Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:37:40.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of ambient temperature and age on dietary lysine and energy in turkey production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

T. Veldkamp ,
R.P. Kwakkel ,
P.R. Ferket  and
M.W.A. Verstegen
T. Veldkamp*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Husbandry, P.O. Box 2176, 8203 AD Lelystad, The Netherlands
R.P. Kwakkel
Affiliation:
Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Production Systems, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
P.R. Ferket
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Department of Poultry Science, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7608, USA
M.W.A. Verstegen
Affiliation:
Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Nutrition, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: e-mail: t.veldkamp@pv.agro.nl
Get access

Abstract

The commercial turkey market changed during the last two or three decades from predominantly whole turkey to mostly further processed products as consumer demand for breast meat and convenience increased in most western countries. Turkey operations focus on selection in breeding, management, and feeding programs to obtain a high breast meat yield. Main factors that affect breast meat yield are age, weight, sex, strain, genetic selection, and nutrition. The degree of influence by these factors on breast meat yield is highly dependent upon environmental conditions, especially ambient temperatures. This review deals with the response of commercial male turkeys on dietary lysine to energy ratios in moderate and hot climate conditions. A range dietary lysine to energy ratios have been determined to be optimal during each successive four-week period after hatch: 1.12 to 1.65, 1.10 to 1.36, 0.76 to 1.15, 0.64 to 0.81, and 0.53 to 0.86 g dietary lysine per MJ of ME, respectively). These optimum ranges in lysine to energy ratios are partly due to the continuous changes in genetic potential for growth and environmental effects on feed intake. Commercial male turkeys weighed about 18.5 kg at 140 days of age with a feed: gain ratio of 2.6 in 2001, as compared to about 8.0 kg at 220 days of age with a feed: gain ratio of 3.0 in 1966. Moreover, there is clear evidence in scientific literature that feed intake, and thus protein intake is negatively affected by short or long periods of heat stress in moderate and hot climates, respectively. Although some research included ambient temperature as a treatment variable in nutritional requirement studies with turkeys, most have been conducted at moderate temperatures. Feeding turkeys to minimize the adverse effects of heat stress is a big challenge for the modern turkey industry. More research is needed to better understand the relationship between dietary energy and lysine at different climatic conditions.

Keywords

turkeysambient temperaturedietary lysinedietary energyperformancecarcass traits
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 475 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austic, R.E. (1986) Biochemical description of nutritional effects. In: Nutrient requirements of poultry and nutritional research. Fisher, C. and Boorman, K.N., editors. Butterworths, London. pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Baker, D.H. (1997) Ideal amino acid profiles for swine and poultry and their applications in feed formulation. In: BioKyowa Technical Review 9, BioKyowa, Inc., Chesterfield, USA.Google Scholar
Boling, S.D. and Firman, J.D. (1998) Digestible lysine requirement of female turkeys during the starter period. Poultry Science. 77: 547–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottje, W.G. and Harrison, P.C. (1986) The effect of high ambient temperature and hypercapnia on postprandial intestinal hyperemia in domestic cockerels. Poultry Science 65: 1606–1614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottje, W.G. and Harrison, P.C. (1987) Celiac cyclic blood flow pattern response to feeding and heat exposure. Poultry Science 66: 2039–2042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brake, J., Ferket, P.R., Grimes, J., Balnave, D., Gorman, I. and Dibner, J.J. (1994) Optimum arginine:lysine ratio changes in hot weather. Proceedings 21st Annual Carolina Poultry Nutrition ConferenceCharlotte, NC, pp. 82–104.Google Scholar
Brake, J., Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Rives, D.V. and Giesbrecht, F.G. (1995) Relationship of sex, strain, and body weight to carcass yield and offal production in turkeys. Poultry Science 74: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brake, J., Balnave, D. and Dibner, J.J. (1998) Optimum dietary arginine:lysine ratio for broiler chickens is altered during heat stress in association with changes in intestinal uptake and dietary sodium chloride. British Poultry Science 39: 639–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British United Turkeys (1994) BUT Big 6 Performance Goals. Broughton, Chester, UK.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, T.M., Beck, M.M., Schulte, D.D., Parkhurst, A.M. and Deshazer, J.A. (1997) Physiological responses of tom turkeys to temperature and humidity change with age. Journal of Thermal Biology 22: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, T.K., Hamre, M.L and Coon, C.N. (1997) Effect of environmental temperature, dietary protein, and energy levels on broiler performance. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 6: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, G.A., Nixey, C. and Monaghan, G. (1978) Meat yield in turkeys. British Poultry Science 19: 755–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, P.J and Michie, W. (1978) Environmental temperature and broiler performance: the use of diets containing increased amounts of protein. British Poultry Science 19: 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, Farms (1990) Recommendations for feeding commercial turkeys. Leeson, S. ed. Strathroy, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Dale, N. M. and Fuller, H.L. (1980) Effect of diet composition on feed intake and growth of chicks under heat stress. II. Constant vs. Cycling temperatures. Poultry Science 59: 1434–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, W.F. and Scott, H.M. (1965) The development of an amino acid reference diet for the early growth of chicks. Poultry Science 44: 803–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degussa, (1993) Amino Acid Recommendations for Poultry. Degussa AG, Hanau, Germany.Google Scholar
D'mello, J.P.F. and Lewis, D. (1970) Amino acid interactions in chick nutrition. 1. The interrelationship between lysine and arginine. British Poultry Science 11: 299–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmans, G.C. and Kyriazakis, I. (2000) Issues arising from genetic selection for growth and body composition characteristics in poultry and pigs. In: Occasional Publication No. 27, British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 39–53.Google Scholar
England, J.A., Waldroup, P.W., Kidd, M.L. and Kerr, B.J. (1996) Increasing arginine:lysine ratios in turkey diets does not improve performance when lysine levels are adequate. Poultry Science 75 (supplement 1): 3.Google Scholar
European Community (2001) Gross production of turkey meat per country in the EU.Google Scholar
Ferket, P.R. (1995) Nutrition of turkeys during hot weather. In: 18th Technical Turkey Conference. Renfrew, Scotland.Google Scholar
Ferket, P.R., Garlich, J.D., Kuiper, R. and Kidd, M.T. (1998) Dietary arginine requirement of growing and finishing turkey toms. In: Proceedings of turkey nutrition workshopNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh, NC, USA. pp. 6–14.Google Scholar
Ferket, P.R., Grimes, J.L., Brake, J. and Rives, D.V. (1995) Effects of dietary virginiamycin, arginine:lysine ratio, and electrolyte balance on the performance and carcass yield of turkey toms. Poultry Science 74 (supplement 1): 190.Google Scholar
Ferket, P.R. (2002) Turkey performance similar to last year. Poultry USA (in press).Google Scholar
Firman, J.D. and Boling, S.D. (1998) Symposium: lysine. Ideal protein in turkeys. Poultry Science 77: 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. (1984) Fat deposition in broilers. In: Fats in Animal Nutrition (Wiseman, J., Ed), London, Butterworths, U.K., pp. 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign Agricultural Service (2002) In: World markets and trade. Councelor and attache reports, official statistics, and results of office research. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 25.Google Scholar
Gascoyne, J. (1989) The world turkey industry, structure and production. In: Recent advances in turkey science. (Nixey, C. and Grey, T.C., Eds) Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., U.K., pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Halvorson, J.C., Waibel, P.E., Oju, E.M., Noll, S.L. and El Halawan, M.E. (1991) Effect of diet and population density on male turkeys under various environmental conditions. Poultry Science 70: 935–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Y. and Baker, D.H. (1994) Digestible lysine requirement of male and female broiler chicks during the period three to six weeks posthatching. Poultry Science 73: 1739–1745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S., Weiselberg, M., Eisner, U., Bartov, I., Riesenfeld, G., Sharvit, M., Niv, A. and Bornstein, S. (1980) The energy requirements and performance of growing chickens and turkeys as affected by environmental temperature. Poultry Science 59: 2290–2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S. and Ben-Gal, I. (1982) Energy use and performance of young turkeys kept under various constant and cycling environmental temperatures. Poultry Science 61: 1082–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S., Frisch, Y., Bar, A., Eisner, U., Bengal, I. and Pines, M. (1983a) The amino acid requirements of growing turkeys. 1. Model construction and parameter estimation. Poultry Science 62: 2208–2217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S., Plavnik, I., Ben-Gal, I., Talpaz, H. and Bartov, I. (1983b) The amino acid requirements of growing turkeys. 2. Experimental validation of model-calculated requirements for sulfur amino acids and lysine. Poultry Science 62: 2387–2393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S., Sklan, D., Talpaz, H. and Plavnik, I. (1998) The effect of dietary protein level on the lysine and arginine requirements of growing chickens. Poultry Science 77: 689–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, L.S., Manning, B., Falen, L. and McGinnis, J. (1976) Lysine needs of rapidly growing turkeys from 12–22 weeks of age. Poultry Science 55: 1394–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J.D. (1961) Lysine toxicity in the chick. Journal of Nutrition 73: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, J.M.M. and Balnave, D. (1996) Heat stress in broilers. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands and University of Sidney, Australia.Google Scholar
Latshaw, J.D. (1993) Dietary lysine concentrations from deficient to excessive and the effects on broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 34: 951–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1980) Production and carcass characteristics of the Large White turkey. Poultry Science 59: 1237–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, D., Pack, M. and Jeroch, H. (1996) Responses of growing and finishing turkey toms to dietary lysine. Poultry Science 75: 711–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilburn, M.S. and Emmerson, D. (1993) The influence of differences in dietary amino acids during the early growing period on growth and development of Nicholas and British United Turkey toms. Poultry Science 72: 1722–1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmoud, H.A., Teeter, R.G. and Makled, M.N. (1996) Arginine:lysine ratio effects on performance and carcass variables of broilers reared in thermoneutral and heat stress environments. Poultry Science 75(supplement 1): 88.Google Scholar
McNaughton, J.L. and Reece, F.N. (1984) Response of broiler chickens to dietary energy and lysine levels in a warm environment. Poultry Science 63: 1170–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateos, G.G., Sel, J.L. and Eastwood, J.A. (1982) Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat. Poultry Science 61: 94–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendes, A.A., Watkins, S.E., England, J.A., Saleh, E.A., Waldroup, A.L. and Waldroup, P.W. (1997) Influence of dietary lysine and arginine:lysine ratio on performance of broilers exposed to heat or cold stress from 3 to 6 weeks of age. Poultry Science 76: 472–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, H. (1999) Einfluss unterschiedlicher Fütterngsintensitäten bei schweren und mittelschweren Putenhähnen auf Mastleistung, Schlachtkörperzusammensetzung und Fleischqualit¨t. Thesis, Institut für Tierzuchtwissenschaft der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universi¨at, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Moncada, S., Palmer, R.M.J. and Higgs, E.A. (1991) Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacological Reviews 43: 109–142.Google ScholarPubMed
Moran, E.T., Orr, H.L. and Larmond, E. (1971) Sex and age related production efficiency, grades and yields with the Small White broiler-fryer type turkey. Poultry Science 50: 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, E.T. (1977) Growth and meat yield in poultry. In: Growth and Poultry Meat Production (Boorman, K.N. and Wilson, B.J., Eds.),. Edinburgh, pp. 145–173.Google Scholar
Musharaf, N.A. and Latshaw, J.D. (1999) Heat increment as affected by protein and amino acid nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nestor, K.E., Anderson, J.W. and Patterson, R.A. (2000) Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 14. Changes in genetic parameters over thirty generations of selection for increased body weight. Poultry Science 79: 445–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nixey, C. (1991) The lysine response of the turkey. Thesis. University of Nottingham. October 1991.Google Scholar
Noll, S.L. and Waibel, P.E. (1989) Lysine requirements of growing turkeys in various temperature environments. Poultry Science 68: 781–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noll, S.L., El Halawani, M.E., Waibel, P.E., Redig, P. and Janni, K. (1991) Effect of diet and population density on male turkeys under various environmental conditions. 1. Turkey growth and health performance. Poultry Science 70: 923–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oju, E.M., Waibel, P.E. and Noll, S.L. (1987) Protein, methionine, and lysine requirements of growing hen turkeys under various environmental temperatures. Poultry Science 66: 1675–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perenyi, M., Suto, Z. and Ujvarine, J. (1980) Changes in the proportion of the carcass parts of male and female heavy type turkeys between 4 and 20 weeks of age. In: Proceedings 6th European Poultry ConferenceWorld's Poultry Science Association, pp. 514–519.Google Scholar
Plavnik, I. and Hurwitz, S. (1993) Amino acids and protein requirement in turkeys. Pages 236–243 In: 9th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition. Jelenia Gòra, Poland.Google Scholar
Potter, L.M., Shelton, J.R. and McCarthy, J.P. (1981) Lysine and protein requirements of growing turkeys. Poultry Science 60: 2678–2686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, R.P., Potter, L.M. and Irish, W.W. (1961) Response of chickens to temperature and ventilation environments. Poultry Science 40: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Productschappen Vee, Vlees En Eieren (2001) Vee, Vlees en Eieren in cijfers, 2001. In: Statistisch jaarrapport 2000. Productschappen Vee, VIees en Eieren, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, Printer Trento, Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
Reece, F.N. and McNaughton, J.L. (1982) Effects of dietary nutrient density on broiler performance at low and moderate environmental temperatures. Poultry Science 61: 2208–2211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, S.P. and Michie, W. (1987) Environmental temperature and dietary protein concentrations for growing turkeys. British Poultry Science 28: 213–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, R.E. (1979) Slaughter losses and carcass composition of the Medium White Turkey. British Poultry Science 20: 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, J.L., Jeffrey, M.J. and Kerr, B.J. (1994) Influence of amino acid supplementation of low-protein diets and metabolizable energy feeding sequences on performance and carcass composition of toms. Poultry Science 73: 1867–1880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, D.W.F. and Brown, W.O. (1969) Calorimetric studies on the effect of dietary energy source and environmental temperature on the metabolic efficiency of energy utilization by mature Light Sussex cockerels. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 72: 479–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinurat, A.P. and Balnave, D. (1985) Effect of dietary amino acids and metabolisable energy on the performance of broilers kept at high temperatures. British Poultry Science 26: 117–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturkie, P.D. (1954) Regulation of body temperature. In: Avian Physiology. Comstock publishing associates, Ithaca, New York, pp. 118–137.Google Scholar
Tuttle, W.L. and Balloun, S.L. (1974) Lysine requirements of starting and growing turkeys. Poultry Science 53: 1698–1704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waibel, P.E. and Noll, S.L. (1985) Amino acid requirements in turkeys. Feed Management 38: 22–32.Google Scholar
Waibel, P.E. and Macleod, M.G. (1995) Effect of cycling temperature on growth, energy metabolism and nutrient retention of individual male turkeys. British Poultry Science 36: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldroup, P.W., Adams, M.H. and Waldroup, A.L. (1997a) Evaluation of national research council amino acid recommendations for large white turkeys. Poultry Science 76: 711–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldroup, P.W., England, J.A., Waldroup, A.L. and Anthony, N.B. (1997b) Response of two strains of large white male turkeys to amino acid levels when diets are changed at three-or four-week intervals. Poultry Science 76: 1543–1555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldroup, P.W., England, J.A., Kidd, M.T. and Kerr, B.J. (1998) Dietary Arginine and Lysine in large white toms. 1. Increasing arginine:lysine ratios does not improve performance when lysine levels are adequate. Poultry Science 77: 1364–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermeier, C, Strobel, E. and Jeroch, H. (2000) Stimmen die Lysin-bedarfswerte noch? DGS Magazin 13: 35–39Google Scholar
Wilson, E.K., Pierson, F.W., Hester, P.V., Adams, R.L. and Stadelman, W.J. (1980) The effects of high environmental temperature on feed passage time and performance traits of white pekin ducks. Poultry Science 59: 2322–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, P.C. (1992) Animal energetics. In: Comparative Animal Physiology. Saunders College Publishing. New York, NY. pp. 108.Google Scholar
Wolfenson, D., Frei, Y.F., Snapir, N. and Berman, A. (1981) Heat stress effects on capillary blood flow and its redistribution in the laying hen. Pflügers Archiv ges. Physiologie 390: 86–93.Google Scholar
Wolfenson, D. (1986) The effect of acclimatization on blood flow and its distribution in normothermic and hyperthermic domestic fowl. Comparative Biochemical Physiology 85A: 739–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J.D. (1989) Meat yield and carcass composition in turkeys. In: Recent advances in turkey science. (Nixey, C. and Grey, T.C., Eds) Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., U.K., pp. 271–288.Google Scholar
Yahav, S., Goldfeld, S., Pplavnik, I. and Hurwitz, S. (1995). Physiological response of chickens and turkeys to relative humidity during exposure to high ambient temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology 209: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahav, S. (2000). Relative humidity at moderate ambient temperatures: its effect on male broiler chickens and turkeys. British Poultry Science 41: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yahav, S. (2001) Different strategies to alleviate climatic stress in poultry production. In: Proceedings of the 13rh European Symposium on Poultry NutritionBlankenbergeBelgium, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
Zuprizal, , Larbier, M., Chagneau, A.M. and Geraert, P.A. (1993) Influence of ambient temperature on true digestibility of protein and amino acids of rapeseed and soybean meals in broilers. Poultry Science 72: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar