Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T21:28:25.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re Holy Trinity, Rusholme

Manchester Consistory Court: Tattersall Ch, March 2012 Re-ordering – pews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Ruth Arlow
Affiliation:
Barrister, Deputy Chancellor of the Dioceses of Chichester and Norwich
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2012

A faculty was sought for the re-ordering of a Grade II* listed church to create more flexible worship and meeting space, including replacing the pews (which had unusual terracotta pew ends) with chairs. The church was one of three ‘terracotta’ churches built by the same Victorian architect in the diocese. The Victorian Society and English Heritage opposed, although did not formally object to, the removal of the pews, arguing that their terracotta features had intrinsic value and made an important contribution to the character of the interior and its terracotta architecture. The faculty was granted as the wholesale retention of the pews was not merited and the petitioners had proved necessity for the proposed changes. The chancellor observed that the pews were of little significance in their own right but had an intrinsic heritage value in their historic environment. It was a condition of the faculty that some pews would be preserved in situ as rare examples of pews with terracotta features finished to resemble timber. [Catherine Shelley]