Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:14:21.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What about the behavioral constellation of advantage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Jeremy Freese
Jeremy Freese*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2047. jfreese@stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many short-sighted behaviors are more common among poorer people. These behaviors are neither evolutionarily nor historically unusual and have strong contemporary encouragement. The bigger puzzle is their lower frequency among the affluent. The behaviors also have clear cultural and normative aspects that limit the usefulness of strictly individualist theories.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, A. (2009) The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Link, B. G. & Phelan, J. (2009) The social shaping of health and smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 104(Suppl. 1):S6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papachristos, A. V., Wildeman, C. & Roberto, E. (2015) Tragic, but not random: The social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Social Science & Medicine 125:139–50.Google Scholar