Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-b2xwp Total loading time: 0.333 Render date: 2022-09-28T06:01:08.918Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The past, present and future of force-feeding and “foie gras” production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

D. Guémené*
Affiliation:
INRA, Station de Recherches Avicoles, Centre de Tours-Nouzilly, F-37380 NouzillyFrance
G. Guy
Affiliation:
INRA, Unité Expérimentale des Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Artiguères, F-40280 Benquet, France
*
*Corresponding author: e-mail: daniel.guemene@tours.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

Force-feeding is a very old practice, first recorded in ancient Egypt, but until the 1950's foie gras production remained somewhat limited in volume. Foie gras is currently produced in various countries but approximately 80% of world production and consumption takes place in France.

Geese, which were the most common specie been force-fed until recently, now account for less than 10% of the total world foie gras production. Ducks such as the Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata) account for less than 5%, and mule ducks for the rest. Thus, over 35 million mule ducks were force-fed in France in 2001, accounting for nearly 95% of the domestic foie gras production. This increase was made possible by technical progress in specific breeding programmes and force-feeding practice.

However, the future of this production is uncertain, at least in Europe. Indeed, although a number of experimental approaches have shown that there is no scientific evidence that validates such adverse comment, this procedure is highly criticised in terms of animal welfare. The Council of Europe therefore adopted two specific recommendations in 1999 and although its practice is not banned at present, it is limited to the areas where it is already practised and only under specific rearing conditions. Therefore, the question is: will it be still possible to produce foie gras in France or elsewhere in Europe in the future and, if not, where and how will it be produced?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babilé, R., Auvergne, A., Andrade, V., Héraut, F., Bénard, G., Bouiller-Oudot, M. and Manse, H. (1996) Réversibilité de la stéatose hépatique chez le canard mulard. 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, 12–13 Mars:107–110.Google Scholar
Babilé, R., Auvergne, A., Dubois, JP., Bénard, G. and Manse, H. (1998) Réversibilité de la stéatose hépatique chez l'oie. 3èmes Journéés de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux. 27–28 Octobre: 45–48.Google Scholar
Bénard, P., Bengone, T., Bénard, G., Prehn, D., Tanguy, J., Babilé, R. and Grimm, F. (1996) Déinonstration de la réversibilté du gavage chez le canard à I'aide de tests d'exploration fonctionnelle hépatique. 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Pulmipèdes è Foie Gras, Bordeaux. 12–13 Mars: 45–48.Google Scholar
Bénard, G., Bénard, P., Prehn, D., Jouglar, JY. and Durand, S. (1998) Démonstration de la réversibilté de la stéatose hépatique obtenue par gavage de canards mulards. Etude réalisée sur 3 cycles de gavage-dégavage. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palrnipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux. 27–28 Octobre: 49–52.Google Scholar
Blum, J.C. (1990) Caractéristiques anatomiques, physiologiques et biochimiques en relation avec la formation du Foie Gras chez les palmipèdes. Session ITAVI. Dax, 15 Novembre.Google Scholar
CIFOG (2002) Rapport économique. AG du 06/09/2002. Anglet France.Google Scholar
CIFOG (2003) Rapport économique. A.G. du 03/07/2003. Bordeaux France.Google Scholar
Comite Permanent De La Convention Europeenne Sur La Protection Des Ani-Maux Dans Les Elevages (1976) “European convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes”.Google Scholar
Comite Permanent De La Convention Europeenne Sur La Protection Des Ani-Maux Dans Les Elevages (1999) Recommandations concernant les canards domestiques (Anus platyrhynchos). T-AP94 (3): 13p.Google Scholar
Comite Permanent De La Convention Europeenne Sur La Protection Des Ani-Maux Dans Les Elevages (1999) Recommandations concernant les canards de barbarie (Cairina moschata) et les hybrides de canards de barbarie (Cairina moschata) et de canards domestiques (Anas plaryrhynchos). T-AP95 (20): 16p.Google Scholar
Comite Permanent De La Convention Europeenne Sur La Protection Des Ani-Maux Dans Les Elevages (1999) Recommandations concernant les oies domestiques (Anser anser F domesticus, (Anser cygnoides F domesticus) et leurs croisements. T-AP95 (5): 14p.Google Scholar
Davail, S., Rideau, N., Guy, G., Andre, J.M. and Hoo-Paris, R. (2003) Lipid store distribution between liver and extrahepatic tissues, lipoprotein lipase activity, plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations in overfed ducks. 2nd World Waterfowl SymposiumAlexandria, EgyptApril 7–9th. In press.Google Scholar
Deffarge, H. (1973) L'histoire du Foie Gras. Ed Jean Virmouneix. 104p.Google Scholar
Dubois, J.P., Auvergne, A., Babilé, R., Verdier, M., Lavigne, F. and Dutour, H. (1994) Gavage des oies. Essai technologique de gavage : une évolution possible, le mélange grain entier + maïs broyé. Ière Journée Technique SEPALM, Cassen, 10 Juin: 21–28.Google Scholar
Faure, J.M., Noirault, J., Guy, G. and Guémené, D. (1996) L'acte de gavage déclenche t'il des réactions de stress? 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Grus, Bordeaux. 12–13 Mars: 61–64Google Scholar
Faure, J.M., Guémené, D., Destombes, N., Gouraud, P. and Guy, G. (1998) Test d'aversion au gavage et au gaveur chez le canard mulard mâle. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur leu PalmièPdes à Foie Grus, Bordeaux, 27–28 Octobre: 75–78.Google Scholar
Faure, J.M., Guémené, D. and Guy, G. (2001) Is there avoidance of the force-feeding of ducks and geese? Animal Research 50: 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, E., Peresson, R., Guy, G. and Hermier, D. (1997) Relationship between storage and secretion of hepatic lipids in two breeds of geese with different susceptibility to liver steatosis. Poultry Science 76: 599607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guémené, D., Guy, G., Noirault, J. and Faure, J.M. (1996) Influence du mode de contention pendant la période de gavage sur divers indicateurs physiologique du stress. 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, 12–13 Mars: 65–70.Google Scholar
Guémené, D., Guy, G., Destombes, N., Garreau-Mills, M. and Faure, J.M. (1998) Aptitude du canard mulard mâle répondre à un stress aigu pendant le gavage. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, 27–28 Octobre: 63–68.Google Scholar
Guémené, D., Guy, G., Samson, M., Gouraud, P., Garreau-Mills, M. and Faure, J.M. (1998) Réponses physiologiques et comportementales de I'oie à I'acte de gavage. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux. 27–28 Octobre: 69–73.Google Scholar
Guémené, D., Guy, G., Noirault, J., Garreau-Mills, M., Gouraud, P. and Faure, J.M. (2001) Force-feeding procedures and physiological indicators of stress in male mule ducks. British Poultry Science 42: 650657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, G., Rousselot-Pailley, D. and Gourichon, D. (1995) Comparaison des performances de I'oie, du canard mulard et du canard de Barbarie soumis au gavage. Annales de Zoorechnie 44: 297305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G., Faure, J.M. and Guémené, D. (1998) Capacité d'ingestion chez le canard mulard mâle. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Pulmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, 21–28 Octobre: 59–62.Google Scholar
Guy, G., Hermier, D., Davail, S., Bely, M., André, J.M. and Hoo-Paris, R. (1999) Meat production and force-feeding ability of different type of ducks. 1st World Wuterfowl Symposium Taichung.Dec 1–4th: 462468.Google Scholar
Hermier, D., Guy, G., Guillaumin, S., Davail, S., André, J.M. and Hoo-Paris, R. (2002) Differential channeling of livers in relation to susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in two species of ducks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 135: 663675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Journal Officiel Des Communautes Europeennes (1998) Directive 98/58/EC du Conseil du 20-09-98 concernant la protection des animaux dans les élevages. JOL 221 du 8/8/98: 23–27.Google Scholar
Leveille, G.A., Romsos, D.R., Yeh, Y.Y. and O'Hea, E.K. (1975) Lipid biosynthesis in the chick. A consideration of site of synthesis. influence of diet and possible regulatory mechanism. Poulrry Science 54: 10751093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magdelaine, P. (2003) Communication orale, A.G. du CIFOG. Bordeaux, France. 3 Juillet.Google Scholar
Robin, N. and Castaing, J. (1996) Incidence des techniques de gavage grains entiers ou broyés sur la valeur alimentaire du maïs et les performances zootechniques des canards. 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Pulmipèdes à Foie Grus, Bordeaux, 12–13 Mars: 111–114.Google Scholar
Robin, N. and Castaing, J. (1998) Incidence d'une suplémentation énergétique et protéique du maïs broyé. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, 27–28 Octobre: 95–98.Google Scholar
Robin, N. and Castaing, J. (2002) Apports alimentaires pour un gavage de canards mulards en moins de 10 jours. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, 9–10 Octobre: 88–91.Google Scholar
Scientific Veterinary Committee, Animal Welfare Section (1998) Welfare aspects of the production of foie gras in ducks and geese. CEC, DGXXIV.Google Scholar
Servière, J., Bernadet, M.D., Guy, G. and Guémené, D. (2002) Données neurophysiologiques sur la nociception potentiellement associée à I'ingestion forcée chez le canard mulard. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, 9–10 Octobre: 70–75.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The past, present and future of force-feeding and “foie gras” production
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The past, present and future of force-feeding and “foie gras” production
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The past, present and future of force-feeding and “foie gras” production
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *