failure, and Inertia in Canadian Federal Arrangements, 1945–2002
- 6 Fiscal Federalism and Economic Reform in China
- 7 Indian Federalism, Economic Reform, and Globalization
- 8 Mexico's Decentralization at a Crossroads
- 9 Transfer Dependence and Regional Disparities in Nigerian Federalism
- 10 Conclusions and Lessons for Further Study
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The entire history of Nigeria has been characterized by conflict among regions, social classes, and ethno-religious groups over resource allocation. Exploitation of oil deposits in the East and Midwest in the 1960s has only added to the intensity of the conflict: There have been over fifty ethno-religious conflicts and numerous other types of conflict since 1960. Regional disparities are widely perceived as one of the causes of continuing ethnic tensions in Nigeria. According to Post and Vickers (1973, p. 58), the most important grievance of various regions since the early 1950s has been that their wealth was being used to subsidize poorer regions.
Nigeria's recent history has also been characterized by extremely centralized political and economic power. Of the country's forty-three years of independence (obtained from Britain in 1960), twenty-eight have been under military rule. The country was nominally a federation at this point, but local leaders were appointed by the central government. Local elections have come with the recent transition to democracy, but the center still dominates via its control over resources and the allocation of the transfers that make up a large portion of their budgets.
This chapter focuses on how Nigerian fiscal federalism, especially the characteristics of the country's system for transfers to state and local governments, has affected and been affected by these regional disparities and tradition of centralization. Overall, we argue that Nigeria is not fiscally federalist but, rather, a de facto centralized distributive state.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Federalism and Economic ReformInternational Perspectives, pp. 407 - 455Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
, and (1999). “Aid, Taxation, and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Economics and Politics 11 (3): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agiobenebo, T. (1999). “Assignment, Criteria and the Fiscal Constitution: An Excursion into a Theory of Rational Fiscal Federalism,” in , ed. Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development: Selected Papers from the 1999 Annual Conference of the Nigerian Economic Society pp. 25–51. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society.Google Scholar
Ahmad, E., and E. Mottu (2002). “Oil-Revenue Assignments: Country Experiences and Issues,” IMF Working Paper No. 02/203.
Ahmad, E., and R. Singh (2003). “Political Economy of Oil-Revenue Sharing in a Developing Country: Illustrations from Nigeria,” IMF Working Paper No. 03/16.
(2000). Regional Disparities in Nigeria's Development: Lessons and Challenges for the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Akpan, G. E. (1999). “Fiscal Potentials and Dependence in Nigeria,” in , ed. Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development pp. 73–100. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society.
(1995). “How to Pay for the Peace? A Theoretical Framework with Reference to African Countries,” Public Choice 83: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). “The Redistributive State and Conflict in Africa,” Journal and Peace Research 38(4): 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(4): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1992). Nigeria: Policy Responses to Shocks, 1970–1990, An International Center for Economic Growth Publication. San Francisco: ICS Press. Constitution of Nigeria (1999).Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1992). “The State as Problem and Solution: Predatum, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change,” in and , eds., The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State p. 8. Princeton: Princeton University Press: pp. 139–181.Google Scholar
(1989). “State-Federal Relations in Nigerian Agriculture,” MADIA Discussion Paper 8. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
(1955). “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review 45(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
, and (1996). “The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force,” Journal of Economic Literature 34(1): 72–96.Google Scholar
Government of Nigeria, Federal Office of Statistics. National Consumer Survey (NCS), various years.
(1995). Oil and Socioeconomic Crisis in Nigeria: A Regional Perspective to the Nigerian Disease and the Rural Sector. Lewiston: Mellen University Press.Google Scholar
Nnadozie, E. (2002). “Are Growth and Development Constitutional Issues in Nigeria?,” Paper presented at the Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford Conference 2002, “Understanding Poverty and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa,” St. Catherine's College, 18–19 March 2002.
Nwuke, K. O. (2001). “Managing Multi-Ethnicity: Lessons from Nigeria,” paper presented at the Institute on Race and Social Division, Boston University.
(1990). “Flow-of-Funds as a Tool for Analysing Budgetary Behaviour of Nigerian State Governments: Evidence from the Civilian Era,” World Development 18(5): 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). Nigerian Public Finance, African Studies Series, No. 15. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1999). “Fiscal Federalism and Revenue Allocation: The Poverty of the Niger Delta,” in Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society: 405–419.Google Scholar
(1999). “Restructuring Nigeria's Fiscal System: Rationale, Strategies and Policies,” in Fiscal Federalism and Nigeria's Economic Development. Ibadan, Nigeria: The Nigerian Economic Society: 477–499.Google Scholar
(1998). Crippled Giant: Nigeria since Independence. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1973). Structure and Conflict in Nigeria 1960–65. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2001). “Creating a More Perfect Union: Electoral Incentives and the Reform of Federal Systems.” MIT, mimeo.
Salisu, M. (2001). “Incentive Structure, Civil Service Efficiency and the Hidden Economy in Nigeria,” Discussion Paper No 2001/86, United Nations University.
Soludo, C. C. (2001). “Growth Models and Regional Divergence: Implications for Public Policy in Nigeria,” Department of Economics, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Tanzi, V. (1995). “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects,” in Bruuo, M., and B. Pleskovic, eds. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995: 295–316.
(1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (1995). Human Development Report 1994. New York: United Nations.
UNDP (1997). Human Development Report, Nigeria 1996. United Nations Development Programme, Lagos, Nigeria.
UNDP (2002). Human Development Report 2002, available at www.UNDP.org.
UNDP (2003). Human Development Report 2003, available at www.UNDP.org.
(2002). “Why Do Resource Abundant Countries Have Authoritarian Governments?,” Journal of African Finance and Economic Development 5(2): 17–56.Google Scholar
(1995). “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
(2000). “Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance,” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). “Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 13: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2002). World Bank Africa Database, Washington DC: The World Bank.
- 2
- Cited by