Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:45:51.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History as We Would Like It

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

I should be glad to believe with Mr. James Reston that God is not mocked and that the crimes of statesmen and of peoples obtain their just due at the hands of history. But I find it difficult to divorce myself from the thought that, at any rate in the long run, it is the conquerors and the big battalions that determine the verdicts (despite some shining exceptions) of historians. Over a century and a half ago, Immanuel Kant wrote, "If those revolts which gave Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Great Britain their constitutions, and which are now praised as so felicitous, had failed, historians would see-in the execution of their originators the deserved punishment of major criminals" (from an essay entitled "That may be all right in theory, but it does not work in practice," 1793).

Type
The Judgments of History—A Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)