To the Editor—In recent years, polymyxins have been reintroduced into the arsenal of antimicrobial therapy because they are one of the few agents clinically available to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria.Reference Li, Nation and Turnidge ¹ Although their clinical usefulness has been put into practice in most treatment approaches, including many empirical therapies, ever-greater resistance has been observed in regions where polymyxins have become more heavily prescribed.Reference Gales, Jones and Sader ²

Polymyxins have been widely applied to treat infections related to non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., and the rapid emergence of resistance to this class of drug among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), mostly those Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producers, is notable.Reference Perez and Dias ^{3 ,} Reference van Duin and Doi ⁴

While attention is focused on the widespread resistance to polymyxins among KPC producers, with important repercussions for their usefulness, little is known about the polymyxin resistance rates among multidrug resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae with in vitro carbapenem susceptibility. Would selective pressure via the use of polymyxins also act on this type of threat as much as it has on the KPC-producing ones?

To answer this question, a retrospective survey was conducted to assess the prevalence of polymyxin B (PMB) resistance among MDR Enterobacteriaceae. MDR was defined as nonsusceptibility to at least 1 agent in 3 or more antimicrobial categories, including isolates not susceptible to at least 1 carbapenem agent (eg, ertapenem, meropenem, or imipenem), except KPC-producers and those intrinsically resistant to polymyxins. These isolates were recovered from inpatients between January 1 and September 10, 2016, at a tertiary hospital in Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil.

Identification of bacterial species as well as antimicrobial susceptibility testing were initially performed using an automated broth microdilution system (MicroScan; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Polymyxin B minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was confirmed using Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). To attribute the resistance mechanism for the enterobacterial species, a synergistic test was applied using phenyl-boronic acid to detect KPC (isolates not included in the study). Enzymatic inhibition testing with clavulanic acid and cloxacillin was used to detect extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC enzymes, in that order, as previously described.Reference Perez ⁵

During the study period, 67 enterobacterial isolates presenting a multidrug-resistance phenotype were recovered from 45 patients. These isolates were found in blood (26.9%; 18 of 67), in respiratory secretions (14.9%; 10 of 67), in urine (55.2%; 37 of 67), and at other sites (3%; 2 of 67). According to the phenotypic testing, 47 isolates were ESBL producers, including 42 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 4 Escherichia coli, and 1 Enterobacter aerogenes. The remaining 20 isolates (15 Enterobacter cloacae, 4 E. aerogenes, and 1 E. coli) were categorized as CRE because they were able to hydrolyze at least 1 carbapenem agent (ie, a single E. aerogenes was resistant to meropenem and ertapenem while others were only resistant to ertapenem). Notably, decreased susceptibility to any carbapenem agent among many (if not all) CRE isolates is related to the production of an ESBL and/or AmpC enzymes associated with membrane impermeability. In this study, the “majority mechanism” regarding the spectrum of antimicrobial hydrolysis detected by the phenotypic tests was considered.

Of the 67 isolates, 11 (16.4%) were recovered from 9 distinct patients and were resistant to PMB: 8 ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, 1 ESBL-producing E. coli, 1 ESBL-producing E. aerogenes, and 1 carbapenem-resistant E. aerogenes. The microbiological data regarding the PMB-resistant enterobacterial species found in this study are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Microbiological Features of the PMB-R MDR Noncarbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Evaluated in This Study

NOTE. PMB-R MDR, polymyxin B-resistant multidrug resistant; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase.

^a According to results obtained using a MicroScan automated system.

^b Attributable resistance mechanism for a MDR phenotype inferred by phenotypic tests.

^c Considering ≤2 mg/L and >2 mg/L as susceptible and resistant, respectively.

Resistance to carbapenems (formerly cephalosporins) among Enterobacteriaceae does matter, which could be interpreted as strong justification to be more liberal with polymyxins (formerly carbapenems) in empirical therapies.Reference Lee, Patel, Huprikar, Calfee and Jenkins ⁶ However, the degree to which this can be reflected among MDR organisms other than carbapenem-resistant ones, equally recovered from a setting with a high-level selection pressure, has not been evaluated properly.

Although the resistance rate was lower among MDR Enterobacteriaceae than among KPC producers (16.4% vs 34.8%, respectively) during the same period of evaluation, the outcome reported here is an important matter (and not a myth) because it illustrates a possible influence of PMB use on other bacteria whose infectious processes need not be treated with it.

Additionally, some important observations in this study follow: First, K. pneumoniae seems to be a specie with fitness for resistance acquisition. Second, although not as notable as the bloodstream, for example, the urinary site appears to be a reservoir for MDR organisms. Third, PMB resistance does occur without carbapenem resistance: among the 11 PMB-resistant isolates found in this study, only one E. aerogenes was a CRE (Table 1).

In conclusion, in this study, an important PMB resistance rate was detected among MDR Enterobacteriaceae isolates with the exception of the carbapenemase-producing ones. This finding emphasizes the need for a constant monitoring program to prevent the emergence of PMB resistance, not only among carbapenemase producers but especially among organisms that have a fitness to develop it.