Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T11:58:50.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shimao and Erlitou: new perspectives on the origins of the bronze industry in central China*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Rawson*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 34–36 Beaumont Street, Oxford OX1 2PG, UK (Email: jessica.rawson@merton.ox.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last five years, excavation of a large, stone, fortified site at Shimao, on the northern edge of the Loess Plateau in Shaanxi Province, China, has radically changed our understanding of the events that precipitated the development of the first bronze casting in central China at Erlitou (Figure 1). An international conference on the Shimao site, held at Shenmu in August 2016, explored many aspects of this major discovery.

Type
Project Gallery
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017 

Over the last five years, excavation of a large, stone, fortified site at Shimao, on the northern edge of the Loess Plateau in Shaanxi Province, China, has radically changed our understanding of the events that precipitated the development of the first bronze casting in central China at Erlitou (Figure 1). An international conference on the Shimao site, held at Shenmu in August 2016, explored many aspects of this major discovery.

Figure 1. Map of northern China and the steppe, showing the sites named in the paper. The shaded area is an intermediate zone between the steppe and central China. The dotted line encircles a region with stone fortified sites. Map by Beichen Chen.

The Shimao site, on a hilltop in the Loess Plateau, south-east of the Ordos region, covers 400ha. It comprises two walled areas, inner and outer, with substantial gates and a large central construction thought to be a ritual or palace site (Figure 2). The excavators, the Shaanxi Provincial Archaeological Institute led by Sun Zhouyong, regard Shimao as a city. Several pits containing skulls have been excavated and radiocarbon-dated to between 2300 and 1800 BC (Figure 3). Neolithic-period ceramics of Longshan type, including tripods and steamers suitable for boiling and steaming millet, are congruent with this dating.

Figure 2. One of the major retaining walls at Shimao, after Faxian Shimao gucheng, p. 37 (upper figure).

Figure 3. Detail of skull-pit 2 at Shimao, after Faxian Shimao gucheng, p. 113 (upper figure).

While the stone walls and jades found in the area have been known for many decades, the region was not fully explored until recently. Shimao is the largest site in the area and clearly a dominant centre, but it was by no means isolated, with 11 walled, and over 190 unwalled, sites found nearby (Shaanxi Reference Shaanxi2016). Additional walled sites have now been explored (Figure 1), extending to Yulin and as far south as Luliang on both sides of the Yellow River (Wang & Zhang Reference Wang and Zhang2016: fig. 9).

Shimao's significance is twofold. First of all, a previously unrecognised Neolithic community has been identified with many unusual practices, including, most notably, large-scale stone fortifications—implying a competitive or even hostile social environment—and the presence of bronze knives, arrowheads and ornaments, comparable with those of similar periods in the steppe, alongside jade and Longshan-type pottery, with strong links to wider, central-Chinese Neolithic developments. Secondly, the site and the associated areas with similar stone fortified centres were evidently important links between the peoples of the steppe, in present-day Inner Mongolia and farther north, and the much better-known large sites at Taosi and Erlitou, regarded as the founding centres of China's Bronze Age culture (Figure 1).

In these wider relationships, climate change played a significant role. Large increases in the number of settlements in the region in the fourth to third millennia BC indicate a propitious climate, while domesticated animals, such as sheep and goats, may have been brought there by people from the north moving south (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Pengcheng and Ming2008). Bronze Age sites in the region, post-dating Shimao, illustrate a sharp decline in population, as a cold dry spell took over (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Xu and Qin1999; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Jin, Sun, Sun, Niu, Xie and Li2014; Peng et al. Reference Peng, Xiao, Nakamura, Liu and Inouchi2015). Telling examples of closely related bronzes and jades have been found farther south, at Taosi (Taosi Reference Taosi2015: vol. 4, pls 39–53) and Erlitou, suggesting that some of the populations of Shimao or of the other stone fortified sites moved there, taking both bronzes and jades with them.

It has long been known that a single-edged knife found at Erlitou, the centre of the first bronzes cast on China's central plain, belonged to a steppe tradition (Mei Reference Mei, Mei and Rehren2009). The knife can be compared with one from the Elunino culture in the Russian Altai, and with its relatives at Shimao (Figure 4). Jade sceptres excavated at Erlitou (Figure 5: left) are copies of similar jades from Shimao. Hitherto unremarked is a significant trait of the Erlitou jades: many of them feature small projecting teeth (Figure 5). These jades have always been regarded as major products of Erlitou's central-Chinese tradition (Guojia wenwuju 2009: 156–57). Neat projecting teeth are, however, a hallmark of ornaments from Shimao, and are also found on similar bronze ornaments in the Yenisei Valley, southSiberia (Figure 6a & b). Such similarities were probably the consequence of a shared culture across the steppe and into the northern regions of the Loess Plateau, rather than of direct contact. A similar ornament from Taosi (Figure 6c), which has puzzled excavators, can now be identified as a version of the ones from Shimao, or even an import brought by people from Shimao moving south. Personal ornaments in bronze were not at any stage popular in early central China, where jade was preferred. Therefore, it is not surprising that at Erlitou, and later at Shang sites, the bronzes were not adopted, but instead, small projecting teeth were taken over from the bronzes to enhance ceremonial jades (Figure 5).

Figure 4. Drawing of three single-edged knives: a) of the Elunio culture, 2000–1800 BC, Russian Altai, length around 220mm; b) from Shimao, 2000–1800 BC, length around 100mm, see http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-01/11/c_1120285032.htm; c) Erlitou, 1700–1600 BC, length around 255mm (drawing by John Rawson).

Figure 5. A group of jades excavated at Erlitou, all with small projecting teeth: left) two sceptres; centre) an axe; right) the edges of two reaping knives. Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing (author's photograph).

Figure 6. Drawing of three bronze ornaments: a) Karasuk culture c. 1400–1200 BC, diameter around 100mm Abakan Museum; b) Shimao 2000–1800 BC, diameter around 120mm, private museum in Shenmu; c) excavated at Taosi, diameter around 125mm Shanxi province (drawing by John Rawson).

These comparisons join together the steppe, Shimao, Taosi and Erlitou. Thus, we here recognise that one of the routes by which Erlitou gained bronze technology was precipitated by climate change, which first brought more people to Shimao, and then, as a colder dry spell made agriculture difficult, drove bronze-using peoples south, first to Taosi and then to Erlitou. It has long been accepted that the much earlier use of bronze in the steppe must have contributed to the developmentof China's production and use of bronze. The finds from Shimao now provide direct evidence of one of the most probable sources of this revolutionary change.

Acknowledgements

The visit to Shimao was organised by the Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology. The author is grateful for the invitation to Shimao, and for the work of Sun Zhouyong and his colleagues. I am grateful for the assistance of Xiaojia Tang, who accompanied me to Shimao. The visit to Abakan Museum was organised by Yuri Esin.

Footnotes

*

Figures 2, 3 and 4 have been replaced, and their captions amended from the originally published article. A correction notice has been published online https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.34

References

Guojia wenwuju. 2009. Zaoqi Zhongguo, Zhonghua wenming qiyuan. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Hu, S., Pengcheng, Z. & Ming, Y.. 2008. Yulin Huoshiliang yizhi dongwu yicun yanjiu. Renleixue xuebao 3: 232–48.Google Scholar
Liu, B., Jin, H., Sun, L., Sun, Z., Niu, Q., Xie, S. & Li, G.. 2014. Holocene moisture change revealed by the Rb/Sr ratio of aeolian deposits in the southeastern Mu Us Desert, China. Aeolian Research 13: 109–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.03.006 Google Scholar
Mei, J.J. 2009. Early metallurgy in the Eurasian Steppe and China: some challenging issues, in Mei, J.J. & Rehren, T. (ed.) Metallurgy and civilization: Eurasia and beyond: 916. London: Archetype.Google Scholar
Peng, Y.J., Xiao, J., Nakamura, T., Liu, B. & Inouchi, Y.. 2015. Holocene East Asian monsoonal precipitation pattern revealed by grain-size distribution of core sediments of Daihai Lake in Inner Mongolia of north-central China. Earth and Planetary, Science Letters 233: 467–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaanxi, (ed.). 2016. Faxian Shimao gucheng. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Taosi, (ed.). 2015. Xiangfen Taosi, 1978–1985 nian kaogu fajue baogao. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wang, X.Y. & Zhang, G.H.. 2016. Xing xian Bi cun Longshan shidai yicun chutan. Kaogu yu wenwu 4: 8087.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Xu, J. & Qin, J.. 1999. Zhongguo wenwu dituji: Shaanxi fence. Xi'an: Ditu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of northern China and the steppe, showing the sites named in the paper. The shaded area is an intermediate zone between the steppe and central China. The dotted line encircles a region with stone fortified sites. Map by Beichen Chen.

Figure 1

Figure 2. One of the major retaining walls at Shimao, after Faxian Shimao gucheng, p. 37 (upper figure).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Detail of skull-pit 2 at Shimao, after Faxian Shimao gucheng, p. 113 (upper figure).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Drawing of three single-edged knives: a) of the Elunio culture, 2000–1800 BC, Russian Altai, length around 220mm; b) from Shimao, 2000–1800 BC, length around 100mm, see http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-01/11/c_1120285032.htm; c) Erlitou, 1700–1600 BC, length around 255mm (drawing by John Rawson).

Figure 4

Figure 5. A group of jades excavated at Erlitou, all with small projecting teeth: left) two sceptres; centre) an axe; right) the edges of two reaping knives. Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing (author's photograph).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Drawing of three bronze ornaments: a) Karasuk culture c. 1400–1200 BC, diameter around 100mm Abakan Museum; b) Shimao 2000–1800 BC, diameter around 120mm, private museum in Shenmu; c) excavated at Taosi, diameter around 125mm Shanxi province (drawing by John Rawson).