Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:39:01.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential Regulatory Problems Associated with Atrazine, Cyanazine, and Alachlor in Surface Water Source Drinking Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Henry Nelson  and
R. David Jones
Henry Nelson
Affiliation:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, 401 M St., S.W. 7507C, Washington, D.C. 20460
R. David Jones
Affiliation:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, 401 M St., S.W. 7507C, Washington, D.C. 20460
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Post-application seasonal (May-July) average concentrations of atrazine, cyanazine, and, to a lesser extent, alachlor sometimes exceed their Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) (3 ug/L for atrazine and 2 ug/L for alachlor) or Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) (1 ug/L for cyanazine) in surface waters of the Mississippi and Great Lakes Basins. These three chemicals are among the primary pre-emergent herbicides applied to corn. MCLs and MCLGs are compared to annual average concentrations for regulatory purposes. However, annual average concentrations are much less frequently reported than post-application seasonal averages. In most cases, both seasonal and annual average concentrations are substantially less than the MCLs or MCLG. However, actual and estimated annual mean concentrations occasionally exceed the MCLs or MCLG. Actual or estimated exceedences occur more frequently for atrazine and cyanazine than for alachlor, and may occur more frequently in lakes or reservoirs with long retention times than in streams and rivers. Additional year round data, and data for lakes and reservoirs, are needed to determine the extent to which such exceedences occur throughout the corn belt. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) believes that substantial numbers of Community Water Systems (CWSs) within the corn belt are currently, or will be, in violation of the revised Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) with respect to atrazine and cyanazine. They are concerned that such violations could result in numerous CWSs having to implement expensive tertiary treatment systems such as granular activated carbon to decrease herbicide concentrations. The United States Environmental Protection Agency, (US EPA) is continuing to review data on the pesticide concentrations in reservoirs and lakes that registrants have been submitting over the last 18 mo under the 6(a)(2) adverse impact provision of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The US EPA is also currently using computer modeling and other methods to evaluate potential alternative and/or supplemental herbicides to reduce atrazine use. In June 1992, the US EPA approved revised labeling that is designed to reduce indirect atrazine loadings to surface waters. Additional mitigation methods have been proposed and are being considered.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)-acetamideatrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminecyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrilecorn, Zea mays L.FIFRAlabel restrictionsrunoffrunoff mitigationSafe Drinking Water Act.
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 852 - 861
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, D. B. 1988. Sediment, nutrient, and pesticide transport in selected lower great lakes tributaries. EPA-905/4-88-001. Performed by Heidelberg College, Tiffin, OH, for the Great Lakes National Program Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
2. Baker, D. B. and Richards, R. P. 1989. Herbicide concentration patterns in rivers draining intensively cultivated farmlands of Northwestern Ohio. p. 103–119 in Weigmann, D. L., ed. Pesticides in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments. Proc. of a National Research Conference, May 11-12, 1989, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
3. Baker, D. and Richards, R. P. 1991. Herbicide concentrations in Ohio's drinking water supplies: A quantitative exposure assessment, p. 9–30 in Weigmann, D. L., ed. Pesticides in the Next Decade: The Challenges Ahead. Proc. of the Third National Research Conference on Pesticides, November 8-9, 1990, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
4. Bouzaher, A. and Manale, A. 1992. CEEPES Atrazine Project: Research memos 1-5. Performed by Iowa State University, Ames, I A, for the Office of Planning and Policy Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
5. Carsel, R. F., Smith, C. N., Mulkey, L. A., Dean, J. D., and Jowise, P. 1984. Users Manual for the Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM), Release 1. EPA-600/3-84-109. Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA and Anderson Nichols, Inc., Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
6. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 1991, 7th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
7. Christensen, B. and Montgomery, J. 1992. Herbicides in drinking water sources: Public health perspectives. Tierney, D., ed. Technical Report: 4-92. Performed by Consulting Engineers, Inc., Wayzata, MN, for the CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
8. Christensen, B., Montgomery, J. M., and Fawcett, R. S. 1992. Reducing herbicide runoff: Role of best management practices. Tierney, D., ed. Technical Report: 10-92. Performed by Consulting Engineers, Inc., Wayzata, MN and Agricultural Consultants, Huxley, IA for the CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Greensboro, NC. 9. Ciba-Geigy. 1992. Guidance for atrazine ground and surface water label amendments. Published by CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
10. Farm Chemicals Handbook. 1991. Meister Publishing Company.Google Scholar
11. Fawcett, R. S., Christensen, B., and Montgomery, J. M. 1992. Best management practices to reduce runoff of pesticides into surface water: A review and analysis of supporting research. Tierney, D., ed. Technical Report: 9-92. Performed by Agricultural Consultants, Huxley, IA and Consulting Engineers, Inc., Wayzata, MN for the CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
12. Gianessi, L. P. 1992. U.S. pesticide use trends: Prepared by Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. for the Office of Policy Analysis, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
13. Goolsby, D. A. and Thurman, E. M. 1991. Herbicides in rivers and streams of the upper midwestern United States. Proc. 46th Annu. Meeting of the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
14. Goolsby, D. A., Coupe, R. C., and Markovchick, D. J. 1991. Distribution of selected herbicides and nitrate in the Mississippi River and its major tributaries. Water Resources Investigations Report 91-4163, U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
15. Goolsby, D. A., Thurman, E. M., and Kolpin, D. W. 1991. Herbicides in streams: Midwestern United States, p. 17–20 in Irrigation and Drainage Proc, July 22-26,1991, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
16. Goolsby, D. A. and Battaglin, W. A. 1992. Occurrence, distribution and transport of agricultural chemicals in surface waters of the midwestern United States. Presented at the 204th meeting of the American Chemical Society, August 26, 1992.Google Scholar
17. Goss, D. and Wauchope, R. D. 1991. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database II: Using it with soils data in a screening procedure, p. 471–493 in Wiegman, D., ed. Pesticides in the Next Decade: The Challenges Ahead. Proc. of the Third National Research Conference on Pesticides, November 8-9, 1990, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
18. Himmel, C. M., Loats, H., and Bailey, G. W. 1990. Pesticide sources to the soil and principles of spray physics. Chapter 2 in Cheng, , ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modeling. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
19. Kansas Dept. of Public Health. 1988. A survey of pesticides in Tuttle Creek Lake, its tributaries, and the upper Kansas River. Bureau of Water Protection of KDPH and Kansas City District of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
20. Keck, P. 1991. Missouri River Public Water Supplies Association 1991 Missouri River monitoring study. Missouri River Public Water Supplies Association.Google Scholar
21. Lauer, R., Smith, R. G., Baszis, S. R., Horner, L. M., Rupel, F. L., Triebe, F. M., and Klein, A. J. 1986. Alachlor in raw and finished drinking water derived from surface sources from 24 community water systems located in regions of extensive Lasso use. Report No.: MSL-5412. Monsanto Agricultural Company, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
22. Leifer, A. 1988. The Kinetics of Environmental Aquatic Photochemistry, ACS Professional Reference Book, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. p. 38–39.Google Scholar
23. Leonard, R. A. 1990. Movement of pesticides into surface waters. Chap. 9 in Cheng, , ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modeling. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
24. Moyer, L. and Cross, J. 1990. Pesticide monitoring: Illinois EPA's summary of results. Division of Water Pollution Control, State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
25. Roux, P. 1988. Summary of atrazine surface water monitoring program. Laboratory Study Number CG-02814. Performed by Roux Associates, Inc., Huntington, NY for Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
26. Smith, R. G., Triebe, F. M., and Baszis, S. R. 1987. Alachlor, atrazine, cyanazine, metolachlor, and simazine in surface water from 30 community water systems located in regions of Lasso use. Report No.: MSL-6787. Monsanto Agricultural Company, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
27. Squillace, P. J. and Engberg, R. A. 1988. Surface-water quality of the Cedar River Basin, Iowa-Minnesota, with emphasis on the occurrence and transport of herbicides, May 1984 through November 1985. Water Resources Investigations Report 88-4060. U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
28. Squillace, P. J. and Thurman, E. M. 1992. Herbicide transport in rivers: Importance of hydrology and geochemistry in non-point source contamination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:538–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Sullivan, J. H. and Roberson, J. A. 1993. Herbicides in drinking water and the regulatory impact on water supplies. American Water Works Association. Presented at Symposium on Herbicides in Runoff and Surface Waters: Environmental and Regulatory Impacts, Feb. 10, 1993, Weed Science Society of America Meeting, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
30. Taylor, A. G. 1992. Pre-compliance date testing for pesticides in Illinois surface water supplies. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
31. Thurman, E. M., Goolsby, D. A., Meyer, M. T., and Kolpin, D. W. 1991. Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States: The effect of Spring flush. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1794–1796.Google Scholar
32. Thurman, E. M., Goolsby, D. A., Meyer, M. T., Mills, M. S., Pomes, M. L., and Kolpin, D. W. 1992. Reconnaissance study of herbicides and their metabolites in surface water of the midwestern United States using immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:2440–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Groundwater Branch. 1992. Pesticide environmental fate summaries.Google Scholar
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water. 1992. Code of Federal Regulations 40:141.24(h).Google Scholar
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water. 1992. Code of Federal Regulations 40:141.40(n).Google Scholar
36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water. 1992. Code of Federal Regulations 40:141.61(c).Google Scholar
37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Drinking water regulations and health advisories. Published by the Office of Water, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
38. Ware, G. W. 1983. Reducing pesticide application drift-losses. Published by College of Agriculture, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ.Google Scholar
39. Wauchope, R. D., Hornsby, A. G., Goss, D. W., and Burt, J. P. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database I: A set of parameter values for first-tier comparative water pollution risk analysis, p. 455–470 in Wiegman, D., ed. Pesticides in the Next Decade: The Challenges Ahead. Proc. of the Third National Research Conference on Pesticides, November 8-9, 1990, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
40. Williams, W. M. and Miller, D. 1991. Investigation of atrazine in Hoover Reservoir, Columbus, Ohio. Performed by Blasland & Bouck Engineers, Leesburg, VA for the Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar