Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:53:48.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Serological evidence of Toscana virus infection in Portuguese patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2011

F. AMARO*
Affiliation:
Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Research Dr. Francisco Cambournac, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Portugal
T. LUZ
Affiliation:
Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Research Dr. Francisco Cambournac, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Portugal
P. PARREIRA
Affiliation:
Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Research Dr. Francisco Cambournac, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Portugal
A. MARCHI
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immune-Mediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
M. G. CIUFOLINI
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immune-Mediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
M. J. ALVES
Affiliation:
Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Research Dr. Francisco Cambournac, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Portugal
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr F. Amaro, Center for Vector and Infectious Diseases Research Dr. Francisco Cambournac, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge. Av. da Liberdade no. 5, 2965-575 Águas de Moura, Portugal. (Email: fatima.f.amaro@gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Toscana virus (TOSV) is an emerging Phlebovirus of growing interest as a human pathogen in the Mediterranean Basin. In Portugal, however, little is known about the prevalence of TOSV infection. The aim of this work was to perform a seroprevalence study in patients with requests for laboratory diagnosis of vector-borne viruses. A total of 538 patients with and without neurological signs from 2004 to 2008 were studied by in-house indirect immunofluorescence assay and commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A prevalence of 4·2% for IgG antibodies was found in the group of patients with neurological signs. Five (3%) of these had recent infections. In the group with no neurological signs, the IgG prevalence was 1·3%. Two samples, belonging to two patients, were also confirmed with plaque reduction neutralization tests with the TOSV ISS. Phl.3 Italian strain. This work showed that TOSV is present and causing disease from north to south in Portugal. The probable circulation of different phlebovirus serotypes in Portugal emphasizes the need for further studies.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

INTRODUCTION

Toscana virus (TOSV) is a Phlebovirus (family Bunyaviridae) transmitted to man by Phlebotomus perniciosus and P. perfiliewi (Diptera, Psychodidae) sandflies [Reference Verani1]. The first human isolation of TOSV was achieved in 1983, from the cerebrospinal fluid of an Italian patient diagnosed with acute lymphocytic meningitis [Reference Leoncini, Bartolozzi and Banchi2]. In the following years an extensive study on the significance of this virus as a human pathogen in Central Italy has demonstrated its neurovirulence [Reference Nicoletti3]. Since then, TOSV has been identified as the major cause of meningitis and encephalitis in some regions of Italy and has been progressively detected in patients hospitalized with neurological symptoms during the summer. Several studies in other Mediterranean countries such as Spain [Reference Echevarria4], France and Greece [Reference Charrel5], and Cyprus [Reference Eitrem, Vene and Niklasson6], have shown the extensive geographical range of TOSV.

The first reference to TOSV presence in Portugal was made in 1985, when its isolation from a tourist who became infected in Albufeira was reported in Sweden [Reference Ehrnst7]. In 1996 serological evidence of TOSV infection in a German tourist in Coimbra was demonstrated [Reference Schwarz8]. Recently, between 2002 and 2005, six cases were diagnosed in Portuguese patients with meningitis by molecular methods [Reference Santos9]. To our knowledge, little else is known about the prevalence of antibodies against TOSV in the local population. The main aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of antibodies against TOSV in Portuguese patients.

METHODS

Patients

The study population comprised patients admitted to healthcare centres in mainland Portugal and the Azores and Madeira archipelagos, from 2004 to 2008. Samples were sent to the Centre for Vectors and Infectious Diseases Research (CEVDI) for laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of vector-borne viruses. Patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of patients with typical neurological symptoms such as headache, ocular pain and neck rigidity and/or diagnosed with aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis; group II was composed of patients with no neurological signs. All sera samples were stored at −20°C until tested.

Serological methods

Patients' sera were tested for the presence of antibodies against TOSV from both IgG and IgM classes using an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Briefly, spot slides containing TOSV (ISS. Phl.3) infected Vero E6 cells and uninfected cells (at an approximate proportion of 3:1) were prepared. The samples were tested with fluorescein-conjugated rabbit anti-human immunoglobulins (Dako, Denmark).

Sera with IgG titres ⩾32 and/or IgM titres ⩾16 were considered positive. Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [Reference Soldateschi10] were also used to test the positive results obtained by in-house IFA. Samples with an optical density at 450 nm of 0·360 were considered positive, as suggested by the manufacturer. For seroprevalence calculations only positive samples by both IFA and ELISA were considered.

Finally, plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs) were performed with TOSV (ISS. Phl.3) strain in positive samples by both previous techniques. Titres ⩾10 were considered positive [Reference Nicoletti, Ciufolini and Verani11].

RESULTS

A total of 538 patients were eligible for this study. Patients' ages ranged from 5 months to 93 years.

One hundred and sixty-five patients were assigned to group I and laboratory diagnosis was requested for TOSV (n=22), other arboviruses (n=51) and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (n=92) (LCMV, family Arenaviridae). The most cited clinical manifestations were meningitis (44·2%), meningoencephalitis (15·8%) and encephalitis (15·8%). In this group, the prevalence of IgG antibodies was 4·2%. Five patients (3%), with ages ranging from 17 to 62 years and presenting with meningitis or meningoencephalitis signs (patients 1–5, Table 1) showed recent infections. All five patients fell ill between May and October and did not travel abroad or around the country prior to that period, therefore the infections were assumed to have been acquired in Faro, Coimbra and Aveiro districts.

Table 1. Clinical manifestations and results of IFA, ELISA and PRNT in patients with recent TOSV infections

M, Male; F, female.

In group II, samples from 373 patients were tested and laboratory diagnosis was requested for TOSV (n=12), other arboviruses (n=309) and LCMV (n=52). In total, 33·5% were referred as having febrile syndrome. The prevalence of IgG antibodies was 1·3%.

Overall two sera were confirmed by PRNT.

DISCUSSION

Our study indicates that TOSV circulates in mainland Portugal and is associated with neurological illness. It also corroborates the presence of the virus in the north, centre and south, indicating that it is very likely to be widespread in mainland Portugal, which is in accordance with the distribution of P. perniciosus, known to be present throughout the country [Reference Pires12]. The number of human samples from Madeira or Azores archipelagos matching the criteria for this study was low considering the total amount tested (4·8% of total serum samples). No antibodies against TOSV were found in these samples; however, to date there have been no reports on the presence of the arthropod vectors, P. perniciosus or P. perfiliewi in those islands.

TOSV-specific laboratory diagnosis was not requested for any of the recent infections. Instead, diagnoses were requested for West Nile virus (WNV, family Flaviviridae) and LCMV infections, which appears to indicate that only a small number of clinicians in Portugal consider TOSV as a causative agent of disease. According to Moureau and colleagues [Reference Moureau13], in Europe TOSV is more common than WNV and more prevalent than originally estimated.

One of the patients with recent TOSV infection presented with exanthema (patient 1, Table 1) and another with early symptoms suggesting gastroenteritis (patient 5, Table 1). A case of rash with no central nervous system involvement has been previously described [Reference Sanbonmatsu-Gámez14] and several descriptions of TOSV infections with unusual manifestations, e.g. deafness [Reference Martínez-García15], encephalitis without meningitis [Reference Dionisio16] or even hydrocephaly [Reference Baldelli17] have been reported in recent years. Valentini and colleagues [Reference Valentini18] suggested that genetic differences in the virus may reflect different pathological pictures in infected people.

In the present study there were some positive results by IFA that were not confirmed by ELISA (data not shown) and in 17 samples positive by both techniques only two were confirmed when tested with PRNT against TOSV Italian serotype. This could mean reduced sensitivity of PRNT compared to the other techniques used, as previously reported [Reference Ciufolini19], but it can also indicate the occurrence of cross-reactions with possibly different TOSV serotypes circulating in Portugal similarly to that reported in France [Reference Charrel20]. Additionally, and most likely, our results may be explained by the presence of different phleboviruses in Portugal, as recently described in other countries [Reference Charrel21, Reference Zhioua22].

This is the first comprehensive serological study regarding antibodies against TOSV in Portuguese patients. Even though the prevalence of active or recent infection by TOSV in patients with neurological disease in this study was lower than that reported in other countries such as Spain, where similar research resulted in a prevalence of 5·6% [Reference De Ory23], this virus is causing disease in Portugal and its importance as a human pathogen is certainly being underestimated. TOSV should be considered an aetiological agent in cases of neurological disease or febrile syndrome of unknown origin, and in travellers who become ill after visiting Portigal, particularly in the summer.

Additional studies should be performed in order to clarify the possible existence of different Phlebovirus strains in circulation.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Verani, P, et al. Ecology of viruses isolated from sand flies in Italy and characterization of a new Phlebovirus (Arabia virus). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1988; 38: 433439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Leoncini, F, Bartolozzi, D, Banchi, S. Il virus Toscana: un nuovo Phlebovirus causa di malattie infiammatorie acute del SNC nell'uomo. Giornale di malattie infettive e parassitarie 1986; 38: 649652.Google Scholar
3.Nicoletti, L, et al. Central nervous system involvement during infection by Phlebovirus Toscana of residents in natural foci in central Italy (1977–1988). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1991; 45: 429434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Echevarria, JM, et al. Acute meningitis due to Toscana virus infection among patients from both the Spanish Mediterranean region and the region of Madrid. Journal of Clinic Virology 2003; 26: 7984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Charrel, RN, et al. Emergence of Toscana virus in Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 16571663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Eitrem, R, Vene, S, Niklasson, B. Incidence of sandfly fever among Swedish United Nations soldiers on Cyprus during 1985. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1990; 43: 207211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ehrnst, A, et al. Neurovirulent Toscana virus (a sandfly fever virus) in Swedish man after visit to Portugal. Lancet 1985; 325: 12121213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Schwarz, TF, et al. Travel-related vector-borne virus infections in Germany. Archives of Virology (Suppl.) 1996; 11: 5766.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Santos, , et al. Toscana virus meningitis in Portugal, 2002–2005. Eurosurveillance2007; 12: pii=715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Soldateschi, D et al. Laboratory diagnosis of Toscana virus infection by enzyme immunoassay with recombinant viral nucleoprotein. Jounal of Clinical Microbiology 1999; 37: 649652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Nicoletti, L, Ciufolini, MG, Verani, P. Sandfly fever viruses in Italy. Archives of Virology 1996; 11: 4147.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Pires, C.Os flebótomos (Diptera, Psychodidae) dos focos zoonóticos de leishmanioses em Portugal (Dissertation). Lisboa: Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2000, pp. 228.Google Scholar
13.Moureau, G et al. Molecular and serological evidence for the presence of novel phleboviruses in sandflies from northern Algeria. Open Virology Journal 2010; 4: 1521.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Sanbonmatsu-Gámez, S, et al. Unusual manifestation of toscana virus infection, Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 15: 347348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Martínez-García, FA, et al. Deafness as a sequela of Toscana virus meningitis. Medicina Clinica 2008; 130: 639.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Dionisio, D, et al. Encephalitis without meningitis due to sandfly fever virus serotype toscana. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001; 32: 12411243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Baldelli, F, et al. Unusual presentation of life-threatening Toscana virus meningoencephalitis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004; 38: 515520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Valentini, M, et al. Nucleotide variability of Toscana virus M segment in strains isolated from clinical cases. Virus Research 2008; 135: 187190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Ciufolini, MG, et al. Detection of IgG and IgM antibodies by Elisa assay. Arthropod-borne Virus Information Exchange 1989: 4243.Google Scholar
20.Charrel, RN, et al. Cocirculation of 2 genotypes of Toscana virus, southeastern France. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2007; 13: 465468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Charrel, RN, et al. Massilia virus, a novel Phlebovirus (Bunyaviridae) isolated from sandflies in the Mediterranean. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2009; 9: 519530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Zhioua, E, et al. Punique virus, a novel phlebovirus, related to Sandfly fever Naples virus, isolated from sandflies collected in Tunisia. Journal of General Virology 2010; 91: 12751283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.De Ory, F, et al. Toscana virus, West Nile virus and lymphochoriomeningitis virus as causing agents of aseptic meningitis in Spain. Medicina Clinica 2009; 132: 587590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Clinical manifestations and results of IFA, ELISA and PRNT in patients with recent TOSV infections