Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:44:57.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of Glyphosate and Quizalofop and Metabolism of Quizalofop in Quackgrass Biotypes (Elytrigia repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

François J. Tardif
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Laval Univ., Cité Universitaire, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4
Gilles D. Leroux
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Laval Univ., Cité Universitaire, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the translocation pattern of 14C-glyphosate and 14C-quizalofop in five quackgrass biotypes at two stages of growth. Whole plant translocation differed between stages for each herbicide. The percentage of 14C-glyphosate and 14C-quizalofop in the leafwash and in the treated leaf did not differ among biotypes, but differences occurred for the translocation to the underground parts. The partitioning of the 14C-glyphosate and 14C-quizalofop in the treated crown, other crowns, propagating rhizomes, and other rhizomes differed among biotypes. On a disintegration per minute (DPM) mg-1 basis, differences among biotypes were found with 14C-glyphosate but much less with 14C-quizalofop. Metabolism of 14C-quizalofop in the treated leaf was similar in the two biotypes tested except for the percentage of polar metabolites 1 d after treatment. The percentage of 14C-quizalofop available for translocation was the same in both biotypes.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alcantara, E. N., Wyse, D. L., and Spitzmueller, J. M. 1989. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotype response to sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 37:107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Allen, O. B. 1983. A guide to the analysis of growth curve data with special reference to SAS. Computers Biomed. Res. 16:101115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Burton, J. D., Gronwald, J. W., Somers, D. A., Connelly, J. A., Gengenbach, B. G., and Wyse, D. L. 1987. Inhibition of plant acetyl-CoA carboxylase by the herbicides sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 148:10391044.Google Scholar
4. Chandrasena, J.P.N.R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Some factors affecting the performance of fluazifop-butyl against Elymus repens (L.) Gould [= Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]. Weed Res. 26:139148.Google Scholar
5. Claus, J. S., and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.Google Scholar
6. Dekker, J., and Harker, N. 1985. Comparative efficacy of several graminicides in controlling Elymus repens . Brit. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds. p. 471478.Google Scholar
7. Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. p. 170 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides. Vol. 3, Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
8. Duke, S. O., and Kenyon, W. H. 1988. Polycyclic alkanoic acids. p. 71116 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides. Vol. 3, Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
9. Harker, K. N., and Dekker, J. 1988. Temperature effects on translocation patterns of several herbicides within quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 36:545552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ivany, J. A. 1975. Effects of glyphosate application at different growth stages on quack grass control. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:861863.Google Scholar
11. Ivany, J. A. 1988. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with fluazifop. Weed Sci. 36:363366.Google Scholar
12. Rioux, R., Bandeen, J. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1974. Effects of growth stage on translocation of glyphosate in quack grass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:397401.Google Scholar
13. Sampson, M. G. 1987. Quackgrass biotypes in Technical Proc. Quackgrass Action Committee Workshop, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Can. Google Scholar
14. Secor, S., and Cseke, C. 1988. Inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity by haloxyfop and tralkoxydim. Plant Physiol. 86:1012.Google Scholar
15. Stoltenberg, D. E., and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence application of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:664668.Google Scholar
16. Tardif, F. 1987. Étude de la variabilité du chiendent (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) dans l'est du Canada: caractérisation de dix biotypes. M.Sc. Thesis, Laval Univ. 72 p.Google Scholar
17. Tardif, F. J., and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Response of quackgrass biotypes to glyphosate and quizalofop. Can. J. Plant Sci. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Trimmer, M. C., and Linscott, D. L. 1988. Water relations in quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:273278.Google Scholar
19. Wallgren, B. 1979. Effect of glyphosate on Agropyron repens at different temperature–preliminary results. Proc. 20th Swed. Weed Conf. 1:139144.Google Scholar
20. Westra, P. 1980. Control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotypes with glyphosate. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Minnesota, 183 p.Google Scholar
21. Wilhm, J. L., Meggitt, M. F., and Penner, D. 1986. Effect of acifluorfen and bentazon on absorption and translocation of haloxyfop and DPX-Y6202 in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 34:333337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar