Book contents
- The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy
- The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Ethics before Socrates
- 2 Socrates and Sophists
- 3 Plato
- 4 Aristotle
- 5 Epicureanism and Hedonism
- 6 Stoicism
- 7 Ancient Skepticism
- 8 Neo-Platonism
- 9 Early Christian Ethics
- 10 Boethius, Abelard and Anselm
- 11 Medieval Jewish Ethics
- 12 Moral Philosophy in the Medieval Islamicate World
- 13 “Christian Aristotelianism”? Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas
- 14 Duns Scotus and William of Ockham
- 15 Humanism
- 16 The Protestant Reformation
- 17 Descartes’s Provisional Morality
- 18 Hobbes
- 19 The Cambridge Platonists
- 20 Bayle
- 21 Leibniz
- 22 Spinoza
- 23 Pascal
- 24 Locke and Butler
- 25 Shaftesbury, Hutcheson and the Moral Sense
- 26 Hume
- 27 Smith and Bentham
- 28 Rousseau
- 29 Rationalism and Perfectionism
- 30 Kant
- 31 Fichte
- 32 Hegel
- 33 Mill
- 34 Schopenhauer
- 35 Kierkegaard
- 36 American Transcendentalism
- 37 Nietzsche
- 38 Marxism
- 39 Sidgwick
- 40 Pragmatism
- 41 British Idealism
- 42 Ethical Intuitionism
- 43 Husserl and Phenomenological Ethics
- 44 Ethics in Freudian and Post-Freudian Psychoanalysis
- 45 Noncognitivism: From the Vienna Circle to the Present Day
- 46 The Frankfurt School
- 47 Heidegger
- 48 Sartre
- 49 French Ethical Philosophy since the 1960s
- 50 Wittgenstein’s Ethics and Wittgensteinian Moral Philosophy
- 51 Anti-Theory: Anscombe, Foot and Williams
- 52 Discourse Ethics
- 53 Decision Theory
- 54 Rawls
- Index
- References
30 - Kant
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy
- The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Ethics before Socrates
- 2 Socrates and Sophists
- 3 Plato
- 4 Aristotle
- 5 Epicureanism and Hedonism
- 6 Stoicism
- 7 Ancient Skepticism
- 8 Neo-Platonism
- 9 Early Christian Ethics
- 10 Boethius, Abelard and Anselm
- 11 Medieval Jewish Ethics
- 12 Moral Philosophy in the Medieval Islamicate World
- 13 “Christian Aristotelianism”? Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas
- 14 Duns Scotus and William of Ockham
- 15 Humanism
- 16 The Protestant Reformation
- 17 Descartes’s Provisional Morality
- 18 Hobbes
- 19 The Cambridge Platonists
- 20 Bayle
- 21 Leibniz
- 22 Spinoza
- 23 Pascal
- 24 Locke and Butler
- 25 Shaftesbury, Hutcheson and the Moral Sense
- 26 Hume
- 27 Smith and Bentham
- 28 Rousseau
- 29 Rationalism and Perfectionism
- 30 Kant
- 31 Fichte
- 32 Hegel
- 33 Mill
- 34 Schopenhauer
- 35 Kierkegaard
- 36 American Transcendentalism
- 37 Nietzsche
- 38 Marxism
- 39 Sidgwick
- 40 Pragmatism
- 41 British Idealism
- 42 Ethical Intuitionism
- 43 Husserl and Phenomenological Ethics
- 44 Ethics in Freudian and Post-Freudian Psychoanalysis
- 45 Noncognitivism: From the Vienna Circle to the Present Day
- 46 The Frankfurt School
- 47 Heidegger
- 48 Sartre
- 49 French Ethical Philosophy since the 1960s
- 50 Wittgenstein’s Ethics and Wittgensteinian Moral Philosophy
- 51 Anti-Theory: Anscombe, Foot and Williams
- 52 Discourse Ethics
- 53 Decision Theory
- 54 Rawls
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy , pp. 394 - 409Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allison, Henry E. 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Marcia 1995. Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.*Google Scholar
Byrd, Sharon 1989. ‘Kant’s Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in Its Threat, Retribution in Its Execution’. Law and Philosophy 8: 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara 2001. Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Glasgow, Joshua 2003. ‘Expanding the Limits of Universalization: Kant’s Duties and Kantian Moral Deliberation’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2007. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum.*Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 1993. ‘Leaving Deontology Behind’. In The Practice of Moral Judgment, 208–40. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1992. ‘The Kantian Conception of Autonomy’. In Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory: 76–96. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.*Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline 2010. ‘Moral Consciousness and the “Fact of Reason”’. In Reath, Andrews & Timmermann, Jens (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1983. ‘Two Distinctions in Goodness’. Philosophical Review 92: 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1985. ‘Kant’s Formula of Universal Law’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. 2012. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2003. ‘Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes’. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77: 1–21.Google Scholar
Paton, H.J. 1946. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson.*Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2007. Kant’s ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’: A Commentary. Cambridge University Press.*CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens 2013. ‘Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95: 36–64.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus 2002. ‘Which Imperatives for Right? On the Prescriptivity of Juridical Laws in Kant’s “Metaphysics of Morals”’. In Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Morals’: Interpretative Essays, 65–87. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2002. ‘The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy’. In Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Morals’: Interpretative Essays, 1–21. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by