Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:47:12.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elevated secondary infection rates in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Part of: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Joseph E. Marcus Open the ORCID record for Joseph E. Marcus [Opens in a new window] ,
Valerie G. Sams  and
Alice E. Barsoumian
Joseph E. Marcus*
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Service, Department of Internal Medicine, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas
Valerie G. Sams
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, San AntonioTexas
Alice E. Barsoumian
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Service, Department of Internal Medicine, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas
*
Author for correspondence: Joseph E Marcus, E-mail: joseph.e.marcus3.mil@mail.mil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Research Brief
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , June 2021 , pp. 770 - 772
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a tremendous impact in healthcare, including a surge of hospitalizations. To prevent in-hospital outbreaks, contact and airborne precautions have been implemented for patients with COVID-19 with demonstrated success in preventing severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Reference Lepak, Shirley, Buys, Stevens and Safdar1 Data on the rates of secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are limited. Reference Zhou, Liu, Chen, Xiao, Huang and Fan2 Although early studies showed low rates of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19, Reference Nori, Cowman and Chen3 more recent studies in both larger and sicker populations have shown elevated rates of secondary infection. Reference Giacobbe, Battaglini and Ball4–Reference Ripa, Galli and Poli6

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for pulmonary bypass in patients with reversible respiratory failure, and it poses a significant risk of secondary infections. Reference Bizzarro, Conrad, Kaufman and Rycus7 ECMO is currently only recommended for COVID-19 patients with few comorbidities and without severe multisystem organ failure. Reference Shekar, Badulak and Peek8 Although it has been utilized worldwide for patients with COVID-19, no data on secondary infections in these patients are available. Reference Barbaro, MacLaren and Boonstra9 In this study, we retrospectively compared secondary infection rates on ECMO for patients with COVID-19 to patients with influenza. Although both viruses can cause devastating pulmonary disease, unlike influenza, patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are treated with immunosuppression. Additionally, COVID-19 has been associated with high patient volumes, which strained healthcare systems. As such, we hypothesized that there would be more secondary infections with COVID-19, despite the increased use of PPE and emphasis on infection prevention.

Methods

All patients who completed a course of ECMO at Brooke Army Medical Center between January 1, 2013, and October 10, 2020, with confirmed influenza or severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included in this retrospective analysis. Positive cultures during ECMO course or within 48 hours of decannulation that were determined to be pathogenic by the patient’s treatment team were labeled as bloodstream, respiratory, or urinary infections based on the site of culture. Culture organisms that were considered colonizers or contaminants by the treatment team were excluded. Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) were defined as resistance to 3 or more classes of antibiotics.

We compared patients with influenza and COVID-19 by demographics, duration of hospitalization prior to ECMO cannulation, length of stay, mortality, number of infections, infection rates per 1,000 ECMO patient days, and MDRO rate. Nominal variables and rates were compared using the χ2or Fisher exact test as appropriate, whereas continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. A P value of .05 was considered significant.

Results

Of the 210 patients who received ECMO during the study period, 39 patients (19%) were diagnosed with either COVID-19 or influenza. All patients received the venovenous modality of ECMO. Overall, 4 patients (10%) who completed their ECMO course were still inpatients and 35 patients (90%) had completed their hospital course as of October 10, 2020, with a survival rate to hospital discharge of 72%.

We detected minimal differences in the demographics of patients who underwent ECMO with influenza versus COVID-19 (Table 1). All patients with COVID-19 were treated with immunosuppression during their hospital course. Patients with COVID-19 were hospitalized longer prior to ECMO cannulation than patients with influenza (median 12 [IQR, 8–14] days vs 5 [IQR, 3–8]; P = .001).

Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) With Influenza or COVID-19

Note. IQR, interquartile range; BSI, bloodstream infection; RI, respiratory infection, UTI, urinary tract infection.

a Presented as no. (%) or median (IQR).

b χ2, Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

c Excludes 4 patients with COVID-19 who were still inpatients as of October 10, 2020.

For the primary outcome, patients with COVID-19 had greater rates of secondary infection while on ECMO (37.3 per 1,000 patient days vs 17.7; P = .04). Infections occurred earlier after cannulation in patients with COVID-19 (median day 5 [IQR, 3–8] vs 16 [IQR, 10–21]; P = .03). However, there was no difference in day of infection after hospital admission (19 [IQR, 14–26] vs 21 [IQR, 16–25]; P = .92). MDROs were isolated at similar frequencies in the 2 groups (17% vs 36%; P = .60).

Discussion

In this study, we compared patients with respiratory viruses requiring ECMO, and we detected an elevated secondary infection rate for patients with COVID-19. The reasons for this difference are likely multifactorial and include strain on the healthcare system, the use of immunosuppressants, and possible COVID-19 disease-specific characteristics. Overall, the rate of infections of 37.1 per 1,000 patient days in patients with COVID-19 is higher than the national average for all adults who receive ECMO of 30.6. Reference Bizzarro, Conrad, Kaufman and Rycus7

Infections tended to occur earlier in the ECMO course for patients with COVID-19 than for patients with influenza. Despite similar time on ECMO circuit between the 2 groups, no patient with COVID-19 had an infection after ECMO day 17, whereas 5 infections occurred after that day in patients with influenza. Additionally, patients with COVID-19 had longer hospital courses pre-ECMO, which may contribute to the timing of infection onset. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk factors contributing to secondary infection.

This study has several limitations. It was a retrospective, single-center study with a small number of patients, and it may be underpowered to detect differences in specific types of infections and MDROs. Secondly, COVID-19 and influenza have different pathophysiology and comparisons may be premature. We were not able to differentiate whether secondary infections are caused by a failure of infection prevention practices, overall strain on the healthcare system, or due to differences in the underlying disease process. Finally, we have no data on adherence to PPE and hand hygiene.

In this study, we compared critically ill patients that presented with similar demographics to an established ECMO center with adequate resources throughout the pandemic. Our results show that the risk of secondary infections is significant for this population. Infection control strategies should continue to be implemented that protect healthcare workers, with emphasis on adherence to infection prevention and control bundles. However, secondary infections for COVID-19 patients on ECMO may persist due to unrecognized factors. Larger, multicenter trials with COVID-19 patients are needed to determine the best practices for caring for these patients to reduce secondary infections.

Acknowledgments

The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the US Air Force Medical Department, the US Air Force Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force and Department of Defense, or the US government.

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Lepak, AJ, Shirley, DK, Buys, A, Stevens, L, Safdar, N. Implementation of infection control measures to prevent healthcare-associated transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, P, Liu, Z, Chen, Y, Xiao, Y, Huang, X, Fan, XG. Bacterial and fungal infections in COVID-19 patients: a matter of concern. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1124–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nori, P, Cowman, K, Chen, V, et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the New York City pandemic surge. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;42:84–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giacobbe, DR, Battaglini, D, Ball, L, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Investig 2020;50:e13319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cates, J, Lucero-Obusan, C, Dahl, RM, et al. Risk for in-hospital complications associated with COVID-19 and influenza—Veterans’ Health Administration, United States, October 1, 2018–May 31, 2020. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripa, M, Galli, L, Poli, A, et al. Secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: incidence and predictive factors. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;69;1528–1534.Google Scholar
Bizzarro, MJ, Conrad, SA, Kaufman, DA, Rycus, P. Infections acquired during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates, children, and adults. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shekar, K, Badulak, J, Peek, G, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization coronavirus disease 2019 interim guidelines: a consensus document from an international group of interdisciplinary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation providers. Am Soc Artif Intern Organs J 2020;66:707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, RP, MacLaren, G, Boonstra, PS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet 2020;396:1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) With Influenza or COVID-19