Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:19:09.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-establishment of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus in Cyprus: priorities for conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

Haris Nicolaou
Affiliation:
Department of Forests, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Nicosia, Cyprus
Panagiotis Dendrinos
Affiliation:
MOm/Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Monk Seal, Athens, Greece
Melina Marcou
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Marine Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Nicosia, Cyprus
Savvas Michaelides
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Marine Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Nicosia, Cyprus
Alexandros A. Karamanlidis*
Affiliation:
MOm/Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Monk Seal, Athens, Greece
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail akaramanlidis@gmail.com

Abstract

Once widespread throughout the Black and Mediterranean Seas and the coasts of north Africa, the Endangered Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus has disappeared throughout most of its original range. In Cyprus evidence suggests that the species became effectively extinct at the end of the 20th century. Following an increase of seal sightings around the island, a monitoring programme was established in 2009 to evaluate the status of the species. During 2009–2018, using field surveys, photographs from camera traps and an information network, we recorded an increasing number of seal sightings, and the birth of several pups, indicating the permanent presence of the species on the island. This is the first recorded re-establishment of a Mediterranean monk seal population in an area of its former range following near eradication.

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

Worldwide biodiversity is in decline and conservation success stories are comparatively rare (Butchart et al., Reference Butchart, Walpole, Collen, Van Strien, Scharlemann and Almond2010). However, although conservation successes do occur (e.g. Halley & Rosell, Reference Halley and Rosell2002; Balmford, Reference Balmford2017; Knowlton, Reference Knowlton2019), highlighting the importance of conservation action, continued monitoring is required. Whilst species may return to areas where they were previously extirpated, many populations remain below historical abundance levels and do not reach the numbers necessary to secure long-term survival (Deinet et al., Reference Deinet, Ieronymidou, McRae, Burfield, Foppen, Collen and Böhm2013). In such cases continued conservation actions are necessary to facilitate population recovery.

The Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus is categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, with < 700 individuals remaining (Karamanlidis & Dendrinos, Reference Karamanlidis and Dendrinos2015). The species is, however, showing some signs of recovery. The population has increased in its principal range and extralimital sightings have been recorded throughout the eastern Mediterranean (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Dendrinos, Fernández de Larrinoa, Gücü, Johnson, Kiraç and Pires2016a). This increase in abundance resulted in a recategorization from Critically Endangered to Endangered in 2015 (Karamanlidis & Dendrinos, Reference Karamanlidis and Dendrinos2015).

Monk seals were first mentioned as part of the native fauna of Cyprus in 1959 (Davidson, Reference Davidson1959), and the species appears to have steadily declined since then (Hadjichristophorou & Demetropoulos, Reference Hadjichristophorou and Demetropoulos1994); the last previously reported reproductive activity was recorded during 1955–1958. However, during 1972–2006, 46 sightings of subadult and adult seals were recorded. Field surveys in 1997 and in 2005–2006 verified the existence of suitable habitat for the species and recorded its occasional presence, but failed to document any reproductive activity (Dendrinos & Demetropoulos, Reference Dendrinos and Demetropoulos2000; Demetropoulos et al., Reference Demetropoulos, Hadjichristophorou, Demetropoulos and Cebrian2006; Demetropoulos, Reference Demetropoulos2011), leading to the conclusion that only a small number of seals survived (Demetropoulos, Reference Demetropoulos2011) or that the species was effectively extinct in Cyprus (Aguilar & Lowry, Reference Aguilar and Lowry2008). Following the report of a dead pup in 2009 (Demetropoulos, Reference Demetropoulos2011) a study was initiated to evaluate the status of the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus and to identify priority conservation actions.

During 2009–2018 we evaluated the status of the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus (i.e. the coastline under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus) following the monitoring framework used for the monk seal in Greece (MOm, 2007). This comprised (1) the establishment of a national information network to collect information on monk seal sightings reported by the general public (Adamantopoulou et al., Reference Adamantopoulou, Androukaki and Kotomatas1999), (2) a coastline survey that evaluated potentially suitable seal habitat based on pre-defined criteria (Dendrinos et al., Reference Dendrinos, Karamanlidis, Kotomatas, Legakis and Tounta2007), and (3) surveys that recorded terrestrial habitat use, identified individuals and recorded annual pup production through visual observations and the use of camera traps. Photo-identification used standard techniques (Forcada & Aguilar, Reference Forcada and Aguilar2000) and morphological criteria for monk seals (Samaranch & González, Reference Samaranch and González2000).

The information network recorded 361 monk seal sightings (Fig. 1), most of which were in three areas in the north-west and south: Pafos–Akamas (166 sightings), Limassol (118 sightings), and Kavo Greko–Kavo Pyla (68 sightings; Fig. 2a). The majority of sightings (95%) were of juvenile and adult individuals, but 18 sightings of new-born pups were also reported. Some of these sightings may refer to the same individuals. No negative human–seal interactions were recorded.

Fig. 1 Number of sightings of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus on and around Cyprus during 2009–2018.

Fig. 2 Cyprus, showing (a) the three areas of the Republic of Cyprus where most of the monk seal sightings were made (Pafos–Akamas, 166 sightings; Limassol, 118 sightings; Kavo Greko–Kavo Pyla, 68 sightings), and (b) the locations of the 17 shelters identified as suitable for resting and pupping or resting only.

In the survey of 370 km of coastline, 17 suitable monk seal shelters were identified (Fig. 2b), seven of which were suitable for pupping and 10 suitable only for resting. We visited the shelters a total of 185 times. On 78 occasions, we confirmed seal presence through direct observations or indirect evidence (e.g. scats, tracks). Twenty-three camera traps, installed at 13 of the shelters, covered a total of 4,120 trap days and recorded 342,000 images. A combination of visual observations, digital images and sightings reported by the general public led to the identification of 14 individual seals, including five new-born pups (one born in 2011, two in 2015 and one each in 2017 and 2018).

There is a long history of exploitation of, and negative interactions with, the Mediterranean monk seal, leading to the gradual disappearance of the species from most of its former range (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Dendrinos, Fernández de Larrinoa, Gücü, Johnson, Kiraç and Pires2016a). Our findings, together with observations from northern Cyprus (Gücü et al., Reference Gücü, Ok and Sakinan2009), indicate that until 2009 the species was on the brink of extinction on the island (Aguilar & Lowry, Reference Aguilar and Lowry2008). Since the verified birth of a monk seal in Cyprus in 2009, sightings of the species have increased. Since 2015 births have been recorded almost annually, and pupping was recorded in 2018 in northern Cyprus (Taksent Nature Park, 2019). The presence of suitable habitat on the island (including in the north; Gücü et al., Reference Gücü, Ok and Sakinan2009), the increasing number of sightings and the recent pupping events indicate there is now a resident, reproducing Mediterranean monk seal population in the country. This is the first documented re-establishment of a Mediterranean monk seal population following its near eradication. We are unable to determine whether this recovery is attributable to the few animals that potentially survived on the island or is the result of immigration from populations in the Cilician Basin (Gücü et al., Reference Gücü, Gücü and Orek2004) or Greece. In support of the latter, a pup born in 2015 shared the same haplotype as the monk seal population of the Cyclades Islands of Greece (MOm & DFMR, unpubl. data), the source of other extralimital sightings (Karamanlidis et al., Reference Karamanlidis, Gaughran, Aguilar, Dendrinos, Huber and Pires2016b).

Based on the current status of the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus we identify the following priority conservation actions for the species: (1) All habitat suitable for the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus (i.e. terrestrial and marine) should be effectively protected from tourism and development. (2) Human activity around pupping sites should be restricted by creation of 200 m protection zones. (3) A permanent monitoring plan should be established for the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus, including further development of the national information network, in combination with a rescue and rehabilitation plan for sick or injured seals and the involvement of the relevant public authorities and appropriate stakeholders. (4) An awareness campaign focusing on the general public and on fishers should be developed, to help raise awareness of the status of, and threats to, the monk seal.

These actions are consistent with the National Action Plan for the conservation of the species (Demetropoulos, Reference Demetropoulos2011). However, given the new information now available, the National Action Plan requires updating, to safeguard the future of the Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus.

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Hadjichristoforou and A. Demetropoulos for their assistance in establishing this project, and two anonymous reviewers for their critiques. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, or commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

Study design: all authors; fieldwork: HN, MM, SM; data analysis: HN, MM, SM, AAK; writing: all authors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.

References

Adamantopoulou, S., Androukaki, E. & Kotomatas, S. (1999) The distribution of the Mediterranean monk seal in Greece based on an information network. Contributions to the Zoogeography and Ecology of the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 1, 399404.Google Scholar
Aguilar, A. & Lowry, L. (2008) Monachus monachus. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T13653A4304960. iucnredlist.org/species/13653/43702988 [accessed 27 February 2019].Google Scholar
Balmford, A. (2017) On positive shifting baselines and the importance of optimism. Oryx, 51, 191192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A. et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 11641168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, D.F. (1959) Seals. Bulletin of the Cyprus Ornithological Society, 7, 10.Google Scholar
Deinet, S., Ieronymidou, C., McRae, L., Burfield, I.J., Foppen, R.P., Collen, B. & Böhm, M. (2013) Wildlife Comeback in Europe: The Recovery of Selected Mammal and Bird Species. Zoological Society of London, London, UK.Google Scholar
Demetropoulos, A. (2011) National Action Plan for the Conservation of the Mediterranean Monk Seal in Cyprus. Unpublished report. United Nations Environment Programme/Mediterranean Action Plan, and Department of Fisheries and Marine Research, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Demetropoulos, A., Hadjichristophorou, M., Demetropoulos, S. & Cebrian, D. (2006) Monk Seal Survey of the Cyprus Coasts 2005–2006. Cyprus Wildlife Society, Department of Fisheries and Marine Research, Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Dendrinos, P. & Demetropoulos, A. (2000) The Mediterranean monk seal in Cyprus. The Monachus Guardian, 3, 7577.Google Scholar
Dendrinos, P., Karamanlidis, A.A., Kotomatas, S., Legakis, A. & Tounta, E. (2007) Reproductive parameters of the Mediterranean monk seal population in the Northern Sporades archipelago, Greece. In 17th World Marine Mammal Science Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
Forcada, J. & Aguilar, A. (2000) Use of photographic identification in capture-recapture studies of Mediterranean monk seals. Marine Mammal Science, 16, 767793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gücü, A.C., Gücü, G. & Orek, H. (2004) Habitat use and preliminary demographic evaluation of the Critically Endangered Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in the Cilician Basin. Biological Conservation, 116, 417431.10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00234-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gücü, A.C., Ok, M. & Sakinan, S. (2009) A survey of the Critically Endangered Mediterranean monk seal, Monachus monachus (Hermann, 1779) along the coast of northern Cyprus. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution, 55, 7782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristophorou, M. & Demetropoulos, A. (1994) The Mediterranean monk seals in Cyprus. In UNEP/MAP Meeting of Experts on the Evaluation of the Implementation of the Action Plan for the Management of the Mediterranean Monk Seal, pp. 45, In Annex IV. Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (United Nations Environment Programme), Rabat, Morocco.Google Scholar
Halley, D.J. & Rosell, F. (2002) The beaver's reconquest of Eurasia: status, population development and management of a conservation success. Mammal Review, 32, 153178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanlidis, A.A. & Dendrinos, P. (2015) Monachus monachus. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T13653A117647375. dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T13653A45227543.en [accessed 24 June 2019].Google Scholar
Karamanlidis, A.A., Dendrinos, P., Fernández de Larrinoa, P., Gücü, A.C., Johnson, W.M., Kiraç, C.O. & Pires, R. (2016a) The Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus: status, biology, threats, and conservation priorities. Mammal Review, 46, 92105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanlidis, A.A., Gaughran, S., Aguilar, A., Dendrinos, P., Huber, D., Pires, R. et al. (2016b) Shaping species conservation strategies using mtDNA analysis: the case of the elusive Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus). Biological Conservation, 193, 7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, N. (2019) Earth Optimism—recapturing the positive. Oryx, 52, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOm (2007) Status of the Population of the Mediterranean Monk Seal (Monachus monachus) in Greece. MOm/Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Monk Seal, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Samaranch, R. & González, L.M. (2000) Changes in morphology with age in Mediterranean monk seals (Monachus monachus). Marine Mammal Science, 16, 141157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taksent Nature Park (2019) Why didn't we protect the baby seal! facebook.com/taskentdogaparki/photos/a.867286936712554/1875428175898420 [accessed 5 March 2019]. [In Turkish]Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Number of sightings of the Mediterranean monk seal Monachus monachus on and around Cyprus during 2009–2018.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Cyprus, showing (a) the three areas of the Republic of Cyprus where most of the monk seal sightings were made (Pafos–Akamas, 166 sightings; Limassol, 118 sightings; Kavo Greko–Kavo Pyla, 68 sightings), and (b) the locations of the 17 shelters identified as suitable for resting and pupping or resting only.