Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T19:26:54.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary cholesterol increases body levels of oral administered vitamin D3 in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2024

Julia Kühn*
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Alexandra Schutkowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Lina-Maria Rayo-Abella
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Mikis Kiourtzidis
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Anika Nier
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Corinna Brandsch
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
Gabriele I. Stangl
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Julia Kühn, email: julia.kuehn@landw.uni-halle.de

Abstract

Vitamin D and cholesterol share the same intestinal transporters. Thus, it was hypothesized that dietary cholesterol adversely affects vitamin D uptake. The current studies investigated the influence of cholesterol on the availability of oral vitamin D. First, 42 wild-type mice received a diet with 25 µg/kg labelled vitamin D3 (vitamin D3-d3), supplemented with either 0% (control), 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0% or 2.0% cholesterol for four weeks to investigate vitamin D uptake. In a second study, 10 wild-type mice received diets containing 0% (control) or 1% cholesterol over four weeks to determine cholesterol-induced changes in bile acids. Finally, we investigated the impact of cholesterol versus bile acids on vitamin D uptake in Caco-2 cells. Surprisingly, dietary cholesterol intake was associated with 40% higher serum levels of vitamin D3-d3 and 2.3-fold higher vitamin D3-d3 concentrations in the liver compared to controls. The second study showed that cholesterol intake resulted in higher concentrations of faecal bile acids (control: 3.55 ± 1.71 mg/g dry matter; 1% dietary cholesterol: 8.95 ± 3.69 mg/g dry matter; P < 0.05) and changes in the bile acid profile with lower contents of muricholic acids (P < 0.1) and higher contents of taurodeoxycholic acid (P < 0.01) compared to controls. In-vitro analyses revealed that taurocholic acid (P < 0.001) but not cholesterol increased the cellular uptake of vitamin D by Caco-2 cells. To conclude, dietary cholesterol seems to improve the bioavailability of oral vitamin D by stimulating the release of bile acids and increasing the hydrophobicity of bile.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Vitamin D deficiency is a global public health problem among all age groups.(Reference Palacios and Gonzalez1) To prevent or treat vitamin D deficiency, many health authorities have established guidelines on vitamin D intake. The National Academy of Medicine recommends a daily oral intake of 15 µg of vitamin D.(Reference Ross, Manson and Abrams2) However, the response of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), which is used as a vitamin D status marker, to vitamin D supplementation depends not only on endogenous factors such as genetics,(Reference Didriksen, Grimnes and Hutchinson3,Reference Waterhouse, Tran and Armstrong4) age(Reference Lehmann, Riedel and Hirche5) and body fat,(Reference Saliba, Barnett-Griness and Rennert6) but also on dietary compounds such as the type of dietary fatty acids,(Reference Hollander, Muralidhara and Zimmerman7) phytosterols(Reference Reboul, Goncalves and Comera8) or fungal ergosterol.(Reference Baur, Kühn and Brandsch9) While multiple studies have investigated the role of vitamin D on cholesterol metabolism in humans, the influence of dietary cholesterol on the bioavailability of oral vitamin D is currently unknown. In 2004, Altmann et al. (Reference Altmann, Davis and Zhu10) identified Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) as a transmembrane protein that is crucial for the intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. In 2011, Reboul et al. observed that the cellular uptake of vitamin D was significantly reduced when Caco-2 cells were incubated with ezetimibe, a specific inhibitor of NPC1L1.(Reference Reboul, Goncalves and Comera8) Additionally, inhibition of NPC1L1 in mice resulted in markedly lower concentrations of vitamin D in the liver, adipose tissues, skeletal muscle, kidney and heart.(Reference Kiourtzidis, Kühn and Schutkowski11) These data indicate that cholesterol and vitamin D compete for the same absorption mechanism in the gut. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that dietary cholesterol could impact vitamin D status by modulating the intestinal uptake of vitamin D.

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reported that the mean dietary cholesterol intake of U.S. adults in the 2013–2014 survey cycle was 293 mg/day (348 mg/day for men and 242 mg/day for women).(Reference Xu, McClure and Appel12) However, the dietary cholesterol intake of a person largely depends on the foods and diets that are consumed because foods of animal origin such as eggs and meat are major sources of cholesterol. Since many individuals depend, at least temporarily, on vitamin D supplementation, the question arises whether foods or diets rich in cholesterol may reduce the efficacy of oral vitamin D to improve vitamin D status. Based on the similar chemical structures of cholesterol and vitamin D and the fact that both molecules share the same intestinal transporter, we hypothesized that the consumption of cholesterol could adversely affect vitamin D uptake and in turn vitamin D status.

Methods

The experimental protocols of the mouse studies were approved by the animal welfare committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval numbers: H1-4/T3-19, H1-4/T1-15). The experimental protocols followed the established guidelines for the care and handling of laboratory animals(13) and were in accordance with the German animal welfare regulations. The studies adhered to the ARRIVE Guidelines for reporting animal research.

The impact of dietary cholesterol on vitamin D status in mice

The impact of dietary cholesterol on vitamin D status was first examined in a mouse study. All mice were kept in pairs in Macrolon cages in a room with a constant temperature (22 ± 2°C), light cycle (12-h light, 12-h dark with lamps that did not emit UV light) and relative humidity (50 – 60%). The animals had free access to feed and water.

Forty-two male 6-week-old wild-type mice (C57BL/6N) were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). Mice were given five days to acclimate to their environment before they were randomly assigned into seven groups of six animals each (initial body weight of 21.6 ± 0.93 g). During the study, mice were fed diets with 25 µg/kg triple-deuterated vitamin D3 (vitamin D3-d3, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) that contained 0% (control group), 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0% or 2.0% cholesterol for four weeks. The basal diet contained (per kg) 297 g of starch, 200 g of sucrose, 200 g of casein, 150 g of coconut oil, 50 g of soybean oil, 50 g of a vitamin and mineral mixture, 50 g of cellulose, and 3 g of DL-methionine. Varying amounts of cholesterol were added to the diet in exchange for starch. Vitamins and minerals were added to the diet according to the recommendations of the National Research Council.(14)

After four weeks of treatment, the mice were deprived of feed for four hours, anaesthetised and decapitated. Feed withdrawal four hours before sampling and dissection of mice were carried out during the light phase of the light-dark cycle, starting between 6:00 am and 10:00 am. The blood samples were taken and collected in tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) to obtain serum. Additionally, intestinal mucosa, livers, kidneys and retroperitoneal adipose tissues were harvested. All samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until analyses.

The effects of dietary cholesterol on bile acids in mice

To investigate the impact of dietary cholesterol on bile acids, which in turn can influence the digestibility and uptake of fat-soluble nutrients, a second study with mice was conducted. The care and handling of the mice were in line with the protocol described above.

Ten male 4-week-old wild-type mice (C57BL/6N; Charles River) with an initial body weight of 14.3 ± 1.49 g were randomly allotted to two groups (n = 5). The mice were fed diets with 25 µg/kg vitamin D3 (Sigma-Aldrich) that contained either 0% (control group) or 1.0% cholesterol. The basal diet contained (per kg) 397 g of starch, 200 g of sucrose, 200 g of casein, 100 g of lard, 50 g of a vitamin and mineral mixture, 50 g of cellulose, and 3 g of DL-methionine. Cholesterol was added to the diet in exchange for starch. Vitamins and minerals were added to the diet according to recommendations of the National Research Council.(14)

After four weeks of treatment, the mice were deprived of feed for four hours, anaesthetized and decapitated in accordance to mouse study 1 described above. The intestinal mucosa samples were harvested to analyse the intracellular vitamin D concentration, bile was obtained from the gallbladder, and faeces was collected from the rectum to quantify bile acids. The samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until analyses.

Cell culture study on the effects of cholesterol and bile acids on vitamin D uptake

To elucidate the impact of cholesterol versus bile acids on the cellular uptake of vitamin D3, a cell culture study using human colorectal adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells (ACC 169, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany) was conducted. The Caco-2 cells, which formed monolayers, were cultivated in Minimal Essential Medium, GlutaMAX® (MEM), supplemented with 1% non-essential amino acids (NEAAs), 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.5% gentamycin (all from Gibco, Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (95% air and 5% CO2). For intracellular vitamin D3 analysis, cells were seeded in dishes (diameter: 3.5 cm) at a density of 0.8 × 106 cells per dish. For relative mRNA expression analysis, cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 0.15 × 106 cells per well. The seeded cells were cultured for seven days, to differentiate them into small intestinal epithelial-like cells.(Reference Brandsch, Miyamoto and Ganapathy15,Reference Brandsch, Brandsch and Ganapathy16) Eighteen hours prior to incubation, the medium was replaced by FBS-free MEM supplemented with 1% NEAAs. For uptake experiments, cells were incubated in FBS-free MEM with 1 µM vitamin D3 for 60 min at 37°C. To this end, vitamin D3 was incorporated in micelles as described by Reboul et al. (Reference Reboul, Goncalves and Comera8,Reference Reboul, Abou and Mikail17) All micelles consisted of 0.04 mM L-α-phosphatidylcholine, 0.5 mM oleic acid, 0.3 mM monoolein, 0.16 mM 1-α-lysophosphatidylcholine and 1 µM vitamin D3 (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Then, the cells were treated in a two-factorial design with taurocholic acid (1 mM vs. 5 mM) and cholesterol (0 vs. 100 µM cholesterol) (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Taurocholic acid and cholesterol were added to the micellular components. For preparation of the micelles, appropriate volumes of lipids and vitamin D3 stock solutions in absolute ethanol were transferred to a glass tube. The solvent was evaporated under nitrogen, and the dried residues were dissolved in MEM containing taurocholic acid. All micelle components were vigorously mixed in a sonication bath at room temperature for 5 min. The viability of the treated cells was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. None of the incubation conditions affected cell viability. After the treatments, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), harvested with a cell scraper and centrifuged. The cell pellets were stored at -20°C until further analysis. Protein concentrations of the cell pellets were determined by the Bradford assay.(Reference Bradford18) The experiment was independently repeated three times. Analyses from each experiment were run in duplicate (gene expression) or triplicate (vitamin D3).

Analysis of vitamin D metabolites in plasma, tissues and cells

The concentrations of vitamin D3, vitamin D3-d3 and triple-deuterated 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3-d3) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as recently described.(Reference Kiourtzidis, Kühn and Schutkowski11) In brief, sevenfold deuterated vitamin D3 (Toronto Research Chemicals, Inc., Toronto, Canada) and sixfold deuterated 25(OH)D3 (Chemaphor Chemical Services, Ottawa, Canada) were added to the samples as internal standards. Subsequently, the samples were saponified with potassium hydroxide, extracted with n-hexane and washed with ultrapure water. Tissue samples were further purified by normal-phase HPLC (1100 Series, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). All types of samples were subjected to derivatization with 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (PTAD; Sigma-Aldrich) and analysed by LC-MS/MS (1260 Infinity Series, Agilent Technologies; QTRAP 5500, SCIEX, Darmstadt, Germany) with positive electrospray ionization. For quantification of vitamin D3 and vitamin D3-d3, a Hypersil ODS C18 column (120 A, 5 μm, 150 × 2.0 mm2; VDS Optilab, Berlin, Germany) was used, and for quantification of 25(OH)D3-d3, a Poroshell C18 column (120 A, 2.7 μm, 50 × 4.6 mm2; Agilent Technologies) was used. Quantifier mass transitions of the PTAD adducts were vitamin D3 560 > 298, vitamin D3-d3 563 > 301, sevenfold deuterated vitamin D3 567 > 298, 25(OH)D3-d3 579 > 301, and sixfold deuterated 25(OH)D3 582 > 298. Calibration curves were constructed with standard solutions for vitamin D3-d3 and 25(OH)D3-d3 (both from Sigma-Aldrich) by plotting the ratio of the analyte peak area to the internal standard peak area versus the concentration of the analytes.

Analysis of triglycerides in liver

Liver samples were prepared as described elsewhere(Reference Radtke, Geissler and Schutkowski19) and the triglyceride concentration of the extracts was quantified using an enzymatic reagent kit according to the manufacturer’s manual (DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH, Holzheim, Germany).

Analysis of the relative mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D uptake and metabolism

Relative mRNA expression was analysed by real-time RT-PCR as described previously.(Reference Radtke, Geissler and Schutkowski19) Prior to analysis, total RNA was isolated from tissue samples and Caco-2 cells using peqGOLD TriFast™ (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). The concentration of RNA in the samples was determined at a wavelength of 260 nm with a NanoDropTM Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Schwerte, Germany). Reverse transcription reactions were performed using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to yield cDNA, and real-time RT-PCR was performed with GoTaq® Flexi DNA-Polymerase (Promega) on a Rotorgene 6000 cycler (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia) according to a protocol described elsewhere.(Reference Radtke, Geissler and Schutkowski19) After each PCR run, melting curve analysis and gel electrophoresis verified the amplification and product size. The relative mRNA expression of the target genes was calculated by the method of Pfaffl.(Reference Pfaffl20) Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh/GAPDH) and ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (Rplp0/RPLP0) were used as the appropriate reference genes. Primers of the target and reference genes are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1. Primers of target genes involved in vitamin D uptake and metabolism and appropriate reference genes

* Reference gene. Abcg5/ABCG5, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5; Abcg8/ABCG8, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 8; Cd36/CD36, CD36 molecule; Cyp2r1, vitamin D 25-hydroxylase; Cyp27a1, sterol 27-hydroxylase; Gapdh/GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Npc1l1/NPC1L1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; Rplp0/RPLP0, ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0; SCARB1, scavenger receptor class B member 1.

Analysis of faecal bile acids

The concentration of bile acids was determined in the faeces of mice obtained from the rectum by MS-Omics (Vedbaek, Netherlands). The freeze-dried samples were extracted with methanol, transferred to centrifuge tube filters and centrifuged for purification. The filtrate was then subjected to a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to Thermo Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer for bile acid analysis. An electrospray ionisation interface was used as the ionisation source. The system was operated in negative ionisation mode. Chromatographic separation of the bile acids was carried out on a Waters Acquity HSS T3 1.8 μm 2.1 × 150 mm. The column was thermostatted at 30°C. The mobile phases consisted of (A) ammonium acetate (10 mmol/l) and (B) methanol/acetonitrile (1/1, v/v). Bile acids were eluted by increasing the concentration of B in A from 45 to 100% over 16 min. The flow rate was 0.3 ml/min. Peak areas were extracted using TraceFinder 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Identification of the compounds was based on the accurate mass and retention time of the authentic standards.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data obtained from the first mouse study were tested for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homoscedasticity (Levene’s test). Treatment effects were identified by one-way ANOVA for normally distributed data. In the case of significant treatment effects, an appropriate post hoc group comparison was performed (Tukey’s test for equal variances or Games-Howell for unequal variances). For parameters that were not normally distributed, the effects of treatment were analysed by the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Individual group comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s correction. A correlation analysis of liver triglyceride concentration and liver vitamin D3-d3 concentration was performed by Spearman correlation as a non-parametric measure of correlation. If not otherwise stated, all mice (N = 42) were included in the analysis. For the second mouse study, data were subjected to Student’s t-test in cases of normal distribution or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. All mice (N = 10) were included in the analysis. Data from the cell culture experiment were analysed by two-way ANOVA including the factors of taurocholic acid treatment, cholesterol treatment and their interaction (taurocholic acid × cholesterol). P < 0.05 was designated as a significant difference and P < 0.1 as a trend toward significance.

Results

The impact of dietary cholesterol on vitamin D status

Body weight, liver weight, liver triglycerides and feed intake

The final body weights, liver weights and the liver:body weight ratios as well as the concentrations of triglycerides in the liver of the mice were not differentially affected by the dietary treatments (Table 2). Also, daily feed intake (assessed from two mice per cage) did not differ between the groups (Table 2).

Table 2. Body weight, liver weight, relative liver weight, liver triglyceride and feed intake of mice fed different doses of cholesterol

Ns, not significant.

a Feed intake was assessed from two mice per cage. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were analysed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Dietary cholesterol increases vitamin D3-d3 in serum and tissues

To assess the effects of dietary cholesterol on vitamin D uptake and vitamin D status, the amounts of deuterated vitamin D metabolites were determined in serum, liver, kidney and adipose tissue. The data showed that the serum and tissue concentrations of vitamin D3-d3 were significantly influenced by cholesterol in the diet (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the mice fed cholesterol-containing diets had higher serum and tissue concentrations of vitamin D3-d3 than mice fed the cholesterol-free diet, although no clear dose-response relationship between dietary cholesterol and levels of vitamin D3-d3 was observed. The increase in vitamin D3-d3 in response to dietary cholesterol was most pronounced in the serum and liver (Fig. 1a and b). To test whether the higher vitamin D3-d3 levels in the cholesterol-fed mice were associated with higher triglyceride concentrations in the liver, a correlation between both parameters was performed. As depicted in Fig. 2, no significant correlation was observed between liver triglycerides and the liver vitamin D3-d3 concentration. Due to the high variance, the increase in vitamin D in the kidney and adipose tissue of mice fed the cholesterol diets did not consistently reach statistical significance (Fig. 1c and d). The concentrations of 25(OH)D3-d3 in the serum (0% cholesterol group: 59.1 ± 8.89 nmol/l; 0.2%: 57.5 ± 6.94 nmol/l; 0.4%: 54.1 ± 11.7 nmol/l; 0.6%: 68.5 ± 10.6 nmol/l; 0.8%: 57.9 ± 9.56 nmol/l; 1.0%: 64.7 ± 8.56 nmol/l; 2.0%: 61.8 ± 6.80 nmol/l) and kidneys (0% cholesterol group: 2.90 ± 0.23 ng/g; 0.2%: 3.30 ± 0.21 ng/g; 0.4%: 3.39 ± 0.41 ng/g; 0.6%: 3.57 ± 0.49 ng/g; 0.8%: 3.15 ± 0.68 ng/g; 1.0%: 3.52 ± 0.71 ng/g; 2.0%: 3.52 ± 0.55 ng/g) were not affected by dietary cholesterol. The levels of 25(OH)D3-d3 in the liver and adipose tissue were lower than the limit of quantification (6 ng/g and 2 ng/g, respectively).

Fig. 1. Concentration of vitamin D3-d3 in the serum (a), livers (b), kidneys (c) and adipose tissues (D) of mice fed different doses of cholesterol. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test. a,b Different letters indicate differences between groups (multiple group comparison, P < 0.05). Vitamin D3-d3, triple-deuterated vitamin D3.

Fig. 2. Correlation between concentrations of liver triglycerides and liver vitamin D3-d3 of mice that were fed different doses of cholesterol. No correlation was identified by Spearman correlation, N = 39.

Dietary cholesterol did not modify the mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D uptake and metabolism

To determine whether the increased serum and tissue levels of vitamin D were caused by a higher abundance of uptake transporters, we analysed the mRNA expression of intestinal vitamin D transporters. These data did not indicate any consistent effect of dietary cholesterol on the mRNA expression of transporters involved in vitamin D uptake (Table 3). In addition, we analysed the mRNA expression of the most important hydroxylases in the liver but found no differences between the groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Relative mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D3 uptake and metabolism in mice fed different doses of cholesterol

Abcg5, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5; Abcg8, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 8; Cd36, CD36 molecule; Cyp2r1, vitamin D 25-hydroxylase; Cyp27a1, sterol 27-hydroxylase; Npc1l1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; ns, not significant.

Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. a,b Different letters indicate differences between groups (multiple group comparison, P < 0.05).

The impact of cholesterol on intestinal vitamin D and bile acids

To elucidate whether cholesterol feeding is associated with higher intestinal bile acid concentrations and in turn, higher vitamin D concentrations in enterocytes in vivo, we conducted a subsequent study. Mice that were fed a vitamin D-adequate diet with 0 or 1% cholesterol over four weeks did not show differences in their final body weights (0% cholesterol: 22.2 ± 0.99 g, 1% cholesterol: 22.4 ± 1.62 g).

Here, we found that the vitamin D3 concentration in the intestinal mucosa was significantly higher in mice fed 1% cholesterol than in those fed 0% cholesterol (P < 0.01, Fig. 3). In addition, the faecal concentrations of total and secondary bile acids were significantly higher in the mice fed 1% cholesterol than in those fed 0% cholesterol. The primary and tertiary bile acids showed a trend towards higher levels in the cholesterol group (Table 4).

Fig. 3. Concentration of vitamin D3 in the intestinal mucosa of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effect was identified by Student’s t-test.

Table 4. Faecal bile acid concentration [µg/g dry matter] of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply

Ns, not significant.

Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Differences between the two groups were identified by Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

The three major types of bile acids found in bile obtained from the gallbladder were muricholic acids, taurocholic acid and taurodeoxycholic acid. Dietary cholesterol intake was associated with a change in the bile acid composition in the bile (Fig. 4). The bile acid profiles of the mice fed 1% cholesterol were characterized by a higher proportion of hydrophobic taurodeoxycholic acid (P < 0.01) and a trend towards less hydrophilic muricholic acids (P < 0.1, Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Major bile acids (weight % of the total) in the bile of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply. Data are expressed as the means. Taurodeoxycholic acid was significantly different (P < 0.01), and muricholic acids showed a trend towards significance (P < 0.1) in response to dietary cholesterol (Student’s t-test).

Taurocholic acid but not cholesterol increases the uptake of vitamin D in Caco-2 cells

To investigate whether cholesterol can directly improve the cellular uptake of vitamin D or indirectly by the changes in bile acids, we treated Caco-2 cells with micelles differing in cholesterol and taurocholic acid concentrations. Treatment of cells with 100 µM versus 0 µM cholesterol did not change the intracellular vitamin D3 concentration, suggesting that cholesterol is not capable of modifying vitamin D uptake in Caco-2 cells per se (Fig. 5). In contrast, the intracellular vitamin D3 concentration was approximately fourfold higher after incubation with 5 mM taurocholic acid than with 1 mM taurocholic acid, indicating a strong effect of taurocholic acid in improving vitamin D3 uptake into intestinal cells (Fig. 5). Neither cholesterol nor taurocholic acid altered the relative mRNA expression of vitamin D transporters in Caco-2 cells (Table 5).

Fig. 5. Concentration of vitamin D3 in Caco-2 cells in response to micellar cholesterol and taurocholic acid content. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by two-way ANOVA.

Table 5. Relative mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D uptake in Caco-2 cells

ABCG5, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5; ABCG8, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 8; Chol, cholesterol; CD36, CD36 molecule; NPC1L1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; ns, not significant; SCARB1, scavenger receptor class B member 1; TCA, taurocholic acid.

Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by two-way ANOVA.

Discussion

In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that cholesterol could affect the intestinal uptake of oral vitamin D and in turn vitamin D status. Surprisingly, we found significant increases in vitamin D in the serum and livers of mice fed cholesterol, indicating that cholesterol is able to increase the uptake of orally administered vitamin D, although 25(OH)D, which is normally used as a biomarker of vitamin D status, remained unaffected. This finding contradicts the hypothesis that cholesterol and vitamin D compete for the same intestinal transporter and that cholesterol, which was in excess compared to vitamin D, may hinder the absorption of vitamin D. NPC1L1 plays a crucial role in the absorption of cholesterol by enterocytes(Reference Altmann, Davis and Zhu10) and is important for vitamin D uptake.(Reference Reboul, Goncalves and Comera8,Reference Kiourtzidis, Kühn and Schutkowski11) However, the current mRNA data were not indicative that the improvement in vitamin D status that we observed in the cholesterol-fed groups was caused by cholesterol-induced changes in the expression of NPC1L1 and other transporters, such as CD36 molecule (CD36) or ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5/8 (ABCG5/8), which have been suggested to be involved in vitamin D absorption.(Reference Reboul, Goncalves and Comera8,Reference Kiourtzidis, Kühn and Brandsch21) Thus, these data were not indicative of any direct effect of cholesterol on vitamin D transporter expression. However, it should be noted that the intestinal uptake of cholesterol and vitamin D involves both transporter-mediated uptake and passive diffusion. It is therefore possible that the higher vitamin D3-d3 levels in cholesterol-fed mice resulted from higher passive diffusion.

Cholesterol serves as a precursor for bile acid synthesis and stimulates the formation of bile acids in the liver.(Reference Sehayek, Ono and Shefer22,Reference Schwarz, Russell and Dietschy23) This explains why mice fed a high-cholesterol diet had substantially higher concentrations of bile acids in their faeces than mice fed no cholesterol. Based on these data, we hypothesised that cholesterol could enhance vitamin D uptake indirectly by increasing the formation and release of bile acids into the gut. This assumption was confirmed in the two subsequent studies that we conducted. First, the concentrations of faecal bile acids and vitamin D in enterocytes were significantly higher in mice fed the cholesterol-containing diet than in mice fed the cholesterol-free diet. Second, analysis of the human Caco-2 cells revealed a substantially higher cellular uptake of vitamin D when micelles contained higher concentrations of taurocholic acid but not when they contained cholesterol. This cell culture study clearly indicates a direct effect of bile acids on vitamin D uptake, but the findings need to be confirmed in further in vivo studies.

Bile acids serve as micelle-forming surfactants and facilitate the absorption of lipids and hydrophobic nutrients. Micelles are usually self-assembling structures that are formed from lipid digestion products and bile acids,(Reference Marze24) and their shape, size and composition might determine their efficiency in carrying lipophilic compounds. Thus, we assume that cholesterol could have influenced bile acid formation, release and profile and, in turn, the composition of the micelles and the solubility of vitamin D within micelles. A study revealed that mice deficient in 7α-hydroxylase, an enzyme that plays a key role in the synthesis of bile acids, had low serum vitamin D levels, emphasizing an important role of the classic bile acid pathway in intestinal vitamin D uptake.(Reference Schwarz, Lund and Setchell25) Moreover, the co-supplementation of vitamin D and cholic acid restored the serum vitamin D levels more efficiently than vitamin D supplementation alone in these mice.(Reference Schwarz, Lund and Setchell25) Bile acids largely differ in their hydrophobicity, which in turn influences sterol absorption.(Reference Wang, Tazuma and Cohen26) Supplementation with hydrophobic cholic acid was associated with a higher micellar cholesterol concentration and increased absorption of cholesterol in healthy subjects.(Reference Woollett, Buckley and Yao27) In contrast, the administration of hydrophilic muricholic acids resulted in low cholesterol absorption in mice in comparison with the most hydrophobic bile acids (cholic acid and deoxycholic acid).(Reference Wang, Tazuma and Cohen26) In our mouse study, muricholic acids were the most prominent bile acids found in bile, comprising 65% of the total bile acids in the controls. However, it must be mentioned that muricholic acids belong to a group of bile acids primarily found in mice.(Reference Russell28) Since these bile acids are absent in humans, it is to be expected that the effect of cholesterol on vitamin D uptake in humans differs from that of mice. Feeding cholesterol reduced the content of muricholic acids to 55%. Conversely, the percentage of hydrophobic taurodeoxycholic acid increased in response to a cholesterol-containing diet. Thus, we speculate that the improved uptake of oral vitamin D can also be attributed to a more hydrophobic bile acid pool after dietary cholesterol intake.

Notably, our study did not show a clear dose-response relationship between dietary cholesterol intake and vitamin D3-d3 concentration in serum and tissue. The maximum levels of vitamin D3-d3 in serum and tissue were already reached at the lowest dietary cholesterol concentration. Dietary cholesterol administration usually predisposes mice to develop liver steatosis which is associated with the accumulation of lipid droplets in the liver.(Reference Tu, Showalter and Cajka29) Thus, it is tempted to speculate that higher levels of liver lipids may explain the higher levels of vitamin D3-d3 in the cholesterol-fed mice. However, data from the current study are not indicative of higher liver triglyceride levels in the cholesterol-fed mice and there was no correlation between triglycerides and vitamin D3-d3 in the liver. Instead, we assume that the lowest dose of cholesterol already had the maximum effect on the formation of bile acids or that higher doses of cholesterol had partly displaced vitamin D from the micelles, as has been observed for phytosterols.(Reference Goncalves, Gleize and Bott30) This would have to be investigated in further studies.

Conclusions

To conclude, the data demonstrate that dietary cholesterol increases body concentrations of vitamin D, shown by the significant rises of vitamin D in the serum and livers of cholesterol-fed mice. However, these findings are not indicative of a direct cholesterol effect on the absorption of vitamin D but indicate that ingested cholesterol might stimulate the formation and release of bile acids, which in turn increases the micellar solubility of vitamin D and its intestinal uptake.

Abbreviations

Abcg5/ABCG5: ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5; Abcg8/ABCG8: ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 8; Chol: cholesterol; Cd36/CD36: CD36 molecule; Cyp2r1: vitamin D 25-hydroxylase; Cyp27a1: sterol 27-hydroxylase; FBS: foetal bovine serum; Gapdh/GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LC-MS/MS: liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; MEM: minimal essential medium; NEAAs: non-essential amino acids; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; Npc1l1/NPC1L1: Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; ns not significant; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; PTAD: 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione; Rplp0/RPLP0: ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0; SCARB1: scavenger receptor class B member 1; TCA: taurocholic acid; vitamin D3-d3: triple-deuterated vitamin D3; 25(OH)D3-d3: triple-deuterated 25-hydroxyvitamin D3; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Heike Giese and Christine Leibelt for their excellent work in performing real-time RT-PCR analyses and preparing the samples for the LC-MS/MS-based analyses.

Financial support

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (project number: 320705652; grant number: STA 868/4-1).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authorship

JK, AS, CB and GIS designed the studies; JK, AS and LR performed the studies; JK, LR, MK and AN analysed the samples; JK statistically analysed the data; and JK and GIS wrote the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Footnotes

Julia Kühn and Alexandra Schutkowski share an equal contribution.

References

Palacios, C, Gonzalez, L. Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144:138145.Google Scholar
Ross, AC, Manson, JE, Abrams, SA, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):5358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Didriksen, A, Grimnes, G, Hutchinson, MS, et al. The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D response to vitamin D supplementation is related to genetic factors, BMI, and baseline levels. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(5):559567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterhouse, M, Tran, B, Armstrong, BK, et al. Environmental, personal, and genetic determinants of response to vitamin D supplementation in older adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(7):E1332E1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, U, Riedel, A, Hirche, F, et al. Vitamin D3 supplementation: response and predictors of vitamin D3 metabolites - a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(2):351358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saliba, W, Barnett-Griness, O, Rennert, G. The relationship between obesity and the increase in serum 25(OH)D levels in response to vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):14471454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollander, D, Muralidhara, KS, Zimmerman, A. Vitamin D-3 intestinal absorption in vivo: influence of fatty acids, bile salts, and perfusate pH on absorption. Gut. 1978;19(4):267272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reboul, E, Goncalves, A, Comera, C, et al. Vitamin D intestinal absorption is not a simple passive diffusion: evidences for involvement of cholesterol transporters. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(5):691702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baur, AC, Kühn, J, Brandsch, C, et al. Intake of ergosterol increases the vitamin D concentrations in serum and liver of mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;194:105435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, SW, Davis, HR, Zhu, L-J, et al. Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption. Science. 2004;303(5661):12011204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiourtzidis, M, Kühn, J, Schutkowski, A, et al. Inhibition of Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 by ezetimibe reduces uptake of deuterium-labeled vitamin D in mice. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;197:105504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Z, McClure, ST, Appel, LJ. Dietary cholesterol intake and sources among U.S adults: results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2001–2014. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals: Fourth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1995.Google Scholar
Brandsch, M, Miyamoto, Y, Ganapathy, V, et al. Expression and protein kinase C-dependent regulation of peptide/H+ co-transport system in the Caco-2 human colon carcinoma cell line. Biochem J. 1994;299(1):253260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandsch, M, Brandsch, C, Ganapathy, ME, et al. Influence of proton and essential histidyl residues on the transport kinetics of the H+/peptide cotransport systems in intestine (PEPT 1) and kidney (PEPT 2). Biochem Biophys Acta. 1997;1324(2):251262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reboul, E, Abou, L, Mikail, C, et al. Lutein transport by Caco-2 TC-7 cells occurs partly by a facilitated process involving the scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI). Biochem J. 2005;387(Pt 2):455461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radtke, J, Geissler, S, Schutkowski, A, et al. Lupin protein isolate versus casein modifies cholesterol excretion and mRNA expression of intestinal sterol transporters in a pig model. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2014;11(1):9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaffl, MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiourtzidis, M, Kühn, J, Brandsch, C, et al. Vitamin D Status of mice deficient in scavenger receptor class B type 1, cluster determinant 36 and ATP-binding cassette proteins G5/G8. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehayek, E, Ono, JG, Shefer, S, et al. Biliary cholesterol excretion: a novel mechanism that regulates dietary cholesterol absorption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(17):1019410199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, M, Russell, DW, Dietschy, JM, et al. Alternate pathways of bile acid synthesis in the cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase knockout mouse are not upregulated by either cholesterol or cholestyramine feeding. J Lipid Res. 2001;42(10):15941603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marze, S. Refining in silico simulation to study digestion parameters affecting the bioaccessibility of lipophilic nutrients and micronutrients. Food Funct. 2015;6(1):115124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, M, Lund, EG, Setchell, KD, et al. Disruption of cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene in mice. II. Bile acid deficiency is overcome by induction of oxysterol 7alpha-hydroxylase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(30):1802418031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, DQ-H, Tazuma, S, Cohen, DE, et al. Feeding natural hydrophilic bile acids inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption: studies in the gallstone-susceptible mouse. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285(3):G494G502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woollett, LA, Buckley, DD, Yao, L, et al. Cholic acid supplementation enhances cholesterol absorption in humans. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(3):724731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, DW. The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:137174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, LN, Showalter, MR, Cajka, T, et al. Metabolomic characteristics of cholesterol-induced non-obese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goncalves, A, Gleize, B, Bott, R, et al. Phytosterols can impair vitamin D intestinal absorption in vitro and in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(2):S303S311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Primers of target genes involved in vitamin D uptake and metabolism and appropriate reference genes

Figure 1

Table 2. Body weight, liver weight, relative liver weight, liver triglyceride and feed intake of mice fed different doses of cholesterol

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Concentration of vitamin D3-d3 in the serum (a), livers (b), kidneys (c) and adipose tissues (D) of mice fed different doses of cholesterol. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test. a,b Different letters indicate differences between groups (multiple group comparison, P < 0.05). Vitamin D3-d3, triple-deuterated vitamin D3.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Correlation between concentrations of liver triglycerides and liver vitamin D3-d3 of mice that were fed different doses of cholesterol. No correlation was identified by Spearman correlation, N = 39.

Figure 4

Table 3. Relative mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D3 uptake and metabolism in mice fed different doses of cholesterol

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Concentration of vitamin D3 in the intestinal mucosa of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effect was identified by Student’s t-test.

Figure 6

Table 4. Faecal bile acid concentration [µg/g dry matter] of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Major bile acids (weight % of the total) in the bile of mice in response to dietary cholesterol supply. Data are expressed as the means. Taurodeoxycholic acid was significantly different (P < 0.01), and muricholic acids showed a trend towards significance (P < 0.1) in response to dietary cholesterol (Student’s t-test).

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Concentration of vitamin D3 in Caco-2 cells in response to micellar cholesterol and taurocholic acid content. Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were identified by two-way ANOVA.

Figure 9

Table 5. Relative mRNA expression of genes involved in vitamin D uptake in Caco-2 cells