Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:23:47.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Atrazine from Soil by Corn, Sorghum, and Johnsongrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. C. Sikka  and
D. E. Davis
H. C. Sikka
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Auburn University Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
D. E. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
Get access

Abstract

The role of corn (Zea mays L.) var. Dixie 18, sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) var. RS 610, and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) in dissipation of 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine) from Norfolk sandy loam was studied in the field and in a pot-culture experiment in the greenhouse. Atrazine residues were determined by both chemical and bio-assay methods. Corn and Johnsongrass field plots had significantly less atrazine remaining in the 0- to 6-in depth than similarly treated fallow plots 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after planting, and the crops were equally effective in dissipating atrazine from soil. Soil in pots cropped with corn, sorghum, or Johnsongrass had significantly less atrazine remaining than in uncropped pots. Uptake by corn, Johnsongrass, and sorghum within 3 months in the pot-culture experiment accounted for losses of approximately 25, 25, and 20%, respectively, of the herbicide initially present. Bio- and chemical assays were equally sensitive methods of determining atrazine in the soil and gave similar results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 1966 , pp. 289 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L. J. 1960. Microbial breakdown of herbicides in soils, pp. 1–19. In Woodford, E. K. (ed.) Herbicides and the Soil. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
2. Audus, L. J. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil. pp. 163–203. In Audus, L. J. (ed.) The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
3. Bollen, W. B. 1961. Interactions between pesticides and soil micro-organisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 15:69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Castelfranco, P., For, C. L., and Deutsch, D. B. 1961. Nonenzymatic detoxification of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) by extracts of Zea mays . Weeds 9:580–591.Google Scholar
5. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. 1959. Absorption, translocation, degradation and volatilization of radioactive simazine. Proc. SWC 12:172–173.Google Scholar
6. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. 1959. Absorption and translocation of C14-labeled simazine by corn, cotton and cucumber. Weeds 7:300–309.Google Scholar
7. Dewey, O. R. 1960. Further experimental evidence on the fate of simazine in the soil. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. 5:91–97.Google Scholar
8. Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Davis, D. E. 1963. The metabolism of C14-chain-and ring-labeled simazine by corn and the effect of atrazine on plant respiration systems. Weeds 11:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gast, A. 1958. Uber pflanzenwachstumsregulatoren. Beitrage zur kenntnis der phytotoxi schen Wirkung von triazen. Experientia 14:134–136.Google Scholar
10. Gysin, H. and Knüsli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives. pp. 289–358, In Advances in Pest Control Research Metcalf, R. L. (ed.) Vol. III Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
11. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1962. Simazine: Degradation by corn seedlings. Science 135:373–374.Google Scholar
12. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.Google Scholar
13. Minarik, C. E. 1951. Pre-emergence herbicides and their behavior. Proc. NEWCC (Suppl.) 5:29–39.Google Scholar
14. Montgomery, M. and Freed, V. H. 1961. The uptake, translocation, and metabolism of simazine and atrazine by corn plants. Weeds 9:231–237.Google Scholar
15. Montgomery, M., and Freed, V. H. 1964. Metabolism of triazine herbicides by plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Negi, N. S., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Davis, D. E. 1964. Metabolism of atrazine by susceptible and resistant plants. Weeds 12:53–57.Google Scholar
17. Norman, A. G. and Newman, A. S. 1950. The persistence of herbicides in soils. Proc. NEWCC 4:7–12 Google Scholar
18. Ragab, M. T. H. and McCollum, J. P. 1961. Degradation of C14-labeled simazine by plants and soil microorganisms. Weeds 9:72–84.Google Scholar
19. Roth, W. 1957. Etude comparee de la reaction du mais et du Ble a la simazine, substance herbicide. Comptes Rendus. L'Acadamie des Sciences 245:942–944.Google Scholar
20. Sheets, T. J. 1962. Persistence of herbicides in soils. Proc. WWCC 24:37–42.Google Scholar
21. Sheets., T. J. and Danielsen, L. L. 1960. Herbicides in soils. pp. 170–181. In the Nature and Fate of Chemicals Applied to Soils, Plants, and Animals. U.S.D.A., A.R.S., 20–9.Google Scholar
22. Sheets, T. J., Harris, C. I., Kaufman, D. D., and Kearney, P. C. 1964. Fate of herbicides in soils. Proc. NEWCC 18:21–31.Google Scholar
23. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 481 p.Google Scholar
24. Wicks, G. A. and Burnside, O. C. 1965. Residues in soil one year after herbicides were applied to sorghum. Weeds 13:173–174.Google Scholar