Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:24:21.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gordon Memorial Lecture: The Biologist's Debt to the Domestic Fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2013

Marie E. Coates
Affiliation:
The Robens Institute of Industrial and Environmental Health and Safety, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, England
Get access

Abstract

This lecture, the third given in memory of the late Dr R. F. Gordon, was delivered at the Connaught Hall, University of London, on 28th March, 1985. It was first published in British Poultry Science, Volume 27, pp 3–10, in March, 1986, and is here reprinted with thanks to the author and to the Board of British Poultry Science Ltd.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coates, M. E., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K. (1951). The chick assay of vitamin B12 and the animal protein factor. Analyst 76: 146150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Ford, J. E., Harrison, G. F., Kons, K., Shepheard, E. E., Wilby, F. W. (1952a). The use of chicks for the assay of viamins of the B complex: 2. Tests on natural materials and comparisons with microbiological and other assays. British Journal of Nutrition 6: 7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Dickinson, C. D., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Porter, J. W. G., Cummins, S. H., Cuthbertson, W. F. J. (1952b). A mode of action of antibiotics in chick nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1: 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Doran, B. M., Harrison, G. F. (1964). Activity of vitamin B12 coenzymes and antagonists in the chick and developing chick embryos. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 112: 837843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Ford, J. E., Harrison, G. F. (1968). Intestinal synthesis of the B complex in chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 22: 493500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copp, D. H., Cockcroft, D. W., Kueh, Y. (1967). Calcitonin from ultimobranchial glands of dogfish and chickens. Science, New York 158: 924925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Luca, H. F. (1979). Vitamin D Metabolism and Function, (Berlin, Springer Verlag).Google ScholarPubMed
Eijkman, C. (1897). Ein Versuch zur Bekampfung der Beri-beri. Virchow's Archiv Für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie 149: 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1953). The microbiological assay of “vitamin B12“. The specificity of the requirement of Ochromonas malhamensis for cyanocobalamin. British Journal of Nutrition 7: 199306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J. E., Gregory, M. E., Porter, J. W. G., Thompson, S. Y. (1953). Vitamin assay in milk products by chemical and microbiological means. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Dairy Congress 3: 12821286. (The Hague)Google Scholar
Fuller, R., Coates, M. E., Harrison, G. F. (1979). The influence of specific bacteria and a filterable agent on the growth of gnotobiotic chicks. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 46: 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R., Houghton, S. B., Coates, M. E. (1983). The effect of dietary penicillin on the growth of gnotobiotic chickens monoassociated with Streptococcus faecium. British Poultry Science 24: 111114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furuse, M., Yokota, H. (1984). Protein and energy utilization in germ-free and conventional chicks given diets containing different levels of dietary protein. British Journal of Nutrition 51: 255264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furuse, M., Yokota, H. (1985). Effect of the gut microflora on chick growth and utilisation of protein and energy at different concentrations of dietary protein. British Poultry Science 26: 97104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, B., Chang, T. S., Jaap, R. G. (1956). The bursa of Fabricius and antibody production. Poutry Science 35: 224225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impey, C. S., Mead, G. C., George, S. M. (1982). Competitive exclusion of salmonellas from the adult bird. Journal of Hygiene, Cambridge 89: 479490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latymer, E. A., Coates, M. E. (1981). The influence of microorganisms and of stress on the chick's requirement for pantothenic acid. British Journal of Nutrition 45: 441449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawson, D. E. M. (1978). Vitamin D. (London and New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Nurmi, E., Rantala, M. (1973). New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature London 241: 210211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasteur, L. (1885). Observations relative a la note precedante de M. Duclaux. Comptes Hebdomaires Séances de l'Academie de Sciences, Paris 100: 68.Google Scholar
Rolls, B. A. (1979). Inorganic ions in the intestinal and caecal contents of germ-free and conventional chicks. Laboratory Animals 11: 99104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, D. N., Hewitt, D., Coates, M. E. (1974). The utilization of protein and excretion of uric acid in germ-free and conventional chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 31: 307318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M., Smyser, C. F. (1978). Protecting chicks and poults from salmonella by oral administration of normal gut microflora. Avian Diseases 322: 2763–287.Google Scholar
Soerjadi, A. S., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M. (1982). Intestinal colonization and competitive exclusion of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni in young chicks. Avian Diseases 26: 520524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokstad, E. L. R. Jukes (1950). Further observations on the “animal protein factor”. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine 73: 523528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar