Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:56:25.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology practical recommendations for surveillance and prevention of cardiac disease in childhood cancer survivors: the importance of physical activity and lifestyle changes From the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology Working Group Sports Cardiology, Physical Activity and Prevention, Working Group Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Working Group Imaging and Working Group Heart Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Sabine Kesting*
Affiliation:
Institute of Preventive Paediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Kinderklinik München Schwabing, Department of Paediatrics and Children’s Cancer Research Centre, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Ugo Giordano
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Cardiology and Heart/Lung Transplantation Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy
Jochen Weil
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
Colin J. McMahon
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Dimpna C. Albert
Affiliation:
Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Claire Berger
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, University Jean Monnet, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
Werner Budts
Affiliation:
Congenital and Structural Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Peter Fritsch
Affiliation:
Private Practice, Institute for Pediatric Cardiology, Graz, Austria
Erzsébet V. Hidvégi
Affiliation:
Paediatric Cardiology, Dr. Jakab & Co. Ltd, Szolnok, Hungary
Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz
Affiliation:
Institute of Preventive Paediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Giuseppe M. Milano
Affiliation:
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy
Annette Wacker-Gußmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Preventive Paediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
Vesna Herceg-Čavrak
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Science, Libertas International University, Zagreb, Croatia
*
Corresponding author: S. Kesting; Email: sabine.kesting@tum.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Childhood cancer survivors are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, presenting as the main causes of morbidity and mortality within this group. Besides the usual primary and secondary prevention in combination with screening during follow-up, the modifiable lifestyle factors of physical activity, nutrition, and body weight have not yet gained enough attention regarding potential cardiovascular risk reduction.

Objective:

These practical recommendations aim to provide summarised information and practical implications to paediatricians and health professionals treating childhood cancer survivors to reduce the risk of cardiovascular late effects.

Methods:

The content derives from either published guidelines or expert opinions from Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology working groups and is in accordance with current state-of-the-art.

Results:

All usual methods of prevention and screening regarding the risk, monitoring, and treatment of occurring cardiovascular diseases are summarised. Additionally, modifiable lifestyle factors are explained, and clear practical implications are named.

Conclusion:

Modifiable lifestyle factors should definitely be considered as a cost-effective and complementary approach to already implemented follow-up care programs in cardio-oncology, which can be actively addressed by the survivors themselves. However, treating physicians are strongly encouraged to support survivors to develop and maintain a healthy lifestyle, including physical activity as one of the major influencing factors. This article summarises relevant background information and provides specific practical recommendations on how to advise survivors to increase their level of physical activity.

Type
Guidelines
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Key learning objectives

These practical recommendations aim to provide information and assistance to paediatricians and healthcare professionals treating childhood cancer survivors

  • with general background regarding the risk and extent of cardiovascular diseases.

  • recommended diagnostic methods for surveillance and early detection of cardiovascular diseases.

  • how to motivate survivors to be physically active and engage in a healthy lifestyle to reduce the risk of cardiovascular late effects.

Childhood cancer treatment has radically changed in the last few years. Since 1990, there have been attempts to reduce the intensity of treatment among children with relatively good prognosis neoplasms, with the aim of reducing the risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Previous research identified that thoracic radiotherapy and specific types of chemotherapy, especially anthracycline, introduced in the late 1970s, increase the risk of heart disease among childhood cancer survivors. The survival of children with cancer has risen considerably over the last decades with 5-year survival rates exceeding 80%. Reference Gatta, Botta and Rossi1 However, the long-term health effects in the growing population of childhood cancer survivors are of significant concern. Adverse cardiovascular events (e.g., chronic cardiomyopathy, valvular dysfunction, arrhythmias, peripheral vascular disease, pericardial disease, early coronary artery diseases, and stroke) are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality for cancer patients and constitute a significant health problem, considering the prevalence with a previous diagnosis of cancer. Reference Leerink, de and Feijen2,Reference Armenian, Armstrong and Aune3 In this scenario, cardio-oncology, a discipline aimed at the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases as complications of anticancer therapies, is constantly evolving. Not only in terms of clinical activity and scientific research but also regarding the development of organisational models and training courses. For this reason, the multidisciplinary Working Group Sports Cardiology, Physical Activity and Prevention, the Working Group Adult Congenital Heart Disease, the Working Group Imaging, and the Working Group Heart Failure of the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology aimed to state the art, risk prediction, surveillance, and treatment but also the establishment about the role of physical activity in the prevention of future cardiovascular diseases.

Cardiovascular diseases in childhood cancer survivors

Survival after childhood cancer continues to improve but second malignant neoplasia and cardiovascular diseases remain among the risk of premature mortality in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors. The risk of death related to cardiovascular diseases is most common after a long survival period. Long-term survivors of childhood cancer are five to seven times more likely to develop cardiovascular diseases compared to the healthy population due to the treatments they were exposed to at a young age. Reference Mertens, Liu and Neglia4Reference Nathan, Amir and Abdel-Qadir8 This primarily includes anthracyclines and radiation therapy targeting the chest. Over time, survivors may additionally acquire conventional risk factors for cardiovascular diseases as the general population. Certain cancers have been independently linked to the development of cardiovascular diseases, and many oncological patients have pre-existing risk factors or a genetic predisposition. Kidney cancers (Wilms tumour), bone sarcoma, lymphoma (especially non-Hodgkin lymphoma), and leukaemia are associated with a higher cardiovascular risk because of the more significant cardiotoxicity of their treatments or their association with cardiovascular risk factors Reference Mertens, Liu and Neglia4,Reference Fidler, Reulen and Henson9 compared to other malignant diseases like some tumours of the central nervous system and some soft-tissue sarcomas not being treated with anthracyclines. However, most patients receive cardiotoxic treatment of varying doses. Oncological therapy should be considered an independent risk factor for potentially cardiotoxic events, critical after anthracycline therapy exceeding 250 mg/m2 or after radiotherapy of > 30 Grays (or after combined therapies).

Cardiovascular diseases, which appear among long-term survivors of childhood cancer, may manifest in different ways as summarised in Table 1. Reference Leerink, de and Feijen2,Reference Armenian, Armstrong and Aune3 Adequate control of cardiovascular risk factors in people diagnosed with cancer during childhood is a priority during follow-up.

Table 1. Most common cardiovascular diseases in paediatric cancer and underlying causes

DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; RT = radiation therapy; QTc = corrected QT interval; CV = cardiovascular.

Adapted from Armenian et al. Reference Armenian, Armstrong and Aune3

Key message: cardiovascular diseases in childhood cancer survivors

  • Children and adolescents treated for cancer are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular pathology in long-term survival.

  • Certain cancers are associated with a higher cardiovascular risk due to the necessary application of cardiotoxic treatment.

  • Cardiovascular diseases can manifest in various ways in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Therefore, adequate control of cardiovascular risk factors is essential during follow-up.

Primary and secondary prevention of cardiotoxicity

Primary prevention

Extensive research has been devoted to identify possible cardioprotective interventions during anthracycline treatment that have no adverse effects on anticancer efficacy or other non-cardiac adverse effects. Below, we discuss three preventive measures mostly used and refer to the recently published Delphi consensus. Reference Toro, Felmingham and Jessop10

Dexrazoxane

Dexrazoxane is a cardioprotective drug extensively studied in several clinical trials. Clinical heart disease and subclinical injury have been clearly demonstrated in adult patients. Reference van Dalen, Caron, Dickinson and Kremer11 The few published paediatric data included subjects diagnosed with leukaemia, lymphoma, and sarcoma. Reference Chow, Asselin and Schwartz12Reference Lipshultz, Rifai and Dalton14 These early studies demonstrate no significant differences in the occurrence of heart failure between patients treated with or without dexrazoxane. Reference Asselin, Devidas and Chen15 In a recent review, de Baat et al. Reference de, Mulder and Armenian16 posed light on the debate growth concerning the risk it may interfere with the antitumor efficacy and predisposition to secondary malignant tumours, Reference Tebbi, London and Friedman17 concluding that the benefits of dexrazoxane probably outweigh the risk of subsequent neoplasms. It could be linearly related to the cumulative doxorubicin dose of 250 mg/m2 or an equivalent dose (moderate recommendation).

Liposomal anthracyclines

The purpose of this anthracycline formulation is to limit drug exposure in healthy tissues such as the heart and increase drug infusibility in malignant cells by altering distribution in the tissue. Reference Lao, Madani and Puértolas18 Liposomal anthracyclines have shown promising results in breast cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, liposomal doxorubicin significantly reduced clinical and subclinical heart failure. Reference van Dalen, Michiels, Caron and Kremer19 To date, few randomised clinical trials or controlled trials have been performed in paediatric patients. Reference de, van Dalen and Mulder20

Duration of the infusion

Time of administration and route of administration could play a role in the primary prevention of cardiotoxicity. A Cochrane systematic review compared the different durations of anthracycline infusions in children and adults with cancer. Reference van Dalen, van der Pal and Kremer21 An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or more appeared to reduce the risk of both clinical heart failure and subclinical cardiotoxicity. In clinical practice, it is recommended, although no strict recommendation can be made, that an anthracycline infusion of at least one hour can prevent heart damage. Reference Loeffen, van Dalen and Mulder22

Secondary prevention

Cardiomyopathy and heart failure are among the most severe conditions observed in childhood cancer survivors, so the potential for secondary prevention strategies is being evaluated. Secondary prevention involves managing asymptomatic cardiotoxicity and preventing symptoms, heart failure, and mortality. Reference Bansal, Adams and Ganatra23 The timing and appropriateness of using neurohormonal drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers, in the secondary prevention of heart failure are still debated, especially in children and adolescents, due to the potential adverse effects of long-term use. Adult data are often extrapolated to paediatric cases in the absence of paediatric data. The evidence for using these drugs in long-term survivors with asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% is derived from published guidelines by Erhardt et al. Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24 There is a lack of evidence for treating individuals with asymptomatic, mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction between 40 and 49% who do not have comorbidities. Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24

Apart from the initially defined approaches for secondary prevention regarding cardiotoxicity, it is essential for childhood cancer survivors to know and to be able to manage cardiovascular risk factors themselves (e.g., hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes). It is known that childhood cancer survivors show low adherence to multiple health behaviour guidelines and to improve health outcomes, multiple health behaviours should be targeted simultaneously. Reference Webster, Dhaduk and Gordon25 Therefore, counselling for a healthy lifestyle by physicians and other healthcare professionals is essential.

Key messages: primary and secondary prevention of cardiotoxicity

  • To reduce the risk of cardiotoxic late effects, it is important to integrate primary and secondary prevention into cancer treatment regimens.

  • For primary prevention, dexrazoxane, liposomal anthracyclines, and elongated infusion time (up to six hours) appear to have cardioprotective effects and are well tolerated. Reference de, van Dalen and Mulder20

  • Secondary prevention aims at evading and managing occurring problems following application of cardiotoxic treatment and reducing risk factors for cardiovascular diseases on multiple levels, including cardioprotective medication and promoting a healthy lifestyle.

Screening for cardiovascular disease in long-term childhood cancer survivors

Long-term childhood cancer survivors are at risk of the following cardiovascular diseases:

  • Myocardial damage: cardiomyopathy, heart failure

  • Arterial hypertension

  • Metabolic syndrome

  • Valvular disease, pericardial constriction, and premature coronary artery disease (caused by mediastinal radiation).

The risk of developing cardiovascular diseases depends on the cumulative dosage of anthracycline or mediastinal irradiation administrated. A useful risk score according to Erhardt et al. Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24 is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Definition of cardiovascular disease risk groups and surveillance recommendations Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24

Gy = gray; NA = not applicable.

It is recommended that childhood cancer survivors with high and moderate risk should have a lifelong surveillance for development of cardiomyopathy. The screening aims to detect subtle cardiovascular system dysfunction in asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors as early as possible.

Besides taking the history and performing the physical examination of childhood cancer survivors as usual, the examinations described below should be performed

Detection of myocardial damage

Childhood cancer survivors have a risk of > 50% to develop subclinical cardiac dysfunction in later life.

In all childhood cancer survivors, as a basis, the following examinations summarised in Table 3 should be performed.

Table 3. Summary of benefits and harms regarding primary surveillance by risk groups and modalities Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24

MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

* see Table 2.

Echocardiography

Standard echocardiography must be performed including measurement of 2D or 3D left ventricular ejection fraction to investigate asymptomatic left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction or heart failure as defined by the American Society of Echocardiography Reference Lang, Badano and Mor-Avi26 and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations Reference Nagueh, Smiseth and Appleton27 as previously published Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24 (Table 3).

It is agreed that left ventricular ejection fraction is reduced when there is a decrease by > 10 percentage points with a final value of < 53%. Reference Plana, Galderisi and Barac28 Additional determination of diastolic left ventricular function is thought to be a marker of early myocardial damage in asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors. For this purpose, the following measurements should be performed:

  • Left atrial size (area or volume)

  • Peak mitral valve diastolic velocity (E- and A-wave)

  • Mitral valve septal and lateral diastolic velocity (tissue Doppler with E/E´).

Recently, it has been shown that measuring global longitudinal strain with speckle tracking might detect myocardial dysfunction before a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction is seen. A reduction of global longitudinal strain > 15% over baseline is thought to be potentially pathological. Usually, a global longitudinal strain < −18% is considered reduced. Reference Plana, Galderisi and Barac28Reference Dobson, Ghosh and Ky30

Electrocardiogram

Electrocardiogram is recommended when patients enter survivorship. Further testing is conducted if needed based on clinical indicators. Screening electrocardiogram is strongly recommended for heart rhythm, ST segment changes and all sorts of arrhythmia. Special attention should be paid to prolonged QT interval corrected for heart rate interval and reduced variation in circadian heart rate.

Cardiac biomarkers

Serial measurements of blood biomarkers (natriuretic peptides and troponins) are not recommended but strongly suggested as strategy for cardiomyopathy surveillance. It is generally recommended to monitor the course of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction or heart failure. Reference Ehrhardt, Leerink and Mulder24

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can detect cardiorespiratory dysfunction, which is not seen in routine resting studies. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is one of the most useful parameters for assessing physical capacity. Age- and sex-adjusted measurements < 80% of normal are considered pathological. Studies have shown that patients treated with median anthracycline doses of 240 mg/m2 (range 100–490) are at significant risk of subclinical cardiac dysfunction. De Caro et al. reported that post-exercise subclinical cardiac dysfunction could be identified in up to one-third of patients, such as reduced left ventricular posterior wall dimension or percentage thickening or increased left ventricular end-systolic wall stress. Reference De Caro, Smeraldi, Trocchio, Calevo, Hanau and Pongiglione31

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac MRI is the gold standard for evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction. MRI should be done if the echocardiography fails to give sufficient information on myocardial performance. Furthermore, cardiac MRI can measure myocardial fibrosis associated with myocardial damage via late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping sequences. Cardiac MRI is therefore increasingly used in cardiac surveillance. Reference De Caro, Smeraldi, Trocchio, Calevo, Hanau and Pongiglione31,Reference De Caro, Smeraldi, Trocchio, Calevo, Hanau and Pongiglione31Reference Foulkes, Costello and Howden36 One paediatric study reported that the end-systolic volume index increased, and the left and right ventricle ejection fraction decreased during anthracycline therapy without any clinical signs of dysfunction. Reference Oberholzer, Kunz, Dittrich and Thelen32 Exercise cardiac MRI is also increasingly used to detect subclinical changes in cardiac function. Reference Foulkes, Costello and Howden36

Comorbidities of myocardial damage

Arterial hypertension

Hypertension is the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in childhood cancer survivors. In the study by Chow et al., Reference Chow, Chen and Armstrong37 hypertension occurred among 18% of childhood cancer survivors. The prevalence is 2.6-fold (95% CI 1.6–4.7) higher than expected, based on age-, gender-, race-, and body mass index-specific rates in the general population. Reference Gibson, Li and Green38 Arterial hypertension in children under 16 years of age can easily be determined following blood pressure reference values for height percentile, age, and gender. Reference Flynn, Kaelber and Baker-Smith39 In adolescents aged 16 years or older and adults, high normal blood pressure is defined as a blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg and hypertension as ≥ 140/90 mmHg, respectively. Reference de, Mancusi and Hanssen40,Reference Lurbe, Agabiti-Rosei and Cruickshank41 As high-quality and moderate-quality evidence supported the association between hypertension and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction and heart failure, care providers must remain vigilant for hypertension in childhood cancer survivors.

Metabolic syndrome

In the study by Chow et al., the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in young adult survivors in different studies is 6.9–33.6%. Reference Chow, Chen and Armstrong37,Reference Pluimakers, van Waas, Neggers and van den Heuvel-Eibrink42 It is recommended that in all follow-up examinations, at least every two years, blood has to be taken to determine the cardiovascular risk factors, such as total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, fasting glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin.

Cardiovascular diseases after mediastinal irradiation

Accelerated atherosclerosis and vascular events are significantly more likely in patients treated with radiotherapy. In childhood cancer survivors, these risks are increased 5- to 29-fold for cardiovascular mortality and 2.4- to 3.6-fold for acute myocardial infarction. Mediastinal radiotherapy has been found to increase the relative risk of death in childhood cancer survivors. Reference Nielsen, Offersen, Nielsen, Vaage-Nilsen and Yusuf43 Mediastinal irradiation may induce fibrosis and subsequent insufficiency of the cardiac valves Reference Shrestha, Bates and Liu44,Reference Zamorano, Lancellotti and Rodriguez Muñoz45 and may result in pericarditis and pericardial constriction. Echocardiography is the method of choice to detect and monitor these changes. Additionally, cardiac MRI will add further information that is difficult to receive by echocardiography, such as in childhood cancer survivors with constrictive pericarditis. There are no specific diagnostic tools for the detection of premature coronary artery disease in this population. The usual examinations to rule out or to confirm myocardial ischaemia should include: Electrocardiogram at rest and under exercise, measurement of the biomarker high-sensitive troponin, and looking for regional wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography. Reference Leerink, Feijen and van der Pal46

Key message: screening for cardiovascular disease in long-term childhood cancer survivors

  • Childhood cancer survivors need a lifelong screening for cardiovascular diseases with a frequency depending on the number of cardiotoxic drugs and mediastinal irradiation administered.

  • Echocardiography is favourable for detecting cardiomyopathy early by assessing 2D or 3D left ventricular ejection fraction (recommended additional measurements: diastolic left ventricular function and global longitudinal strain). If the information on myocardial performance is insufficient, cardiac MRI should be done additionally.

  • Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can detect cardiopulmonary changes, which are not apparent at rest. Regular testing intervals of 2–3 years are recommended.

Monitoring and treatment

Frequency of performing cardiovascular monitoring

The Children’s Oncology Group and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network have provided guidelines for the long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors. 47,48 The Children’s Oncology Group suggested a monitoring timeframe dependent on patient age, anthracycline dosage or exposure to radiation doses. 47 The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network group recommended repeated echocardiograms during treatment and every three years after treatment in their guideline or naturally increasing the frequency of follow-up in those situations where cardiac dysfunction occurs. 48 Concordances and discordances among cardiomyopathy surveillance recommendations between different groups are summarised in Table 4 according to Armenian et al. Reference Armenian, Hudson and Mulder49

Table 4. Concordances and discordances among cardiomyopathy surveillance recommendations (cited from Armenian et al.) Reference Armenian, Hudson and Mulder49

ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; CV = cardiovascular; Dx = diagnosis; Gy = gray; Hx = History; RT = radiation therapy; yrs = years.

* Radiation therapy involving the heart: mediastinal, thoracic, left or whole upper abdominal, or total body irradiation.

Concordance and discordance are shown across the guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukemia Group (UKCCLG).

Treatment

The most common complications after cardiotoxic therapy are: (1) dilated or restrictive cardiomyopathy, (2) arrhythmias, (3) valve disease, and (4) pericardial dysfunction. Moreover, a combination of these is not uncommon. Medical therapy is then initiated (Table 5). Late dilated cardiomyopathy is considered a progressive disease, and the medical treatment initiation seems still too late. Elevated biomarkers, progressive exercise intolerance, and deep echocardiographic phenotyping of myocardial muscle function (standard echocardiographic measurements, tissue Doppler, strain and strain rate analysis) could be used as a marker to start medical therapy. In this setting, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, statins, and spironolactone have been tried. Reference Yancy, Jessup and Bozkurt50Reference Akpek, Ozdogru and Sahin54 Medical treatment is initiated according to the current heart failure guidelines. Reference McDonagh, Metra and Adamo55,Reference Lyon, López-Fernández and Couch56

Table 5. Medical therapy for late complications in cardio-oncology patients

SGLT-2 = sodium-glucose cotransporter-2.

For restrictive cardiomyopathy or constrictive pericarditis, medical therapy is mainly initiated to suppress symptoms and clinical signs of heart failure. Reference McDonagh, Metra and Adamo55 It involves using loop diuretics and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors that might improve outcomes. Therapeutic strategies are adapted from standard cardiology treatment. Reference McDonagh, Metra and Adamo55

When drug therapy fails, fenestration of the interatrial septum, mechanical support to decompress the left atrium, pericardiectomy, or heart transplantation (if in remission) may be considered as alternative therapeutic choices.

Arrhythmias can be either bradycardia or tachycardia. For the approach, reference is made to the existing guidelines for treating arrhythmias. Reference Brugada, Katritsis and Arbelo57Reference Zeppenfeld, Tfelt-Hansen, Riva and de59 Besides medication, ablations and implantation of devices may also be necessary.

Finally, managing valve disease due to past oncological treatment is no different from managing degenerative valve disease. Both valve pathologies are progressive and require timely intervention. As it involves damaged valve tissue, valve replacement rather than valve-sparing therapy will be preferred. Also here, valve guidelines can be referred to existing guidelines. Reference Vahanian, Beyersdorf and Praz60

Key message: monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular diseases in long-term childhood cancer survivors

  • Treatment of the wide range of cardiovascular diseases in long-term childhood cancer survivors should start as early as possible to minimise their progression and limit late effects.

  • Elevated biomarkers, progressive exercise intolerance, and deep echocardiographic phenotyping of myocardial muscle function are valuable markers for early initiation of medical therapy.

  • Guidelines provide long-term follow-up monitoring and treatment recommendations, including medical and surgical interventions tailored individually to the survivor.

Physical activity and lifestyle changes

All previously described recommendations and methods to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases in childhood cancer survivors are passive actions from the survivors’ perspective. Beyond that, there is a spectrum of influencing factors that have not received enough attention yet, however, with a promising potential: modifiable lifestyle risk factors. These factors include physical activity, body weight, and nutrition. Lack of physical inactivity, unhealthy nutrition, and most commonly associated obesity increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the generally healthy population. Reference Zhang, Pan and Chen61

Physical activity

Physical and cardiorespiratory fitness are usually used as a measurable surrogate marker for physical activity behaviour and one of the most important predictors of overall health. An active and healthy lifestyle can reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases in the group of survivors, Reference Armstrong, Oeffinger and Chen62 and encouraging physical activity may even positively reduce overall mortality. Reference Slater, Ross and Kelly63 Meta-analytic evidence supports the effectiveness of physical exercise to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and highlights the effectiveness of the cardiovascular system in childhood cancer survivors. Reference Bourdon, Grandy and Keats64,Reference Morales, Valenzuela and Herrera-Olivares65 Schindera et al. Reference Schindera, Zürcher and Jung66 recently showed that increased physical fitness is also associated with fewer cardiovascular risk factors. This potential cardioprotective effect, or at least the increase in physical capacity, should convince childhood cancer survivors to engage in a long-term active lifestyle. However, a high number of this population is physically inactive compared to healthy controls. Innovative strategies (Table 6) tailored to the survivors’ physical limitations and preferences to encourage physical activity are needed. Reference Antwi, Jayawardene, Lohrmann and Mueller67,Reference Sloof, Hendershot, Griffin, Anderson and Marjerrison68 Although knowledge of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity and exercise interventions is at an early stage, Reference Caru and Curnier69 the importance of engagement in exercise for childhood cancer survivors to mitigate and manage treatment-related cardiovascular dysfunction is obvious. Reference Kendall, Langley and Aghdam70

Table 6. Practical implications for physicians to address the topic of physical activity with childhood cancer survivors

Body weight

Body weight significantly impacts oncogenesis, the outcome of cancer therapy, the patient’s different lifespan, and their quality of life. Although there is no data available for paediatric patients, it is recognized that an increased body mass index in childhood raises the risk of several malignancies in adulthood. Reference Weihe, Spielmann, Kielstein, Henning-Klusmann and Weihrauch-Blüher71 There are 430 million children with excessively high body weight worldwide. Reference Abarca-Gómez, Abdeen and Hamid72 After stabilisation on a high level, increases are obvious due to global events like the COVID-19 pandemic. 73,Reference Schienkiewitz, Brettschneider, Damerow and Rosario74 Body weight is crucial already in diagnosing cancer in children since being overweight, obese, and even underweight increases the risk of morbidity and mortality during therapy and beyond. Reference Barr and Stevens75,Reference Ladas, Sacks and Meacham76

Furthermore, if the patient is considered a normal weight at the beginning of treatment, unwanted weight gain is often caused by certain therapies such as higher cranial radiation dose, abdominal radiation, total body radiation, surgery in suprasellar region, corticosteroids or being younger age at treatment (age < 4 years), and female sex. Conversely, weight loss is also a common consequence of the oncotherapy. More than 50% of cancer patients suffer from cachexia, which impairs quality of life, responsiveness to cancer therapy, and survival. Reference Sadeghi, Keshavarz-Fathi, Baracos, Arends, Mahmoudi and Rezaei77 Consequently, successful primary prevention of increased body mass index is pivotal in children in general, moreover it is highly recommended to perform a precise follow-up of the patient’s body weight and composition during and after cancer therapy, to minimise the overall morbidity and mortality among childhood cancer survivors.

Nutrition

Adequate nutrition plays an important role both in prevention and treatment of childhood cancer. Besides its known positive impact on the cardiovascular system, it may contribute to the reduction of overweight and obesity, which are associated with reduced disease-free survival and overall survival in cancer. Reference Protani, Coory and Martin78Reference Kroenke, Chen, Rosner and Holmes83 In adults, a high intake of vegetables/fruits and whole grains has been shown to be associated with reduced mortality and cancer recurrence when compared with a high intake of refined grains, processed and red meats, and high-fat dairy products. Reference Kwan, Weltzien, Kushi, Castillo, Slattery and Caan84Reference Kroenke, Fung, Hu and Holmes86 Successful personalised nutrition must be based on the patients’ and parents’ knowledge of the long-term impact of the child’s nutritional status. This includes proper counselling regarding avoidance of restrictive or alternative nutrition. Reference Fabozzi, Trovato and Diamanti87

Besides usual nutrition recommendations, the link between nutrition and physical activity behaviour should not be overlooked. Physical activity is positively associated with healthier eating habits as shown in healthy adults in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Christofaro, Werneck and Tebar88 Furthermore, interventions must target multiple health behaviours as healthy adolescents often show risk behaviour patterns and fail to meet dietary and physical activity guidelines. Reference Sanchez, Norman, Sallis, Calfas, Cella and Patrick89

Apart from an unhealthy diet, alcohol, drug abuse, and smoking habits might increase the risk of late effects and other health problems in childhood cancer survivors. Reference Marjerrison, Hendershot, Empringham and Smoking90 Therefore, advice regarding this risk-taking behaviour should be provided for survivors by their treating physician and other healthcare professionals and specialists.

The risk factors mentioned above are modifiable and probably a cost-effective measure to reduce long-term sequelae concerning cardiovascular health. The most apparent problem in interventions aiming at lifestyle changes in childhood cancer survivors is the lack of sustainability, due to the complexity of behaviour change. Future research focusing on targeted and effective interventions should be supported by advice from treating physicians (e.g., oncologist, cardiologist) as a different approach to encouraging an active and healthy lifestyle in childhood cancer survivors. Exercise professionals should further assist survivors in maintaining and consolidating this behaviour and, most importantly, avoiding physical inactivity. Practical implications for treating physicians are summarised in Table 6.

General physical activity recommendations for different groups of childhood cancer survivors

  • For adult childhood cancer survivors: Physical activity, including aerobic training three times per week for at least 30 minutes with moderate intensity and resistance training at least twice per week dependent on the individual health status and treatment-related outcomes, according to the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Reference Campbell, Winters-Stone and Wiskemann91

  • For young childhood cancer survivors: According to the 11 consensus-based recommendations by the Network ActiveOncoKids Reference Götte, Gauß and Dirksen92 and the International Pediatric Oncology Exercise Guidelines, Reference Wurz, McLaughlin and Lategan93 childhood cancer patients and survivors should be supported to be physically active following their health status during all phases of treatment.

Apart from particular recommendations for cancer survivors, the World Health Organization’s guidelines 94 on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for the healthy population may be the aim to achieve for survivors considering disease- and treatment-related impairments.

  • Healthy adults (18–64 years) are recommended to be physically active for at least 150–300 minutes with moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity per week or at least 75–150 minutes of vigorous aerobic physical exercise. Muscle-strengthening activities involving all major muscle groups should be added twice a week, and the number of sedentary activities should be limited for extended periods.

  • Healthy children and adolescents (5–17 years) should be physically active for an average of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity per day with mostly aerobic but strengthening exercises for muscles and bones at least three days per week. Moreover, the amount of recreational screen time and time spent being sedentary should be limited for extended periods.

All these modifiable risk factors can only be reduced with the active participation of childhood cancer survivors themselves. The key word is health literacy to achieve this competence and knowledge regarding a healthy lifestyle. Although health literacy in childhood cancer patients and survivors is still understudied, this critical construct must be considered and addressed in the future Reference Lynn, Quast, Rogers, Effinger and Gilleland-Marchak95 and first examples of educating childhood cancer survivors regarding these risk factors already exist. Reference Berger, Casagranda and Sudour-Bonnange96

Key messages: physical activity and lifestyle changes

  • Physical activity, adequate nutrition, and body weight management are promising and actively modifiable factors to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases associated with childhood cancer.

  • Personalised strategies to incorporate an active and healthy lifestyle during treatment and follow-up are needed.

  • Treating physicians and exercise professionals should assist survivors in maintaining an active and healthy lifestyle by explaining the importance, giving advice, and helping to detect potential barriers in realisation.

Conclusion

Although successful treatment results in high survival rates in paediatric oncology, childhood cancer survivors are at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases due to the necessary cardiotoxic treatment regimen. Therefore, primary, and secondary prevention, in combination with systematic screenings during follow-up in long-term survivors are highly recommended to detect myocardial damage as early as possible (Figure 1). Emerging cardiovascular diseases should be monitored and treated to avoid further progression. Regulation of actively modifiable factors like physical activity, adequate nutrition, and body weight management to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases needs to receive increased attention as these can be influenced by the survivors themselves. Active encouragement by treating physicians and healthcare professionals as summarised in these practical recommendations is needed to support childhood cancer survivors both to engage in and maintain an active and healthy lifestyle.

Figure 1. Summary of prevention and surveillance to decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases in childhood cancer survivors.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Educational Committee and the Council of the Association for Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology for endorsement of these practical recommendations.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

None.

References

Gatta, G, Botta, L, Rossi, S, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 3547. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leerink, JM, de, Baat EC, Feijen, EAM, et al. Cardiac disease in childhood cancer survivors: risk prediction, prevention, and surveillance: JACC CardioOncology state-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol 2020; 2: 363378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.08.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armenian, SH, Armstrong, GT, Aune, G, et al. Cardiovascular disease in survivors of childhood cancer: insights into epidemiology, pathophysiology, and prevention. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 21352144. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.3920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, AC, Liu, Q, Neglia, JP, et al. Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 13681379. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reulen, RC, Winter, DL, Frobisher, C, et al. Long-term cause-specific mortality among survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 2010; 304: 172179. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, HC, Onderko, L, Francis, SA. Cardiovascular risk in survivors of cancer. Curr Cardiol Rep 2017; 19: 64. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0873-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose-Felker, K, Border, WL, Hong, BJ, Chow, EJ. Cardio-oncology related to heart failure: pediatric considerations for cardiac dysfunction. Heart Fail Clin 2017; 13: 311325. DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2016.12.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, PC, Amir, E, Abdel-Qadir, H. Cardiac outcomes in survivors of pediatric and adult cancers. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32: 871880. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fidler, MM, Reulen, RC, Henson, K, et al. Population-based long-term cardiac-specific mortality among 34 489 five-year survivors of childhood cancer in great Britain. Circulation 2017; 135: 951963. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, C, Felmingham, B, Jessop, S, et al. Cardio-oncology recommendations for pediatric oncology patients. JACC: Advances 2022; 1: 100155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100155.Google Scholar
van Dalen, EC, Caron, HN, Dickinson, HO, Kremer, LC. Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2016: CD003917. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub4.Google Scholar
Chow, EJ, Asselin, BL, Schwartz, CL, et al. Late mortality after dexrazoxane treatment: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 26392645. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexler, LH, Andrich, MP, Venzon, D, et al. Randomized trial of the cardioprotective agent ICRF-187 in pediatric sarcoma patients treated with doxorubicin. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 362372. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipshultz, SE, Rifai, N, Dalton, VM, et al. The effect of dexrazoxane on myocardial injury in doxorubicin-treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 145153. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa035153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asselin, BL, Devidas, M, Chen, L, et al. Cardioprotection and safety of dexrazoxane in patients treated for newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic Leukemia or advanced-stage lymphoblastic non-hodgkin lymphoma: a report of the children’s oncology group randomized trial pediatric oncology group 9404. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 854862. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de, Baat EC, Mulder, RL, Armenian, S, et al. Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9: CD014638. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014638.pub2.Google Scholar
Tebbi, CK, London, WB, Friedman, D, et al. Dexrazoxane-associated risk for acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome and other secondary malignancies in pediatric hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 493500. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.3879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lao, J, Madani, J, Puértolas, T, et al. Liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of breast cancer patients: a review. J Drug Deliv 2013; 2013: 456409–12. DOI: 10.1155/2013/456409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dalen, EC, Michiels, EM, Caron, HN, Kremer, LC. Different anthracycline derivates for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD005006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005006.pub3.Google Scholar
de, Baat EC, van Dalen, EC, Mulder, RL, et al. Primary cardioprotection with dexrazoxane in patients with childhood cancer who are expected to receive anthracyclines: recommendations from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022; 6: 885894. DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00239-5.Google Scholar
van Dalen, EC, van der Pal, HJH, Kremer, LCM. Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in people with cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: CD005008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005008.pub4.Google ScholarPubMed
Loeffen, EAH, van Dalen, EC, Mulder, RL, et al. The duration of anthracycline infusion should be at least one hour in children with cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, N, Adams, MJ, Ganatra, S, et al. Strategies to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in cancer survivors. Cardiooncology 2019; 5: 18. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-019-0054-5.Google ScholarPubMed
Ehrhardt, MJ, Leerink, JM, Mulder, RL, et al. Systematic review and updated recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24: e108e120. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00012-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, RT, Dhaduk, R, Gordon, ML, et al. Health behavior profiles in young survivors of childhood cancer: findings from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Cancer 2023; 129: 20752083. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, RM, Badano, LP, Mor-Avi, V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 139.e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagueh, SF, Smiseth, OA, Appleton, CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29: 277314. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plana, JC, Galderisi, M, Barac, A, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15: 10631093. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santoro, C, Arpino, G, Esposito, R, et al. 2D and 3D strain for detection of subclinical anthracycline cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients: a balance with feasibility. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 930936. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, R, Ghosh, AK, Ky, B, et al. BSE and BCOS guideline for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of adult cancer patients receiving anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. JACC CardioOncol 2021; 3: 116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Caro, E, Smeraldi, A, Trocchio, G, Calevo, M, Hanau, G, Pongiglione, G. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction and exercise performance in childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 56: 122126. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberholzer, K, Kunz, RP, Dittrich, M, Thelen, M. Anthrazyklin-induzierte kardiotoxizität: MRT des Herzens bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit malignen erkrankungen. Rofo 2004; 176: 12451250. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, EJ, Leger, KJ, Bhatt, NS, et al. Paediatric cardio-oncology: epidemiology, screening, prevention, and treatment. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115: 922934. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basar, EZ, Corapcioglu, F, Babaoglu, K, Anik, Y, Gorur Daglioz, G, Dedeoglu, R. Are cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide ventriculography good options against echocardiography for evaluation of anthracycline induced chronic cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2014; 31: 237252. DOI: 10.3109/08880018.2013.851753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mawad, W, Mertens, L, Pagano, JJ, et al. Effect of anthracycline therapy on myocardial function and markers of fibrotic remodelling in childhood cancer survivors. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 22: 435442. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, S, Costello, BT, Howden, EJ, et al. Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals reduced cardiac reserve in pediatric cancer survivors with impaired cardiopulmonary fitness. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020; 22: 64. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00658-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, EJ, Chen, Y, Armstrong, GT, et al. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among survivors of childhood cancer. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: e024735. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, TM, Li, Z, Green, DM, et al. Blood pressure status in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017; 26: 17051713. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, JT, Kaelber, DC, Baker-Smith, CM, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2017; 140: e20171904. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de, Simone G, Mancusi, C, Hanssen, H, et al. Hypertension in children and adolescents. Eur Heart J 2022; 43: 32903301. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac328.Google Scholar
Lurbe, E, Agabiti-Rosei, E, Cruickshank, JK, et al. European society of hypertension guidelines for the management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. J Hypertens 2016; 34: 18871920. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluimakers, VG, van Waas, M, Neggers, SJCMM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink, MM. Metabolic syndrome as cardiovascular risk factor in childhood cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 133: 129141. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.10.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, KM, Offersen, BV, Nielsen, HM, Vaage-Nilsen, M, Yusuf, SW. Short and long term radiation induced cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40: 255261. DOI: 10.1002/clc.22634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, S, Bates, JE, Liu, Q, et al. Radiation therapy related cardiac disease risk in childhood cancer survivors: updated dosimetry analysis from the childhood cancer survivor study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163: 199208. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamorano, JL, Lancellotti, P, Rodriguez Muñoz, D, et al. 2016 ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC committee for practice guidelines: the task force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 27682801. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leerink, JM, Feijen, ELAM, van der Pal, HJH, et al. Diagnostic tools for early detection of cardiac dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors: methodological aspects of the dutch late effects after childhood cancer (LATER) cardiology study. Am Heart J 2020; 219: 8998. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Children’s Oncology Group. Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivor of Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer, version 6.0 2023, Available from www.survivorshipguidelines.org.Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Longterm Follow Up of Survivors of Childhood Cancer. SIGN, Edinburgh, 2013. Available from http://www.sign.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Armenian, SH, Hudson, MM, Mulder, RL, et al. Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: e123e136. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70409-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yancy, CW, Jessup, M, Bozkurt, B, et al. ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of america. J Card Fail 2017; 23: 628651. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheuk, DKL, Sieswerda, E, van Dalen, EC, Postma, A, Kremer, LCM. Medical interventions for treating anthracycline-induced symptomatic and asymptomatic cardiotoxicity during and after treatment for childhood cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016: CD008011. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008011.pub3.Google ScholarPubMed
Seicean, S, Seicean, A, Plana, JC, Budd, GT, Marwick, TH. Effect of statin therapy on the risk for incident heart failure in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy: an observational clinical cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 23842390. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acar, Z, Kale, A, Turgut, M, et al. Efficiency of atorvastatin in the protection of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 988989. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akpek, M, Ozdogru, I, Sahin, O, et al. Protective effects of spironolactone against anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2015; 17: 8189. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonagh, TA, Metra, M, Adamo, M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European society of cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24: 4131. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.Google Scholar
Lyon, AR, López-Fernández, T, Couch, LS, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the european hematology association (EHA), the european society for therapeutic radiology and oncology (ESTRO) and the international cardio-oncology society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23: e333e465. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugada, J, Katritsis, DG, Arbelo, E, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardiaThe task force for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 655720. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glikson, M, Nielsen, JC, Kronborg, MB, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 34273520. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeppenfeld, K, Tfelt-Hansen, J, Riva, M, de, etal. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2022; 43: 39974126. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vahanian, A, Beyersdorf, F, Praz, F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43: 561632. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y-B, Pan, X-F, Chen, J, et al. Combined lifestyle factors, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2021; 75: 9299. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-214050.Google ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, GT, Oeffinger, KC, Chen, Y, et al. Modifiable risk factors and major cardiac events among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 36733680. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, ME, Ross, JA, Kelly, AS, et al. Physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62: 305310. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdon, A, Grandy, SA, Keats, MR. Aerobic exercise and cardiopulmonary fitness in childhood cancer survivors treated with a cardiotoxic agent: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 21132123. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4208-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, JS, Valenzuela, PL, Herrera-Olivares, AM, et al. Exercise interventions and cardiovascular health in childhood cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41: 141153. DOI: 10.1055/a-1073-8104.Google ScholarPubMed
Schindera, C, Zürcher, SJ, Jung, R, et al. Physical fitness and modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the SURfit study. Cancer 2021; 127: 16901698. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antwi, GO, Jayawardene, W, Lohrmann, DK, Mueller, EL. Physical activity and fitness among pediatric cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27: 31833194. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04788-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloof, N, Hendershot, E, Griffin, M, Anderson, L, Marjerrison, S. The impact of physical activity on the health of young adult survivors of childhood cancer: an exploratory analysis. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8: 602609. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caru, M, Curnier, D. The pediatric oncology exercise field speeds up to address important issues regarding chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 998337. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.998337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, SJ, Langley, JE, Aghdam, M, et al. The impact of exercise on cardiotoxicity in pediatric and adolescent cancer survivors: a scoping review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29: 63506363. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weihe, P, Spielmann, J, Kielstein, H, Henning-Klusmann, J, Weihrauch-Blüher, S. Childhood obesity and cancer risk in adulthood. Curr Obes Rep 2020; 9: 204212. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-020-00387-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abarca-Gómez, L, Abdeen, ZA, Hamid, ZA, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. The Lancet 2017; 390: 26272642. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schienkiewitz, A, Brettschneider, A-K, Damerow, S, Rosario, AS. Overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study and trends. J Health Monit 2018; 3: 1522. DOI: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-022.2.Google ScholarPubMed
Barr, RD, Stevens, MCG. The influence of nutrition on clinical outcomes in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67: e28117. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladas, EJ, Sacks, N, Meacham, L, et al. A multidisciplinary review of nutrition considerations in the pediatric oncology population: a perspective from children’s oncology group. Nutr Clin Pract 2005; 20: 377393. DOI: 10.1177/0115426505020004377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadeghi, M, Keshavarz-Fathi, M, Baracos, V, Arends, J, Mahmoudi, M, Rezaei, N. Cancer cachexia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 127: 91104. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.05.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Protani, M, Coory, M, Martin, JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 123: 627635. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0990-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerhardt, JA, Ma, J, Courneya, KS. Energetics in colorectal and prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 40664073. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.8797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, EM, Ulrich, CM, Poole, EM, Holmes, RS, Jacobsen, PB, Shibata, D. The effects of obesity and obesity-related conditions on colorectal cancer prognosis. Cancer Control 2010; 17: 5257. DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerhardt, JA, Niedzwiecki, D, Hollis, D, et al. Impact of body mass index and weight change after treatment on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from cancer and Leukemia group B 89803. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 41094115. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, ME, Chang, S-C, Schatzkin, A, et al. Prospective study of adiposity and weight change in relation to prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 2007; 109: 675684. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, CH, Chen, WY, Rosner, B, Holmes, MD. Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 13701378. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwan, ML, Weltzien, E, Kushi, LH, Castillo, A, Slattery, ML, Caan, BJ. Dietary patterns and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 919926. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerhardt, JA, Niedzwiecki, D, Hollis, D, et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA 2007; 298: 754764. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.7.754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, CH, Fung, TT, Hu, FB, Holmes, MD. Dietary patterns and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 92959303. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabozzi, F, Trovato, CM, Diamanti, A, et al. Management of nutritional needs in pediatric oncology: a consensus statement. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 3378. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christofaro, DGD, Werneck, AO, Tebar, WR, et al. Physical activity is associated with improved eating habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 664568. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, A, Norman, GJ, Sallis, JF, Calfas, KJ, Cella, J, Patrick, K. Patterns and correlates of physical activity and nutrition behaviors in adolescents. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 124130. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marjerrison, S, Hendershot, E, Empringham, B, Smoking, Nathan PC. Binge drinking, and drug use among childhood cancer survivors: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; 63: 12541263. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, KL, Winters-Stone, KM, Wiskemann, J, et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 23752390. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götte, M, Gauß, G, Dirksen, U, et al. Multidisciplinary network activeOncoKids guidelines for providing movement and exercise in pediatric oncology: consensus-based recommendations. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69: e29953. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurz, A, McLaughlin, E, Lategan, C, et al. The international pediatric oncology exercise guidelines (iPOEG). Transl Behav Med 2021; 11: 19151922. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.Google Scholar
Lynn, C, Quast, L, Rogers, H, Effinger, K, Gilleland-Marchak, J. Systematic review of health literacy in childhood cancer patients, survivors, and their caregivers. J Pediatr Psychol 2020; 45: 373385. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, C, Casagranda, L, Sudour-Bonnange, H, et al. Personalized massive open online course for childhood cancer survivors: behind the scenes. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12: 237244. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725185.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Most common cardiovascular diseases in paediatric cancer and underlying causes

Figure 1

Table 2. Definition of cardiovascular disease risk groups and surveillance recommendations24

Figure 2

Table 3. Summary of benefits and harms regarding primary surveillance by risk groups and modalities24

Figure 3

Table 4. Concordances and discordances among cardiomyopathy surveillance recommendations (cited from Armenian et al.)49

Figure 4

Table 5. Medical therapy for late complications in cardio-oncology patients

Figure 5

Table 6. Practical implications for physicians to address the topic of physical activity with childhood cancer survivors

Figure 6

Figure 1. Summary of prevention and surveillance to decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases in childhood cancer survivors.