Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:22:42.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Soil Type, Soil pH, and Simulated Rainfall on the Distribution of DNBP in the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clyde Dowler ,
N. M. Baughman  and
Collins Veatch
Clyde Dowler
Affiliation:
Now Research Assistant, Agronomy Dept., Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
N. M. Baughman
Affiliation:
West Virginia Agr. Expt. Sta., Morgantown, West Virginia
Collins Veatch
Affiliation:
West Virginia Agr. Expt. Sta., Morgantown, West Virginia
Get access

Extract

A relationship has been noted between environmental conditions, including soil characteristics, and the movement, persistence and activity of herbicides applied to the soil. Field studies have often given differing, and sometimes contradictory results, possibly because of different environments. Empirical studies cannot fully explain these differences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1958 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dallyn, S. L., Sawyer, R. L., Self, R. D., and Haliburton, T. H. Effects of soil organic matter on herbicides. Proc. NEWCC 9:87. 1955.Google Scholar
2. Davis, D. E., and Davis, F. L. Some effects of rainfall and lime on the phytotoxicity of water soluble dinitro. Proc. SWC 7:208–211. 1954.Google Scholar
3. Davis, F. L., and Selman, F. L. Effects of water upon the movement of dinitro weed killers in soils. Weeds 3:11–20. 1954.Google Scholar
4. Davis, F. L., and Davis, D. E. Some factors affecting the behavior of dinitro herbicides in soils. Proc. SWC 7:205–207. 1954.Google Scholar
5. Dowler, C. C., and Baughman, N. M. Recovery of DNOSBP as affected by soil properties. Proc. NEWCC 10:278–282. 1956.Google Scholar
6. Hanks, R. W. Removal of 2,4–D acid and its Ca salt from six different soils by leaching. Bot. Gaz. 108:186–191. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hernandez, T. P., and Warren, G. F. Some factors affecting the rate of inactivation and leaching of 2,4–D in different soils. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 56:287–293. 1950.Google Scholar
8. Hollingsworth, E. B. Effect of soil pH on activity of DNOSBP. Proc. SWC 7:212–218. 1954.Google Scholar
9. Kries, O. H. Persistence of 2,4–D in soil in relation to content of water, organic matter and lime. Bot. Gaz. 108:510–525. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Page, Glen E. Sprayers for experimental plots. Agric. Eng. 35:498–499. 1954.Google Scholar