Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-wfvfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-06T22:43:31.169Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": false, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

In vitro fertilization in inbred BALB/c mice I: isotonic osmolarity and increased calcium-enhanced sperm penetration through the zona pellucida and male pronuclear formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

Seiji Kito*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Radiation Protection, Department of Advanced Technologies for Radiation Protection Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4–9-Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263–8555, Japan. Department of Advanced Technologies for Radiation Protection Research, Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, 263–8555, Japan.
Yuki Ohta
Affiliation:
Science Services, Chiba 263–8555, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: Seiji Kito. Research Center for Radiation Protection, Department of Advanced Technologies for Radiation Protection Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4–9-Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263–8555, Japan. Tel: +81 43 206 3059. Fax: +81 43 251 4138. e-mail: sk126@nirs.go.jp

Summary

To optimize IVF conditions for BALB/c mice, which are known to have poor in vitro fertilizability, the requirements for sperm–ova interaction were studied by use of modified simplex optimization medium (mKSOM) as a basic medium. Modified human tubal fluid (mHTF) was used for sperm preincubation and acted as a positive control. When the two media were compared, neither capacitation nor fertilization was supported in mKSOM. Increasing the calcium concentration in mKSOM to 5 mM or more during sperm: ova coincubation improved zona penetration but not male pronuclear (MPN) formation to the same level as those cells incubated in mHTF. When medium osmolarity was varied from 230–305 mOsmol by NaCl at 5 mM CaCl2, MPN formation improved at 280 mOsmol or higher osmolarity to the same level as that found when using mHTF. When NaCl equivalent to 25–75 mOsmol was substituted with trehalose, no significant reduction in fertilization was observed. Substitution of NaCl equivalent to 75 mOsmol with other osmotic reagents (sucrose, choline chloride and sorbitol) resulted in similar levels of fertilization as found with mHTF, except for sorbitol, which reduced fertilization significantly caused by its detrimental effect on sperm viability. At isotonic osmolarity (305 mOsmol), maximum fertilization was observed at 5 mM CaCl2; lower or higher concentrations of CaCl2 resulted in reduced fertilization. Calcium and osmolarity, therefore, are important for sperm : ova interaction in BALB/c mice and the increases in calcium to 5 mM and osmolarity to 305 mOsmol are optimal for BALB/c sperm to penetrate through the zona and to form MPN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, R.J., Wang, Y.F., Liu, J., Best, F. & Richardson, D.W. (1983). The influence of medium composition, osmolarity and albumin content on the acrosome reaction and fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa: development of an improved zona-free hamster egg penetration test. Int. J. Androl. 6, 180–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burruel, V.R., Yanagimachi, R. & Whitten, W.K. (1996). Normal mice develop from oocytes injected with spermatozoa with grossly misshapen heads. Biol. Reprod. 55, 709–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, S.L., Payson, S.J. & Taft, R.A. (2006). Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Theriogenology 65, 1716–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y-H., Seng, S. & Toyoda, Y. (2000). Comparison of capacitation and fertilizing ability of BALB/c and ICR mice epididymal spermatozoa: analysis by in vitro fertilization with cumulus-intact and zona-free mouse eggs. J. Mamm. Ova Res. 17, 914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, K.M. & Baltz, J.M. (1997). Organic osmolytes and embryos: substrates of the Gly and beta transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol. Reprod. 56, 1550–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L.R. (1987). Minimum and maximum extracellular Ca2+ requirements during mouse sperm capacitation and fertilization in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 81, 7789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, R.F. (1995). Ionic control of sperm function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 7, 905–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadi, T., Hammer, M.A., Algire, C., Richards, T. & Baltz, J.M. (2005). Similar effects of osmolarity, glucose and phosphate on cleavage past the 2-cell stage in mouse embryos from outbred and F1 hybrid females. Biol. Reprod. 72, 179–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrick, J.R., Conover-Sparman, M.L. & Krisher, R.L. (2003). Reduced polyspermic fertilization of porcine oocytes utilizing elevated bicarbonate and reduced calcium concentrations in a single-medium system. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneau, D. & Crozet, N. (1989). In vitro fertilization in the sheep: effect of elevated calcium concentration at insemination. Gamete Res. 23, 119–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itagaki, Y. & Toyoda, Y. (1992). Effects of prolonged sperm preincubation and elevated calcium concentration on fertilization of cumulus-free mouse eggs in vitro. J. Reprod. Dev. 38, 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. & Kraicer, P.F. (1978). Effect of elevated calcium concentration on fertilization of rat oocyte in vitro. Gamete Res. 1, 281–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B.K., Lee, S.C., Lee, K.S., Lee, B.K., Han, C.H., Kim, J.H. & Lee, C.S. (2002). Effect of medium milieu on sperm penetration and pronuclear formation of bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 57, 2093–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kito, S. & Ohta, Y. (2005). Medium effects on capacitation and sperm penetration through the zona pellucida in inbred BALB/c spermatozoa. Zygote 13, 145–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kito, S., Hayao, T., Noguchi-Kawasaki, Y., Ohta, Y., Hideki, U. & Tateno, S. (2004). Improved in vitro fertilization and development by use of modified human tubal fluid and applicability of pronucleate embryos for cryopreservation by rapid freezing in inbred mice. Comp. Med. 54, 564–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawitts, J.A. & Biggers, J.D. (1992). Joint effects of sodium chloride, glutamine and glucose in mouse preimplantation embryo culture media. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 31, 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawitts, J.A. & Biggers, J.D. (1993). Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods Enzymol. 225, 153–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, D.Y., Clarke, G.N. & Baker, H.W. (2006). Hyper-osmotic condition enhances protein tyrosine phosphorylation and zona pellucida binding capacity of human sperm. Hum. Reprod. 21, 745–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, H. & Chang, M.C. (1973). Effect of osmolality on fertilization of mouse and golden hamster eggs in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 33, 481–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, H. & Ishibashi, T. (1975). The role of calcium ions in fertilization of mouse and rat eggs in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 45, 523–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mobraaten, L.E. (1986). Mouse embryo cryobanking. J. In Vitro Fertil. Embryo Transf. 3, 2832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagata, N. (1996). Use of cryopreservation techniques of embryos and spermatozoa for production of transgenic (Tg) mice and for maintenance of Tg mouse lines. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46, 236–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Oh, S.H., Miyoshi, K. & Funahashi, H. (1998). Rat oocytes fertilized in modified rat 1-cell embryo culture medium containing a high sodium chloride concentration and bovine serum albumin maintain developmental ability to the blastocyst stage. Biol. Reprod. 59, 884–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossato, M., Di Virgilio, F. & Foresta, C. (1996). Involvement of osmo-sensitive calcium influx in human sperm activation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2, 903–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roudebush, W.E. & Duralia, D.R. (1996). Superovulation, fertilization and in vitro embryo development in BALB/c ByJ, BALB/cJ, B6D2F1/J and CFW mouse strains. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46, 239–40.Google Scholar
Simpson, E.M., Linder, C.C., Sargent, E.E., Davisson, M.T., Mobraaten, L.E. & Sharp, J.J. (1997). Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice. Nat. Genet. 16, 1927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summers, M.C., Bhatnagar, P.R., Lawitts, J.A. & Biggers, J.D. (1995). Fertilization in vitro of mouse ova from inbred and outbred strains: complete preimplantation embryo development in glucose-supplemented KSOM. Biol. Reprod. 53, 431–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szczygiel, M.A., Kusakabe, H., Yanagimachi, R. & Whittingham, D.G. (2002). Separation of motile populations of spermatozoa prior to freezing is beneficial for subsequent fertilization in vitro: a study with various mouse strains. Biol. Reprod. 67, 287–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sztein, J.M., Farley, J.S. & Mobraaten, L.E. (2000). In vitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm. Biol. Reprod. 63, 1774–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, C.E., Brown, S.D. & Glenister, P.H. (1999). Large numbers of mice established by in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved spermatozoa: implications and applications for genetic resource banks, mutagenesis screens and mouse backcrosses. Mamm. Genome 10, 987–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toyoda, Y., Yokoyama, M. & Hoshi, T. (1971). Studies on fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. I. In vitro fertilization of eggs by fresh epididymal sperm. Jpn. J. Anim. Reprod. 16, 147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagimachi, R. (1982). Requirement of extracellular calcium ions for various stages of fertilization and fertilization-related phenomena in hamster. Gamete Res. 5, 324–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. pp. 277305. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar