Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:11:28.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Control with Herbicides and Cultivation in Field Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rick A. Boydston
Rick A. Boydston*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350-9687
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: boydston@tricity.wsu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Volunteer potato plants are difficult to control in rotational crops, and they harbor harmful diseases, nematodes, and insects. Five herbicide treatments were evaluated for control of volunteer potato in field corn grown under no-till and conventional tillage in 1994 and 1995. In mid-June, potato control was greater in conventionally tilled corn than no-till corn primarily due to the reservoir tillage that followed postemergence (POST) herbicide applications in the conventional system. Final potato tuber weight was not different between tillage levels in 1994 or 1995. Herbicide treatments reduced potato tuber weight 64 to 96% in no-till corn and 85 to 99% in conventionally tilled corn compared to nontreated checks. Atrazine applied preemergence at 1.1 kg ai/ha followed by dicamba plus 2,4-D applied POST at 0.28 plus 1.1 kg ae/ha, respectively, reduced potato tuber weight greater than 95% in both years and both tillage systems. Corn yield was not affected by tillage level or herbicide treatments in 1994 or 1995 and averaged 10.5 MT/ha in 1994 and 15.1 MT/ha in 1995. In a separate experiment, glyphosate, dicamba plus 2,4-D, or fluroxypyr applied at the eight-leaf stage to potato grown without a corn crop, and followed by cultivation 10 d later, reduced the number of potato tubers produced 79 to 95% compared to nontreated potato.

Keywords

Atrazinecyanazine2,4-D, dicamba, dimethylamine saltfluroxypyrglyphosate, nicosulfuronprimisulfurontriclopyr, triethylamine saltcorn, Zea mays L ‘Pioneer 3394’potato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank.’No-tillreservoir tillage (dammer diking)DAT, days after treatmentEPOST, early postemergenceLPOST, late postemergencePRE, preemergencePOST, postemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 461 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bevis, A. J. and Jewell, S. N. 1986. Preliminary results from the use of chemicals or cultivations to control potato groundkeepers. Aspects Appl. Biol. 13: 201–208.Google Scholar
Bond, W. 1993. Evaluation of ioxynil, fluroxypyr and clopyralid for the control of volunteer potato in vegetable crops. Aspects Appl. Biol. 35: 123–130.Google Scholar
Lobb, P. G. 1989. Response of potatoes, onions, and tomatoes to herbicides used for brushweed control. Proc. 42nd N. Z. Weed Pest Control Conf. 42: 251–253.Google Scholar
Lumkes, L. M. 1974. Research on the control of volunteer potatoes in The Netherlands. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 12: 1031–1040.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. 1977. Investigations into some aspects of the biology of potatoes as weeds. Weed Res. 17: 123–132.Google Scholar
Lutman, P.J.W. and Richardson, W. G. 1978. The activity of glyphosate and aminotriazole against volunteer potato plants and their daughter tubers. Weed Res. 18: 65–70.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1995. Sulfonylure herbicide effects on following crops. Weed Technol. 9: 373–379.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Esau, R., and Kozub, G. C. 1990. Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of nine rotational crops in alkaline soils of southern Alberta. Weed Technol. 4: 543–548.Google Scholar
Oglivy, S. E., Cleal, R.A.E., and Rogers-Lewis, D. S. 1989. The control of potato groundkeepers in cereal crops. Brighton Crop Pro. Conf.—Weeds 1: 205–212.Google Scholar
Perombelon, M. C. M. 1975. Observations on the survival of potato groundkeepers in Scotland. Potato Res. 18: 205–215.Google Scholar
Runham, S. R., Davies, J. S., and Leatherland, M. J. 1993. Weed control strategies for volunteer potatoes in onions. Aspects Appl. Biol. 35: 113–121.Google Scholar
Smid, D. and Hiller, L. K. 1981. Phytotoxicity and translocation of glyphosate in the potato (Solanum tuberosum) prior to tuber initiation. Weed Sci. 29: 218–224.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. E. 1983. Sources and dissemination of potato viruses in the Columbia Basin of the Northwestern United States. Plant Dis. 67: 744–747.Google Scholar
Wright, G. C. and Bishop, G. W. 1981. Volunteer potatoes as a source of potato leafroll virus and potato virus X. Am. Potato J. 58: 603–609.Google Scholar