Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:35:17.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Road to Peace in the Middle East

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

In light of the recent war between Israel and Egypt and Syria and the uneasy cease-fire which now prevails, it is entirely natural to inquire whether Resolution 242 of the United Nations Security Council, adopted on November 22, 1967, following the Six-Day War, remains operative.

In a lecture delivered at Chatham House on April 6, 1971, and in an article published in a recent issue of the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, I stated my conviction that Resolution 242 may ultimately prove to be the basis for a peace settlement in the Middle East. I adhere to this view, despite the recent hostilities still smoldering.

There is an important new development which reaffirms my conviction that the guidelines set forth in Resolution 242 are still relevant. That development is the resolution of the Security Council sponsored by the United States and the Soviet Union–Resolution 338, adopted on October 22, 1973–calling for a cease-fire in the early hours of the morning of the following day.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

page 8 note • I am quoting from the English text of the Resolution. The French and Russian texts differ, but it was the English text which was voted upon at the Security Council meeting on November 22 when Resolution 242 was adopted.