Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:45:33.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertility and hatchability in duck eggs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2019

M.E. ABD EL-HACK*
Affiliation:
Poultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
C.B. HURTADO
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnic, University of Córdoba, Monteria 230002, Colombia
D.M. TORO
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Queretaro 76230, Mexico
M. ALAGAWANY*
Affiliation:
Poultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
E.M. ABDELFATTAH
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Meyer Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. USA
S.S. ELNESR
Affiliation:
Poultry Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, 63514, Egypt
Get access

Abstract

Ducks are waterfowl belonging to the Anatidae family of cosmopolitan distribution. In duck production systems, obtaining ducklings at one-day-old is determinant for the productive chain. The egg production in some species of ducks reaches about 250 to 300 eggs per year. Obtaining one-day-old ducklings can be done by natural incubation with a broody female duck or artificially in an incubator. During artificial incubation, fertility and hatchability are the most important indicators that must be controlled, because they influence the supply of ducklings to the farm. Many factors are related to fertility and hatching, such as environmental conditions, production system, season, nutrition, management of broodstock, storage time of egg and cleaning of eggs before the incubation. According to some reports, Pekin eggs have greater hatchability than Muscovy eggs. The eggs of Muscovy have presented values lower than 22.7% of hatchability. The hatchability of Pekin duck eggs was 78.0% in the spring, while in summer it was around 46.5%. The best hatchability is observed during the winter (57.68%), as in the summer it decreases to 54.14%. The reproductive characteristics of flocks, age, external and internal quality of the egg, male female relation, and presence of lethal genes are factors that directly involve breeders. Larger sexual ratios between males and females of 1:4.3 to 1: 10 cause reduced egg fertility from 75.9% down to 49.6%. Successful production of day-old ducklings starts with the proper selection and management of breeding stock, proper post-lay handling of fertile eggs and the correct incubation process. There are different methods used to improve the hatchability such as dipping eggs in nutrients during the incubation period.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABD EL-HACK, M.E., ALAGAWANY, M. and NORELDIN, A.E. (2018) Managerial and nutritional trends to mitigate heat stress risks in poultry farms, in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, pp 1-14 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Germany).Google Scholar
ALI, M.A., RAHAMAN, M.A., WAHID, M.A. and SINGH, T.K. (1989) The hatchability of Muscovy duck eggs under natural and artificial incubation. Bangladesh Journal Animal Science 8 (1): 13.Google Scholar
ALONSO-ALVAREZ, C. (2006) Manipulation of primary sex-ratio: an updated review. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 17 (1): 1-20.Google Scholar
APPLEGATE, T.J., HARPER, D. and LILBURN, M.S. (1998) Effect of hen production age on egg composition and embryo development in commercial Pekin ducks. Poultry Science 77 (11): 1608-1612.Google Scholar
ARCHER, G.S., JEFFREY, D. and TUCKER, Z. (2017) Effect of the combination of white and red LED lighting during incubation on layer, broiler, and Pekin duck hatchability. Poultry Science 96 (8): 2670-2675.Google Scholar
AWAD, A.L. (2013) Field study on hatching traits of duck eggs under Egyptian environmental conditions. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal 33: 849-863‏.Google Scholar
BANERJEE, S. (2013) Morphological traits of duck and geese breeds of West Bengal, India. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources Génétiques Animales/Recursos Genéticos Animales 52: 1-16.Google Scholar
BAUER, F., TULLETT, S.G. and WILSON, H.R. (1990) Effects of setting eggs small end up on hatchability and posthatching performance of broilers. British Poultry Science 31 (4): 715-724.Google Scholar
BEAUMONT, C., MILLET, N., LE BIHAN-DUVAL, E., KIPI, A. and DUPUY, V. (1997) Genetic parameters of survival to the different stages of embryonic death in laying hens. Poultry Science 76 (9): 1193-1196.Google Scholar
BENNEWITZ, J., MORGADES, O., PREISINGER, R., THALLER, G. and KALM, E. (2007) Variance component and breeding value estimation for reproductive traits in laying hens using a Bayesian threshold model. Poultry Science 86 (5): 823-828.Google Scholar
BENTON, C.E. and BRAKE, J. (1994) The effect of the presence of an embryo on albumen height and pH during preincubation storage and incubation. Poultry Science 73 (Suppl 1): 38.Google Scholar
BRILLARD, J.P. (2003) Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 59 (4): 441-446.Google Scholar
BROMMER, J.E. and RATTISTE, K. (2008) “Hidden” reproductive conflict between mates in a wild bird population. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 62 (9): 2326-2333.Google Scholar
BUHR, R.J. (1995) Incubation relative humidity effects on allantoic fluid volume and hatchability. Poultry Science 74 (5): 874-884.Google Scholar
CHENG, Y.S., ROUVIER, R., POIVEY, J.P., TAI, J.J.L., TAI, C. and HUANG, S.C. (2002) Selection responses for the number of fertile eggs of the Brown Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhynchos) after a single artificial insemination with pooled Muscovy (Cairina moschata) semen. Genetics Selection Evolution 34 (5): 597.Google Scholar
CHOWDHURY, M.M.I., ASHRAF, A., MONDAL, S.P., MONDOL, N.M.A.A.M. and HASAN, M.M. (2004) Effect of season on the hatchability of duck eggs. International Journal of Poultry Science 3 (6): 419-421.Google Scholar
DEMIREL, S. and KIRIKÇI, K. (2009) Effect of different egg storage times on some egg quality characteristics and hatchability of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Poultry Science 88 (2): 440-444.Google Scholar
DROUILHET, L., BASSO, B., BERNADET, M.D., CORNUEZ, A., BODIN, L., DAVID, I. and MARIE-ETANCELIN, C. (2014) Improving residual feed intake of mule progeny of Muscovy ducks: genetic parameters and responses to selection with emphasis on carcass composition and fatty liver quality. Journal of Animal Science 92 (10): 4287-4296.Google Scholar
ELIBOL, O., PEAK, S.D. and BRAKE, J. (2002) Effect of flock age, length of egg storage, and frequency of turning during storage on hatchability of broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 81 (7): 945-950.Google Scholar
EL-KHOLY, M.S., IBRAHIM, Z.A., EL-MEKKAWY, M.M. and ALAGAWANY, M. (2019) Influence of in-ovo administration of some water-soluble vitamins on hatchability traits, growth, carcass traits and blood chemistry of Japanese quails. Annals of Animal Science 19: 97-111.Google Scholar
ERICSON, P.G., QU, Y., BLOM, M.P., JOHANSSON, U.S. and IRESTEDT, M. (2017) A genomic perspective of the pink-headed duck Rhodonessa caryophyllacea suggests a long history of low effective population size. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 16853.Google Scholar
FARGHLY, M.F.A., ABD EL-HACK, M.E., ALAGAWANY, M., SAADELDIN, I.M. and SWELUM, A.A. (2018a) Ameliorating deleterious effects of heat stress on growing Muscovy ducklings using feed withdrawal and cold water. Poultry Science 98: 251-259.Google Scholar
FARGHLY, M.F.A., ABD EL-HACK, M.E., ALAGAWANY, M., SAADELDIN, I.M. and SWELUM, A.A. (2018b) Wet feed and cold water as heat stress modulators in growing Muscovy ducklings . Poultry Science 97: 1588-1594.Google Scholar
GIRI, S.C., KUMAR, P., JAISWARA, R., BAIS, R.K.S., SAHOO, S.K., SASTRY, K.V.H. and SARAN, S. (2014) Ideal mating sex ratio in duck houses for optimum production of fertile eggs. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 49 (1): 106-107.Google Scholar
HESTER, P.Y. (2017) Effects of temperature and storage conditions on eggs, in: Egg innovations and strategies for improvements, Section III Food Safety, Chapter 12, pp. 125-134.Google Scholar
IDAHOR, K.O., AKINOLA, L.A.F. and CHIA, S.S. (2015) Egg colour, weight and shape: possible indices in the predetermination of duckling sex. Journal of Recent Advances in Agriculture 3 (1): 337-344.Google Scholar
JIBRIN, M.M., IDIKE, F.I., AHMAD, K. and IBRAHIM, U. (2011) Modelling incubation temperature: the effects of incubator design, embryonic development and egg size. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology 19 (1): 46-59.Google Scholar
KING'ORI, A.M. (2011) Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (6): 483-492.Google Scholar
KUURMAN, W.W., BAILEY, B.A., KOOPS, W.J. and GROSSMAN, M. (2003) A model for failure of a chicken embryo to survive incubation. Poultry Science 82 (2): 214-222.Google Scholar
LI, X., WEN, Y., ZHANG, J., LIU, L., JIN, L., YAN, T. and WANG, Y. (2018) The effect of low-temperature event on the survival and growth of Juglans mandshurica seedlings within forest gaps. Journal of Forestry Research 29 (4): 943-951.Google Scholar
LIPTOI, K. and HIDAS, A. (2006) Investigation of possible genetic background of early embryonic mortality in poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal 62 (2): 326-337.Google Scholar
MARTÍNEZ, Y., GUERRA, L.D., RODRÍGUEZ, R. and BETANCUR, C.A. (2014) Effect of pre-incubation storage conditions on embryonic development and chick quality of Camperos breeders. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 6 (3): 108-111.Google Scholar
MOHAN, J., SHARMA, S., KOLLURI, G. and DHAMA, K. (2018) History of artificial insemination in poultry, its components and significance. World's Poultry Science Journal 74 (3): 1-14.Google Scholar
NARUSHIN, V.A. and ROMANOV, M.N. (2002) Egg physical characteristics and hatchability. World's Poultry Science Journal 58 (3): 297-303.Google Scholar
NICKOLOVA, M. (2005) Effect of the sex ratio on the egg fertility of Muscovy duck (Cairina moshcata). Journal of Central European Agriculture 5 (4): 367-372.Google Scholar
OJEWOLA, F.E.G. (2006) Effect of Management Systems on Semen Quality of Muscovy Drakes. International Journal of Poultry Science 5 (5): 482-484.Google Scholar
ONASANYA, G.O. and IKEOBI, C.O.N. (2013) Egg physical traits, performance, fertility and hatchability in exotic and Nigerian indigenous chickens. Standard Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1 (1): 1-8.Google Scholar
ONBAŞILAR, E., ERDEM, E., HACAN, Ö. and YALÇIN, S. (2014) Effects of breeder age on mineral contents and weight of yolk sac, embryo development, and hatchability in Pekin ducks. Poultry Science 93 (2): 473-478.Google Scholar
ONBAŞILAR, E., POYRAZ, Ö. and ERDEM, E. (2007) Effects of egg storage period on hatching egg quality, hatchability, chick quality and relative growth in Pekin ducks. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 71 (4): 187-191.Google Scholar
PEEBLES, E.D., DOYLE, S.M., ZUMWALT, C.D., GERARD, P.D., LATOUR, M.A., BOYLE, C.R. and SMITH, T.W. (2001) Breeder age influences embryogenesis in broiler hatching eggs. Poultry Science 80 (3): 272-277.Google Scholar
PENFOLD, L.M., WILDT, D.E., HERZOG, T.L., LYNCH, W., WARE, L., DERRICKSON, S.E. and MONFORT, S.L. (2000) Seasonal patterns of LH, testosterone and semen quality in the Northern pintail duck (Anas acuta). Reproduction, Fertility and Development 12 (4): 229-235.Google Scholar
RAMLI, M.B., WAHAB, M.S., ZAIN, B.A., RAUS, A.A., RAJA, P. and PAHAT, B. (2017) Effect of incubation temperature on ikta's quail breed with new rolling mechanism system. Journal of Mechanical Engineering SI 4 (3): 78-88.Google Scholar
RANDEL, R.D., CHASE, C.C. (Jr) and WYSE, S.J. (1992) Effects of gossypol and cottonseed products on reproduction of mammals. Journal of Animal Science 70 (5): 1628-1638.Google Scholar
RASHID, M., KAWSAR, M., MIAH, M. and HOWLIDER, M. (2009) Fertility and hatchability of Pekin and Muscovy duck eggs and performance of their ducklings. Progressive Agriculture 20 (1-2): 93-98.Google Scholar
REYNA, K.S. and BURGGREN, W.W. (2017) Altered embryonic development in northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) induced by pre-incubation oscillatory thermal stresses mimicking global warming predictions. PloS One 12 (9): e0184670.Google Scholar
SAEED, M., BABAZADEH, D., NAVEED, M., ALAGAWANY, M., ABD EL-HACK, M.E., ARAIN, M.A., TIWARI, R., SACHAN, S., KARTHIK, K., DHAMA, K., ELNESR, S.S. and CHAO, S. (2019) In ovo delivery of various biological supplements, vaccines and drugs in poultry: current knowledge. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 99: 3727-3739.Google Scholar
SAHA, S.K., CHOWDHURY, S.D. and HAMID, M.A. (1992) A study on the incubation of indigenous (Desi), Khaki Campbell and crossbred (Indian Runner x Khaki Campbell, F1) duck eggs under two pre-incubation holding periods. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 5 (3): 541.Google Scholar
TAPLAH, A.J., SUMINISTRADO, D.C., AMONGO, R.M.C., PARAS, F.O. (Jr), ELAURIA, J.C. and TORKPAH, D.P. (2018) Economic analysis of duck eggs incubation using hot spring as heat source. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 10 (2): 38-44.Google Scholar
TORO, D.M., AGUILAR, Y.M., BERTOT, R.R., HURTADO, C.B. and NAVA, O.R. (2015) Effect of dietary supplementation with Morinda citrifolia on productivity and egg quality of laying hens. Revista Ciencia y Agricultura 12 (2): 7-12.Google Scholar
UNI, Z., YADGARY, L. and YAIR, R. (2012) Nutritional limitations during poultry embryonic development. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21 (1): 175-184.Google Scholar
WAEHNER, M., PINGEL, H. and HAIDONG, S. (2015) Effect of prolonged storage of eggs of Pekin ducks with periodical warming on internal egg quality and hatchability. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on New Perspectives and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Production, October 7-9, 2015, Belgrade, Serbia, pp: 140-144.Google Scholar
WEIS, J., HRNČÁR, C., PÁL, G., BARAŇSKA, B., BUJKO, J. and MALÍKOVÁ, L. (2011) Effect of the egg size on egg loses and hatchability of the Muscovy duck. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies 44 (1): 354-356.Google Scholar
WIDIYANINGRUM, P., LISDIANA, L. and UTAMI, N. (2016) Egg production and hatchability of local ducks under semi intensive vs extensive managements. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 41 (2): 77-82.Google Scholar
WILSON, H.R. (1991) Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, post hatching growth and hatchability. World's Poultry Science Journal 47 (1): 5-20.Google Scholar
YAIR, R. and UNI, Z. (2011) Content and uptake of minerals in the yolk of broiler embryos during incubation and effect of nutrient enrichment. Poultry Science 90 (7): 1523-1531.Google Scholar
YAKUBU, A. (2013) Characterization of the local Muscovy duck in Nigeria and its potential for egg and meat production. World's Poultry Science Journal 69 (4): 931-938.Google Scholar
YAKUBU, A., MUHAMMED, M.M., ARI, M.M., MUSA-AZARA, I.S. and OMEJE, J.N. (2015) Correlation and path coefficient analysis of body weight and morphometric traits of two exotic genetic groups of ducks in Nigeria. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 44 (1): 1-9.Google Scholar