Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:25:53.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) and Rotational Crop Response to PPI Chlorimuron, Clomazone, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald F. Krausz ,
George Kapusta  and
Joseph L. Matthews
Ronald F. Krausz
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Sci., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1989 to 1992 to evaluate soybean and rotational crop tolerance to PPI applications of chlorimuron (23 to 140 g ai/ha), clomazone (560 to 3360 g/ha), imazaquin (70 to 420 g/ha), and imazethapyr (53 to 310 g/ha). Soybean injury was evident only in 1989. Soybean height reduction 45 d after application increased linearly with increasing rates of chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Chlorimuron at 140 g/ha and imazaquin at 420 g/ha reduced soybean height 120 d after planting. None of the herbicides influenced soybean density. Chlorimuron and imazaquin reduced soybean seed yield linearly as rates increased. None of the herbicides reduced subsequent wheat yield. Corn height reduction increased as the rate of imazaquin and imazethapyr increased. Imazethapyr and imazaquin caused 2 to 40% and 1 to 12% height reduction at 30 d after planting, respectively. Imazethapyr at 310 g/ha applied the previous year reduced corn height at 120 d after planting. There were no differences in corn density. Imazaquin and imazethapyr at 420 and 310 g/ha, respectively, applied the previous year reduced corn yield.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-primidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidclomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinoneimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L., ‘Pioneer 3471’soybean, Glycine max L. Merr., ‘Williams 82’wheat, Triticum aestivum L., ‘Pioneer 2555,’ ‘Pioneer 2548.’Carryoverherbicide persistenceherbicide residuetrifluralin
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 224 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.Google Scholar
2. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
4. Burns, R. G. 1975. Factors affecting pesticide loss from soil. P. 103–141 in Paul, E. A. and McLoren, A. D., eds. Soil Biochemistry. Vol. 4. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, R. J., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232–237.Google Scholar
7. Curran, W. S., Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Photolysis of imidazolinone herbicides in aqueous solution and on soil. Weed Sci. 40:143–148.Google Scholar
8. Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, W. F. 1992. Effects of tillage and application method on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40:482–489.Google Scholar
9. Frederickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Technol. 34:328–332.Google Scholar
10. Fuesler, T. P. and Hanafey, M. K. 1990. Effect of moisture on chlorimuron degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 38:256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.Google Scholar
12. Goetz, A. J., Lavy, T. L., and Gbur, E. E. Jr. 1990. Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:421–428.Google Scholar
13. Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Knake, E. L. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) and rotational crop tolerance to chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Loux, M. M. and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.Google Scholar
15. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
16. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Effect of tillage systems on the efficacy and phytotoxicity of imazaquin and imazethapyr in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:233–238.Google Scholar
17. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.Google Scholar
18. Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:217–222.Google Scholar
19. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.Google Scholar
20. Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) response to chlorimuron and imazaquin as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Technol. 6:389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1989. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.Google Scholar
22. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Risley, M. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1991. Efficacy of imazaquin on various weed species. Weed Sci. 39:243–250.Google Scholar
24. Salzman, F. P. and Renner, K. A. 1992. Response of soybean to combination of clomazone metribuzin, linuron, alachlor, and atrazine. Weed Technol. 6:922–929.Google Scholar
25. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.Google Scholar
26. Shaner, D. L. 1989. Factors affecting soil and foliar bioavailability of imidazolinones. American Cyanamid Co., Princeton, NJ. p. 32.Google Scholar
27. Stevenson, F. J. 1972. Organic matter reactions in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1:333–343.Google Scholar
28. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.Google Scholar
29. Thelen, K. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1988. Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol. 2:323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858–864.Google Scholar