Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T11:52:47.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of avian nuclei to mammalian maturation promoting factor (MPF)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

P. Trefil
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
M. Horská
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
J. Kaňka
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
J. Fulka
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
J. Jirmanová
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
R.M. Moor
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
J Fulka Jr*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Academy of Sciences, Liběchov, Czech Republic; The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
*
J. Fulka, Jr, Institute of Animal Production, Cs-104 00 Prague 10-Uhříněves, Czech Republic. Telephone: 42 2 67710659. Fax 42 2 67710779.

Summary

Chicken blastodermal cells (stage X) were fused to mouse enucleated oocytes with either no or high maturation promoting factor (MPF) activity. High MPF levels always induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) irrespective of the number of nuclei fused to a single oocyte. When a single blastodermal cell was fused to a single oocyte without MPF activity the nucleus remained intact for up to 3 h and thereafter underwent PCC. A quite different situation was observed after multiple fusion of several blastodermal cells to a single oocyte without MPF activity. Here, the transplanted nuclei remained intact even after prolonged culture but underwent extensive swelling. DNA synthesis was detected in almost all unfused blastodermal cells. However, after the fusion of several blastodermal cells to a single oocyte no DNA synthesis could be detected. These results provide further evidence that MPF is the universal cell-cycle regulator in the animal kingdom. Its activity is blocked (or neutralised) after fusion to several S-phase cells. Interestingly, our results further suggest that DNA synthesis is suppressed in meiotic cytoplasm even in the presence of an intact nuclear envelope.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlakha, R.S., Sahasrubaddhe, C.C., Wright, D.A. & Rao, P.N. (1983). Evidence for the presence of inhibitors of mitotic factors during G1 period in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 97, 1707–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balakier, H. & Masui, Y. (1986). Interactions between metaphase and interphase factors produced by fusion of mouse oocytes and zygotes. Dev. Biol. 117, 102–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blow, J.J. (1993). Preventing re-replication of DNA in a single cell cycle: evidence for a replication licensing factor. J. Cell Biol. 122, 9931002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H.J., Rossant, J. & Masui, Y. (1988). Suppression of chromosome condensation during meiotic maturation induces parthenogenetic development of mouse oocytes. Development 104, 97103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverley, D. & Laskey, R.A. (1994). Regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 745–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coverley, D., Downes, C.S., Romanowski, P. & Laskey, R.A. (1993). Reversible effects of nuclear membrane permeabilization on DNA replication: evidence for a positive licensing factor. J. Cell Biol. 122, 985–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, F., Roberts, J. & Weintraub, H. (1989). Simple and complex cell cycles. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 5, 341–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyal-Giladi, H. & Kochav, S. (1976). A complementary normal table and new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. I. General morphology. Dev. Biol. 49, 321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulka, J. Jr & Moor, R.M. (1993). Noninvasive chemical enucleation of mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34, 427–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulka, J. JrJung, T. & Moor, R.M. (1992). The fall of biological Maturation Promoting Factor (MPF) and histone HI kinase activity during anaphase and telophase in mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 32, 378–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulka, J. Jr, Notarianni, E., Passoni, L. & Moor, R.M. (1993). Early changes in embryonic nuclei fused to chemically enucleated mouse oocytes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 37, 433–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Fulka, J. Jr, Moor, R.M. & Fulka, J. (1995). Replicating DNA does not block germinal vesicle breakdown in mouse oocytes. J. Exp. Zool. 272, 245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R.T. & Rao, P.N. (1971). Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions in the achievement of nuclear synchrony in DNA synthesis and mitosis in multinucleate cells. Biol. Rev. 46, 97155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, T., Moor, R.M. & Fulka, J. Jr (1993). Kinetics of MPF and histone H1 kinase activity differ during the G2- to M-phase transition in mouse oocytes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 37, 595600.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaňka, J., Fulka, J. Jr., Fulka, J. & Petr, J. (1991). Nuclear transplantation in bovine embryo: fine structural and autoradiographic studies. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 29, 1210–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaňka, J., Fulka, J. Jr, Ouhibi, N. & Moor, R.M. (1994). Remodeling changes in embryonic and embryonic stem cell nuclei after cell fusion with chemically enucleated mouse oocytes: an autoradiography and ultrastructural study. In. Proceedings of the European Conference on Embryo Technology and Genetic Engineering in Cattle and Sheep, pp. 210–11.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, T., Yamazaki, K., Kato, Y., Koide, S. & Kanatani, H. (1984). Induction of starfish oocyte maturation by Maturation-Promoting Factor of mouse and surf clam oocytes. J. Exp. Zool. 231, 293–5.Google Scholar
Kopeńný, V., Fulka, J. Jr., Pivko, J. & Petr, J. (1989). localization of replicated DNA-containing sites in preimplantation bovine embryo in relation to the onset of RNA synthesis. Blot. Cell 65, 231–8.Google Scholar
Kornbluth, S., Smythe, C. & Newport, J.W. (1992). In vitro cell cycle arrest induced by using artificial DNA templates. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 3216–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, A. & Hunt, T. (1993). The Cell Cycle: An Introduction. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nurse, P. (1990). Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344, 503–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petitte, J.N., Clark, M.E., Lin, G., Verrinder Gibbins, A.M.. Etches, R.J. (1990). Production of somatic and germline chimeras in the chicken by transfer of early blastodermal cells. Development 108, 185–9.Google Scholar
Rao, P.N., Wilson, B. & Puck, T.T. (1977). Premature chromosome condensation and cell cycle analysis. J. Cell Physiol. 91, 131–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorensen, R.A., Cyert, M.S. & Pedersen, R.A. (1985). Active Maturation-Promoting Factor is present in mature mouse oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 100, 1637–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tesařík, J., Kopenčný, V., Plachot, M. & Mandelbaum, J.High-resolution autoradiographic localization of DNA-containing sites and RNA synthesis in developing nucleoli of human preimplantation embrys: a new concept of embryonic nucleogenesis. Development 101, 777–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Blerkom, J. & Motta, P. (1979). The Cellular Basis of Mammalian Reproduction. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Benbow, R.M. (1994). Inhibition of DNA replication in cell-free extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs by extracts of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Dev. Biol. 164, 5262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed