Bibliography

Jessica Lightfoot

doi:10.1017/9781009003551.009

Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012) Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Allan, W. (1999–2000) ‘Euripides and the Sophists: Society and the Theatre of War’. ICS 24–5: 145–56.Google Scholar

Allison, J. W. (1997) Word and Concept in Thucydides. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Alonso Troncoso, V. (2013) ‘The Diadochi and the Zoology of Kingship: The Elephants’, in Alonso Troncoso, V. and Anson, E. M. (eds.), After Alexander: The Time of the Diadochi (323–281 BC). Oxford: 254–70.Google Scholar

Amati, M. F. (2010) ‘Meton’s Star-City: Geometry and Utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds’. CJ 105: 213–27.Google Scholar

Angelucci, M. (2014) ‘Water and Paradoxography: Polemon’s Work Περὶ τῶν ἐν Σικελίᾳ θαυμαζομένων ποταμῶν’. OTerr 12: 9–25.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2011) ‘Changing from Within: Plato’s Later Political Thinking’. The Corbett Lecture, University of Cambridge, November 2011. [Unpublished lecture, online]. Available at: www.u.arizona.edu/~jannas/Forthcoming/corbett.pdf [Accessed Sept. 2020].Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (2004) ‘Horace’s Epistles 1 and Philodemus’, in Armstrong, D. (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin: 267–98.Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, W. (1973) ‘Aristophanes’ Birds: The Fantasy Politics of Eros’. Arion 1: 119–67.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2007) ‘The Wonderful World of Mucianus’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), ‘Vita vigilia est’: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 1–17.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2005) ‘Group Laughter and Comic Affirmation: Aristophanes’ Birds and the Political Function of Old Comedy’. Hyperboreus 11: 5–30.Google Scholar

Austin, C. and Bastianini, G. (2002) Posidippi Pellaei quae supersunt omnia. Milan.Google Scholar

Austin, C. and Olson, S. D. (2004) Aristophanes: Thesmophoriazusae. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Avery, H. C. (1973) ‘Themes in Thucydides’ Account of the Sicilian Expedition’. Hermes 101: 1–13.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. (1972) Aristotle: De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2012) ‘The Wonder of Freedom: Xenophon on Slavery’, in Hobden, F. and Tuplin, C. J. (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden: 631–63.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. S. (1964) Hippolytos. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barth, H. (1968) ‘Zur Bewertung und Auswahl des Stoffes durch Herodot’. Klio 50: 93–110.Google Scholar

Bartoňková, D. (1999) ‘Il prosimetrum nella Paradossografia Greca’. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské university 3–4: 63–7.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. (2013) ‘Heron of Alexandria’s “Toy Theatre” Automaton: Reality, Allusion and Illusion’, in Reilly, K. (ed.), Theatre, Performance and Analogue Technology: Historical Interfaces and Intermedialities. Basingstoke: 15–39.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (1992) Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2007) ‘Situating Nature’s Wonders in Pliny’s Natural History’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), ‘Vita vigilia est’: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 19–40.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2011) ‘The Curious Eye of the Elder Pliny’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (eds.), Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts. Leiden: 71–88.Google Scholar

Becker, A. S. (1992) ‘Reading Poetry Through a Distant Lens: Ecphrasis, Ancient Greek Rhetoricians, and the Pseudo-Hesiodic Shield of Heracles’. AJP 113: 5–24.Google Scholar

Becker, A. S. (1995) The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Beekes, R. S. P. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden.Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. S. (1992) ‘Aristotle and Iphigenia’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton: 359–77.Google Scholar

Bernabé, A. (2012) ‘The Sixth Definition (Sophist 226a–231 c): Transposition of Religious Language’, in Bossi, B. and Robinson, T. M. (eds.), Plato’s Sophist Revisited. Berlin and Boston: 41–56.Google Scholar

Berrey, M. (2017) Hellenistic Science at Court. Berlin.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. A. (2003) ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’. Phronesis 48.4: 344–69.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. A. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bianchi, O and Thévenaz, O. (2004) Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique. Bern.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1995) ‘Ergänzungsspiel in the Epigrams of Callimachus’. A&A 41: 115–31.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (2003) ‘The Unruly Tongue: Philitas of Cos as Scholar and Poet’. CP 98.4: 330–48.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (2005) ‘The Politics and Poetics of Geography in the Milan Posidippus Section One: On Stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 119–40.Google Scholar

Bishop, T. (1996) Shakespeare and the Theatre of Wonder. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bobrick, E. (1991) ‘Iphigeneia Revisited: Thesmophoriazusae 1160–1225’. Arethusa 24: 67–76.Google Scholar

Bolton, J. D. P. (1962) Aristeas of Proconnesus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowe, G. S. (2017) ‘Thaumata in Aristotle’s Metaphysics A’. Acta Classica 60: 50–72.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. J. (1998) Xenophon: Symposium. Warminster.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (1993) Aristophanes: Myth, Ritual, and Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (2012) ‘A Science of First Principles Metaphysics A 2’, in Steel, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: 43–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruno, V. J. (1977) Form and Colour in Greek Painting: A Study of the Colour Harmonies and Shading Techniques Used by the Major Painters of Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Revisiting Plato’s Cave’, in Cleary, J. J. and Gurtler, G. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 19. Leiden: 145–77.Google Scholar

Budelmann, F. (2019) ‘Dare to Believe: Wonder, Trust and the Limitations of Human Cognition in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Braund, D., Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), Ancient Theatre and Performance Culture Around the Black Sea. Cambridge: 289–304.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1986) Studia Pindarica. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Buonajuto, A. (1996) ‘L’ἐξωκεανισμός dei viaggi di Odisseo in Cratete e negli Alessandrini’. A&R 41: 1–8.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1983) Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by Peter Bing. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Burnett, A. P. (1971) Catastrophe Survived: Euripides’ Plays of Mixed Reversal. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1999) ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 20: 215–324.Google Scholar

Burstein, S. M. (1989) Agatharchides of Cnidus: On the Erythraean Sea. London.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (1996) Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien: légende et culte en Grèce antique. Lausanne.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. (1994) ‘Automaton’. StudStor 35: 613–33.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. (2012) ‘The Desire to Know Metaphysics A 1’, in Steel, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: 1–42.Google Scholar

Cambitoglou, A. and Turner, M. (eds.) (2008) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Australia [Fasc. 1]. The Nicholson Museum, The University of Sydney: The Red Figure Pottery of Apulia. Sydney.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. B. (1999) Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Cappelletto, C. (2011) ‘The Puppet’s Paradox: An Organic Prosthesis’. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 59/60: 325–36.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Casadesús Bordoy, F. (2012) ‘Why Is it So Difficult to Catch a Sophist? Pl. Sph. 218d3 and 261a5’, in Bossi, B. and Robinson, T. M. (eds.), Plato’s Sophist Revisited. Berlin and Boston: 15–27.Google Scholar

Càssola, F. (1975) Inni omerici. Milan.Google Scholar

Casson, L. (1993) ‘Ptolemy II and the Hunting of African Elephants’. TAPA 123: 247–60.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (1988) Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2018) Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1992) ‘Plato’s First Words’. YCS 29: 113–29.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2006) The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Coleridge, S. T. (1817) Biographia Literaria. London.Google Scholar

Collard, C. and Cropp, M. (2008) Euripides, Fragments: Aegeus-Meleager. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Conacher, D. J. (1998) Euripides and the Sophists: Some Dramatic Treatments of Philosophical Ideas. London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1907) Thucydides Mythistoricus. London.Google Scholar

Cozzoli, A.-T. (2011) ‘The Poet as a Child’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: 407–28.Google Scholar

Cropp, M. J. (1997) ‘Notes on Euripides, Iphigenia in Tauris’. ICS 22: 25–41.Google Scholar

Cropp, M. J. (2000) Euripides: Iphigenia in Tauris. Warminster.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2003) ‘The Dolphins of Dionysus’, in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.), Poetry, Theory, Praxis: The Social Life of Myth, Word and Image in Ancient Greece. Essays in Honour of William J. Slater. Oxford: 69–98.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. and Miler, M. C. (2007) ‘General Introduction’, in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.), The Origins of Theater in Ancient Greece and Beyond: From Ritual to Drama. Cambridge: 1–38.Google Scholar

Cunningham, V. (2007) ‘Why Ekphrasis?’ CP 102: 57–71.Google Scholar

Cursaru, G. (2012) ‘Les sandales d’Hermès III: enquête sur les traces des σάνδαλα dans l’Hymne homérique à Hermès’. Mouseion 12: 17–50.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. (2013) ‘“The Name of the Dithyramb”: Diachronic and Diatopic Variations’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 113–32.Google Scholar

Danek, G. (2001) ‘Das Staunen des Chores: Götter und Menschen im Ion des Euripides’. WS 114: 47–58.Google Scholar

D’Angour, A. (2011) The Greeks and the New: Novelty in Ancient Greek Imagination and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2013) ‘Plato’s Charmides as a Political Act: Apologetics and the Promotion of Ideology’. GRBS 53.3: 486–519.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2014) ‘The Use and Abuse of Critias: Conflicting Portraits in Plato and Xenophon’. CQ 64: 507–24.Google Scholar

Daston, L. and Park, K. (1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (1998) ‘Euripides’ Electra: The Recognition Scene Again’. CQ 48: 389–403.Google Scholar

Dearden, C. W. (1995) ‘Pots, Tumblers and Phlyax Vases’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley. London: 81–6.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, D. (2016) ‘The Meeting Scenes in the Incipit of Plato’s Dialogue’, in Cornelli, G. (ed.), Plato’s Styles and Characters: Between Literature and Philosophy. Berlin: 119–35.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1994) The Gardens of Adonis: Spices in Greek Mythology. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dettori, E. (2000) Filita grammatico: testimonianze e frammenti. Rome.Google Scholar

Dickie, M. W. (2001a) ‘Mimes, Thaumaturgy, and the Theatre’. CQ 51: 599–603.Google Scholar

Dickie, M. W. (2001b) Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World. London.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1951–2) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 3 vols. 6th ed. Berlin.Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (1981a) Euripides: Fabulae, II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (1981b) Studies on the Text of Euripides: Supplices, Electra, Heracles, Troades, Iphigenia in Tauris, Ion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dobrov, G. W. (1997) ‘Language, Fiction, and Utopia’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 95–132.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1999) Antigone de Caryste: Fragments. Paris.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2005) ‘Accessioni a Antigono di Caristo’. SCO 51: 119–33.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. (1995) Aristophanes: Birds. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dunn, F. M. (2017) ‘Euripides and His Intellectual Context’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 447–67.Google Scholar

Edgar, C. C. (1925) Zenon Papyri: Catalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire, Vol. 1: (Cat. 79). Cairo.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. (1991) The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 5. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2014) ‘Lithic Poetics: Posidippus and His Stones’. Ramus 43.2: 152–72.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (1995) ‘Culture and Power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and Library of Alexandria’. G&R 42: 38–48.Google Scholar

Evans, R. J. W. and Marr, A. (eds.) (2006) Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A. (1987) ‘Hephaestus the Magician and Near Eastern Parallels for Alcinous’ Watchdogs’. GRBS 28: 257–80.Google Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2011) ‘The Collection of the Homeric Hymns: From the Seventh to the Third Centuries BC’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 175–205.Google Scholar

Fearn, D. (2007) Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fearn, D. (2017) Pindar’s Eyes: Visual and Material Culture in Epinician Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. K. (1995) ‘The Concept of Miracle in Homer’. Antichthon 29: 1–14.Google Scholar

Flashar, H. (1972) Aristoteles: Mirabilia. Berlin.Google Scholar

Flores, S. O. (2018) ‘The Development of Critias in Plato’s Dialogues’. CP 113: 162–88.Google Scholar

Folch, M. (2013) ‘Unideal Genres and the Ideal City: Comedy, Threnody, and the Making of Citizens in Plato’s Laws’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: 339–67.Google Scholar

Folch, M. (2015) The City and the Stage: Performance, Genre, and Gender in Plato’s Laws. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ford, A. L. (1992) Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ford, A. L. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fornara, C.W. (1971) ‘Evidence for the Date of Herodotus’ Publication’. JHS 91: 25–34.Google Scholar

Fraser, P. M. (1972a) Ptolemaic Alexandria, Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fraser, P. M. (1972b) Ptolemaic Alexandria, Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, D. (2010) ‘Puppets on Strings: Moral Psychology in Laws Books 1 and 2’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: 108–26.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1981) ‘True and False History in Classical Antiquity’. JRS 71: 50–62.Google Scholar

Gallagher, C. and Greenblatt, S. (2000) Practicing New Historicism. Chicago.Google Scholar

Gerolemou, M. (2018) Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Giannini, A. (1963) ‘Studi sulla paradossografia greca, I: Da Omero a Caliimaco, motivi e forme del meraviglioso’. RIL XCVII: 247–66.Google Scholar

Giannini, A. (1964) ‘Studi sulla paradossografia greca, II: Da Callimaco all’età imperial: la letteratura paradossografica’. Acme 17: 99–140.Google Scholar

Giannini, A. (1966) Paradoxographorum Graecorum reliquiae. Milan.Google Scholar

Gibert, J. C. (2019) Euripides: Ion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilhuly, K. (2009) The Feminine Matrix of Sex and Gender in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1981) ‘Who’s Afraid of Rope-Walkers and Gladiators? (Terence, Hec. 1–57)’. Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (2002) ‘Entertainment at Xenophon’s Symposium’. Athenaeum 90.1: 207–13.Google Scholar

Giraud, M. H. (1987) ‘Les Oiseaux dans l’Ion d’Euripide’. RPh 61: 83–94.Google Scholar

Gocer, A. (1999) ‘The Puppet Theater in Plato’s Parable of the Cave’. CJ 95.2: 119–29.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2013) Terence: Hecyra. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, F. J. (2003) ‘How to Read a Platonic Prologue: Lysis 203A–207D’, in Michelini, A. N. (ed.) Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar

González, J. M. (2013) The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. (2012) Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus. London.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. (1954) ‘Asclepiades and Posidippus: Notes and Queries’. CR 68: 195–200.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965) The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams, Vol. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2012) Horace: Satires Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2001) ‘Herodotus’ Literary and Historical Method: Arion’s Story (1.23–24)’. AJP 122: 11–28.Google Scholar

Green, P. (1970) Armada from Athens. New York.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1990) ‘Resonance and Wonder’. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43.4: 11–34.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S. (1899) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar

Griffiths, E. M. (2017) ‘Ion: An Edible Fairy Tale?’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 228–42.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2009) Nox Philologiae: Aulus Gellius and the Fantasy of the Roman Library. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1986) ‘The Plant Decoration on Theocritus’ Ivy-Cup’. AJP 107: 253–5.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2002) ‘Art’s Echo: The Tradition of Hellenistic Ecphrastic Epigram’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Hellenistic Epigrams. Groningen: 85–112.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2007) A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1990) ‘Sacrifice, Society, and Vergil’s Ox-Born Bees’, in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta: 209–23.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1987) ‘The Geography of Euripides’ Iphigenia among the Taurians’. AJP 108: 427–33.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1989) ‘The Archer Scene in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae’. Philologus 133: 38–54.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2012) Adventures with Iphigenia in Tauris: A Cultural History of Euripides’ Black Sea Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2020) ‘Aristophanes’ Birds as Satire on Athenian Opportunists in Thrace’, in Rosen, R. M. and Foley, H. P. (eds.), Aristophanes and Politics: New Studies. Leiden: 187–213.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle’s Poetics. London.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1987) The Poetics of Aristotle. London.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hansen, W. (1996) Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Exeter.Google Scholar

Harb, L. (2020) Arabic Poetics: Aesthetic Experience in Classical Arabic Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. (2012) Callimachus: Aetia, Vols. 1 and 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009) Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harte, V. (2007) ‘Language in the Cave’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 195–215.Google Scholar

Hartigan, K. (1991) Ambiguity and Self Deception: The Apollo and Artemis Plays of Euripides. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1980) Le miroir d’Hérodote: essai sur la représentation de l’autre. Paris.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hauben, H. (1984–6) ‘Onagres et hémionagres en Transjordanie au IIIᵉ s. av. J. C. À propos d’une lettre de Toubias’. AncSoc 15–17: 89–111.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G. (2011) ‘Bild, Mythos, and Ritual: Choral Dance in Theseus’s Cretan Adventure on the François Vase’. Hesperia 80: 491–510.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G. (2013) ‘The Semantics of Processional Dithyramb: Pindar’s Second Dithyramb and Archaic Athenian Vase-Painting’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 171–97.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (1998) ‘The Simile of the Fugitive Homicide, Iliad 24.480–84: Analogy, Foiling and Allusion’. AJP 119: 1–10.Google Scholar

Herington, J. (1985) Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hersey, G. L. (2009) Falling in Love with Statues: Artificial Humans from Pygmalion to the Present. Chicago.Google Scholar

Hilton, J. L. (2011) ‘On Isopsephic Lines in Homer and Apollonius of Rhodes’. CJ 106.4: 385–94.Google Scholar

Hilton, J. L. (2013) ‘The Hunt for Acrostics by Some Ancient Readers of Homer’. Hermes 141.1: 88–95.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, A. (1989) ‘Books XIII–XVI’, in Heubeck, A. and Hoekstra, A. (eds.), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, II: Books IX–XVI. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (1996) ‘Violence, Culture, and the Workings of Ideology in Euripides’ Ion’. ClAnt 15: 289–318.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (1982) ‘Fact and Fiction in Aulus Gellius’. LCM VII: 65–68.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (1988) Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. London.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2002) The Greek World, 479–323 BC. 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2004) Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2008) A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. 3: Books 5.25–8.109. Oxford.Google Scholar

Howie, J. G. (1983) ‘The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian 1: The Death and Revival of Pelops (25–27, 36–66)’, reprinted in Howie, J. G. (2012) Exemplum and Myth, Criticism and Creation: Papers on Early Greek Literature. Prenton: 161–90.Google Scholar

Howley, J. A. (2018) Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge in the Noctes Atticae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. (1997) ‘Utopianism and the Sophistic City in Aristophanes’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 23–50.Google Scholar

Hubbell, H. M. (1935) ‘Ptolemy’s Zoo’. CJ 31: 68–76.Google Scholar

Hughes, A. (2008) ‘Αἱ Διονυσιάζουσαι: Women in Greek Theatre’. BICS 51: 1–27.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1992) ‘Callimachus and Heraclitus’. MD 28: 113–23.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1999) Theocritus: A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. (1986) ‘Thucydides, Gorgias, and Mass Psychology’. Hermes 114: 412–29.Google Scholar

Hunzinger, C. (1993) ‘L’étonnement et l’émerveillement chez Homère: les mots de la famille de thauma’. Revue des Etudes Grecques 106: 17–9.Google Scholar

Hunzinger, C. (1995). ‘La notion de θῶμα chez Hérodote’. Ktèma 20: 47–70.Google Scholar

Hunzinger, C. (2015) ‘Wonder’, in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics. Chichester: 422–37.Google Scholar

Hunzinger, C. (2018) ‘Perceiving Thauma in Archaic Greek Epic’, in Gerolemou, M. (ed.), Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston: 259–73.Google Scholar

Huss, B. (1997) ‘In Xenophontis Symposium obseruatiunculae criticae’. ICS 22: 43–50.Google Scholar

Huss, B. (1999) Xenophons Symposion: ein Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (1983) ‘De l’art de compiler à la fabrication du merveilleux. Sur la paradoxographie grecque’. LALIES 2: 121–40.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (2000) ‘Athenaeus the Librarian’, in Braund, D. C. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 85–110.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (2013a) ‘Fragments of a History of Ancient Libraries’, in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 57–81.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (2013b) The Web of Athenaeus. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotos’. RE Suppl. 2: 205–520.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. (1998) ‘Dramatic Frame and Philosophic Idea in Plato’. AJP 119.4: 577–98.Google Scholar

Johnstone, S. (2014) ‘A New History of Libraries and Books in the Hellenistic Period’. ClAnt 33: 347–93.Google Scholar

Joho, T. (2017) ‘The Revival of the Funeral Oration and the Plague in Thucydides Books 6–7’. GRBS 57.1: 16–48.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1991) ‘Dinner Theater’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Dining in a Classical Context. Ann Arbor: 185–98.Google Scholar

Jordan, B. (2000) ‘The Sicilian Expedition Was a Potemkin Fleet’. CQ 50: 63–79.Google Scholar

Jordan, D. R. (2006) ‘Patterns and Laughter in Euripides’ Helen’. Symbolae Osloenses 81: 6–28.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (1992) ‘Le statut du thauma chez les médecins de la Collection hippocratique’, in Thivel, A. (ed.), Le miracle grec. Paris: 223–36.Google Scholar

Kahn, L. (1978) Hermès passe ou les ambiguïtés de la communication. Paris.Google Scholar

Kaklamanou, E. and Pavlou, M. (2016) ‘Reading the Proemium of Plato’s Theaetetus: Euclides in Action’. GRBS 56: 410–37.Google Scholar

Kallet, L. (2001) Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and Its Aftermath. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kannicht, R. (2004) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, Vol. 5.1: Euripides. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Karasmanis, V. (1988) ‘Plato’s Republic: The Line and the Cave’. Apeiron 21: 147–71.Google Scholar

Kareem, S. T. (2014) Eighteenth-Century Fiction and the Reinvention of Wonder. Oxford.Google Scholar

Karttunen, K. (2002) ‘The Ethnography of the Fringes’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden: 457–74.Google Scholar

Kazantzidis, G. (2019) ‘Introduction: Medicine and Paradoxography in Dialogue’, in Kazantzidis, G. (ed.), Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 1–40.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1991) Aristotle On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kenny, N. (1998) Curiosity in Early Modern Europe: Word Histories. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Kenny, N. (2004) The Uses of Curiosity in Early Modern France and Germany. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kenny, N. (2006) ‘The Metaphorical Collecting of Curiosities in Early Modern France and Germany’, in Evans, R. J. W. and Marr, A. (eds.), Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot: 43–62.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. (2004) ‘Gellius, Apuleius, and Satire on the Intellectual’, in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford: 224–44.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. (2009) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights. Leiden.Google Scholar

Keuls, E. (1978) Plato and Greek Painting. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kitchell, K. F. (1989) ‘The Origin of Vergil’s Myth of the Bugonia’, in Sutton, R. F. (ed.), Daidalikon: Studies in Memory of Raymond V. Schoder. Wauconda: 193–206.Google Scholar

Klimek-Winter, R. (1993) Andromedatragödien: Sophokles, Euripides, Livius Andronikos, Ennius, Accius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 1–31.Google Scholar

König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and Coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.) (2007) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1997) ‘The Greek Polis and Its Negations: Versions of Utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 3–22.Google Scholar

Kosak, J. C. (2006) ‘The Wall in Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Rosen, R. M and Sluiter, I. (eds.), City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 173–80.Google Scholar

Kosak, J. C (2017) ‘Iphigenia in Tauris’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 214–27.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2013) ‘Dancing Dolphins: Dithyramb and Society in the Archaic Period’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 31–58.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. (2004) ‘Callimachus and the Pedestrian Muse’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus II. Groningen: 173–84.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. (2005) ‘The Editor’s Toolbox: Strategies for Selection and Presentation in the Milan Epigram Papyrus’, in Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 81–96.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ Philology’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: 118–33.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1935) ‘Θαυματοποιοί’. RE Suppl. VI: 1278–82.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2012) ‘The Value of Chorality in Ancient Greece’, in Papadopoulos, J. K. and Urton, G. (eds.), The Construction of Value in the Ancient World. Los Angeles: 218–35.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2013) ‘Imagining Chorality: Wonder, Plato’s Puppets, and Moving Statues’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: 123–70.Google Scholar

Kyriakou, P. (2006) A Commentary on Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris. Berlin.Google Scholar

Kyselý, R. (2010) ‘Breed Character or Pathology? Cattle with Loose Horns from the Eneolithic Site of Hostivice–Litovice (Czech Republic)’. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 1241–46.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (2004) ‘Authorial Voice and Theatrical Self-Definition in Terence and Beyond: The Hecyra Prologues in Ancient and Modern Contexts’. G&R 51.1: 55–82.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (2007) Silent Eloquence: Lucian and Pantomime Dancing. London.Google Scholar

Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds) (2016) Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lämmle, R. (2013) Poetik des Satyrspiels. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lämmle, R. (2019) ‘Precarious Choreia in Satyr Play’. BICS 62.2: 29–48.Google Scholar

Lather, A. (2017) ‘The Sound of Music: The Semantics of Noise in Early Greek Hexameter’. Greek and Roman Musical Studies 5: 127–46.Google Scholar

Lebrère, M. (2015) ‘L’artialisation des sons de la nature dans les sanctuaires à automates d’Alexandrie, du III^e s. av. J.-C. au I^er s. apr. J.-C.’. Pallas 98: 31–53.Google Scholar

Lee, K. (1997) Euripides: Ion. Warminster.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2013) From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J. (1965) Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. (2001) Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. (2019a) ‘Galen’s Language of Wonder: Thauma, Medicine and Philosophy in On Prognosis and On Affected Parts’, in Kazantzidis, G. (ed.), Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 163–82.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. (2019b) ‘Textual Wanderings: Homeric Scholarship and the Written Landscape of Strabo’s Geography’. AJP 140.4: 671–97.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2002) ‘Nothing to Do with the τεχνῖται of Dionysus?’, in Easterling, P. E. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 209–24.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2009) Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lindermann, J.-O. (2006) Aulus Gellius Noctes Atticae, Buch 9: Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar

Llewelyn, J. (1988) ‘On the Saying that Philosophy Begins in Thaumazein’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.), Post-Structuralist Classics. London: 173–91.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1996) Sophocles: Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum. Berlin.Google Scholar

Lonsdale, S. H. (1993) Dance and Ritual Play in Greek Religion. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1986) The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1990) ‘Kreousa the Autochthon: A Study of Euripides’ Ion’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton: 168–206.Google Scholar

Lucas, D. W. (1968) Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Luz, C. (2010) Technopaignia, Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung. Leiden.Google Scholar

Maass, E. (1892) Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae. Berlin.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1982) Iliad: Book XXIV. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1983) Collected Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar

Manakidou, F. P. (2012) ‘Philitas, Theocritus, and Thorny Plants: A Reconsideration of Their Relationship’. Prometheus 1: 107–27.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2000) ‘Female Performers on Stage? (PhV 96 [RVP 2/33])’. Text and Presentation 21: 13–25.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2003) ‘Sophocles’ Nauplius and Heron of Alexandria’s Mechanical Theatre’, in Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.), Shards from Kolonos: Studies in Sophoclean Fragments. Bari: 261–79.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2009) ‘Sophocles’ Chryses and the Date of Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. R. (eds.), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp. Leiden: 141–56.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. W. (2014) The Structure and Performance of Euripides’ Helen. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martin, G. (2018) Euripides, Ion. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1974) Scholia in Aratum Vetera. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2005) ‘Pulp Epic: The Catalogue and the Shield’, in Hunter, R. L. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: 153–75.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (1994) Horace: Epistles, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McAvoy, M. (1996) ‘Carnal Knowledge in the Charmides’. Apeiron 29: 63–103.Google Scholar

McCabe, M. M. (2007) ‘Looking Inside Charmides’ Cloak: Seeing Others and Oneself in Plato’s Charmides’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 1–19.Google Scholar

McCarter, S. A. (2015) Horace between Freedom and Slavery: The First Book of Epistles. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

McCoy, M. B. (2008) Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McCoy, M. B. (2009) ‘Alcidamas, Isocrates, and Plato on Speech, Writing, and Philosophical Rhetoric’. AncPhil 29: 45–66.Google Scholar

McPhee, B. D. (2017) ‘Apollo, Dionysus, and the Multivalent Birds of Euripides’ Ion’. CW 110.4: 475–89.Google Scholar

Mette, H. J. (1960) ‘“Schauen” und “Staunen”’. Glotta 39: 49–71.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. (2007) ‘The Act of Reading and the Act of Writing in Hellenistic Epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden: 187–210.Google Scholar

Meyer, S. S. (2015) Plato Laws 1 and 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Milanezi, S. (2004) ‘À l’ombre des acteurs: les amuseurs à l’époque classique’, in Hugoniot, C., Hurlet, F. and Milanezi, S. (eds.), Le statut de l’acteur dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine. Tours: 183–209.Google Scholar

Monoson, S. S. (2012) ‘Dionysius I and Sicilian Theatrical Traditions in Plato’s Republic: Representing Continuities Between Democracy and Tyranny’, in Bosher, K. (ed.), Theater Outside Athens: Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy. Cambridge: 156–72.Google Scholar

Moore, K. (2014) ‘Plato’s Puppets of the Gods: Representing the Magical, the Mystical and the Metaphysical’. Arion 22.2: 37–72.Google Scholar

Moran, R. (1996) ‘Artifice and Persuasion: The Work of Metaphor in the Rhetoric’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: 385–98.Google Scholar

Morgan, K. A. (2012) ‘A Prolegomenon to Performance in the West’, in Bosher, K. (ed.), Theater Outside Athens: Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy. Cambridge: 35–55.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. J. (2011) ‘The Miscellany and Plutarch’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 49–73.Google Scholar

Morris, S. P. (1992) Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art. Princeton.Google Scholar

Moulton, C. (1981) Aristophanic Poetry. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Muir, J. V. (2001) Alcidamas: The Works and Fragments. London.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2001) Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. (1995) ‘Heron of Alexandria’s On Automaton-Making’. HTechn 17: 1–44.Google Scholar

Murphy, T. M. (2004) Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Musso, O. (1976) ‘Sulla struttura del cod. Pal. gr. 398 e deduzioni storico-letterarie’. Prometheus 2: 1–10.Google Scholar

Musso, O. (1977) Michele Psello: Nozioni paradossali. Naples.Google Scholar

Musso, O. (1985) [Antigonus Carystius]: Rerum mirabilium collectio. Naples.Google Scholar

Nails, D. (2002) The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Naas, V. (2004) ‘Opera mirabilia in terris et Romae operum miracula dans l’Histoire naturelle de Pline l’Ancien’, in Bianchi, O and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique. Bern: 253–64.Google Scholar

Naas, V. (2011) ‘Imperialism, Mirabilia and Knowledge: Some Paradoxes in the Naturalis Historia’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (eds.), Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts. Leiden: 57–70.Google Scholar

Neer, R. T. (2010) The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.Google Scholar

Neer, R. T. and Kurke, L. (2019) Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nenci, G. (1957/8) ‘La concezione del miracoloso nei poemi omerici’. AAT XCII: 275–311.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H-G. (2014) ‘Ancient Comedy and Historiography: Aristophanes Meets Herodotus’, in Olson, S. D. (ed.), Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin and Boston: 51–61.Google Scholar

Nichols, A. (2018) ‘Ctesias’ Indica and the Origins of Paradoxography’, in Gerolemou, M. (ed.), Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston: 3–16.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2002) ‘Distant Views: “Realistic” and “Fantastic” Mimesis in Plato’, in Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient. Cambridge, MA: 227–48.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014) Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. J. (1988) ‘Pelopid History and the Plot of Iphigenia in Tauris’. CQ 38: 98–115.Google Scholar

Olsen, S. (2017) ‘The Fantastic Phaeacians: Dance and Disruption in the Odyssey’. ClAnt 36: 1–32.Google Scholar

Olson, S. D. and Sens, A. (1999) Matro of Pitane and the Tradition of Epic Parody in the Fourth Century BCE: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, F. (2006) ‘Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Metaphor’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 21.1: 155–90.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Packman, Z. M. (1991) ‘The Incredible and the Incredulous: The Vocabulary of Disbelief in Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon’. Hermes 119: 399–414.Google Scholar

Padel, R. (1974) ‘Imagery of the Elsewhere: Two Choral Odes of Euripides’. CQ 24: 227–41.Google Scholar

Page, D. L. (1981) Further Greek Epigrams. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pajón Leyra, I. (2011) Entre ciencia y maravilla: el género literario de la paradoxografía griega. Zaragoza.Google Scholar

Pajón Leyra, I. (2014) ‘Little Horror Stories in an Oxyrhynchus Papyrus: A Re-edition and Commentary of P. Oxy. II 218’. APF 60: 304–30.Google Scholar

Pajón Leyra, I. and Sánchez Muñoz, L. (2015) ‘The Magnetic Stone of Posidippus’ Poem Nr. 17: The Earliest Description of Magnetic Polarity in Hellenistic Egypt’. ZPE 195: 30–7.Google Scholar

Parker, H. N. (1996) ‘Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-examined’. AJP 117.4: 585–617.Google Scholar

Parker, L. P. E. (1997) The Songs of Aristophanes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Parker, L. P. E. (2016) Euripides: Iphigenia in Tauris. Oxford.Google Scholar

Passmore, O. (2018) ‘Thaumastic Acoustics: Typhoeus and “Ty-phonics” in Pindar, Pythian 1.26 and Hesiod, Theogony 834’. Mnemosyne 71.5: 733–49.Google Scholar

Pavlou, M. (2012) ‘Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean’. GRBS 52.4: 510–39.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (1997) ‘East Is East and West Is West – Or Are They? National Stereotypes in Herodotus’. Histos 1: 51–66.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R (2000a) ‘Fun with Fragments: Athenaeus and the Historians’, in Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 171–90.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R (2000b) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. London.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. (2016) ‘Herodotus’ Persian Stories: Narrative Shape and Historical Interpretation’. Syllecta Classica 27: 65–92.Google Scholar

Peponi, A.-E. (2009) ‘Χορεία and Aesthetics in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Performance of the Delian Maidens (Lines 156–64)’. ClAnt 28: 39–70.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus, Vol. 1: Fragmenta. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Platnauer, M. (1938) Iphigenia in Tauris. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Platt, P. G. (1997) Reason Diminished: Shakespeare and the Marvelous. Lincoln.Google Scholar

Platt, V. (2011) Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature, and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (1992) ‘Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the Exegesis of Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Princeton: 67–114.Google Scholar

Poulakos, J. and Crick, N. (2012) ‘There is Beauty Here, Too: Aristotle’s Rhetoric for Science’. Ph&Rh 45.3: 295–311.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2010) The Culture of Kitharôidia. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2011) ‘Cyberchorus: Pindar’s Κηληδόνες and the Aura of the Artificial’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.), Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin: 67–113.Google Scholar

Prier, R. A. (1989) Thauma Idesthai: The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek. Tallahassee.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (2014) Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar

Prioux, É. (2009) ‘On the Oddities and Wonders of Italy: When Poets Look Westward’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. (eds.), Nature and Science in Hellenistic Poetry. Leuven: 121–48.Google Scholar

Pulitani, G., Caldana, I., Busato, R., Schiavon, F., Conti, G., Rampazzo, E. and Vidale, M. (2017) ‘Performances of (and on) Greek Potter’s Wheels: An Experimental Project’. Eidola 14: 35–56.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1988) Classical Genres and English Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Radt, S. (1999) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, Vol. 4: Sophocles. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Redfield, J. (1985) ‘Herodotus the Tourist’. CP 90: 97–118.Google Scholar

Reece, A. S. (1998) ‘Drama, Narrative, and Socratic Eros in Plato’s Charmides’. Interpretation 26: 65–76.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. R. (2006) ‘A Study in Violets: Alcibiades in the Symposium’, in Lesher, J. H., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.), Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: 124–46.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, K. (1960) Tradition und Geist: Gesammelte Essays zur Dichtung. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Rice, E. E. (1983) The Grand Procession of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1993) The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 6. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (2010) Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes and Aphrodite. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Robert, L. (1929) ‘Epigraphica VIII: au théâtre de Delphes’. REG 42.198: 427–38.Google Scholar

Roby, C. (2016) Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rocco, A. (1954) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, Italia 24: Napoli, Museo Nazionale 3. Rome.Google Scholar

Rogkotis, Z. (2006) ‘Thucydides and Herodotus: Aspects of Their Intertextual Relationship’, in Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden: 57–86.Google Scholar

Romm, J. S. (1992) The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration, and Fiction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ronca, I. (1992) ‘Semper Aliquid Novi Africam Adferre: Philological Afterthoughts on the Plinian Reception of a Pre-Aristotelian Saying’. Akroterion 37: 146–58.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (1998) Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (1999) ‘Thucydides’ Persian Wars’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden: 141–68.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Foreign Lands’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge: 290–305.Google Scholar

Rothwell, K. S. (2007) Nature, Culture, and the Origins of Greek Comedy: A Study of Animal Choruses. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rouveret, A. (1989) Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (Vᵉ siècle av. J. C.–Iᵉʳ siècle ap. J. C.). Rome.Google Scholar

Rudd, N. (1993) ‘Horace as a Moralist’, in Rudd, N. (ed.), Horace 2000: A Celebration – Essays for the Bimillennium. Ann Arbor: 64–88.Google Scholar

Rudebusch, G. (2002) ‘Dramatic Prefiguration in Plato’s Republic’. Ph&Lit 26: 75–83.Google Scholar

Rusten, J. (2013) ‘The Mirror of Aristophanes: The Winged Ethnographers of Birds (1470–93, 1553–64, 1694–1705)’, in Bakola, E., Prauscello, L. and Telò, M. (eds.), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge: 298–315.Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (1982) ‘Tragic Form and Feeling in the Iliad’. JHS 102: 145–60.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1982) ‘How Terence’s Hecyra Failed’. CQ 32.1: 134–5.Google Scholar

Sansone, D. (1975) ‘The Sacrifice-Motif in Euripides’ IT’. TAPA 105: 283–95.Google Scholar

Sbardella, L. (2000) Filita: testimonianze e frammenti poetici. Rome.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. F. (1994) ‘Echoes of Herodotus in Thucydides: Self-Sufficiency, Admiration, and Law’. Historia 43: 143–76.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, D. (1999) ‘Wisdom and Wonder in Metaphysics Α: 1–2’. The Review of Metaphysics 52.3: 641–56.Google Scholar

Schäfer, A. (1997) Unterhaltung beim griechischen Symposion: Darbietungen, Spiele und Wettkämpfe von homerischer bis in spätklassische Zeit. Mainz.Google Scholar

Schepens, G. and Delcroix, K. (1996) ‘Ancient Paradoxography: Origin, Evolution, Production and Reception’, in Pecere, O. and Stramaglia, A. (eds.), La letteratura di consumo nel mondo greco-latino. Cassino: 373–460.Google Scholar

Schmid, W. and Stählin, O. (1920–4) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. Munich.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2007) ‘Metaspeleology’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 216–31.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2016) ‘Plato’s Marionette’. Rhizomata 4.2: 128–53.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1996) ‘Δόμων ἄγαλμα: Virgin Sacrifice and Aesthetic Object’. TAPA 126: 111–28.Google Scholar

Scullard, H. H. (1974) The Elephant in the Greek and Roman World. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Segvic, H. (2006) ‘Homer in Plato’s Protagoras’. CP 101: 247–62.Google Scholar

Shannon-Henderson, K. E. (2020) ‘Constructing a New Imperial Paradoxography: Phlegon of Tralles and His Sources’, in König, A., Langlands, R. and Uden, J. (eds.), Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge: 159–78.Google Scholar

Shelmerdine, S. C. (1981) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: A Commentary (1–114) with Introduction. PhD thesis, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Shershow, S. C. (1995) Puppets and ‘Popular’ Culture. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Shklovsky, V. (1916) ‘Art as Technique’, translated in Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J. (eds.) (1965) Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln: 3–24.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W (1997) ‘Performing the City in Birds’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 75–94.Google Scholar

Slater, N. W. (2000) ‘Religion and Identity in Pacuvius’s Chryses’, in Manuwald, G. (ed.), Identität und Alterität in der frührömischen Tragödie. Würzburg: 315–23.Google Scholar

Slater, W. J. (2004) ‘Where Are the Actors?’, in Hugoniot, C., Hurlet, F. and Milanezi, S. (eds.), Le statut de l’acteur dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine. Tours: 143–60.Google Scholar

Smith, D. G. (2004) ‘Thucydides’ Ignorant Athenians and the Drama of the Sicilian Expedition’. SyllClass 15: 33–70.Google Scholar

Smith, M. (2004) ‘Elusive Stones: Reading Posidippus’ λιθικά through Technical Writing on Stones’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309). Cambridge, MA: 105–17.Google Scholar

Smith, S. D. (2014) Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, A. H. and Pryce, F. N. (eds.) (1926) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Great Britain. British Museum 2. London.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1953) The Discovery of Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sommerstein, A. (1987) Aristophanes: Birds. Warminster.Google Scholar

Sommerstein, A. H. (1994) Aristophanes: Thesmophoriazusae. Warminster.Google Scholar

Spanoudakis, K. (2002) Philitas of Cos. Leiden.Google Scholar

Spivey, N. J. (1997) ‘Bionic Statues’, in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: 442–59.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2013) ‘Ekphrasis at the Forge and the Forging of Ekphrasis: The “Shield of Achilles” in Graeco-Roman Word and Image’. Word and Image 29: 157–91.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. T. (1994) The Tyrant’s Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. T. (2001) Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar

Steiner, D. T. (2011) ‘Dancing with the Stars: Choreia in the Third Stasimon of Euripides’ Helen’.CP 106.4: 299–323.Google Scholar

Stephanis, I. E. (1988) Dionysiakoi Technitai: Symboles stên prosôpographia tou theatrou kai tês mousikês tôn archaiôn Hellênôn. Heraklion.Google Scholar

Stern, J. (2008) ‘Paradoxographus Vaticanus’, in Heilen, S. (ed.), In Pursuit of Wissenschaft: Festschrift für William M. Calder III zum 75. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: 437–66.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. (1990) Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar

Stramaglia, A. (2006) ‘The Textual Transmission of Ancient Fantastic Fiction: Some Case Studies’, in Hömke, N. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Fremde Wirklichkeiten: literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur. Heidelburg: 289–310.Google Scholar

Sutton, D. F. (1984) The Lost Sophocles. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Swift, L. A. (2009) ‘The Symbolism of Space in Euripidean Choral Fantasy (Hipp. 732–75, Med. 824–65, Bacch. 370–433)’. CQ 59: 364–82.Google Scholar

Swiggers, P. (1984) ‘Cognitive Aspects of Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor’. Glotta 62: 40–5.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. C. (2010) Thucydides, Pericles, and the Idea of Athens in the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thalmann, W. G. (1993) ‘Euripides and Aeschylus: The Case of the Hekabe’. ClAnt 12: 126–59.Google Scholar

Thein, K. (2014) ‘Aristotle on Why Study Lower Animals: (De partibus animalium, I,5, 644b22–645a36)’. Eirene 50: 208–29.Google Scholar

Thomas, O. R. H. (2015) ‘Sophocles, Seduction and Shrivelling: Ichneutai Fr. 316 Radt 65.1’. CQ 65.1: 364–5.Google Scholar

Thomas, O. R. H. (2020) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tipton, J. A. (2014) Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Todorov, T. (1970) Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris.Google Scholar

Torrance, I. (2011) ‘In the Footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, Allusion, and Metapoetics in Euripides. AJP 132: 177–204.Google Scholar

Torrance, I. (2013) Metapoetry in Euripides. Oxford.Google Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1952) ‘Paestan Pottery: A Revision and a Supplement’. PBSR 10: 1–53.Google Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1967a) The Red-Figured Vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily, Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1967b) The Red-Figured Vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily, Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1967c) Phlyax Vases. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Trendall, A. D. (1987) The Red-Figured Vases of Paestum. London.Google Scholar

Trivigno, F. V. (2011) ‘Philosophy and the Ordinary: On the Setting of Plato’s Lysis’. GRBS 51.1: 61–85.Google Scholar

Tschemplik, A. (1993) ‘Framing the Question of Knowledge: Beginning Plato’s Theaetetus’, in Press, G. A. (ed), Plato’s Dialogues: New Studies and Interpretations. Lanham: 169–78.Google Scholar

Turkeltaub, D. (2003) The Gods’ Radiance Manifest: An Examination of the Narrative Pattern Underlying the Homeric Divine Epiphany Scenes. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Tybjerg, K. (2003) ‘Wonder-Making and Philosophical Wonder in Hero of Alexandria’. SHPS 34.3: 443–66.Google Scholar

Vanotti, G. (2007) Aristotele: Racconti meravigliosi. Milan.Google Scholar

Vardi, A. (2004) ‘Genre, Conventions, and Cultural Programme in Gellius’ Noctes Atticae’, in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford 159–86.Google Scholar

Vergados, A. (2007) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Hermes 51 and Antigonus of Carystus’. CQ 57.2: 737–42.Google Scholar

Vergados, A. (2011) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: Humour and Epiphany’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 82–104.Google Scholar

Vergados, A. (2013) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar

Vernant, J. P. (1983) Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London.Google Scholar

Vickers, M. J. (1999) Ancient Greek Pottery. Oxford.Google Scholar

Voutiras, E. (2000) ‘La cadavre et le serpent, ou l’héroïsation manquée de Cléomène de Sparte’, in Pirenne-Delforge, V. and Suárez de la Torre, E. (eds.), Héros et héroïnes dans les mythes et les cultes grecs. Liège: 377–94.Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. (1936) Remains of Old Latin II: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2014) The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Welser, C. S. (2009) ‘Two Didactic Strategies at the End of Herodotus’ Histories (9.108–122)’. ClAnt 28: 359–85.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (2000) ‘Paradoxographoi’, in Der Neue Pauly 9. Stuttgart: 309–12.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (2003) Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Westermann, A. (1839) Paradoxographoi: Scriptores rerum mirabilium Graeci. Braunschweig.Google Scholar

White, S. A. (1992) ‘Aristotle’s Favorite Tragedies’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton: 221–40.Google Scholar

Whitman, C. H. (1974) Euripides and the Full Circle of Myth. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1881) Antigonos von Karystos. Berlin.Google Scholar

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1883) ‘Die beiden Elektren’. Hermes 18: 214–63.Google Scholar

Wilberding, J. (2004) ‘Prisoners and Puppeteers in the Cave’. OSAPh 27: 117–39.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. (2000) ‘Dialogue and Comedy: The Structure of the Deipnosophistae’, in Braund, D. C. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 23–37.Google Scholar

Wilson, P. J. (2003) ‘The Sound of Conflict: Kritias and the Culture of μουσική in Athens’, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration. Cambridge: 181–206.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1969) ‘Euripides: Poiêtês Sophos’. Arethusa 2: 127–42.Google Scholar

Wohl, V. (2004) ‘Dirty Dancing: Xenophon’s Symposium’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. J. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 337–63.Google Scholar

Wolff, C. (1992) ‘Euripides’ Iphigenia among the Taurians: Aetiology, Ritual, and Myth’. ClAnt 11: 308–34.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. (2011) Tales of the Barbarians: Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West. Chichester.Google Scholar

Woolf, G. (2013) ‘Introduction: Approaching the Ancient Library’, in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 1–20.Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2005) Euripides’ Escape-Tragedies: A Study of Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia Among the Taurians. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2006) ‘Cyclops and the Euripidean Tetralogy’. PCPhS 52: 23–48.Google Scholar

Young, D. C. (1968) Three Odes of Pindar: A Literary Study of Pythian 11, Pythian 3 and Olympian 7. Leiden.Google Scholar

Zacharia, K. (2003) Converging Truths: Euripides’ Ion and the Athenian Quest for Self-Definition. Leiden.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. (2004) Modes of Viewing in Hellenistic Poetry and Art. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1989) ‘Mysteries of Identity and Designs of the Self in Euripides’. Ion’. PCPhS 35: 144–97.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1990) ‘Thebes: Theater of Self and Society in Athenian Drama’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton: 130–67.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (2011) ‘Sacrifices Holy and Unholy in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Prescendi, F. and Volokhine, Y. (eds.), Dans le laboratoire de l’historien de religions: mélanges offerts à Philippe Borgeaud. Geneva: 459–66.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (2012) ‘A Study in Form: Three Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays’. Lexis 30: 361–78.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1981) Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity. New York.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. (1949) ‘Paradoxographoi’. RE 18.3: 1137–66.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive