Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T10:40:50.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Semantic and Pragmatic Conditions on Word Order Variation in Chinese

from Part Four - Syntax-semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2022

Chu-Ren Huang
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Yen-Hwei Lin
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
I-Hsuan Chen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Yu-Yin Hsu
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Get access

Summary

The canonical word order of Modern Chinese is SVO, and yet Modern Chinese does not demonstrate the patterns of a typical VO language. This chapter reviews representative arguments that have contributed to our closer understanding of what pragmatic and semantic factors condition word order variation in Modern Chinese. Discourse analyses in relation with information structure account for the pragmatic function of the preverbal object and why there is the relative ordering between subject and object in non-canonical SOV/OSV patterns, based on the notion of topicality, focus, and emphatic/contrastive function. Semantic accounts explain how the animacy of subject and object constrains the obligatory vs. optional ba marking of object in the SOV pattern and the acceptability of the OSV pattern. Finally, arguments based on iconicity principle and lexical aspect analyses are used to account for the relative ordering of verb and locative/temporal adverbials.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21:435483.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1981. On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. In Radical pragmatics, ed. Cole, Peter, 6381. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9:516.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J., and Ward, Gregory. 1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1985. Diffentielle bjektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sorachen. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In New analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April 7–9, 1988, ed. Wanner, D. and Kibbee, D., 143170. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topic and point of view. In Subject and topic, ed. Li, Charles N., 2555. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Chung-yu. 1978. Aspectual features of the verb and the relative positions of the locatives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:76103.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Roberta. 1988. Who dun it? The influence of actor–patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language 27(4):447465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Sicong, and Jie, Xu. 2022. SOV as the canonical word order in Modern Chinese. In The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Yen-Hwei, Chen, I-Hsuan, and Hsu, Yu-Yin, 428443. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1999. Notes to semantics seminar: Aktionsart. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68:81138.Google Scholar
Fan, Jiyan 范继淹. 1982. On the prepositional phrase ‘zài +location’ 论介词短语”在+处所”. Studies in Language and Linguistics 语言研究 2:7186.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M. 1987. The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics 8(4):329350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language 2:73113.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Studies in syntactic typology, ed. Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, and Wirth, Jessica, 209239. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher, and Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements’. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9:127144.Google Scholar
Ho, Yong. 1993. Aspects of discourse structure in Mandarin Chinese. Lewiston, NY: Mellen University Press.Google Scholar
Hovav, Malka Rappaport, and Levin, Beth. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, ed. Hovav, Malka Rappaport, Doron, Edit, and Sichel, Ivy, 2138.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jin, Lixin, and Yu, Xiujin 金立鑫, 于秀金. 2012. The analysis of Mandarin word order typology based on the grammatical pairs correlated and uncorrelated with OV-VO. 从与 OV-VO 相关和不相关参项考察普通话的语序类型. Journal of Foreign Languages 外国语 35(2):2229.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and topic, ed. Li, Charles, 303333. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Kitaek, O’Grady, William, and Deen, Kamil Ud. 2014. Poor performance on scrambled Korean OSV sentences by Korean heritage children: Performance, not competence. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America, 5159. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings ProjectGoogle Scholar
Klipple, Elizabeth Mary. 1991. The aspectual nature of thematic relations: Locative and temporal phrases in English and Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 1995. Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In Word order in discourse, ed. Downing, Pamela and Noonan, Michael, 297329. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1974a. An explanation of word order change SVO→SOV. Foundations of Language 12(2):201214.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1974b. Historical change of word order: A case study of Chinese and its implications. In Historical linguistics I: Syntax, morphology, internal and comparative reconstruction, ed. Anderson, John M. and Jones, Charles, 199218. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Li, Ping, Bates, Elizabeth, and MacWhinney, Brian. 1993. Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 32(2):169192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Timothy. 1979. Word order and word order change. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7:149180. www.jstor.org/stable/23752920.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 2007. Word order variation and ba sentences in Chinese. Studies in Language 31(3):649682.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 2009. Aspect and the post-verbal zai phrase in Mandarin Chinese. In Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches, ed. Xing, Janet Zhiqun, 103129. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 2022. SVO as the canonical word order in Modern Chinese. In The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. Huang, Chu-Ren, Lin, Yen-Hwei, Chen, I-Hsuan, and Hsu, Yu-Yin, 407427. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9(2):191240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, Xiao-chun. 1981. Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehensionInternational Journal of Psycholinguistics 8(3):109122.Google Scholar
Otsu, Yukio. 1994. Early acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar 8:253264.Google Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung, and Sells, Peter. 2006. Preposition incorporation in Mandarin: Economy within VP. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.525.7992&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Peck, Jeeyoung, and Lin, Jingxia. 2019. Semantic constraint on preposition incorporation of postverbal locative PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 20(1):85129.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text, ed. Thompson, Sandra A. and Mann, William, 295325. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41(1):4781.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chao-Fen, and Givón, Talmy. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61:329351.Google Scholar
Tang, Zhengda, and Lamarre, Christine. 2007. A contrastive study of the linguistic encoding of motion events in standard Chinese and in the Guanzhong dialect of Mandarin (Shaanxi). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 2(1):137171.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1976. On the change from SVO to SOV in Chinese. In Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago Linguistic Society, 291–304.Google Scholar
Tai, James H-Y. 1985. Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, ed. Haiman, John, 4972. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax–semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1987. A topic-comment approach to the ba construction. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 15:154.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1990. Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 22:221260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2):143160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Huan 王还. 1980. More on ‘zai’ 再说说“在”. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 语言教学与研究 3:2529.Google Scholar
Yang, Ning, and van Bergen, Geertje. 2007. Scrambled objects and case marking in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua 117(9):16171635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×