Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T14:27:09.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Quinclorac Plus 2,4-D for Controlling Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in Fallow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen F. Enloe ,
Philip Westra ,
Scott J. Nissen ,
Stephen D. Miller  and
Phillip W. Stahlman
Stephen F. Enloe*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Scott J. Nissen
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, KS 67601
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: sfenloe@ucdavis.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming to compare the use of quinclorac plus 2,4-D with picloram plus 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, a glyphosate plus 2,4-D premix, and 2,4-D alone for control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)-fallow rotation. Treatments were applied in late summer or fall each year for two, three, or four consecutive years at the beginning and end of each fallow period. Evaluations were taken 10 to 12 mo after treatment each year. Quinclorac plus 2,4-D and picloram plus 2,4-D consistently performed as well as or better than 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, and glyphosate plus 2,4-D. Wheat yields increased when field bindweed was controlled during the fallow period. Strong correlations (r > −0.85) were obtained among visual field bindweed evaluation, biomass, and stand count data.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinepicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidquinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acidfield bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L. ♯ CONARwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Chemical fallowdryland cropping systemswheat fallow
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 731 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of first author: Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci. 42:205–209.Google Scholar
DeGennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984. Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:472–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W., ed. 1990. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 488 p.Google Scholar
Enache, A. J. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1991. BAS 514 and dithiopyr for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol. 5:616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenster, C. R. and Wicks, G. A. 1982. Fallow systems for winter wheat in western Nebraska. Agron. J. 74:9–13.Google Scholar
Frazier, J. C. 1948. Principal Noxious Perennial Weeds of Kansas, with Emphasis upon Their Root Systems in Relation to Control. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 331. 45 p.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennon, D. S. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in the temperate region. Weed Res. 21:99–109.Google Scholar
Keys, C. H. and Friesen, H. A. 1968. Persistence of picloram activity in soil. Weed Sci. 16:341–343.Google Scholar
Kiesselbach, T. A., Peterson, N. F., and Burr, W. W. 1934. Bindweeds and their control. Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 287. 47 p.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Young, F. L. 1991. Effects of preplant treatment interval and tillages on herbicide toxicity to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 5:291–296.Google Scholar
Rashed, M.H. and Haderlie, L. C. 1980. The relationship between anatomical and physiological aspects of field bindweed under water stress conditions. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:26.Google Scholar
Stahler, L. M. 1948. Shade and soil moisture as factors in competition between selected crops and field bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis . J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40:490–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauber, L. G., Nastasi, P., Smith, R. J. Jr., Baltazar, A. M., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) and bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fasicularis) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 5:337–344.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principals and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 633 p.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7:600–604.Google Scholar
Westra, P. and D'Amato, T. 1992. Field Bindweed Control with BAS-514. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Rep. 186 p.Google Scholar
Westra, P., Chapman, P., Stahlman, P. W., Miller, S. D., and Fay, P. K. 1992. Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with various herbicide combinations. Weed Technol. 6:949–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15:275–280.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Smika, D. E. 1973. Chemical fallow in a winter wheat–fallow rotation. Weed Sci. 21:97–102.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F. and Lavake, D. E. 1985. Control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:77–80.Google Scholar