Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:31:25.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) Management in an ALS-Modified Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Stanley Culpepper ,
Alan C. York ,
Roger B. Batts  and
Katherine M. Jennings
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Roger B. Batts
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide systems consisting of PRE, early POST, and late POST options arranged factorially were compared for control of sicklepod in narrow-row soybean with modified acetolactate synthase (ALS) (E.C.4.1.3.18). Other weeds present included common cocklebur and mixed infestations of entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglories. PRE options were alachlor or alachlor plus metribuzin plus chlorimuron. Early POST options included chlorimuron, chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron, and no herbicide applied 3 wk after planting. Late POST options were chlorimuron and no herbicide applied 5 wk after planting. POST herbicides were more effective than PRE herbicides on all weeds. Chlorimuron and chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron applied early POST were equally effective on these weeds and usually more effective than chlorimuron applied late POST. There was no advantage of two POST applications compared with a single early POST application. Greatest net returns were obtained in systems using only early POST herbicides. There was no economic advantage from using metribuzin plus chlorimuron PRE in systems that included an early POST herbicide.

Keywords

common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANSTivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHEpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOBtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPUsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 5545 STS.’Foreign matternet returnssulfonylurea herbicideschlorimuronmetribuzinthifensulfuronIpomoea hederaceaIpomoea hederacea var. integriusculaIpomoea lacunosaIpomoea purpureaXanthium strumariumCASOBIPOHEIPOHGIPOLAPHBPUXANSTALS, acetolactate synthase
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 164 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barrentine, W. L., 1989. Minimum effective rates of chlorimuron and imazaquin applied to common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Technol, 3:126–130.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Influence of weed management and cropping systems on sicklepod (Cassia abtusifolia) seed in soil. Weed Sci. 33:800–804.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., 1973. Influence of weeds on soybean harvesting losses with a combine. Weed Sci. 21:520–523.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C., 1995. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:290–305.Google Scholar
Dunphy, E. J., and Neuman, D. F. 1995. Soybeans. In North Carolina Farm Enterprise Budget Guidelines. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. p. 73.Google Scholar
Edmund, R. M. Jr., 1986. Control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.) in soybeans (Glycine max) with imazaquin, DPX-F6025, and DPX-L8347. . North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 76 p.Google Scholar
Edmund, R. M. Jr., and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R., and Caviness, C. E. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.). Crop Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures and expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchison, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:355–363.Google Scholar
Hammes, G. G., Sebastian, S., and Hughes, M. R. 1991. Development update on enhanced sulfonylurea tolerance in soybean. Proc. South. Weed. Sci. Soc. 44:377.Google Scholar
Jennings, K. M., 1996. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) management in soybean (Glycine max) with flumetsulam. . North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 113 p.Google Scholar
Lilly, J. P., 1981. The blackland soils of North Carolina. Tech. Bull. 270. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Agricultural Research Service. 48 p.Google Scholar
Mayo, C. M., Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., and Boyer, J. E. 1995. Differential control of four Amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:141–147.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and J. S. Richburg, III., 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:317–332.Google Scholar
Moseley, C., Hatzios, K. K., and Hagood, E. S. 1993. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron in soybean (Glycine max) and morningglory (Ipomoea spp.). Weed Technol. 7:343–348.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Griffin, J. L. 1995. Broadleaf weed control with trifluralin plus flumetsulam in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:446–451.Google Scholar
Sebastian, S. A., Fader, G. M., Ulrich, J. F., Forney, D. R., and Chaleff, R. S. 1989. Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop Sci. 29:1403–1408.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Rainero, H. P., Smith, C. A., Wixson, M. B., Ratnayake, W.R.A.S., Bruff, S. A., and Newsom, L. J. 1990. Emergence and growth of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with various planting and herbicide incorporation depths. Weed Sci. 38:401–405.Google Scholar
Shurtleff, J. L., and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:654–657.Google Scholar
Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, D. L., and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Wilcut, J. W., and Monks, C. D. 1995. Efficacy and economy of weed management systems for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:456–461.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1993, Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with lactofen plus chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 7:311–316.Google Scholar
Walker, R. H., Patterson, M. G., Hauser, E., Isenhour, D. J., Todd, J. W., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Effects of insecticide, weed-free period, and row spacing on soybean (Glycine max) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) growth. Weed Sci. 32:702–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. B., 1994. Properties and behavior of pesticides in soil. In Honeycutt, R. C. and Schabacker, D. J., eds. Mechanisms of Pesticide Movement into Ground Water. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 15–41.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Weed management systems for oil seed crops. In Smith, A. E., ed. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 343–400.Google Scholar