Book contents
- Reshaping Markets
- Reshaping Markets
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction: reshaping markets and the question of agency
- Part I Crisis and normality in transnational market regulation
- Part II Austerity woes: trials and tribulations of debt
- Part III Reforming finance: systemic risk and accountability
- Part IV Transforming contract
- 11 Sustainable contracting: How standard terms could govern markets
- 12 Anti-discrimination law and social policy-making
- 13 European or American style? Cultures of contract regulation*
- Part V Conceptual Utopia: the market after the market
- Index
- References
13 - European or American style? Cultures of contract regulation*
from Part IV - Transforming contract
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- Reshaping Markets
- Reshaping Markets
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction: reshaping markets and the question of agency
- Part I Crisis and normality in transnational market regulation
- Part II Austerity woes: trials and tribulations of debt
- Part III Reforming finance: systemic risk and accountability
- Part IV Transforming contract
- 11 Sustainable contracting: How standard terms could govern markets
- 12 Anti-discrimination law and social policy-making
- 13 European or American style? Cultures of contract regulation*
- Part V Conceptual Utopia: the market after the market
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reshaping MarketsEconomic Governance, the Global Financial Crisis and Liberal Utopia, pp. 298 - 297Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Ackerman, B. 1971. ‘Regulating Slum Housing Markets on Behalf of the Poor’, Yale Law Journal 80: 1093.Google Scholar
Arnow-Richman, R. 2007. ‘Cubewrap Contracts: The Rise of Delayed Term, Standard Form Employment Agreements’, Arizona Law Review 49: 637.Google Scholar
Ayres, I., Vars, F.E. and Zakariya, N. 2005. ‘To Insure Prejudice: Racial Disparities in Taxicab Tipping’, Yale Law Journal 114: 1613.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. 2012. ‘Competition and Consumer Protection: A Behavioral Economics Account’, in Swedish Competition Authority, The Pros and Cons of Consumer Protection 12.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Ben-Shahar, O. 2013. ‘Regulatory Techniques in Consumer Protection: A Critique of European Consumer Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 109.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Ferrari, F. 2010. ‘Informing Consumers about Themselves’, Erasmus Law Review 3: 93.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Stone, R. 2012. ‘Pricing Misperceptions: Explaining Pricing Structure in the Cell Phone Service Market’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9: 430.Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. and Warren, E. 2008. ‘Making Credit Safer’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 1.Google Scholar
Bartl, M. 2015 ‘The Way We Do Europe: Subsidiarity and the Substantive Democratic Deficit’, European Law Journal 21 (in press).Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. 2010. ‘One Way Contracts: Consumer Protection without Law’, European Review of Contract Law 6: 221.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. 2013. ‘Introduction: A Law and Economics Approach to European Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. and Logue, K. D. 2012. ‘Outsourcing Regulation: How Insurance Reduces Moral Hazard’, Michigan Law Review 111: 197.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O. and Schneider, C. 2011. ‘The Failure of Mandated Disclosure’, University of Pennsylvannia Law Review 159: 647.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 2013. ‘An (Un)Common Frame of Reference: An American Perspective on the Jurisprudence of the CESL’, Common Market Law Review 50: 169.Google Scholar
Bignami, F. 2011. ‘Cooperative Legalism and the Non-Americanization of European Regulatory Styles: The Case of Data Privacy’, American Journal of Comparative Law 59: 411.Google Scholar
Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. 2010. ‘Introduction’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. 2008. The European Civil Code: The Way Forward. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craswell, R. 1991. ‘Passing on the Cost of Legal Rules: Efficiency and Distribution in Buyer-Seller Relationships’, Stanford Law Review 43: 361.Google Scholar
Crespy, A. 2010. ‘When “Bolkestein” Is Trapped by the French Anti-liberal Discourse: A Discursive-Institutionalist Account of Preference Formation in the Realm of European Union Multi-Level Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 17: 1253.Google Scholar
Engelbrekt, A. B. 2010. ‘The Impact of EU Enlargement on Private Law Governance in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Consumer Protection’, in Cafaggi, F. and Muir-Watt, H. (eds.), Making European Private Law. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 98.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. 2006. ‘Behavioral Economics: Human Errors and Market Corrections’, University of Chicago Law Review 73: 111.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. 2013. ‘Harmonization, Heterogeneity and Regulation: CESL, The Lost Opportunity for Constructive Harmonization’, Common Market Law Review 50: 207.Google Scholar
European Commission, May 2012, ‘Health & Consumers: Consumer Conditions Scoreboard’, 7th Edition. Available at ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_research/editions/cms7_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission 2014a. ‘Behavioural Research’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/behavioural_research/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission 2014b. ‘Market Studies’. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/market_studies/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Consumer Centres Network (ECC-Net) (2011), ‘Online Cross-Border Mystery Shopping – State of the e-Union’. Available at ec.europa.eu/consumers/ecc/docs/mystery_shopping_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Everson, M. 2005. ‘Legal Constructions of the Consumer’, in Haupt, G. and Trentmann, F. (eds.), Knowing Consumers: Actors, Images, Identities in Modern History. London: Berg Publishing, 99.Google Scholar
Everson, M. and Joerges, C. 2012. ‘Reconfiguring the Politics-Law Relationship in the Integration through Conflicts-Law Constitutionalism’, European Law Journal, 18: 644.Google Scholar
Falla, E. 2012. ‘Report to the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC): Powers of the Judge in Collective Redress Proceedings’, Université Libre de Bruxelles. Available at www.beuc.org/publications/2012-00227-01-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Genn, H., et. al. 2006. Law in the Real World: Improving our Understanding of How Law Works. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D. H. and Wright, J. D. 2012. ‘Behavioral Law and Economics: Its Origins, Fatal Flaws, and Implications for Liberty’, Northwestern Law Review 106: 1033.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. A. Jr. and Twerski, A. D. 1999. ‘What Europe, Japan, and Other Countries Can Learn from the American Restatement of Products Liability’, Texas International Law Journal 34: 1.Google Scholar
Hojnik, J. 2012. ‘Free Movement of Goods in a Labyrinth: Can Buy Irish Survive the Crises?’, Common Market Law Review, 49: 291.Google Scholar
Jabko, N. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. and Schmid, C. 2010. ‘Towards Proceduralization of Private Law in the European Multi-Level System’, in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code, 4th edition. Nijmegen: Kluwer Law International, 277.Google Scholar
Jolls, C. 1998. ‘Behavioral Economics Analysis of Redistributive Legal Rules’, Vanderbilt Law Review 51: 1653.Google Scholar
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C., and Thaler, R. 1998. ‘A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics’, Stanford Law Review 50: 1471.Google Scholar
Kalman, L. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1994. ‘Why the Legal System Is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in Redistributing Income’, Journal of Legal Studies 23: 667.Google Scholar
Kelman, M. 1979. ‘Consumption Theory, Production Theory, and Ideology in the Coase Theorem’, Southern California Law Review 52: 669.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1981. ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis of Entitlement Problems: A Critique’, Stanford Law Review 33: 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1987. ‘The Effect of the Warranty of Habitability on Low Income Housing: “Milking” and Class Violence’, Florida State University Law Review 15: 485.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication [Fin de Siècle]. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2001, ‘The Political Stakes in “Merely Technical” Issues of Contract Law’, European Review of Private Law 1: 7.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. B. 2003. ‘Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability’, University of Chicago Law Review 70: 1203.Google Scholar
Kukovec, D. 2011. ‘Whose Social Europe? The Laval/Viking Judgments and the Prosperity Gap’. Available at www.harvardiglp.org/wp-content/uploads/Writing%20Workshop%20Papers/Kukovec_WhoseSocialEurope.pdf.Google Scholar
Kukovec, D. 2012. ‘A Critique of the Rhetoric of Common Interest in the EU Legal Discourse’. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178332.Google Scholar
Leff, A. A. 1974. ‘Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism’, Virginia Law Review 60: 451.Google Scholar
Mak, C. 2010. ‘Constitutional Aspects of a European Civil Code’, in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code, 4th edition. Nijmegen: Kluwer Law International, 333.Google Scholar
Mak, C. 2013. ‘Unweaving the CESL: Legal-Economic Reason and Institutional Imagination in European Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 286.Google Scholar
Markovits, R. S. 1976. ‘The Distributive Impact, Allocative Efficiency, and Overall Desirability of Ideal Housing Codes: Some Theoretical Clarifications’, Harvard Law Review 89: 1815.Google Scholar
Mattei, U. 2003. ‘A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10: 383.Google Scholar
Meili, S. 2010. ‘Consumer Protection’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 177.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H. 2011. ‘Introduction – Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law’, in Micklitz, H. (ed.), The Many Concepts of Social Justice in European Private Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 3.Google Scholar
Nicola, F. 2008. ‘Transatlanticisms: Constitutional Asymmetry and Selective Reception of U.S. Law and Economics in the Formation of European Private Law’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 16: 87.Google Scholar
Nicola, F. 2012. ‘Invisible Cities in Europe’, Fordham International Law Journal 35: 1282.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. 1998. ‘Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law’, Stanford Law Review 50: 1552.Google Scholar
Rabin, E. H. 1984. ‘Revolution in Residential Landlord-Tenant Law: Causes and Consequences’, Cornell Law Review 69: 517.Google Scholar
Salter, J. 19 June 2006. ‘From Karl Marx to Trademarks’, Brandchannel. Available at www.brandchannel.com/brand_speak.asp?bs_id=140.Google Scholar
Somek, A. 2012. ‘From Workers to Migrants, From Distributive Justice to Inclusion: Exploring the Changing Social Democratic Imagination’, European Law Journal 18: 711.Google Scholar
Study Group on Social Justice in European Private Law 2004. ‘Social Justice in European Contract Law: A Manifesto’, European Law Journal 10: 653.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J., et al. 2013. The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edition. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whittaker, S. 2011. ‘The Optional Instrument of European Contract Law and Freedom of Contract’, European Review of Contract Law 7: 371.Google Scholar
Whittaker, S. 2013. ‘Identifying Legal Costs of Operation of the Common European Sales Law’, Common Market Law Review 50: 85.Google Scholar