Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T09:57:47.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status and Significance of Random Sample Testing in Europe*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

S. Fox
S. Fox
Affiliation:
lately Senior Lecturer, University of Reading, England
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 28 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, W. A. (1961). Comparing entries in Random Sample Tests. Poult. Sci. 40: 1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, W. A. (1964). Changes in performance of entries in Random Sample Tests. Poult. Sci. 43: 716.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. (1965). Random Sample Performance Testing of poultry in the U.S.A. World's Poult. Sci. J. 21: 345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, S. (1976). The Future of Random Sample Testing. Proc. 5th European Poultry Congress W.P.S.A.Google Scholar
Fox, S., Hann, C. M. and Maddison, E. A. (1974). 1973 Report of Random Sample Egg Production Tests in Europe. A.D.A.S., M.A.F.F., London.Google Scholar
Hann, C. M. (1969). Random Sample Testing. N.A.A.S. Regional Office, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. (1973). Random Sample Tests—usefulness and possible application in developing countries. F.A.O. Export Consultation of Animal Genetic Resources (Poultry). ACA:AGR/73/5. F.A.O., Rome.Google Scholar
Hawkins, M. (1972). Random Sample Tests should be changed or discontinued. Poultry Tribune (Sept.) 36.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. (1974). Size of experiments for breed or strain comparisions. Working symposium on Breed Evaluation and Crossing Experiments with Farm Animals. Zeist, Netherlands.Google Scholar
King, R. B. N. (1974). The effect of feed regulation in rearing on the laying performance of 20 strains of brown, white and tinted hybrid layers. Poultry Testing 4: 68.Google Scholar
King, B. B. N. and Holmes, J. J. (1975). A development of Random Sample Testing to meet the needs of the Poultry Industry. N. P. T. Ltd., Milford.Google Scholar
Marble, D. R. (1960). Random Sample Tests for Egg and Poultry Meat Production. F.A.O., Rome.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1971). Poultry Testing? Poultry World, 08 2nd, 12.Google Scholar
Powell, J. C. and Bowman, J. C. (1964). An estimate of maternal effects in early growth characteristics and their effects upon comparative tests of chicken varieties.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, L. J. and Nordskog, A. W. (1962). Influence of parent flock source on poultry performance. Poult. Sci. 41: 1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summer, J. (1974). Private communication.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (1960–1974). Random Sample Egg Production Tests. Two year combined summaries up to 1972–73. Agr. Nes. Fervive, U.S.D.A.Google Scholar