Index

Benjamin Folit-Weinberg

doi:10.1017/9781009047562.011

Index

A-B-C pattern. See types of dependence

actors’ categories, 6, 10

Alcman, 77

Altar of the Twelve Gods. See road signs

Anaximander, 3, 67

Anaximenes, 3, 67

Anscombe, G.E.M., 1, 127 n. 34

Archaeology of Knowledge, 16–19, 20

discourse modes

and ordering of enunciative series, 120

discursive archaeology

vs metaphor, 20, 124 n. 18

discursive regularities, 16–19

and intertextuality, 20

forms of succession, 119–121

levels of dependence, 120

Archilochus, 77

argument. See extended deductive argumentation

absence of in Golden Tablets, 185

and rhetorical schema of hodos, 229

as discourse mode

in Fr. 2 and Od. 12.55–126, 207–209

in Heraclitus, 227–228, 229

in Milesian accounts, 227

in Od. 12.55–126, 177–181

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 230

in Sirens and Thrinacia episodes, 151–154

in Xenophanes, 227–228, 229

key features of, 127–128

vs reasoning, 15–16

Aristotle, 6, 31, 40, 275

definition of apodeixis, 2

astronomy, Parmenides and, 2

atomic tradition, Parmenides and, 2

Austin, N., 173

Austin, S., interpretation of Fr. 8 of, 265–267

Bacchylides, 73, 74

Bakker, E.

on A-B-C patterns, 129

on men … de … clauses, 164

on nostos as quest, 289, 291

Barnes, J., 228, 306, 310

Bicknell, P. J., 306

Bodnár, I., 302, 304, 305–306, 307

Burnet, J., 4

catalogic discourse, 24

and sēmata in Fr. 8, 223

as list, 130–131

as series, 131

definition of, 129–131

key features of, 133–135

Catalogue of Ships, 128, 145

Catalogue of Women, 112

change in epistemic status of poetry

driven by diachronic processes, 89–92

driven by genre, 92–93

Charybdis. See Homer, Odyssey

Chatman, S., 171

Circe, 129

and elegy, 83

and hodos in Od. 10, 138, 141, 142

and hodos in Od. 12, 144, 146–148

and Sirens and Thrinacia, 148–157

and Parmenides’ goddess, 102, 104–105, 110, 114–116, 196–203

first-person speech, use of, 107–108

con-sequence

definition of, 140

in hodos in Od. 12.37–141, 192

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 218, 248

transition to logical consequence from, 218, 260–261, 264, 282

Cornford, F., 4

Couloubaritsis, L., 131

Curd, P., 308, 309, 311, 312

deliberation, Homeric, 180, 181, 187, 189, 281

and Fr. 2, 208–209

and krisis, 211, 213

Democritus, 1, 277

demonstration

importance of hodos for development of, 18–19, 281–283

key features of, 1–3

beginning. See krisis, importance for demonstration

conclusion. See hodos, as activity, teleological nature of

extended deductive argumentation. See extended deductive argumentation

outline of in Parmenides’ poem, 22–27

Derrida, J., 67

Descartes, R., 8

description, 120, 225

-by-negation, 174, 193, 211

with modal charge, 175–176

in rhetorical schema of hodos, 141–142

in Fr. 2, 205–207

in Fr. 8, 231–232, 233–238

in Od. 12.55–126, 159–160, 164, 170, 171–176, 177–181, 205–207

in Sirens and Thrinacia episodes, 148–151

key features of, 125–127

within krisis portion, 166–171

without descriptivity, 132, 248

Dike, 82, 98 n.124, 99

Diogenes of Apollonia, 214

discourse modes, 125–128

discourse-unit

and rhetorical schema of hodos, 283

in Od. 10 and Od. 12, 205

meaning of, 162

discursive regularities. See Archaeology of Knowledge

discursive systematicity

and the rhetorical schema of hodos, 229

features of, 226

in Heraclitus, 229

in Milesian accounts, 226–227, 229

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 230

in Xenophanes, 228, 229

Dolin, E., 102

double motivation, 108

einai, use of

in Od. 12.55–126, 171–173, 179, 180, 182, 190, 193, 210, 281

and Parmenides’ poem, 191

Empedocles, 67, 204, 277

enunciative series, ordering of. See Archaeology of Knowledge, ordering of enunciative series

epei

in Parmenides’ poem, 219

epei and gar

as a feature of argument discourse mode, 128

in argument sections, 177–181, 193

in Fr. 2, 207

in Od. 12.55–126, 177–181, 182, 190, 191

epic poetics

and Invocation of the Muses in Il. 2, 95–96

and ‘poetics of truth’, 85–87, 93–94, 95–96

and Parmenides’ poem, 113–114

and ‘rhetoric of traditionality’, 85–87

and ‘special speech’, 85–87

and ‘traditional referentiality’, 85–87

episode, vs hodos unit and discourse-unit, 158, 161–165

exclusive, exhaustive disjunction. See krisis

extended deductive argumentation

as component of demonstration, 1

as narrativity without narration, description without descriptivity, 132, 237, 248, 264

importance of hodos for invention of, 260–261, 275–276, 282–283

Parmenides’ invention of, 5, 11–12, 19–27, 119–120, 225, 271–276

and interpretations of Fr. 8, 265, 270

and Od. 12.37–141, 193–194

Finkelberg, M., 95

Ford, A., 75

gar. See epei and gar

genealogy. See hodos, as rhetorical schema, vs genealogy

and degree of argumentation afforded, 227

and discursive systematicity, 226–227

as catalogic discourse, 136

Gill, C. See deliberation, Homeric

Golden Tablets, 193

absence of argument in, 185

crossroads image in, 183–185

vs Od. 12.55–126, 185–189

Granger, H., 109–110

Great Panathenaea, 73

Greek Miracle, Parmenides and the, 4

Halliwell, S., 93, 95, 114

Havelock, E.

linguistic task of Presocratics, 233, 234–235, 248

on Parmenides and Homer, 13–14, 16, 72, 124 n. 18, 237 n. 63

Hecataeus, 89, 108

Hegel, G. W. F., 1

Heidegger, M., 1, 67

Heraclitus, 3, 74, 111, 305, 306

and Homer, 73

argumentation in, 227–228, 229

discursive systematicity in, 228–229

herms, 43–44

and Parmenides’ sēmata, 44, 222

Herodotus, 41

Hesiod, 68

and Parmenides, 23

epistemological framework of, 94, 97, 114–116

and Parmenides, 71–72

Theogony, 233

and Parmenides’ poem, 84

as model for Milesians, 226

as series, 131

Muses in, 69–71, 97

and Parmenides’ goddess, 99–102, 103–104

Works and Days

and Parmenides’ poem, 84

crossroads, 183–184, 193

vs Od. 12.55–126, 185–189

Hestia, 284

hodos

and the concept of method, 27, 300

as activity

and linguistic aspect, 58–60

purposive nature of, 52–56

relationship to accomplishments of, 60–63

semantics of, 47–48, 52–63

spatial destination of, 56–57

teleological nature of, 52–59

in Odyssey and Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 296

as catalogic discourse, 131–132, 281

importance for invention of extended deductive argumentation of, 218, 282–283

in Od. 12.39–141, 191–194

as crossroads. See krisis

as physical object, 12

and logical necessity in Parmenides’ poem, 40, 45–46, 64, 108, 115, 254–255, 257–261

and organization of space, 33–35

management of, 40–41

and organization of space, 46

road signs on, 42–44

as rut road, 35–40

construction of, 36–37, 38

dimensions of, 37–38

semantics of, 46–47, 48–52, 63

travel by wheeled vehicles on, 39–40

as rhetorical schema, 131–132, 281, 282

and argumentation, 229

and description, 141–142

without descriptivity, 248

and discursive systematicity, 229

and narrativity, 137–138, 139–140

without narration, 248

and types of dependence, 138–142

as series, not list, 144, 248

epistemological implications of, 233–237

importance for epistemology of, 248

importance for invention of extended deductive argumentation of, 218, 230, 275–276, 282–283

in Od. 12.39–141, 146–149, 191–194

in Od. 55–126, 157–161

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 249–251

in Fr. 8, 223–226, 252–255, 263–267

key features of, 143–145

ontological implications of, 233–238, 241–242, 248–249

relationship to space of, 135–137

rhetorical power of, 264

vs genealogy, 233–237, 241–242, 248–249

importance of

for emergence of demonstration, 281

for extended deductive argumentation, 281

semantic field of, 12

two meanings of, 225

implications for Parmenides’ poem of, 260–261, 262

vs keleuthos, implications for Fr. 2, 262

hodos dizēsios. See Parmenides’ poem, ‘Route to Truth’

as network of meanings, 10–12

hodos-unit, 192, 211, 243

analysis of Od. 12.39–141 by, 161

analysis of Od. 12.55–126 by, 163, 164

analysis of ‘Route to Truth’ by, 214–216, 218, 223–226

definition of, 162

Hölscher, U., 306

Homer

Iliad

Invocation of the Muses, 68, 76–77, 80, 95–96

and Parmenides’ goddess, 99–102, 104

and Xenophanes, 71

maximalist reading of, 114–116

late archaic reception of, 66–67, 72–76, 95–96, 114

Odyssey

12.37–141, 146–157, 191–194

and Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 218, 223–226, 235–237

temporality of, 235–237

12.55–126, 157–181

and Parmenides’ Fr. 2, 203–216

and Parmenides’ Fr. 8, 234–237

and Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 185–191

distinctiveness of, 185–191

and Parmenides’ poem, 83

Apologoi, 107

and Parmenides’ hodos dizēsios, 197–203

end of, and end of Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 296–298

temporality of

plot of, 242

story of, 242

‘Golden Verses’, 74

and Solon’s ‘Eunomia’, 80–82

Homeric Hymns

and epiphany, 97

and poetics of truth, 96

Hopman, M., 164

Hymn to Aphrodite, 112

Hymn to Apollo, 73, 92, 93, 111

Hymn to Demeter, 112

Ibycus, 67, 68, 111

‘Polycrates Ode’, 76

and epic poetics, 87

and Homer’s Muses, 77

and poetics of truth, 96

intertextuality, 10

and discursive archaeology, 20

between Parmenides and Homer, 21–22, 75, 181–183, 185–191, 214, 305

criteria for assessing, 182–183, 189–191

de Jong, I. J. F., 158, 160, 161, 174

Kant, I., 8

Karsten, S., 249

Kenny–Vendler verb types, 60–63

accomplishments, 61–62

Kirk and Raven, 308, 311, 312

Kirk, G. S., 233–234, 235

Knudsen, R., 151–153, 179, 181, 187

krisis

and modally charged negation

in Fr. 2, 212

in Od. 12.55–126, 191

definition of, 166

importance for demonstration, 214–216

in Od. 12.55–126, 166–171, 181–182, 192–194, 282

distinctiveness of, 183–191

in Od. 12.55–126 and Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 217

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 282

description organized by, 166, 205

types of dependence within. See types of dependence

and description, 189

list, 248

features of, 130–131

Lloyd, G. E. R., 6–7, 10, 15–16, 253

polar expressions. See polar expressions

logical necessity

and hodos as physical object, 40, 45–46, 64, 108, 115, 258–261

Lowe, N., 283

McKirahan, R., interpretation of Fr. 8 of, 267–270

Melissus, 1, 67

men … de … clauses

in Fr. 2, 205–206

and Od. 12.55–126, 204–205

in Od. 12.55–73, 164

in Od. 12.73–126, 164–165

method, concept of, 14

and relationship to hodos, 27, 300

Milesians, the

argumentation in, 227, 229

discursive systematicity in, 226–227, 229

Miller, M., 109

Mimnermus, 77

Mogyoródi, E., 240

Most, G., 199

Mourelatos, A. P. D., 240, 249

on ‘motif of chariotry’ and ‘theme of Fate-Constraint’, 256–258

on Parmenides and Homer, 13–15, 16, 72, 124 n. 18

on road imagery in Parmenides’ poem, 18

on sēmata in Parmenides’ poem, 44, 296

on ‘positive teleology’ of Peithous keleuthos, 261–262

narration, 120, 225

in Fr. 8, 230–231

in rhetorical schema of hodos

in Fr. 2, 205

in Od. 12.55–126, 159, 160–190, 205

key features of, 125–127

loss of in Fr. 8, 233–237

narrativity without, 132, 248

negation

in Od. 12.55–126, 173–176

with modal charge, 190, 191, 193, 210

in Fr. 2, 207

in krisis, 212–214

in Od. 12.55–126, 175–176, 178–179

nostos

as quest, 287–289, 295–296

failed, 156

teleological nature of

and bed of Odysseus, 284–287

and Parmenides’ hodos dizēsios, 200–202

observers’ categories. See actors’ categories

Odysseus

and Parmenides’ kouros, 196–203

bed of, 283–296

and Parmenides’ to eon, 293–296

and teleological nature of nostos of, 284–287

and test of identity of, 287–289

as empedon sēma, 289–293

oimē

and rhetorical schema, 121–124

Owen, G. E. L., 219

interpretation of Fr. 8 of, 251, 253–255, 265

Palmer, J., 307

Parmenidean apology, 283

and end of Odyssey, 296–298

Parmenides

as poet, 109, 114–116, 264

Parmenides’ goddess

and Circe, 102, 104–105, 107–108, 110, 114–116, 196–203

and epic Muses, 98–102

and first-person speech, use of, 104–108

and Hesiod’s Muses, 99–102, 103–104

multiple possible identites of, 98, 110

Parmenides’ kouros

and audience of poem, 245–247

and Odysseus, 196–203

Parmenides’ poem, 104

and Hesiod’s Theogony, 84

and Hesiod’s Works and Days, 84

and Od. 12.55–126

and Fr. 2, 203–216

and poetics of truth, 114–116

and religious ritual, 23–24, 108–110

and semantics of hodos, 63–64, 254–255, 259–261

argument in

Fr. 2, 207–209, 214–216

as poem, 5

description in

Fr. 2, 205–207

Fr. 8, 231–232, 233–238

dialectical nature of , 245, 246–247

in Fr. 2, 215

in relation to Od. 12, 209–211

Doxa, 25, 103, 104, 297

place in Parmenides’ poem, 249

Fr. 5, 249, 301–313

narration in

Fr. 2, 205

Fr. 8, 230–231

philosophical vs other interpretations of, 25–26, 270–278

proem of, 82–84, 98–102, 104–108

and elegy, 82–83

as journey to Muse, 97–98

time of narration, 247–248

‘Route to Truth’

and the Apologoi, 197–203

as catalogic discourse, 131–132, 218

as series vs. list, 249–251, 251–255

story-world of, 249–251, 263–264

Fr. 8, 251–255

epistemological implications of, 240–241

intentional vagueness of, 245

ontological implications of, 241, 247

and plot, 242–244

structure of argumentation of vs interpretation of arguments of, 252

temporality of

epistemological implications of, 247

implications for narration and narrativity, 248

and plot, 247–248

time of narration, 244–247

types of dependence in Fr. 2

and Od. 12.55–126, 205–207

use of dactylic hexameter for, 110–114

and ‘poetics of truth’, 114

Penelope

and bed of Odysseus, 287–289

peira of

as valid proof (empedon sēma), 289–293

deductive character of, 287–289

Pindar, 67, 68, 73, 74, 111

and Parmenides, 23

epinicians of, 89

and epic poetics, 88

Muses in, and Homer’s Muses, 105

Paean 6, 76, 93

and epic poetics, 87

and Homer’s Muses, 78–79

epistemic status of, 89–92

Paean 7b, 76

and epic poetics, 87

and Homer’s Muses, 78–79

epistemic status of, 89–92

paeans of

and poetics of truth, 96

relationship to the Muses of, 105–107

Planctae. See Homer, Odyssey

Plato, 173, 277

and dating of Parmenides, 65

polar expressions, 186, 187, 188

definition of, 165

de Polignac, F., 33–34

Popper, K., 1, 283, See Parmenidean apology

Ranzato, S.

and ‘polysemy of myth’, 109

Reinhardt, K., 306

rhetorical modes. See discourse modes

rhetorical schemata

and Lord-Parry ‘theme’, 122–123

definition of, 120

vs oimē, 121–124

ring composition

and Parmenides’ hodos dizēsios, 200–202

road signs

Altar of the Twelve Gods as, 42–43

and Parmenides’ poem, 43, 222

and Parmenides’ poem, 45–46

and Parmenides’ sēmata, 221–223

herms as, 43–44

and Parmenides’ poem, 43–44

and Parmenides’ sēmata, 222

on Thasos, 44–45

Rowett, C., 111

Russell, B., 1, 8, 67

Schofield, M., 4

Scodel, R., 89, 108

Scylla. See Homer, Odyssey

Sedley, D.

interpretation of Fr. 8 of, 251, 252–254, 263–264

implications for Fr. 5, 309

sēma, 146

and Od. 12, 221

as discursive

in Fr. 8, 220, 223, 254–255

in Od. 12, 221

in Od. 23, 289–293

as object

and herms, 44

in Fr. 8, 220, 221–223, 254–255

and Ancient Greek road signs, 221–223

in Od. 23, 289–293

empedon

as valid proof in Od. 23, 289–293

in Fr. 8, 220–226

series, 248

features of, 131

Serres, M., 131

Shield of Heracles, 112

Simonides, 67, 68, 73, 74, 111

‘Plataea Elegy’, 76

and Homer’s Muses, 79

and poetics of truth, 87, 96

19 (IEG), 75

Sirens. See Homer, Odyssey

Solon

‘Eunomia’, 76

and Parmenides’ proem, 82–83

and the ‘Golden Verses’, 80–82

Stesichorus, 73

Story-world

of Apologoi, 313

of Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 249–251, 313

of Fr. 8, 254–255

succession, forms of. See Archaeology of Knowledge, forms of succession

Tarán, L., 304

text-types. See discourse modes

Theagenes of Rhegium, 74

Themis, 99

Theognis, 183

Thrinacia. See Homer, Odyssey

Tiresias, 57, 107, 146, 170, 285, 295, 296

to eon

and bed of Odysseus, 293–296

relationship between qualities of, 223–224, 251, 254–255, 258–261, 263–264

Tor, S., 100, 201

on ‘reasoning’ vs ‘revelation’, 69–70, 109

types of dependence

and A-B-C patterns, 129, 145

and Catalogue of Ships, 129

and Homeric scholarship, 128–129

features of, 120

in Homeric hodos, 281

within rhetorical schema of hodos, 138–142, 144–145, 283

in Fr. 8, 192

in Od. 10, 192

in Od. 12.37–141, 192–193, 192–193

in Parmenides’ ‘Route to Truth’, 192, 230

within krisis, 166–171, 189

in Fr. 2, 207, 208–209

in Od. 12 and Fr. 2, 207–208, 214–216

in Od. 55–126, 166–181

Vernant, J.-P., 4, 284–285

Wittgenstein, L., 8, 67

Xenophanes, 3, 67, 68, 74, 85, 106, 111

and Homer, 71, 73

argumentation in, 227–228, 229

critique of ‘folk epistemology’, 238–240

discursive systematicity in, 228, 229

epistemological framework of, 71–72, 94, 97, 108, 115

Parmenides’ response to, 71–72, 108–110

temporality of epistemological theories of, 238–240

use of verse of, 112

Zeno, 1, 67, 111

Book contents

Index

Summary

Index

Book contents

Index

Summary

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive