Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:30:49.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Westminster as Usual? Three Interpretations for the UK Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2021

Marco Giuliani Open the ORCID record for Marco Giuliani [Opens in a new window]
Marco Giuliani*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: marco.giuliani@unimi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Brexit process has shattered the foundations of British politics, with prime ministerial resignations, government defeats, continuous rebellions and floor-crossings. These phenomena seem at odds with the usual decisiveness of Westminster systems. However, the aforementioned departures from the British tradition could be interpreted as compatible with the typical distance of any empirical reality from theoretical models, as exceptions to the rule due to the specificity of the European issue, or as the surfacing of some deeper social, economic and cultural tensions. Data alone are insufficient to confirm any of the alternative interpretations, although they seem to confirm the existence of long-term dynamics rather than some short-term exceptionalism. Within this scenario, the article suggests that a series of institutional innovations introduced since the late 1990s have facilitated the political consolidation of those tensions, contributed to the partisan dealignment, and made room for a potential departure from a Westminster model of democracy.

Keywords

BrexitcabinetWestminstermodel of democracy
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 552 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagehot, W (1867) The English Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldini, G, Bressanelli, E and Massetti, E (2018) Who is in Control? Brexit and the Westminster Model. Political Quarterly 89(4), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldini, G, Bressanelli, E and Massetti, E (2021) Back to the Westminster Model? The Brexit Process and the UK Political System. International Political Science Review, published early online, January. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192512120967375.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, FR, Jones, BD and Mortensen, PB (2014) Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking. In Sabatier, PA and Weible, CM (eds), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 59–103.Google Scholar
Blau, A (2008) The Effective Number of Parties at Four Scales. Party Politics 14(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068807085888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, J and Battegazzorre, F (2003) ‘Majoritarian’ and ‘Consensus’ Parliamentary Democracies: A Convergence Towards ‘Cooperative Majoritarianism’? Quaderni di Scienza Politica 9, 225–251.Google Scholar
Cameron, D (2010) ‘Press Conference Speech’, 12 May. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-and-deputy-pm-press-conference--2.Google Scholar
Carl, N, Dennison, J and Evans, G (2018) European but not European Enough: An Explanation for Brexit. European Union Politics 20(2), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1465116518802361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M, Irepoglu Carreras, Y and Bowler, S (2019) Long-Term Economic Distress, Cultural Backlash, and Support for Brexit. Comparative Political Studies 52(9), 1396–1424. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414019830714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, I and Stanig, P (2018) Global Competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review 112(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, D and Mahon, JE (1993) Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. America n Political Science Review 87(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conservatives (2019) Get Brexit Done. Unleash Britain's Potential. The Conservative and Unionist Party Manifesto 2019. <https://www.conservatives.com/our-plan>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Conservatives+(2019)+Get+Brexit+Done.+Unleash+Britain's+Potential.+The+Conservative+and+Unionist+Party+Manifesto+2019.+.>Google Scholar
Cowley, P and Norton, P (1999) Rebels and Rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992 Parliament. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-856X.00005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, J (2017) Why Leave Won the UK's EU Referendum. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12613.Google Scholar
Curtice, J (2020) A Return to ‘Normality’ at Last? How the Electoral System Worked in 2019. Parliamentary Affairs 73(Supplement 1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutts, D, Goodwin, M, Heath, O and Surridge, P (2020) Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics. Political Quarterly 91(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriadis, P (2017) Constitutional Illegitimacy over Brexit. Political Quarterly 88(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G and Menon, A (2017) Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, E et al. (2019) Electoral Shocks: The Volatile Voter in a Turbulent World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, R and Goodwin, M (2017) Britain After Brexit: A Nation Divided. Journal of Democracy 28(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, A (2019) The Realignment of British Politics in the Wake of Brexit. Political Quarterly 90(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S (1998) An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giuliani, M (2019) The Eight Votes that Changed the System. Looking at Brexit from Westminster. Annual Conference of the Italian Political Science Association (SISP). Lecce, 11–14 September 2019.Google Scholar
Hall, M, Marsh, D and Vines, E (2018) A Changing Democracy: Contemporary Challenges to the British Political Tradition. Policy Studies 39(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1451504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard (2019) Parliamentary Debates. HC Deb, 1 April, vol. 657, col. 880. www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/publications-records/house-of-commons-publications/bv_commons_vol_657.pdf.Google Scholar
Heath, O and Goodwin, M (2017) The 2017 General Election, Brexit and the Return to Two-Party Politics: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result. Political Quarterly 88(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, W and Lodge, M (2018) Brexit, the Tides and Canute: The Fracturing Politics of the British State. Journal of European Public Policy 26(5), 772–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1478876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, W and Stoker, G (2017) Tilting Towards the Cosmopolitan Axis? Political Change in England and the 2017 General Election. Political Quarterly 88(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A (2008) Thinking about Democracy. Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A (2012) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, Y (2019) Economic Insecurity and the Causes of Populism, Reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(4), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, T (2019) Prime Minister's statement in Downing Street, 24 May 2019. <https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-statement-in-downing-street-24-may-2019>' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=May,+T+(2019)+Prime+Minister's+statement+in+Downing+Street,+24+May+2019.+>Google Scholar
Norton, P (2016) The Fixed-term Parliaments Act and Votes of Confidence. Parliamentary Affairs 69(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, P (2019) Is the House of Commons Too Powerful? The 2019 Bingham Lecture in Constitutional Studies, University of Oxford. Parliamentary Affairs 72(4), 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, TS and Kriesi, H (2015) Populism and Crisis: A Fuzzy Relationship. In Kriesi, H and Pappas, TS (eds), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 303–325.Google Scholar
Powell, GB (2000) Elections as Instruments Of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Prosser, C (2021) The End of the EU Affair: The UK General Election of 2019. West European Politics 44(2), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1773640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, RAW, Wanna, J and Weller, P (2009) Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J (2018) British Policy-Making and the Need for a Post-Brexit Policy Style. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M (2021) Brexit and Parliament: The Anatomy of a Perfect Storm. Parliamentary Affairs 74(2), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M and Serban, R (2020) The Muddle of the ‘Westminster Model’: A Concept Stretched Beyond Repair. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, published early online, July. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.12.Google Scholar
Sartori, G (1994) Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schleiter, P and Evans, G (2021) The Changing Confidence Relationship Between the UK Executive and Parliament in Comparative Context. Parliamentary Affairs 74(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz033.Google Scholar
Smith, J (2019) Fighting to ‘Take Back Control’: The House of Lords and Brexit. In Christiansen, T and Fromage, D (eds), Brexit and Democracy. The Role of Parliaments in the UK and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolewska, M and Ford, R (2020) Brexitland: Identity, Diversity and the Reshaping of British Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmeier, G (2018) Does Westminster (Still) Represent the Westminster Model? An Analysis of the Changing Nature of the UK's Political System. European View 14(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs12290-015-0368-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K (2006) Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation. In Strøm, K, Müller, WC and Bergman, T (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–106.Google Scholar
Sumption, J (2020) Brexit and the British Constitution: Reflections on the Last Three years and the Next Fifty. Political Quarterly 91(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S (1988) National Politics and Collective Action: Recent Theory and Research in Western Europe and the United States. Annual Review of Sociology 14, 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S (2011) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, AL (2017) The Constitutional Implications of Brexit. European Public Law 23(4), 757–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar