Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:27:41.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Volatility and Tracer Studies with Alkylamino-s-Triazines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester L. Foy*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis
Get access

Abstract

Relative vaporization losses of five C14 ring-labeled 2-chloro-4,6-alkylamino-s-triazines were studied at 25 and 60 C. Herbicide solutions in 95% ethanol were deposited on metal planchets, dried and counted at intervals. The herbicides, ranked in order of decreasing volatility, were: trietazine (2-chloro-4-diethylamino-6-ethylamino-s-triazine), ipazine (2-chloro-4-diethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine), atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine), propazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine) and simazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine). Prometone (2-methoxy-4,6-bis (isopropylamino)-s-triazine) and the 2-hydroxy analogues of simazine and propazine, dissolved in water at pH 2–3 (HC1) before plating, showed no detectible loss in 25 hours at 60 C. Foliar penetration and acute toxicity following drop application of the five 2-chloro-triazines and prometone to corn, soybean, tomato, cotton, oat and sorghum appeared to be correlated with their water solubilities. A surfactant tended to enhance activity. Important differences were noted among species, although apparently not related to inherent herbicidal tolerance or susceptibility. Tomato was most sensitive to acute toxicity; soybean cotyledons were least permeable. Basipetal translocation was negligible under all conditions (e.g. 6 herbicides, 6 species, 2 solvents, with or without a surfactant). The 2-hydroxy analogues tended to translocate downward but appeared restricted by acute, acid (pH 2–3) destruction of the transport mechanism. Acropetal (apoplastic) movement of all compounds occurred readily with transpiration, reflecting the vasculature of the species. All 2-chlorotriazines and prometone (but not the two 2-hydroxy compounds) showed pronounced accumulation of C14 in the lysigenous glands of cotton. Root uptake and distribution of C14 within the plant body occurred generally for all compounds and species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartley, C. E. 1957. Simazine and related triazines as herbicides. Agr. Chem. 12(5):3436, 113–115. Google Scholar
2. Bartley, C. E. 1959. Late research report: Triazine compounds. Farm Chem. 122(5):2830, 32, 34. Google Scholar
3. Castelfranco, P., Foy, C. L. and Deutsch, D. 1961. Nonenzymic detoxification of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) by extracts of Zea mays . Weeds 9:580591.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. 1959. Further studies on comparative mobility of labeled herbicides. Plant Physiol. 34:613620.Google Scholar
5. Davis, D. E., Roberts, D. R. and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1963. Radiochemical assay procedures for atrazine and atrazine degradation products. Proc. SWC 16:380386.Google Scholar
6. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr. and Sansing, N. G. 1959. The absorption and translocation of C14-labeled simazine by corn, cotton, and cucumber. Weeds 7:300309.Google Scholar
7. Foy, Chester L. 1961. Accumulation of s-triazine herbicides in the lysigenous glands of cotton and its physiological significance. WSA Abstracts p. 41.Google Scholar
8. Foy, Chester L. and Smith, Leon W. 1963. Volatility of various herbicides under laboratory conditions. Res. Prog. Report, WWCC. pp. 8182.Google Scholar
9. Foy, Chester L. and Castelfranco, Paul. 1961. Distribution and metabolic fate of C14-labeled 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) and four related alkylamino triazines in relation to phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol. (Suppl.) 35:xxviii.Google Scholar
10. Gast, A., Knüsli, E. and Gysin, H. 1956. Über Pflanzenwachstumsregulatoren. Über weitere phytotoxische Triazine. Experientia 12:146148.Google Scholar
11. Gysin, H. and Knüsli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives. Advances in Pest Control Res. 3:289358.Google Scholar
12. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1962. Preparation of volatile carbon-14-labeled compounds for counting. Anal. Chem. 34:717718.Google Scholar
13. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 347.Google Scholar
14. Holstun, J. T. Jr. and Bingham, S. W. 1960. Several triazines as selective post-emergence herbicides in cotton. Weeds 8:187197.Google Scholar
15. van Oorshot, J. L. P. 1960. De werking van eukele herbiciden na toediening aan de bladeren of de wortels bij bruine bonen. Jaarb. I. B. S., Meded. 111, 5568.Google Scholar
16. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using C14-labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar