No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BETWEEN SUMNER AND GALTON: A FURTHER LOOK AT ALBERT GALLOWAY KELLER’S SOCIOLOGY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2024
Abstract
Largely forgotten today, Albert Galloway Keller was one of the foremost sociologists of his time. A brilliant scholar and a staunch disciple of William Graham Sumner, Keller spent his entire academic career at Yale, first as a student and then as professor of the Science of Society, the chair formerly held by his mentor. The main coordinates of Keller’s sociology are to be found in his major work, Societal Evolution (1915), where he sought to apply Charles Darwin’s mechanism of variation, selection, and transmission to Sumner’s general scheme. Although Keller gave priority to social variables, his evolutionary sociology retained many elements of the typically Progressive Era preoccupations with heredity and the biological quality of individuals. The aim of this paper is to examine in some detail Keller’s views on eugenics and related issues, and to assess whether and to what extent these biologically deterministic elements played a role in his Darwinian approach to institutional change.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of History of Economics Society
Footnotes
We wish to thank two unknown referees for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
References
REFERENCES
Bannister, Robert C. 1979. Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C.. 1987. Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. Elmer. 1948. An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, William F. 2010. “William Graham Sumner and the Problem of Liberal Democracy.” Review of Politics 72 (4): 571–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1965. “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-cultural Evolution.” In Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W., eds., Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, Harry. 1891. Differences in the Nervous Organization of Man and Woman: Psychological and Pathological. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Chassagnon, Virgile, and Vallet, Guillaume. 2019. “Albion W. Small’s Neglected Progressive Views: Reducing Inequalities for a Reasonable Capitalism.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 41 (1): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Adam S. 2016. “Harvard’s Eugenics Era. When Academics Embraced Scientific Racism, Immigration Restrictions, and the Suppression of ‘the Unfit.’” Harvard Magazine (March/April). https://harvardmagazine.com/2016/03/harvards-eugenics-era. Accessed February 22, 2024.Google Scholar
Comfort, Nathaniel. 2012. The Science of Human Perfection: How Genes Became the Heart of American Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cot, Annie L. 2005. “‘Breed out the Unfit and Breed in the Fit’: Irving Fisher, Economics, and the Science of Heredity.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64 (3): 793–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1971. “The Abandonment of Evolutionary Social Theory in America: The Impact of Academic Professionalization upon American Sociological Theory, 1890–1920.” American Studies 12 (2): 5–20.Google Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1988. The Triumph of Evolution: The Heredity-Environment Controversy, 1900–1941. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, Paul. 1994. Darwinism, War, and History: The Debate over the Biology of War from the “Origin of Species” to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles R. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Two volumes. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Durham, William H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, Richard T. 1898. “Fraternalism vs. Paternalism in Government.” Century 55 (5): 780–784.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock. 1894. Man and Woman: A Study of Human Secondary Sexual Characters. London: Scott.Google Scholar
Fairchild, Henry P. 1950. Versus: Reflections of a Sociologist. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Farnam, Henry W. 1908. “Some Fundamental Distinctions in Labor Legislation.” American Economic Association Quarterly 10 (1): 105–118.Google Scholar
Fiorito, Luca, and Vatiero, Massimiliano. 2023. “Does Brick Size Matter? Albert G. Keller on Another QWERTY Story.” Economic Letters 223 (February): article 110974. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176522004487?via%3Dihub. Accessed February 22, 2024.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1909. Report on National Vitality: Its Wastes and Conservation. Prepared for the National Conservation Commission. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1921. “Impending Problems of Eugenics.” Scientific Monthly 13 (3): 214–231.Google Scholar
Gregory, Herbert E., Keller, Albert G., and Bishop, Avard L.. 1910. Physical and Commercial Geography: A Study of Certain Controlling Conditions of Commerce. Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Mike. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Dennis. 1991. “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America.” Population and Development Review 17 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure, and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1944. Social Darwinism in American Thought. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G. 1899. “Danish Statistics.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 6 (48): 384–385.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1900a. “Danish Labor Statistics.” Publications of the American Statistical Association 7 (49/50): 62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1900b. “Italy’s Experience with Colonies.” Publications of the American Economic Association, Third Series 1 (3): 105–111.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1903b. “A Sociological View of the Native Question.” Yale Review XII (November): 259–275.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1904. “The Theory of Descent and Social Sciences.” Yale Review XII (February): 429–432.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1908a. Colonization: A Study of the Founding of New Societies. Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1908b. “Eugenics, the Science of Rearing Human Thoroughbreds.” Yale Review XVII (August): 127–155.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1910. “The Limits of Eugenics.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Medicine XI (December): 671–685.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1913. “The Writings of William G. Sumner.” Science, New Series 37 (952): 487–488.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1914. “Eugenics and Its Social Limitations.” In Eugenics: Twelve University Lectures. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, pp. 239–271.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1915. Societal Evolution: A Study of the Evolutionary Basis of the Science of Society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1919. “Law in Evolution.” Yale Law Journal 28 (8): 769–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1922. “Societal Evolution.” In Baitsell, George A., ed., The Evolution of Man; A Series of Lectures Delivered Under the Auspices of the Yale Chapter of the Sigma Xi During the Academic Year 1921–1922. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 126–151.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1925. Race Distinction. New Haven: Department of Anthropology, Yale University.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert. G.. 1931. Societal Evolution: A Study of the Evolutionary Basis of the Science of Society. Revised edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keller, Albert G., and Bishop, Avard L.. 1912. Commercial and Industrial Geography. Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
Lavery, Colm. 2022. “The Power of Racial Mapping: Ellsworth Huntington, Immigration, and Eugenics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 21 (4): 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2005. “Mistaking Eugenics for Social Darwinism: Why Eugenics Is Missing from the History of American Economics.” History of Political Economy 37 (Suppl.): 200–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C.. 2009. “Origins of the Myth of Social Darwinism: The Ambiguous Legacy of Richard Hofstadter’s Social Darwinism in American Thought.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71 (1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C.. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Geoffrey J. 1973. Ellsworth Huntington: His Life and Thought. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Murdock, George P. 1937. “Preface.” In Murdoch, George P., ed., Studies in the Science of Society; Presented to Albert Galloway Keller in Celebration of His Completion of Thirty Years as Professor of the Science of Society in Yale University. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1908b. “A Perfect Race of Men: According to Prof. Keller the Success of Eugenics Depends on Rules Made by Custom.” New York Times, September 27.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard W. 1951. American Sociology. The Study of Sociology in the United States through 1950. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F. 1922. Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Parmelee, Maurice. 1913. Science of Human Behavior: Biological and Psychological Foundations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Patten, Simon N. 1885. The Premises of Political Economy. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Popenoe, Paul. 1915. “Annual Meeting of the American Genetic Association.” Science, New Series 42 (1081): 391–396.Google ScholarPubMed
Rocca, Michel, and & Vallet, Guillaume. 2022. “The Rise and Fall of Two Outstanding Progressives of American Social Sciences (1880s–1930s): A Critical Focus on R. T. Ely and A. W. Small.” Review of Political Economy 36 (1): 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, Stephen K. 2007. Evolutionism and Its Critics: Deconstructing and Reconstructing an Evolutionary Interpretation of Human Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Stephen K.. 2018. “Edward Westermarck: The First Sociobiologist.” In Hopcroft, Rosemary L., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Evolution, Biology, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Schallmayer, Wilhelm. 1903. Vererbung und Auslese im Lebenslauf der Völker. Eine Staatswissenschaftliche Studie auf Grund der Neueren Biologie. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Small, Albion W. 1916. “Fifty Years of Sociology in the United States (1865–1915).” American Journal of Sociology 21 (6): 721–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman E. 1979a. “William Graham Sumner as an Anti-Social Darwinist.” Pacific Sociological Review 22 (3): 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman E.. 1979b. “Summer versus Keller and the Social Evolutionism of Early American Sociology.” Sociological Inquiry 49 (1): 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, William Graham. [1899] 1965. “Earth Hunger or The Philosophy of Land Grabbing.” In Keller, Albert G., ed., Earth-hunger, and Other Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar
Sumner, William Graham. 1906. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Sumner, William G., and Keller, Albert G.. 1927. The Science of Society. Four volumes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Talbert, Ernest L. 1915. “Review of Societal Evolution by Albert G. Keller.” Journal of Political Economy 23 (10): 1012–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eugenics Watch. 2005. The American Eugenics Society: Members, Officers and Directors Activities Database. Eugenics Watch (November 8). https://ia801305.us.archive.org/25/items/AMERICANEUGENICSSOCIETYMEMBERS/AMERICAN%20EUGENICS%20SOCIETY%20MEMBERS.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2024.Google Scholar
Todd, Arthur J. 1914. “Sterilization and Criminal Heredity.” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 5 (1): 5.Google Scholar
Turner, Johnathan H., Maryanski, Alexandra M., and Giesen, Bernhard. 1997. “Biology and Sociology.” In Weingart, Peter, Mitchell, Sandra D., Richerson, Petr J., and Maasen, Sabine, eds., Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester F. 1906. Applied Sociology. A Treatise on the Conscious Improvement of Society by Society. New York: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar