Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T07:16:55.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of seed morphology, seedling genetic variation, and components for seed storage of Agave landraces of commercial interest

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Jesus A. Jimenez-Torres*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, ICAP, Departamento de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Tulancingo, Hidalgo 43600, Mexico Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Facultad de Ingenieria, Mérida, Yucatán 97302, Mexico
Zurisadai Monroy-Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, ICAP, Departamento de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Tulancingo, Hidalgo 43600, Mexico Centro de Investigacion Científica de Yucatán, Departamento de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular A.C., Mérida, Yucatán 97205, Mexico
Juana Juarez-Muñoz
Affiliation:
Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, ICAP, Departamento de Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Tulancingo, Hidalgo 43600, Mexico
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tlacametl@gmail.com

Abstract

Sexual propagation of Agave plants is an incipient cultivation method, these plants withstand drought and adverse growing conditions; therefore, research on Agave’s diversity, seed processing, and storage could support its cultivation on marginal lands. The aim of this work was to evaluate seed morphology, germination, and seedling genetic diversity of six seed origins (species × provenance) of Agave plants collected in five provenances from Mexico. Seed longevity was evaluated in two seed origins after a 10-year storage period. Seed morphology and seedling genetic variation results demonstrated intra- and interspecific variation within Agave salmiana and with the other seed origins, respectively. After a 10-year storage period seed germination of two A. salmiana seed origins remained relatively stable, storage conditions, and seed variables of this work can serve as reference parameters for future analyses. To the best authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of Agave’s seed longevity evaluation after a 10-year storage period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The “maguey pulquero” term identifies some Agave species used for sap extraction to produce a fermented beverage called “pulque”, producers of the Central region from the Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt have recognized diverse landraces of Agave mapisaga Trel. and Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck, based on morphological traits and uses (Mora-Lopez et al., Reference Mora-Lopez, Reyes-Agüero, Flores-Flores, Peña-Valdivia and Aguirre- Rivera2011). The analysis of molecular markers through randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) can help to elucidate the effect of anthropogenic or environmental factors on Agave’s genetic variation (Alfaro et al., Reference Alfaro, Legaria and Rodriguez2007; Gil-Vega et al., Reference Gil-Vega, González, Martínez, Simpson and Vandemark2001).

The current and forecasted climatic events have led to revisiting the importance of the Agave genus, as these plants are able to withstand drought and adverse growing conditions (Corbin et al., Reference Corbin, Byrt, Bauer, DeBolt, Chambers, Holtum, Karem, Henderson, Lahnstein, Beahan, Bacic, Fincher, Betts and Burton2015; García-Moya et al., Reference García-Moya, Romero-Manzanares and Nobel2011). Asexual reproduction is the traditional propagation method; therefore, seed collection and sexual propagation are still incipient practices of maguey pulquero production and diverse aspects related to seed processing and preservation have been little explored (Aragon-Gastellum et al., Reference Aragon-Gastellum, Flores, Jurado, amirez-Tobias, Robles-Diaz, Rodas-Ortiz and Yañez-Espinosa2018; Huerta-Lovera et al., Reference Huerta-Lovera, Peña-Valdivia, Garcia-Esteva, Kohashi-Shibata, Campos-García and Aguirre-Rivera2018). To this date, little is known about seed morphology, and some works have studied seed germination of maguey pulquero plants (Ramírez-Tobías et al., Reference Ramírez-Tobías, Peña-Valdivia, Aguirre, Reyes-Agüero, Sanchez-Urdaneta and Valle2012, Reference Ramírez-Tobías, Peña-Valdivia, Trejo, Aguirre and Vaquera2014), and viability of Agave striata seeds under contrasting conditions (Aragon-Gastellum et al., Reference Aragon-Gastellum, Flores, Jurado, amirez-Tobias, Robles-Diaz, Rodas-Ortiz and Yañez-Espinosa2018); those aspects are important to consider for improving the understanding of sexual propagation, and Agave seed preservation.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the seed morphology, germination, and seedling genetic variation of six seed origins (species × provenance) of Agave americana, A. mapisaga, and A. salmiana collected at five provenances from Hidalgo State, Mexico; the seed morphological variables evaluated were relative weight, area, roundness, length, and width. Germination was evaluated for an 8-day period. Seedling genetic variation was evaluated using random polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) markers. Seed longevity after a 10-year storage period (117 months) was evaluated with maximum germination in two seed origins of A. salmiana. The hypothesis was that anthropogenic and environmental factors of the provenances might influence on the responses evaluated.

Materials and methods

The information of this section is available at DOI: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr6j12vmk/v1.

Results and discussion

Seed relative weight, morphometric variation, and germination

Seeds of A. americana from Sauz Xathe provenance (AmerSauz) exhibited the maximum relative weight and had the highest values (α ≤ 0.05) in all the morphometric variables, except for roundness; seed length appeared as a distinctive feature of AmerSauz, while roundness was uniformly higher in all the A. salmiana seed origins relative to A. mapisaga and A. americana (Table 1). Multivariate analysis of the seed morphology results demonstrated divergence of A. americana respect to A. salmiana and A. mapisaga according to Andrews curves (Figure 1).

Table 1. Relative weight (RW), morphometric evaluation, and initial maximum germination (Max. Germ.) of seeds collected in 2012.

Note. Mean values with different letters within columns are statistically different according to Tukey’s test (α ≤ 0.05). Seed origin = species × provenance, described in Section 2.

Abbreviations: MSD, minimum significant difference; RW, relative weight.

Figure 1. Andrews curves constructed with seed morphometric variables evaluated from A. americana (blue), A. mapisaga (red), and A. salmiana (purple) seed origins.

AmerSauz germination of 89% was inferior relative to the rest of the seed origins (range from 93 to 100%; Table 1). AmerSauz seed capsules were brown color at the collection time, indicative of a dry capsule and the actual moment of flowering stalk maturation was unknown. The variable time that the seeds remained under the abiotic elements might influence on seed’s relative moisture content possibly affecting embryo viability, or enabling dormancy induction; as consequence, reducing germination regardless of its highest relative seed weight (McDonald, Reference McDonald2007; Peña-Valdivia et al., Reference Peña-Valdivia, Sánchez-Urdaneta, RJR, Trejo, Cárdenas and Villegas2006). In contrast, capsules of the rest of the seed origins were green yellowish, the green color was indicative of physiological activity of the capsules’ outer tissue and the yellow color exhibited chlorophyll denaturation part of the aging process; thus, the capsules of these seed origins had a similar maturation time and less affectation by the abiotic elements.

Within A. salmiana seed origins the seeds from Tlaxiaca provenance (SalmTlax), had the highest relative weight, greatest area, and width, which were proportional with high germination of 99%, exhibiting intraspecific variation given by anthropogenic and/or environmental factors. Seed origin of A. mapisaga from Metepec (MapsMet) showed a greater germination of 100%, which was proportional to higher weight, similar to SalmTlax (Table 1). These results indicated that higher relative seed weight was proportional to elevated germination (Penfield, Reference Penfield2017); also, pinpointed the importance of capsule maturation stage for seed harvest, which is an anthropogenic factor that should be considered to standardize Agave seed processing and storage.

Seedlings genetic variation

Seedling DNA amplification exhibited 70 fragments which 57 (81.42%) were polymorphic. Asexual propagation, used traditionally, can reduce genetic variation by 8% for A. salmiana and A. mapisaga populations (Alfaro et al., Reference Alfaro, Legaria and Rodriguez2007), and by 10% for Agave tequilana plantations (Abraham et al., Reference Abraham, Ramírez and Gil2009), which can lead to genetic erosion (Gil-Vega et al., Reference Gil-Vega, González, Martínez, Simpson and Vandemark2001).

The dendrogram (Figure 2) shows AmerSauz isolated from the rest of the seed origins, which is consistent with the differences observed in the seed morphometric results (Table 1 and Figure 1). These results exhibited the interspecific variation of AmerSauz with respect to the plants from the Salmianae section (Gentry, Reference Gentry1982); given by geographic isolation of Sauz Xathe provenance located in the Meztitlan Canyon (INEGI, 1997), reducing its distribution and interaction with other Agave species. Also, the anthropogenic influence can accentuate AmerSauz characters, subjected to less domestication that induce smaller plants with less sap production, compared to A. salmiana and A. mapisaga landraces that have been intensively selected for those purposes (Mora-Lopez et al., Reference Mora-Lopez, Reyes-Agüero, Flores-Flores, Peña-Valdivia and Aguirre- Rivera2011; Trejo et al., Reference Trejo, Reyes, Cortes-Toto, Romano-Grande and Muñoz-Camacho2020).

Figure 2. Dendrogram constructed according to the binary matrix of DNA bands amplified from seedlings of Agave seed origins (species × provenance) using Ward’s method (city block distance).

SalmMet and MapMet were paired in the closest cluster, as both came from the same plantation with similar inflorescence maturation which inferred that hybridization might occur. SalmTlajo and SalmTlax were paired, as both might share genetic traits as a consequence of similar environmental factors, which provenances are in the northern convergent plateau between Mexico City, for Tlajomulco in the northeast toward Tulancingo Valley, and for Tlaxiaca in the northwest toward Actopan Valley, both provenances are communicated by a natural corridor that passes through Pachuca city possessing xerophytic vegetation with sub-humid to semi-arid conditions; contrasting to SalmMetβ located in mild conditions of Tulancingo Valley (INEGI, 1992; Jimenez-Torres et al., Reference Jimenez-Torres, Peña-Valdivia, Padilla-Chacon and Garcia-Nava2021).

Germination after a 10-year storage period

After a 117-month storage period (≈ 10-year storage period), when the lids were removed from the glass jars it was broken a vacuum seal making a characteristic sound while releasing the lid, although these containers were only airtight sealed not vacuum sealed, which indicated that seed respiration during storage consumed the oxygen present into the jar generating a vacuum by itself. The maximum germination for A. salmiana seeds from Metepec (SalmMetβ) and Tlaxiaca (SalmTlax) after a 10-year storage period was 96 and 95%; respectively (Table 2), with a germination reduction of 1 and 4% compared to the initial germination observed at 2012 (Table 1).

Table 2. Evaluation of maximum germination (Max. Germ.), SM content, RW, and DW of seeds after 55-month (SalmTlajo17) and 10-year storage period (SalmTlax and SalmMetβ).

Note. Mean values with different letters within columns are statistically different according to Tukey’s test (α ≤ 0.05). Seed origin = species × provenance, described in Section 2.

Abbreviations: DW, dry weight; MSD, minimum significant difference; RW, relative weight; SM, seed moisture.

Seeds of A. salmiana collected in September 2017 from Tlajomulco provenance (SalmTlajo17) after a 55-month storage period, exhibited no statistical differences in maximum germination results with respect to the other seed origins, regardless of a longer storage period of SalmMetβ and SalmTlax (Table 2). These results pinpointed the importance of the capsules’ maturation stage for seed preservation, as SalmTlajo17 capsules were brown color fully mature, having similar germination results as AmerSauz (Table 1).

After a 10-year storage period, no statistical differences were observed between SalmMetβ and SalmTlax in seed moisture content, relative weight, and dry weight (Table 2). SalmTlajo17 exhibited significant differences for all the variables evaluated (except maximum germination) respect SalmTlax (Table 2).

These values demonstrated that A. salmiana seeds can withstand desiccation and long storage periods (>5 years), such as orthodox seeds, which maintained relatively adequate germination under the given storage conditions. Seed moisture content, storage temperature, and oxygen exposition are key factors that must be considered when working with species without known adequate storage parameters (Bewley et al., Reference Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst, Nonogaki, Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst and Nonogaki2013; De Vitis et al., Reference De Vitis, Hay, Dickie, Trivedi, Choi and Fiegener2020).

The results obtained in this work can be used as reference parameters to determine the optimum Agave’s seed moisture content threshold for adequate storage conditions. In this work, the storage temperature was not controlled nor recorded, but according to normal climatic data of the nearest weather station (Zempoala, Hidalgo) from the storage facility, the storage temperature did not surpass the range of 24–26°C during the warmer season of March–April, and the rest of the year was below that temperature range (CONAGUA, 2021). Oxygen exposition was controlled by airtight containers, the seeds consumed the air that remained in the glass jar and generated a vacuum seal.

Conclusion

Seed morphology and seedling genetic variation were useful to elucidate the interspecific differences of the seed origins evaluated; also, the intraspecific variation observed within A. salmiana seed origins. Greater germination was proportional to higher relative seed weight within seed origins with similar capsule maturity at the moment of seed collection time. Airtight sealed glass jars and temperate room temperature were adequate conditions for seed storage as little germination reduction was observed after a 10-year storage for SalmMetβ and SalmTlax. These results helped to elucidate the anthropogenic and environmental factors that influenced divergences and similarities of the variable responses evaluated.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly thank the maguey pulquero producers Pedro Amador and Beto Solis from Metepec, Hidalgo for their collaboration during seed collection.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Materials and methods used in this study are available at doi: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr6j12vmk/v1.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authorship contributions

J.J.-M. conceived the study, Z.M.-G. performed the laboratory experiments and wrote the article, J.A.J.-T. complemented the study and wrote the article.

References

Abraham, J. M. J., Ramírez, M. R., & Gil, V. K. C. S. J. (2009). AFLP analysis of genetic variability in three reproductive forms of Agave tequilana. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 32, 171175.Google Scholar
Alfaro, R. G., Legaria, S. J. P., & Rodriguez, P. J. E. (2007). Genetic diversity in populations of pulquero agaves (Agave spp.) in Northeastern Mexico State. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 30, 112.Google Scholar
Aragon-Gastellum, J. L., Flores, J., Jurado, E., Ramirez-Tobias, H.M., Robles-Diaz, E., Rodas-Ortiz, J.P., Yañez-Espinosa, L. (2018). Potential impact of global warming on seed bank, dormancy and germination of three succulent species from the Chihuahuan Desert. Seed Science Research, 28, 312318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K. J., Hilhorst, H. W. M., & Nonogaki, H. (2013). Longevity, storage, and deterioration. In Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K. J., Hilhorst, H. W. M., & Nonogaki, H. (Eds.), Seeds (pp. 341376). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONAGUA. (2021). Normal weather information of Hidalgo state climatic stations. https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/informacion-climatologica-por-estado?estado=hgo accessed 14th November 2021.Google Scholar
Corbin, K. R., Byrt, C. S., Bauer, S., DeBolt, S., Chambers, D., Holtum, J. A. M., Karem, G., Henderson, M., Lahnstein, J., Beahan, C. T., Bacic, A., Fincher, G. B., Betts, N. S., & Burton, R. A. (2015). Prospecting for energy-rich renewable raw materials: Agave leaf case study. PLoS ONE, 10, e0135382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135382Google ScholarPubMed
De Vitis, M., Hay, F. R., Dickie, J. B., Trivedi, C., Choi, J., & Fiegener, R. (2020). Seed storage: Maintaining seed viability and vigor for restoration use. Restoration Ecology, 28, S249S255. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13174Google Scholar
García-Moya, E., Romero-Manzanares, A., & Nobel, P. S. (2011). Highlights for Agave productivity. GCB Bioenergy, 3, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, H. S. (1982). Agaves of continental North America (p. 670). The University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-Vega, K., González, C. M., Martínez, V. O., Simpson, J., & Vandemark, G. (2001). Analysis of genetic diversity in Agave tequilana var. Azul using RAPD markers. Euphytica, 119, 335341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huerta-Lovera, M., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Garcia-Esteva, A., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Campos-García, H., & Aguirre-Rivera, J. R. (2018). Maguey (Agave salmiana) infructescence morphology and its relationship to yield components. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 65, 16491661.Google Scholar
INEGI. (1997). Geographical information of Atotonilco el Grande municipality, Hidalgo State, Mexico. http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/historicos/1334/702825928018/702825928018_1.pdf accessed 23rd April 2021.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Torres, J. A., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Padilla-Chacon, D., & Garcia-Nava, R. (2021). Physiological and biochemical responses of Agave to temperature and climate of their native environment. Flora, 278, 151797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2021.151797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M. B. (2007). Seed moisture and the equilibrium seed moisture content curve. Seed Technology, 29, 718.Google Scholar
Mora-Lopez, L. J., Reyes-Agüero, A. J., Flores-Flores, L. J., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., & Aguirre- Rivera, R. J. (2011). Morphological variation and humanization of Agave genus, Salmianae section. Agrociencia, 45, 465477.Google Scholar
Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Sánchez-Urdaneta, A. B., RJR, A., Trejo, C., Cárdenas, E., & Villegas, M. A. (2006). Temperature and mechanical scarification on seed germination of “maguey” (Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck). Seed Science and Technology, 34, 4756. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2006.34.1.06Google Scholar
Penfield, S. (2017). Seed dormancy and germination. Current Biology, 27, R874R878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.050Google ScholarPubMed
Ramírez-Tobías, H. M., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Aguirre, R. J. R., Reyes-Agüero, J. A., Sanchez-Urdaneta, A. S., & Valle, G. S. (2012). Seed germination temperatures of eight Mexican Agave species with economic importance. Plant Species Biology, 27, 124137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Tobías, H. M., Peña-Valdivia, C. B., Trejo, C., Aguirre, R. J. R., & Vaquera, H. H. (2014). Seed germination of Agave species as influenced by substrate water potential. Biological Research, 47, 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Trejo, L., Reyes, M., Cortes-Toto, D., Romano-Grande, E., & Muñoz-Camacho, L. L. (2020). Morphological diversity and genetic relationships in pulque production Agaves in Tlaxcala, Mexico of unsupervised learning and gene sequencing analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 524812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.524812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Relative weight (RW), morphometric evaluation, and initial maximum germination (Max. Germ.) of seeds collected in 2012.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Andrews curves constructed with seed morphometric variables evaluated from A. americana (blue), A. mapisaga (red), and A. salmiana (purple) seed origins.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Dendrogram constructed according to the binary matrix of DNA bands amplified from seedlings of Agave seed origins (species × provenance) using Ward’s method (city block distance).

Figure 3

Table 2. Evaluation of maximum germination (Max. Germ.), SM content, RW, and DW of seeds after 55-month (SalmTlajo17) and 10-year storage period (SalmTlax and SalmMetβ).

Reviewing editor:  Bodil Jørgensen University of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiksberg C, Denmark, 1871
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Evaluation of seed morphology, seedling genetic variation, and components for seed storage of Agave landraces of commercial interest

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: After reviewing the work, it is suggested to strengthen the writing by attending to the following observations.

- The summary could improve if a justification of the work and the methods is included, also if the results and conclusions are deepened.

Methods

- Describe what farming systems and what is the intensity of farming from which the seeds come.

- Define and explain how the roundness of the seed was measured.

- In the analyzes of genetic diversity, how many individuals were analyzed by place of origin?

- Differentiate and explain the statistical analyzes of each of the experiments.

- Line 84. In agaves?

- Explain the main differences between harvesting green fruits and ripe brown fruits. Since it is understood that the green fruits used in this work could be harvested 3 to 4 months before being ripe.

- It is suggested to represent through graphs and multivariate statistical analysis the differences between the morphological characteristics of the seeds.

- Present data on genetic diversity by species and by population or origin place.

- Lines 165-167. Explain the factors mentioned throughout the writing and not only in a general way.

- The discussion needs to be compared with a greater number of works that exist on topics related to Agave.

Presentation

Overall score 3 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
2 out of 5

Context

Overall score 3.5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
2 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
3 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 2 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
2 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
2 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
2 out of 5

Review 2: Evaluation of seed morphology, seedling genetic variation, and components for seed storage of Agave landraces of commercial interest

Conflict of interest statement

None

Comments

Comments to the Author: Methods

Germination as in 2.2 – should this refer to 2.1?

In one of the lines – 2000 milibar – “l” missing (millibar)

DNA purity measured by spectrophotometer – Please describe how this is done, OD etc.

Update the table with geographical information with references to all names used in the text. If you do not know the area it is very difficult to relate to the names used in the full text as these are not the same as used in the table. Consider showing a map to help the reader.

As it is now the result part is difficult to read as the names used is not mentioned for the areas in the table.

The results (table and figure) relate to the areas where the seed where collected. It is missing what the story to be told is for the different species collected – please elaborate.

Illustrations of the seeds stages and perhaps combined with how it is measured will be a help.

Table 1; the table text does not specify whether these results are from collecting time or later.

Include a table with comparison start and after storage.

Presentation

Overall score 3 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
3 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 3 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
3 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
3 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
3 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
3 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5