Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:10:26.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Data from the Vicinity of Four South Korean Nuclear Power Plants in 2013–2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2017

J H Lee*
Affiliation:
NCIRF, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
C H Kim
Affiliation:
NCIRF, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
J Kang
Affiliation:
NCIRF, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
S Song
Affiliation:
NCIRF, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
M H Yun
Affiliation:
NCIRF, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
J C Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jefflee@snu.ac.kr.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon (14C) is a radionuclide generated mainly through neutron-induced reactions in all types of nuclear reactors. Since most of the 14C released into the environment is in the form of gaseous emissions (CO2 and hydrocarbons), terrestrial plants are the primary indicators of increased 14C levels near nuclear power plants (NPPs). In 2013–2014, we collected samples of silver grasses (including common reed) and pine needles within 3 km of four South Korean NPP centers and measured 14C activities using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) at Seoul National University. The highest 14C activities were observed, respectively, in Wolsong>Hanul>Kori>Hanbit [220, 143, 127, and 123% modern carbon (pMC)].

Type
Studies of Calibration, Environment, and Soils
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

INTRODUCTION

Many countries, including South Korea, have plans to increase nuclear energy production in their mix of energy sources or to export the construction of nuclear power plants (NPPs). However, some nongovernmental environmental organizations oppose these plans because of the increase in the threat level for a nuclear activity-related accident. Because both preference for and vigilance regarding nuclear facilities exist together, we turned our attention to radioactive 14CO2 gas. Radiocarbon (14C) is produced not only naturally by cosmic ray-induced nuclear reactions in the atmosphere but also by anthropogenic activities (Suess Reference Suess1955; Hua and Barbetti Reference Hua and Barbetti2004; Usoskin Reference Usoskin2008). NPP operation is one of the main anthropogenic activities that generate 14C. It has been reported that the emission rate and chemical composition of the released 14C depends on the capacity and type of a given reactor (Kunz Reference Kunz1985). Since most of the 14C released into the environment from NPPs is in the form of gaseous emissions (e.g. 14CO2), 14C concentrations in terrestrial samples (e.g. plants) have been used in many studies as indicators of increased 14C levels in the areas surrounding NPPs (Levin et al. Reference Levin, Kromer, Barabas and Munnich1988; Magnusson et al. 2004). To date, a variety of studies about 14C activity around NPPs have been conducted. Even though we could not investigate all the studies, we have considered several published papers. We found studies showing that monitong activities for 14C activity were performed continuously near NPPs for a long-term trend and with a constant time interval (monthly or annually), and some 14C activity measurements for several different monitoring positions near NPPs have been performed over a specific time interval (Magnusson et al. Reference Magnusson, Stensrom, Skog, Adliene, Adlys, Hellborg, Olariu, Jakara, Räät and Mattson2004; Povinec et al. Reference Povinec, Sivo, Simon, Holy, Chudý, Richtáriková and Morávek2008, Reference Povinec, Chudy, Sivo, Simon, Holý and Richtáriková2009, Reference Povinec, Šivo, Ješkovský, Svetlik, Richtáriková and Kaizer2015). On the other hand, accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is expected to open a new possibility to investigate the integrated 14C impact of NPPs on the environment, since AMS is suitable mainly because of the accuracy obtanied with only a submilligram sample, which makes it easy to analyze a sufficient number of samples for a thorough investigation (Strensöm et al. Reference Stenström, Erlandsson, Hellborg, Wiebert and Skog1996; Povinec et al. Reference Povinec, Šivo, Ješkovský, Svetlik, Richtáriková and Kaizer2015). However, to our knowledge, there are poor studies on NPPs monitoring using AMS in South Korea. For this study, in 20132014 we collected samples of silver grasses (including common reed) and pine needles within 3 km of the centers of four South Korean NPPs (Wolsong, Hanul, Kori, and Hanbit), and investigated 14C activities around NPPs using AMS. The highest 14C activities for each NPP were 220, 143, 127, and 123% modern carbon (pMC) for Wolsong, Hanul, Kori, and Hanbit, respectively. The aim of the present paper is to make a foundation and prepare the fundamental data for future or related research about 14C activity from South Korean NPPs.

SAMPLING AND MEASURMENT TECHNIQUES

Sampling

The locations of the NPPs in South Korea are as follows: Hanbit (35°24′54″N, 126°25′26″E), Hanul (37°5′34″N, 129°23′1″E), Wolsong (35°42′40″N, 129°28′30″E), and Kori (35°19′1″N, 129°18′0″E), as shown in Figure 1. Wolsong is a heavy water reactor (HWR), and the other three NPPs are pressurized light water reactors (PWRs). As there is a substantial population around all the NPPs, it is possible that fossil-carbon sources could affect or interfere with the monitored value of 14C, i.e. the Suess Effect (Suess Reference Suess1955; Stuiver and Quay Reference Stuiver and Quay1981).

Figure 1 Locations of the four NPPs with expanded views of their respective 14C background areas. YP=Yongpyung. Map taken from Google Earth, version 7.1.5.1557 (Google Inc. 2015).

First, we collected appropriate terrestrial plant samples from around all the NPPs to check the 14C distribution for as short a time as possible within our AMS team’s capability. The collection work was conducted within the range of about 3 km from the established center of each NPP. All South Korean NPPs are enclosed by mountainous and sea-coastal areas. There are also many restricted areas with barbed-wire fences because NPPs are considered national security facilities. Accordingly, even though we tried to collect terrestrial plant samples symmetrically in a two-dimensional space view, there was a limit to our access, as we could only collect samples from places civilians could access. The samples for three NPPs (Hanul, Wolsong, Kori) were collected in April 2014 and those for the Hanbit NPP were collected in November 2012 (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Choe, Kim, Choi, Kang, Song, Song, Kim and Jang2013a, Reference Lee, Kim, Kang, Song, Yun and Kim2014). Figure 2 shows the detailed locations of sample collections for all four NPPs. Of course, to observe the 14C background values in South Korea and compare them to the data from a bomb pulse (Levin and Kromer Reference Levin and Kromer2004; Levin et al. Reference Levin, Kromer and Hammer2013; CALIBomb 2015), we collected some samples at much farther locations (over 30 km from the centers of the NPPs), assuming that they might have grown in a clean-air environment without anthropogenic fossil carbon and 14C. The locations of the background samples are listed in Table 1. 14C activity monitoring over the long term (several months or years) for all the South Korean NPPs could not be performed because our initial research for this purpose started relatively recently in November 2012 with limited labor power and research funds.

Figure 2 Details of sample-collection locations: (a) Hanbit, (b) Hanul, (c) Kori, and (d) Wolsong. All NPPs’ reactors are positioned at the sea coastline. The maps for each NPP were taken from Google Earth, version 7.1.5.1557 (Google Inc. 2015).

Table 1 Locations of background samples and sample types.

Analyses

After all the samples were collected, the standard acid-alkali-acid (AAA) treatment was performed (Olsson Reference Olsson1980; Bonani et al. Reference Bonani, Ivy, Hajdas, Niklaus and Suter1994; Park Reference Park2003). The plant samples were immersed in 0.5 M of HCl at 80–85°C for 30 min and washed to a neutral pH. Then, they were subjected to 0.1 M of NaOH at 80–85°C for 1 hr and washed to a neutral pH. After that, they were treated by applying 4% NaClO2 at 55–60°C for 1 hr to extract α-cellulose and washed to a neutral pH. They were again immersed in 0.5 M of HCl at 80–85°C for 30 min to remove any CO2 absorbed during the second and the third steps and washed to a neutral pH. The residues from all the samples were dried in an oven at 120°C for 8 hr. The dried residues were combusted by an elemental analyzer, and the produced CO2 was trapped cryogenically. The conversion of CO2 to graphite was thereafter conducted using H2 and Fe powder. The resulting graphite was loaded to the ion source of the AMS facility. Subsequently, the 14C activity in pMC for the samples was measured by using the Tandetron 4130 AMS at Seoul National University. Oxalic acid II was used as a standard, and IAEA-C6, ANU sucrose (150.6 pMC, δ13C=–10.8‰) was used as a secondary standard. The pMC values were corrected by δ13C values relative to Belemnite Americana from the Peedee formation in South Carolina (PDB) (Lee et al. 2013b).

RESULTS

Figure 3 shows the measured pMC values from the AMS measurement for all the samples collected near the four NPPs. The AMS measured sample codes for the Hanbit, Hanul, Wolsong, and Kori NPPs are indicated as SNU13-Hb01~13, SNU14-Hu01~34, SNU14-Ws01~23, and SNU14-Kr01~27, respectively. The samples from the Hanbit NPP were measured in September 2013. All samples from the other three NPPs were measured from May to August 2014. As Figure 3 shows, the sample with the highest value was SNU14-Ws02 with 219±0.67%, from Wolsong, and this was collected from around the public information hall of the NPP, very near to the reactors. This sample was silver grass. If we compare the values from Figure 3 at the wide tendency view and between NPPs, it seems that Wolsong has higher pMC values than the others, followed by Hanul>Kori>Hanbit.

Figure 3 AMS measured pMC values from each NPP. Filled circle, rectangle, triangle, and rhombus symbols are for pMC from Wolsong (Ws), Hanul (Hu), Kori (Kr), and Hanbit (Hb), respectively.

Figure 4 shows the Δ14C values by distance (in km) from the established center of sample collection. Because the nuclear reactors from all NPPs are positioned at the sea coastline and distributed nonsymmetrically, we chose the center of each distance to be the public information center buildings of all NPPs. pMC, Δ14C (‰), and Bq/kg C are the usual units in the evaluation of 14C activity in previous research and these units are linearly proportional to each (Magnusson et al. Reference Magnusson, Stensrom, Skog, Adliene, Adlys, Hellborg, Olariu, Jakara, Räät and Mattson2004; Dias et al. Reference Dias, Santos, Stenström, Nicolí, Skog and Corréa2008; Mazeika et al. Reference Mazeika, Petrosius and Rutile2008; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Cook, Cresswell, Dunbar, Freeman, Hastie, Hou, Jacobsson, Naysmith and Sanderson2015). The figure shows a similar result to that of Figure 3. In the viewpoint of a similar distance, Wolsong shows larger values than the other three NPPs, and Hanul>Kori>Hanbit are also in the same order as that of Figure 3. Moreover, Figure 4 shows a decreasing pMC value tendency with the distance from the established centers except for a few places such as SNU14-Ws16, SNU14-Hu03, and SNU14-Kr15. The surroundings of all the government-controlled NPPs are mountainous with few motor roads and many restricted areas where civilians cannot enter. Thus, we could not take the samples with consistent distances (0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2.5 km, etc.) in a perfect radial shape for the established NPPs’ centers, even though we tried to maintain a radial sampling distribution. Furthermore, all the reactors are not positioned symmetrically at their NPP. They are all located in coastal areas, so they are affected by the main direction of the sea breeze. It was inferred that we could not expect a consistent decreasing 14C concentration tendency in the distance for these reasons. However, a rough decreasing tendency is shown in the distance scale. Additionally, our collection of all samples was taken in the “impact zone” (less than 3 km from the NPP) compared with previous studies and not in the “perimeter zone” (>5 km), with specific activities close to the background values and the distance between the impact and perimeter zones. Accordingly, it seems that the Δ14C values of around 3 km from the Wolsong and Hanul NPPs (which show higher pMC values than Kori and Hanbit) in Figure 4 do not come close to the 14C background value (32.5‰) or decrease below the value (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Santos, Stenström, Nicolí, Skog and Corréa2008). As a second trial for AMS 14C measurement, we will collect more samples and perform more AMS measurements for the two NPPs (Wolsong and Hanbit). In this collection work, the samples from a farther distance (>3 km) will be taken and compared to confirm the saturation at the background value. Figure 5 suggests three-dimensional 14C activity values in Bq/kg C. In Figure 5, the sample types are discriminated into tree leaf (including pine needle) and silver grass. While the silver grass samples show higher activity than those of tree leaf mostly at Wolsong, those from other NPPs show the opposite tendency (the samples of tree leaf show higher 14C activity). The conversion of pMC into Bq/kg C is simply calculated in the relation of 100 pMC=226 Bq/Kg C (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Santos, Stenström, Nicolí, Skog and Corréa2008).

Figure 4 AMS measured and calculated Δ14C (‰) from all NPPs. They are shown in relation to distance (km) from each established NPP center. While the filled circle and triangle symbols are for Wolsong (Ws) and Kori (Kr), respectively, the hollow cyan rectangle and orange rhombus symbols are for Hanul (Hu) and Hanbit (Hb), respectively. (Colors refer to online version.)

Figure 5 Three-dimensional plots of AMS measured and calculated 14C activity in Bq/kg C from the collection positions near NPPs: (a) Wolsong (Ws), (b) Hanul (Hu), (c) Kori (Kr), (d) Hanbit (Hb). Hollow star symbols represent the positions of nuclear reactors.

DISCUSSION

Table 2 compares our results (for as long as we could find them) related to 14C around the NPPs with those of the previously published papers. The highest measured 14C activity value from Wolsong (219±0.67 pMC, 494.9±4.1 Bq/kg C), could be located in third place following the Canadian deuterium uranium HWR and Ignalina NPP, Lithuania. This is shown in Figure 6 as well. Wolsong also shows a higher pMC value than the other South Korean NPPs. There are two related reasons for the observed difference. First, the reactor type at Wolsong is different from that of the other three NPPs. The type of reactors at Wolsong is HWR, known as the Canadian deuterium reactor (CANDU) type, which uses heavy water, and the others are PWR type, which uses light water. Additionally, it is known that the reactors that use heavy water produce and emit more 14CO2 into the outer atmosphere than other types of reactors (IAEA 2004; Hagg et al. Reference Hagg, Nehls and Young1983). Of course, PWR reactors discharge 14C-containing gas molecules, but do more as the other gaseous form of hydrocarbons (14CH4, 14C2H6, and 14CnHm) than 14CO2 (IAEA 2004; Hertelendi et al. Reference Hertelendi, Uchirin and Ormai1989; Uchrin et al. Reference Uchrin, Hertelendi, Volent, Slavik, Morávek, Kobal and Vokal1998; Molnar et al. Reference Molnár, Bujitás, Svingor, Furó and Sveltlík2007). Therefore, it is thought that the terrestrial plants around HWR reactors may absorb more 14C than those around other types of reactors because the photosynthesis process does not use hydrocarbons, but rather CO2 gas molecules. Thus, we think that our results agree with those in the previous report.

Figure 6 Bomb-pulse curve and measured maximum pMC values from worldwide and South Korean NPPs. The labels (a)–(f) are the indication symbols for the values from the references in Table 2. YP01 means the data from SNU13-YP01 sample, and Bg@2014 is the data from SNU14-Ws23 (pine needle at Youngildae Beach). The curve of polynomial fit (dashed black line) has been made with the partial data from 1980 to 2012 (Levin and Kromer 2004; Levin et al. Reference Levin, Kromer and Hammer2013; CALIBomb 2015).

Table 2 AMS results of some samples selected for background comparison.

Additionally, the HWR type generates and emits 3H as gaseous effluent with 14CO2. When we see that the maximum pMC values from the other three NPPs are lower than the peak value of the bomb-pulse curve (approximately 200 pMC), it may seem that the level of distribution of the radio isotope 14C would not have a significant environmental effect on the nearby area or become a threat to residents’ health. Otherwise, the Wolsong NPP shows a larger pMC value for 14C and generates 3H and releases it into the atmosphere (IAEA 2004; Kim et al. Reference Kim, Zheng, Kim, Park, Kang, Doh and Kim2006). A recent news story broadcast over public media (KBS News 2015) also reports that the residents around the Wolsong NPP showed a higher 3H concentration than residents in a distant location, and Kim et al. (Reference Kim, Zheng, Kim, Park, Kang, Doh and Kim2006) report that a specific position at the NPP shows a linear proportional relationship between 14C and 3H. Even though the 3H radioactivity detected from Wolsong is below a hazardous level to the human body and the obtained biological half-life of 3H is shorter than that given in the reference manual of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Kim and Han Reference Kim and Han1999; Kim et al. Reference Kim, Eum, Cha and Kim2001; Yoon et al. Reference Yoon, Ha and Lee2013), social interest in this report (3H concentration in people around Wolsong) is increasing, and one additional nuclear reactor started commercial operation in July 2015. This was after our first sample collection at the NPP site in April 2014 (IAEA PRIS 2016). While the maximum measured 14C activity value at the Wolsong NPP in 1998 was 477 Bq/kg C and just three reactors were running at the time, six reactors are now being operated and the AMS measured maximum 14C activity is about 500 Bq/kg C. Even though many efforts to reduce 14C might have been made, the value has not been drastically reduced (Kim et al. Reference Kim, Lee, Rho and Lee2000). Accordingly, continuous monitoring of these isotopes (14C and 3H) is necessary for the Wolsong NPP. The recent results of other study obtained by using the conventional liquid scintillation counter (LSC) method are quite comparable with our 14C results obtained using AMS (KINS 2014). Thus, it may be possible to improve the existing NPPs’ monitoring methods in South Korea by using the advantages of AMS.

Figure 6 shows the overlap between our AMS measurements and previously reported data (Table 3) with the bomb-pulse curve. The maximum pMC value (219±0.67%) from Wolsong is larger than the peak value in around 1963 on the curve. If the curve is examined from 1980, it seems to show a slowly decreasing trend, and it can be inferred that anyone would be capable of curve fitting with the data-set from 1980 using a commercial mathematical software program. We have used the Wolfram Mathematica ® 9 program to perform the curve fitting and employed only the two simple functions of “Import” (data import) and “Fit” (polynomial fit) with the software. Consequently, the fitted polynomial equation for the bomb pulse since 1980 is as follows:

(1) $${\rm f}\,({\rm y}){\,\equals\,}42083.41{\minus}62.8834\,{\rm y}{\plus}0.0313241\,{\rm y}^{2} {\minus}5.20149{\times}10^{{{\minus}6}} \,{\rm y}^{3} ({\rm y}\,\colon\,{\rm year})$$

Table 3 Previously reported high 14C activity values around NPPs. Bold values are calculated from the reported values in different units (pMC and Bq/kg C). See the references listed below for additional data (long series as well as more recent values).

If the decreasing tendency since 1980 for the bomb-pulse curve is maintained, the above fitted polynomial function is adequate for the data from 2012. From Figure 6, the AMS measured background value at the year in 2014 is only for sample SNU14-Ws23, even though Table 1 shows seven background samples, collected in 2014 at the distance of over 35 km from each NPP. Table 3 shows all the AMS measured pMC values and the corresponding values in Bq/kg C. Here “excess Bq/kg C” is expressed as the difference between the measured 14C activity and the average atmospheric 14C activity in the sample’s corresponding collection year (Dias et al. Reference Dias, Santos, Stenström, Nicolí, Skog and Corréa2008). Although some values are well matched to the values on the bomb-pulse curve of Figure 6, a few are not and show lower values. We assume that these samples were affected by the Suess effect (Suess Reference Suess1955; Stuiver and Quay Reference Stuiver and Quay1981; Park Reference Park2003). SNU14-Ws23 is the best-matched background to the fitted curve. Some collection locations, such as the aviation landing and take-off area near the airport and motorway service stations near the east coastline, may be affected by fossil-fuel contributions. It may be concluded that the maximum 14C values measured from each NPP totally originated from only the 14C generated by the NPP and were not diluted or affected by the fossil carbon generated from public transportation and traffic conditions because all the NPPs are located at the coastline and far from cities. However, we consider that a small amount of anthropogenic activity may affect the 14C results at NPPs when we observe and compare the results of the differences in values of excess Bq/kg C from the Baekyangsa service station (SNU13-Hb04), Gimhae Airport (SNU14-Kr23), and a few rural collection points near an NPP. This is because some people live near a NPP at the present time and there must be some car traffic and other effects, such as construction, which may affect the anthropogenic background.

Our study reports on the 14C activity values around South Korean NPPs, and we have determined that these effects are mostly not large compared with other previous results on NPPs. Thus, we expect that no immediate measures are necessary to limit these emissions except at the position of the Ws01 and Ws02 samples (center of Wolsong NPP). As shown in Figure 4, the values at the position of the Ws01 and Ws02 samples are around or exceed 1000‰ as the Δ14C value, and it is reported that a value of around 1000‰ would deliver an important radiation dose component to the public (Povinec et al. Reference Povinec, Šivo, Ješkovský, Svetlik, Richtáriková and Kaizer2015). Recent research on the effect of 14C from the Fukushima NPP accident shows a similar result (Park et al. Reference Park, Hong, Nakanishi, Park, Sung, Sung and Lee2015; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Cook, Cresswell, Dunbar, Freeman, Hastie, Hou, Jacobsson, Naysmith and Sanderson2015). However, even though such a disastrous accident may not occur in the future, the results of this study would be helpful as past data and could be used if there were a future incident. Furthermore, these kinds of study-related activities should be continued in order to create a safer environment for the residents near NPPs and ensure an effective monitoring method. Of course, to prevent an unknown environmental threat by discharged 14C from NPPs, a South Korean government-controlled organization that produces electricity through NPPs should make some efforts to reduce 14C production and emissions at Wolsong and even Kori for the PWR type (Sohn Reference Sohn, Kang and CHI2004; Charlotte Reference Charlotte2007).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we evaluated 14C activities of terrestrial plants in the vicinity of all four South Korean NPPs through AMS measurement. During 20132014, we collected samples of silver grasses (including common reed) and pine needles within 3 km from the centers of the four South Korean NPPs (Wolsong, Hanul, Kori, and Hanbit), and measured 14C activities using AMS at Seoul National University. The highest 14C activities were observed in the following order: Wolsong>Hanul>Kori>Hanbit (220, 143, 127, and 123 pMC, respectively). Considering that recent 14C results obtained by using the conventional LSC method are quite comparable with our results, it may be possible to improve the existing NPPs’ monitoring methods in South Korea by employing the advantages of AMS. To our knowledge, there are poor studies on NPP monitoring by using AMS in South Korea. Consequently, we suggest further studies to investigate more detailed 14C distributions using the advantages of AMS. For a more detailed second series of measurements, we are currently collecting additional samples around the NPPs (about two more locations than in the first collection and measurement). In advance, we finished the collection work at Wolsong (April 2015) and Hanbit (November 2015). Study of the second set of collection samples may show different effects on 14C activity values between two or three years and the influence on the environment around each NPP. To date, pMC results for the two NPPs of Wolsong and Hanbit in the second trial have been obtained, and their maximum values are 257.5±1.27 (Ws01, pine needle) and 138.8±0.52 (Hb08, pine needle) pMC, respectively. Compared with the maximum values for the first measurement (219.26±0.67 and 122.53±0.52 pMC), those from the second measurement increased by around 38 and 16 pMC, respectively. Therefore, we should further investigate the reasons for the difference and whether the increase is significant. Additionally, we are investigating temporal variations of 14C activity by using tree rings formed near NPPs. We expect that these kinds of continuous studies would provide basic data for future related research of South Korean NPPs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. 2014R1A2A1A11052858).

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Bonani, G, Ivy, SD, Hajdas, I, Niklaus, TR, Suter, M. 1994. AMS 14C age determinations of tissue, bone and grass samples from the Ötztal Ice Man. Radiocarbon 36(2):247250.Google Scholar
CALIBomb. 2015. A concatenation of the Levin’s Vermunt and Schauinsland data sets. URL: <calib.qub.ac.uk/CALIBomb/Levin.html/Levin.f14c>..>Google Scholar
Dias, CM, Santos, RV, Stenström, K, Nicolí, IG, Skog, G, Corréa, RS. 2008. 14C content in vegetation in the vicinities of Brazilian nuclear power reactors. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99:10951101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagg, GL, Nehls, JW Jr, Young, GC. 1983. Carbon-14 immobilazation via the Ba(OH)2 8H2O process. Proceedings of the 17th DOE Nuclear Air Cleaning Conference . Denver, Colorado 2–5 August 1982. p 431455.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Uchirin, G, Ormai, P. 1989. 14C release in various chemical forms with gaseous effluents from Paks nuclear power plant. Radiocarbon 31(3):754761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M. 2004. Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46(3):12731278.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2004. Management of waste containing tritium and Carbon-14. Technical Reports 421:115.Google Scholar
IAEA PRIS. 2016. Power Reactor Information System, Shin-Wolsong-2. URL: <https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=884>..>Google Scholar
Kim, C-K, Han, M-J. 1999. Dose assessment and behavior of tritium in environmental samples around Wolsong nuclear power plant. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 50:783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, C-K, Lee, S-K, Rho, B-H, Lee, YG. 2000. Environmental distribution and behavior of 3H and 14C around Wolsong nuclear power plants. Health Physics 78(6):693699.Google Scholar
Kim, D-S, Zheng, Y-Z, Kim, W, Park, HB, Kang, H-D, Doh, S-H, Kim, C-K. 2006. Retrieval estimation of the gaseous 14C discharge rate using 14C and 3H concentrations in pine tree rings in the vicinity of Wolsung nuclear power plant. LSC 2005, Advances in Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry, Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 401406.Google Scholar
Kim, HG, Eum, HM, Cha, SC, Kim, MC. 2001. Studies on the biological half-lives of tritium released at Wolsong nuclear power plants. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research 26(3):139142. URL: <http://jrpr.org/current/?vol=26&no=3>.Google Scholar
KINS. 2014. Annual Report on the Environmental Radiological Surveillance and Assessment around the Nuclear Facilities 25: 70.Google Scholar
Kunz, C. 1985. Carbon-14 discharge at three light-water reactors. Health Physics 49(1):2535.Google Scholar
Lee, JH, Kang, J, Song, S, Yun, M-H, Kim, JC. 2013a. 14C activities in terrestrial plants in the vicinity of Hanbit NPP, Korea. 5th East Asia AMS Symposium, p 102.Google Scholar
Lee, JH, Choe, K, Kim, JC, Choi, SH, Kang, J, Song, S, Song, YM, Kim, JC, Jang, JG. 2013b. 14C AMS dating Yongcheon Cave. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:692697.Google Scholar
Lee, JH, Kim, C-H, Kang, J, Song, S, Yun, M-H, Kim, JC. 2014. 14C activities in terrestrial plants on South Korea’s Nuclear Power Plants. AMS-13, 13th International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Program and Abstracts Handbook. p 120.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Barabas, M, Munnich, KO. 1988. Environmental distribution and long-term dispersion of reactor 14CO2 around two German nuclear power plants. Health Physics 54(2):149156.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 2004. The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46(3):12611272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092.Google Scholar
Magnusson, A, Stensrom, K, Skog, G, Adliene, D, Adlys, G, Hellborg, R, Olariu, A, Jakara, M, Räät, C, Mattson, S. 2004. Levels of 14C in the terrestrial environment in the vicinity of two European nuclear power plants. Radiocarbon 46(2):863868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazeika, J, Petrosius, R, Rutile, P. 2008. Carbon-14 in tree rings and other terrestrial samples in the vincinity of Ignalina nuclear power plant, Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99:238247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, GM, Kramer, SJ, Brown, RM, Repta, CJW, King, KJ, Rao, RR. 1995. Radiocarbon dispersion around Canadian nuclear facilities. Radiocarbon 37(2):485496.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Bujitás, T, Svingor, E, Furó, I, Sveltlík, I. 2007. Monitoring of atmospheric excess 14C around Paks nuclear power plant, Hungary. Radiocarbon 49(2):10311043.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU. 1980. 14C in extractives from wood. Radiocarbon 22(2):515524.Google Scholar
Park, JH. 2003. 14C levels at Mount Chiak and Mount Kyeryong, and the Suess Effect in the region of Kyungbokkung [PhD dissertation]. Seoul National University, p 3961.Google Scholar
Park, JH, Hong, W, Nakanishi, T, Park, G, Sung, KS, Sung, K, Lee, J-G. 2015. Fukushima accident trace from comparison of Δ14C in Korea and Japan. International Radiocarbon Conference, 2015 Dakar, Senegal. Abstract S05-P-07:198.Google Scholar
Povinec, PP, Sivo, A, Simon, J, Holy, K, Chudý, M, Richtáriková, M, Morávek, J. 2008. Impact of the Bohunice nuclear power plant on atmospheric radiocarbon. Applied Radiation Isotopes 66:16861690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinec, PP, Chudy, M, Sivo, A, Simon, J, Holý, K, Richtáriková, M. 2009. Forty years of atmospheric radiocarbon monitoring around the Bohunice nuclear power plant, Slovakia. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 100:125130.Google Scholar
Povinec, PP, Šivo, A, Ješkovský, M, Svetlik, I, Richtáriková, M, Kaizer, J. 2015. Radiocarbon in the atmosphere of the Žlkovce monitoring station of the Bohunice NPP: 25 years of continuous monthly measurements. Radiocarbon 57(3):355362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, W, Kang, D-W, CHI, J. 2004. Approaches for reducing Carbon-14 stack emissions from Korean CANDU® nuclear power plant. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 41(2):235246.Google Scholar
Stenström, K, Erlandsson, B, Hellborg, R, Wiebert, A, Skog, G. 1996. Environmental levels of carbon-14 around a Swedish nuclear power plant measured with accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 113:474476.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Quay, PD. 1981. Atmospheric 14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux variability. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53:349362.Google Scholar
Strum, M, Vreca, P, Bronić, IK. 2012. Carbon isotopic composition of plant samples in the vincinity of the Slovene nuclear power plant. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 110:2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suess, HE. 1955. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122:415.Google Scholar
Uchrin, G, Hertelendi, E, Volent, G, Slavik, O, Morávek, J, Kobal, I, Vokal, B. 1998. 14C measurement at PWR-type nuclear power plants in 3 middle European countries. Radiocarbon 40(1):439446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, IG. 2008. A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Reviews in Solar Physics 5(3):788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z, Xiang, Y, Guo, Q. 2012. 14C levels in tree rings located near Quinshan nuclear power plant, China. Radiocarbon 54(2):195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S, Cook, GT, Cresswell, AJ, Dunbar, E, Freeman, SPHT, Hastie, H, Hou, X, Jacobsson, P, Naysmith, P, Sanderson, DCW. 2015. Radiocarbon concentration in modern tree rings from Fukushima, Japan. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 146:6772.Google Scholar
Yoon, S, Ha, W-H, Lee, S-S. 2013. Tritium analysis of urine samples from the general Korean public. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 81:276278.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Locations of the four NPPs with expanded views of their respective 14C background areas. YP=Yongpyung. Map taken from Google Earth, version 7.1.5.1557 (Google Inc. 2015).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Details of sample-collection locations: (a) Hanbit, (b) Hanul, (c) Kori, and (d) Wolsong. All NPPs’ reactors are positioned at the sea coastline. The maps for each NPP were taken from Google Earth, version 7.1.5.1557 (Google Inc. 2015).

Figure 2

Table 1 Locations of background samples and sample types.

Figure 3

Figure 3 AMS measured pMC values from each NPP. Filled circle, rectangle, triangle, and rhombus symbols are for pMC from Wolsong (Ws), Hanul (Hu), Kori (Kr), and Hanbit (Hb), respectively.

Figure 4

Figure 4 AMS measured and calculated Δ14C (‰) from all NPPs. They are shown in relation to distance (km) from each established NPP center. While the filled circle and triangle symbols are for Wolsong (Ws) and Kori (Kr), respectively, the hollow cyan rectangle and orange rhombus symbols are for Hanul (Hu) and Hanbit (Hb), respectively. (Colors refer to online version.)

Figure 5

Figure 5 Three-dimensional plots of AMS measured and calculated 14C activity in Bq/kg C from the collection positions near NPPs: (a) Wolsong (Ws), (b) Hanul (Hu), (c) Kori (Kr), (d) Hanbit (Hb). Hollow star symbols represent the positions of nuclear reactors.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Bomb-pulse curve and measured maximum pMC values from worldwide and South Korean NPPs. The labels (a)–(f) are the indication symbols for the values from the references in Table 2. YP01 means the data from SNU13-YP01 sample, and Bg@2014 is the data from SNU14-Ws23 (pine needle at Youngildae Beach). The curve of polynomial fit (dashed black line) has been made with the partial data from 1980 to 2012 (Levin and Kromer 2004; Levin et al. 2013; CALIBomb 2015).

Figure 7

Table 2 AMS results of some samples selected for background comparison.

Figure 8

Table 3 Previously reported high 14C activity values around NPPs. Bold values are calculated from the reported values in different units (pMC and Bq/kg C). See the references listed below for additional data (long series as well as more recent values).