Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:05:45.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancement of microbial nitrification to reduce ammonia emission from poultry manure: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

H.M. SALIM
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada Department of Livestock Services, Khamar Bari, Dhaka, Bangladesh
P.H. PATTERSON
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
S.C. RICKE
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
W.K. KIM*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Corresponding author: wkkim@uga.edu
Get access

Abstract

Ammonia (NH3) emissions from poultry farming operations have become a crucial concern due to their potential adverse effects on performance, birds and human health, and the environment. Due to genetic improvements, current commercial poultry require high quality balanced nutrition to maintain their rapid growth and production. Amino acids are components of protein nutrition that greatly influence the growth of the birds, and methionine is the first limiting essential amino acid in the high protein diets of poultry. However, excess or misuse of amino acid supplementation to poultry diets increases nitrogen (N) excretion and emissions to the environment. Currently, there are limited numbers of research publications regarding NH3 emissions from poultry manure, and few of them address manure enhancement by microbial nitrification. Therefore, the aim of this review is to evaluate the potential of soil nitrifying bacteria to reduce NH3 volatilisation and enhance N retention in poultry manure. This review presents the current status of knowledge regarding soil nitrifying bacteria, NH3 nitrification, and summarises the strategies to enhance microbial nitrification of poultry manure, and the environmental ramifications when using different techniques to control NH3 emissions. In spite of the fact that there are few research studies on reducing NH3 volatilisation through nitrification, it has been concluded that nitrification would be a sustainable method for mitigating N excretion and NH3 emission from poultry; however, further research is needed to identify the proper nitrifying bacteria to enhance microbial nitrification.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMDUR, M.O., DOULL, J. and KLASSEN, E.D. (1991) Casarett and Doul's Toxicology, in: KLASSEN, E.D. (Ed) The Basic Science of Poisons, Fourth edition (Pergamon Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
ANTHONISEN, A.C., LOEHR, R.C., PRAKASAM, T.B.S. and SRINATH, E.G. (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 48: 835-852.Google Scholar
BACHARACH, U. (1957) The aerobic breakdown of uric acid by certain pseudomonad's. Journal of General Microbiology 17: 1-11.Google Scholar
BANERJEE, S. (2010) Effects of livestock antibiotics on nitrification, denitrification, and microbial community composition in soils along a topographic gradient. Master's Thesis, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
BARTON, M.D. (2000) Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nutrition Research Reviews 13: 279-299.Google Scholar
BICUDO, J.R., SCHMIDT, D.R., GAY, S.W., GATES, R.S., JACOBSON, L.D. and HOFF, S.J. (2002) Air quality and emissions from livestock and poultry production/waste management systems. National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (available on CD-ROM from Mid West Plan Service), pp. 57.Google Scholar
BOLAN, N.S., SZOGI, A.A., CHUASAVATHI, T., SESHADRI, B., ROTHROCK, M.J. Jr and PANNEERSELVAM, P. (2010) Uses and management of poultry litter. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 673-698.Google Scholar
BONGAERTS, G.P., UITZETTER, A.J., BROUNS, R. and VOGELS, G.D. (1978) Uricase of Bacillus fastidious properties and regulation of synthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 527: 348-358.Google Scholar
BONGAERTS, G.P.A. and VOGELS, G.D. (1976) Uric acid degradation by uricase of Bacillus fastidious strains. Journal of Bacteriology 125: 689-697.Google Scholar
BURGESS, R.P., CAREY, J.B. and SHAFER, D.J. (1998) The impact of pH on nitrogen retention in laboratory analysis of broiler litter. Poultry Science 77: 1620-1622.Google Scholar
BURNETT, W.E. and DONDERO, N.C. (1969) Microbiological and chemical changes in poultry manure associated with decomposition and odor generation. Proceedings of the Cornell Annual Waste Management Conference, Syracuse, NY, pp. 271-291.Google Scholar
BURRELL, A.L., DOZIER, W.A., DAVIS, A.J., COMPTON, M.M., FREEMAN, M.E., VENDRELL, P.F. and WARD, T.L. (2004) Responses of broilers to dietary zinc concentrations and sources in relation to environmental implications. British Poultry Science 45: 225-263.Google Scholar
CARLILE, F.S. (1984) Ammonia in poultry houses: a literature review. World's Poultry Science Journal 40: 99-113.Google Scholar
CARR, L.E., WHEATON, F.W. and DOUGLASS, L.W. (1990) Empirical models to determine ammonia concentrations from broiler chicken litter. Trans ASAE 33: 1337-1342.Google Scholar
CASTENS, D.J. and ROZICH, A.F. (1986) Analysis of batch nitrification using substrate inhibition kinetics. Biotechnology Bioengineering 28: 461-465.Google Scholar
CHOI, H.C., SALIM, H.M., AKTER, N., NA, J.C., KANG, H.K., KIM, M.J., KIM, D.W., BANG, H.T., CHAE, H.S. and SUH, O.S. (2012) Effect of heating system using a geothermal heat pump on the production performance and housing environment of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 91: 275-281.Google Scholar
COIC, Y. and COPPENET, M. (1989) Les oligo-elements en agriculture etelevage, Paris INRA edition, France, pp. 114.Google Scholar
COOPER, J.E. (1975) Nitrification in soils incubated with pig slurry. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 7: 119-124.Google Scholar
DAWKINS, M.S., DONNELLY, C.A. and JONES, T.A. (2004) Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427: 342-344.Google Scholar
DORIVAR, A.R.D., SAWYER, J.E. and MALLARINO, A.P. (2008) Poultry manure supply of potentially available nitrogen with soil incubation. Agronomy Journal 100: 1310-1317.Google Scholar
EDWARDS, D.R. and DANIEL, T.C. (1992) Environmental impacts of on-farm poultry waste disposal-A review. Bioresource Technology 41: 9-33.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, H.A. and COLLINS, N.E. (1982) Factors affecting ammonia release in broiler houses. Transactions of the ASAE 25: 413-418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELWINGER, K. and SVENSON, L. (1996) Effect of dietary protein content, litter, and drinker type on ammonia emission from broiler houses. Journal of Agricultural Research 64: 197-208.Google Scholar
ERIKSSON DE REZENDE, C.L., MALLINSON, E.T., TABLANTE, N.L., MORALES, R., PARK, A., CARR, L.E. and JOSEPH, S.W. (2001) Effect of dry litter and airflow in reducing Salmonella and Escherichia coli populations in the broiler production environment. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10: 245-251.Google Scholar
FERGUSON, N.S., GATES, R.S., TARABA, J.L., CANTOR, A.H., PESCATORE, A.J., FORD, M.J. and BURNHAM, D.J. (1998) The effect of dietary crude protein on growth, ammonia concentration, and litter composition in broilers. Poultry Science 77: 1481-1487.Google Scholar
GIDDENS, J. and RAO, A.M. (1975) Effect of incubation and contact with soil on microbial and nitrogen changes in poultry manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 4: 275-278.Google Scholar
GROOT KOERKAMP, P.W.G. (1994) Review on emissions of ammonia from housing systems for laying hens in relation to sources, processes, building design and manure handling . Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 59: 73-87.Google Scholar
GUO, M. and SONG, W. (2009) Nutrient value of alum-treated poultry litter for land application. Poultry Science 88: 1782-1792.Google Scholar
HERNÁNDEZ, F., LÓPEZ, M., MARTÍNEZ, S., MEGÍAS, M.D., CATALÁ, P. and MADRID, J. (2012) Effect of low-protein diets and single sex on production performance, plasma metabolites, digestibility, and nitrogen excretion in 1 to 48-day-old broilers. Poultry Science 91: 683-692.Google Scholar
ITP (1984) Les dejections avicoles. Editions ITP-MNE, 149 rue de, Bercy, Paris. Journal of Animal Research 17: 273-278.Google Scholar
JACOB, J.P., BLAIR, R., BENNETT, D.C., SCOTT, T.A. and NEWBERRY, R.C. (1994) The effect of dietary protein and amino acid levels during the grower phase on nitrogen excretion of broiler chickens. Proceedings of Canadian Animal Science Meeting, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, pp. 309.Google Scholar
JACOB, J.P., IBRAHIM, S., BLAIR, R., NAMKUNG, H. and PAIK, I.K. (2000) Using enzyme supplemented, reduced protein diets to decrease nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 11: 1561-1567.Google Scholar
KARCI, A. and BALCIOGLU, I.A. (2009) Investigation of the tetracycline, sulfonamide, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobial compounds in animal manure and agricultural soils in Turkey. Science of the Total Environment 407: 4652-4664.Google Scholar
KEENAN, J.D., STEINRE, R.L. and FUNGAROLI, A.R. (1979) Substrate inhibition of nitrification. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 14: 377-397.Google Scholar
KESHAVARZ, K. and JACKSON, M.E. (1992) Performance of growing pullets and laying hens fed with low-protein amino acid-supplemented diets. Poultry Science 71: 905-918.Google Scholar
KIM, W.K., ANDERSON, R.C., RATLIFF, A.L., NISBET, D.J. and RICKE, S.C. (2006) Growth inhibition by nitrocompounds of selected uric-acid utilizing microorganisms isolated from poultry manure. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 41: 97-107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KIM, W.K. and PATTERSON, P.H. (2003) Effect of minerals on activity of microbial uricase to reduce ammonia volatilisation in poultry manure. Poultry Science 82: 223-231.Google Scholar
KIM, W.K. and PATTERSON, P.H. (2004) Effects of dietary zinc supplementation on broiler performance and nitrogen loss from manure. Poultry Science 83: 34-38.Google Scholar
KIM, W.K. and PATTERSON, P.H. (2005) Effects of dietary zinc supplementation on hen performance, ammonia volatilisation, and nitrogen retention in manure. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 40: 675-686.Google Scholar
KIM, W.K. and PATTERSON, P.H. (2006) Ammonium-nitrogen transformation and nitrogen retention in broiler manure supplemented with a soil amendment containing nitrifying bacteria. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 41: 121-133.Google Scholar
KIM, W.K., WEEKS, L.J., ANDERSON, R.C., NISBET, D.J., DUNKLEY, K. and RICKE, S.C. (2009) Effects of nitrocompounds on uric acid-utilizing microorganisms, nitrogen retention, and microbial community in laying hen manure. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 44: 403-406.Google Scholar
KIRYCHUK, S.P., DOSMAN, J.A., REYNOLDS, J.S., WILLSON, P., SENTHILSELVAN, A., FEDDES, J.J.R., CLASSEN, H.L. and GUENTER, W. (2006) Total dust and endotoxin in poultry operations: Comparison between cage and floor housing and respiratory effects in workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 48: 741-748.Google Scholar
KITAI, K. and ARAKAWA, A. (1979) Effect of antibiotics and caprylohydrozamic acid on ammonia gas from chicken excreta. British Poultry Science 20: 55-62.Google Scholar
KITHOME, M., PAUL, J.W. and BOMKE, A.A. (1999) Reducing nitrogen losses during simulated composting of poultry manure using adsorbents or chemical amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 194-201.Google Scholar
KOOPS, H.P., BOTTCHER, B., MOLLER, A., POMMERENING-ROSER, A. and STEHR, G. (1991) Classification of eight new species of ammonia-oxidising bacteria: Nitrosomonas communis sp. nov., Nitrosomonas ureae sp. nov., Nitrosomonas aestuarii sp. nov., Nitrosomonas marina sp. nov., Nitrosomonas nitrosa sp. nov., Nitrosomonas eutropha sp. nov., Nitrosomonas oligotropha sp. nov. and Nitrosomonas halophila sp. nov. Journal of General Microbiology 137: 1689-1699.Google Scholar
LEHNINGER, A.L., NELSON, D.L. and COX, M.M. (1993a) Amino acid oxidation and the production of urea, in: NEAL, V. (Ed) Principles of Biochemistry, pp. 507-541 (Worth Publishers Inc., New York, NY).Google Scholar
LEHNINGER, A.L., NELSON, D.L. and COX, M.M. (1993b) Biosynthesis of amino acids, nucleotides, and related molecules, in: NEAL, V. (Ed) Principles of Biochemistry, pp. 688-735 (Worth Publishers Inc., New York, NY).Google Scholar
LUOSTARINEN, S., LUSTE, S., VALENTÍN, L. and RINTALA, J. (2006) Nitrogen removal from on-site treated anaerobic effluents using intermittently aerated moving bed biofilm reactors at low temperatures. Water Research 40: 1607-1615.Google Scholar
MADIGAN, M.T., MARTINKO, J.M. and PARKER, J. (2000) Nitrification, in: Madigan, M.T., Martinko, J.M. and Parker, J. (Eds) Brock Biology of Microorganisms, pp. 601-603 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
MAHIMAIRAJA, S., BOLAN, N.S., HEDLEY, M.J. and MACGREGOR, A.N. (1994) Losses and transformation of nitrogen during composting of poultry manure with different amendments: An incubation experiment. Bioresource Technology 47: 265-273.Google Scholar
MALONE, G.W. (1998) Overview of in-house litter treatments. Proceedings of National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 131-132.Google Scholar
MALONE, G.W. (2002) Litter treatments. Watt News e-Dig 2 (5): 1-3.Google Scholar
MANCINELLI, R.L. (1996) "The nature of nitrogen: an overview". Life support & biosphere science: International Journal of Earth Space 3: 17-24.Google Scholar
MARTIN, J.H. Jr and LOEHR, R.C. (1976) Demonstration of Aeration Systems for Poultry Wastes. EPA600/2-76-186. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, pp. 152.Google Scholar
MCDONALD, J.M., RIBAUDO, M.O., LIVINGSTON, M.J., BECKMAN, J. and WANG, H. (2009) Manure Use for Fertilizer and for Energy-Report to Congress. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
MILTON, N. (2001) Bacteria transform ammonium to nitrate in soil. Soils are Alive Newsletter, Centre for Land Rehabilitation, The University of Western Australia, No. 2 (1).Google Scholar
MOHAN, P. and KOVILPILLAI, B. (2012) Addressing the challenges of ammonia loss from poultry droppings through indigenous carbon wastes. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 3: 400-406.Google Scholar
MOHANNA, C. and NYS, Y. (1997a) Variation de la composition des carcasses de poulets de chair en oligo-elements (Zinc, Cuivre, Fer et Manganese) en function de lage, du sexe et de la lignee. Proceedings of the 2nd Fournees de la Recherche Avicoles, Tours, pp. 181-184.Google Scholar
MOHANNA, C. and NYS, Y. (1997b) Excess zinc in manure of broiler chicks: Decrease in zinc supplementation and use of phytase improve its retention in the carcass. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Faaborg, pp. 459-461.Google Scholar
MOHANNA, C. and NYS, Y. (1999) Effect of dietary zinc content and sources on the growth, body zinc deposition and retention, zinc excretion and immune response in chickens. British Poultry Science 40: 108-114.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr (1998) Best management practices for poultry manure utilisation that enhances agricultural productivity and reduce pollution, in: HATFIELD, J.L. & STEWART, B.A. (Eds) Animal Waste Utilisation: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource, pp. 89-117 (Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI).Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr, DANIEL, T.C. and EDWARDS, D.R. (1999) Reducing phosphorus runoff and improving poultry production with alum. Poultry Science 78: 692-698.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr, DANIEL, T.C. and EDWARDS, D.R. (2000) Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia loss from poultry manure with aluminium sulfate. Journal of Environmental Quality 29: 37-49.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr, DANIEL, T.C., EDWARDS, D.R. and MILLER, D.M. (1996) Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce ammonia volatilisation from poultry litter. Poultry Science 75: 315-320.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr and MILLER, D.M. (1994) Decreasing phosphorus solubility in poultry litter with aluminium, calcium, and iron amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality 23: 325-330.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. Jr, DANIEL, T.C., EDWARDS, D.R. and MILLER, D.M. (1995) Effect of chemical amendments on ammonia volatilisation from poultry litter. Journal of Environmental Quality 24: 293-300.Google Scholar
MYROLD, D.D. (1998) Transformations of Nitrogen, in: SYLVIA, D.M., FUHRMANN, J.J., HARTEL, P.G. & ZUBERER, D.A. (Eds) Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, pp. 259-294 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
NAGARAJA, K.V., EMERY, D.A., JORDAN, K.A., SIVANANDAN, V., NEWMAN, J.A. and POMEROY, B.S. (1983) Scanning electron microscopic studies of adverse effects of ammonia on tracheal tissues of turkeys. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44: 1530-1536.Google Scholar
NAHM, K.H. (2002) Efficient feed nutrient utilisation to reduce pollutants in poultry and swine manure. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 32: 1-16.Google Scholar
NAHM, K.H. (2003) Evaluation of the nitrogen content in poultry manure. World's Poultry Science Journal 59: 77-88.Google Scholar
NAHM, K.H. (2005) Environmental effects of chemical additives used in poultry litter and swine manure. Critical reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 35: 487-513.Google Scholar
NAKAUE, H.S., KOELLIKER, J.K. and PIERSON, M.L. (1981) Studies with clinoptilolite in poultry 2. Effect of feeding broilers and the direct application of clinoptilolite (Zeolite) on clean and reused broiler litter on broiler performance and house environment. Poultry Science 60: 1221-1228.Google Scholar
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th review edition (Washington, DC, National Academy Press).Google Scholar
NDEGWA, P.M., HRISTOV, A.N., AROGO, J. and SHEFFIELD, R.E. (2008) A review of ammonia emission mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations. Biosystem Engineering 100: 453-469.Google Scholar
NODAR, R., ACEA, M.J. and CARBALLAS, T. (1990a) Microbial composition of poultry excreta. Biological Wastes 33: 95-105.Google Scholar
NODAR, R., ACEA, M.J. and CARBALLAS, T. (1990b) Microbial populations of poultry pine-sawdust litter. Biological Wastes 33: 295-306.Google Scholar
NOLLET, L., VAN DER KLIS, J.D., LENSING, M. and SPRING, P. (2007) The effect of replacing inorganic with organic trace minerals in broiler diets on productive performance and mineral excretion. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16: 592-597.Google Scholar
PAERL, H.W. and FOGEL, M.L. (1994) Isotopic characterisation of atmospheric nitrogen inputs as sources of enhanced primary production in coastal Atlantic Ocean waters. Marine Biology 119: 635-645.Google Scholar
PAN, P.T. and DRAPCHO, C.M. (2001) Biological anoxic/aerobic treatment of swine waste for reduction of organic carbon, nitrogen, and odor. Trans ASAE 44: 1789-1796.Google Scholar
PATTERSON, P.H. and LORENZ, E.S. (1996) Manure nutrient production from commercial White Leghorn hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 5: 260-268.Google Scholar
PATTERSON, P.H., LORENZ, E.S., WEAVER, W.D. Jr and SCHWARTZ, J.H. (1998) Litter production and nutrients from commercial broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 7: 247-252.Google Scholar
POPE, M.J. and CHERRY, T.E. (2000) An evaluation of the presence of pathogens on broilers raised on poultry litter treatment treated litter. Poultry Science 79: 1351-1355.Google Scholar
PRAKASAM, T.B.S. and LOEHR, R.C. (1972) Microbial nitrification and denitrification in concentrated waste. Water Research pergamon press 6: 859-869.Google Scholar
REECE, F.N., BATES, B.J. and LOTT, B.D. (1979) Ammonia control in broiler houses. Poultry Science 58: 754-755.Google Scholar
RITZ, C.W., FAIRCHILD, B.D. and LACY, M.P. (2004) Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: A review. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13: 684-692.Google Scholar
ROTHROCK, M.J. Jr, COOK, K.L., WARREN, J.G. and SISTANI, K. (2008) The effect of alum addition on microbial communities in poultry litter. Poultry Science 87: 1493-1503.Google Scholar
RYLANDER, R. and CARVALHEIRO, M.F. (2006) Airways inflammation among workers in poultry houses. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 79: 487-490.Google Scholar
SALIM, H.M., JO, C. and LEE, B.D. (2008) Zinc in broiler feeding and nutrition. Avian Biology Research 1: 5-18.Google Scholar
SALIM, H.M., LEE, H.R., JO, C., LEE, S.K. and LEE, B.D. (2012) Effect of sex and dietary organic zinc on growth performance, carcass traits, tissue mineral content and blood parameters of broiler chickens. Biological Trace Element Research 147: 120-129.Google Scholar
SANDSTEDT, C.A. (1990) Nitrates: Sources and Their Effects upon Humans and Livestock. (The American University, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
SCHEFFERLE, H.E. (1965) The decomposition of uric acid in built up poultry litter. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 28: 412-420.Google Scholar
SELLE, P.H. and RAVINDRAN, V. (2007) Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Animal Feed Science Technology 135: 1-41.Google Scholar
SHAH, S., WESTERMAN, P. and PARSONS, J. (2006) Poultry litter amendments. (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC).Google Scholar
SHREVE, B.R., MOORE, P.A. Jr, DANIEL, T.C. and EDWARDS, D.R. (1995) Reduction of phosphorus in run-off from field-applied poultry litter using chemical amendment . Journal of Environmental Quality 24: 106-111.Google Scholar
SIDDIQI, R.H., SPEECE, R.E., ENGLBRECHT, R.S. and SCHMIDT, J.W. (1967) Elimination of nitrification in the BOD determination with 0.10 M ammonium nitrogen. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 39: 579-589.Google Scholar
SILVERSIDES, F.G. and HRUBY, M. (2009) Feed formulation using phytase in laying hen diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 15-22.Google Scholar
SIMS, J.T. (1997) Agricultural and environmental issues in the management of poultry wastes: recent innovations and long-term challenges. Agricultural uses of by-products and wastes, ACS Symposium series, 668: 72-90.Google Scholar
SIMS, J.T. and WOLF, D.C. (1994) Poultry manure management: Agricultural and environmental issues. Advances in Agronomy 52: 1-83.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, J.D. (1993) Reducing nitrogen excretion of the laying hen by feeding lower crude protein diets. Poultry Science 72: 1473-1478.Google Scholar
SUWA, Y., IMANURA, Y., SUZUKI, T., TASHIRO, T. and URUSHIGAWA, Y. (1994) Ammonia-oxidising bacteria with different sensitivities to (NH4)2SO4 in activated sludges. Water Research 28: 1523-1532.Google Scholar
TASSISTRO, A.S., RITZ, C.W. and KISSEL, D.E. (2007) Ammonia emissions from broiler litter: response to bedding materials and acidifiers. British Poultry Science 48: 399-405.Google Scholar
TEN-HAVE, P.J.W., WILLERS, H.C. and DERIKX, P.J.L. (1994) Nitrification and denitrification in an activated-sludge system for supernatant from settled sow manure with molasses as an extra carbon source. Bioresource Technology 47: 135-141.Google Scholar
URL 1 The nitrogen cycle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_cycle (Accessed September 18, 2012).Google Scholar
USDA (2008) Agricultural Statistics 2008. National Agricultural Statistics Service. (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
VAN RYSSEN, J.B.J. (2008) Trace elements in poultry litter: prevalence and risks, in: VAN RYSSEN, J.B.J. (Ed) Trace elements in animal production systems, pp. 102-113 (Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
VAREL, V.H. (1997) Use of urease inhibitors to control nitrogen loss from livestock waste. Bioresource Technology 62: 11-17.Google Scholar
WHEELER, E.F., CASEY, K.D., GATES, R.S., XIN, H., ZAJACZKOWSKI, J.S., TOPPER, P.A., LIANG, Y. and PESCATORE, A.J. (2006) Ammonia emissions from twelve U.S. broiler chicken houses. Trans ASAE 49: 1495-1512.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, C.M., BAKER, J.C. and SIMS, J.T. (1999) Management and utilisation of poultry wastes. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 162: 105-157.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, P.E.V. (1995) Animal production and European pollution problems. Animal Feed Science and Technology 53: 135-144.Google Scholar
WITTER, E. (1991) Use of CaCl2 to decrease ammonia volatilisation after application of fresh and anaerobic chicken slurry to soil. Soil Science 42: 369-380.Google Scholar
WITTER, E. and KIRCHMANN, H. (1989) Effects of addition of calcium and magnesium salts on ammonia volatilisation during manure decomposition. Plant and Soil 115: 53-58.Google Scholar
ZANELLA, I., SAKOMURA, N.K., SILVERSIDES, F.G., FIQUEIRDO, A. and PACK, M. (1999) Effect of enzyme supplementation of broiler diets based on corn and soybeans. Poultry Science 78: 561-568.Google Scholar