Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:39:05.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Scholasticism and the Study of Politics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Barrington Moore Jr
Barrington Moore Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Social Relations, Russian Research Center at Harvard University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
World Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , October 1953 , pp. 122 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

l A logician, such as Hans Reichenbach, however, argues that any proposition is a probability statement and thus comes to the opposite conclusion that some form of the notion of chance has universal applicability. See his Experience and Prediction, Chicago, 1938.

2 The reader may wish to judge for himself by examining some of the formalist writings that attempt empirical application, i.e., particularly the last three essays on political matters in Parsons, , Essays in Sociological Theory Pure and Applied, Glencoe, III., 1949Google Scholar, or Levy, , The Family Revolution in Modern China, Cambridge, Mass., 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Power and Society, New Haven, 1950, pp. 190–91.

4 In this connection, see Rostow, W. W., “Toward a General Theory of Action,” World Politics, v (July 1953), pp. 538–43.Google Scholar

5 “Personality and Social Structure,” in Stanton, A. H. and Perry, S. E., eds., Personality and Political Crisis, Glencoe, III, 1951.Google Scholar

6 For a convenient summary of varying viewpoints, see Kroeber, A. L. and Kluckhohn, Clyde, Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, XLVII, No. 1 (1952), pp. 115–24.Google Scholar