Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T13:22:35.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spray Pattern and Drift from Two Types of nozzles used for Helicopter Spraying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. R. Plumb
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California
L. R. Green
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California
V. E. White
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California
Get access

Abstract

A Whirl jet nozzle and a flat, fan-type nozzle produced similar spray patterns when used for aerial spraying so that no reduction in drift could be obtained by the use of either nozzle. Wind speeds of 3 to 4 mph caused drift more than 80 ft to the leeward of the flight line with both nozzles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akesson, Norman B. 1952. Recent investigations of spraying accessories: a progress report on nozzles. Proc. California Weed Conf. 4:5864.Google Scholar
2. Brooks, F. A. 1947. The drifting of poisonous dusts applied by airplanes and land rigs. Agr. Eng. 28:233239.Google Scholar
3. Graham, Charles A. 1953. A practical way to evaluate spray distribution. J. Range Mangt. 61:255259.Google Scholar
4. Klingman, Glenn C. 1961. Weed control: as a science. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 421 p.Google Scholar
5. Klingman, Glenn C. 1964. Whirl chamber nozzles compared to other herbicide nozzles. Weeds 12:1014.Google Scholar