Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:56:55.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iceberg Response to Sea State (Abstract only)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Olav Orheim
Affiliation:
Norsk Polarinstitutt, Postboks 158, 1330 Oslo Lufthavn, Norway
Peter Wadhams
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1ER, England
Monica Kristensen
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1ER, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from instruments placed on tabular Antarctic icebergs show that they flex, heave, and roll in response to ocean waves. One iceberg was monitored for 13 months in the Weddell Sea by an automatic data collection platform deployed by the Norwegian Antarctic Research Expedition 1978-79. The temperature sensors demonstrated burial by snow-fall during autumn and winter, but melting during the following summer led to a net annual surface mass balance of -0.1 m water equivalent and to snow and firn temperatures being raised to the melting point. Strain and tilt instruments showed flexure and tilt with main frequencies around 15 to 20 s, but short sampling periods made it difficult to conduct comprehensive statistical analysis of the data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1982

The encouraging results from automatic stations led to direct experiments in January 1981 by a party comprising the three authors, working from HMS Endurance. In situ studies of three icebergs included measurements of surface strain in three directions, tilt in two directions, vertical heave and rotation, and concurrent measurements of the sea state by Waverider buoy (Reference Kristensen, Orheim and WadhamsKristensen and others 1981). All icebergs were bending at the surface, and heaved and rolled in response to the long component of the incident waves (10 to 15 s and longer). Typical values were: 5 × 10−8 strain, 0.1 m heave, and ±1 × 10−4 rad tilt. Resonant responses with larger amplitudes and at longer periods were observed both in heave and tilt. The iceberg acts essentially as a low-pass filter on the sea state, but with different response periods to different types of motion.

Measurements of iceberg heading by the automatic stations and by in situ measurements show that the icebergs readily rotate in the horizontal plane, and that the magnitude and direction of rotation is sensitive to changes in wind conditions.

Fig.1. Data obtained from iceberg 2 (dimensions 1100 × 500 m, samples 11 January 1981 at 58°55'S, 26°06'W) and iceberg 3 (1300 × 1200 x 900 m triangle, 14 January 1981, 60°01'S, 43°15'W). (a) Concurrent heave and strain records (berg 2), showing an outbreak of resonant bobbing at 40 s period. Sawtooth on strain record is thermal drift and rezeroing. (b) Tilt records (berg 3); upper record is parallel with long axis, lower record is at right angles (not concurrent). (c) Power spectra of strain and tilt (berg 2) compared with the spectra of ambient wave energy, showing responses at 15 and 40s period.

References

Kristensen, M, Orheim, O, Wadhams, P 1981 Field experiments on Antarctic tabular icebergs. Polar Record 20(128): 445-448 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig.1. Data obtained from iceberg 2 (dimensions 1100 × 500 m, samples 11 January 1981 at 58°55'S, 26°06'W) and iceberg 3 (1300 × 1200 x 900 m triangle, 14 January 1981, 60°01'S, 43°15'W). (a) Concurrent heave and strain records (berg 2), showing an outbreak of resonant bobbing at 40 s period. Sawtooth on strain record is thermal drift and rezeroing. (b) Tilt records (berg 3); upper record is parallel with long axis, lower record is at right angles (not concurrent). (c) Power spectra of strain and tilt (berg 2) compared with the spectra of ambient wave energy, showing responses at 15 and 40s period.