Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T03:21:00.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postemergence Hemp Sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) Control in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. Roy Vidrine
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Res. Stn., 8105 E. Campus, Alexandria, LA 71302
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., Box 438, St Joseph, LA 71366
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at three locations in Louisiana over two years to evaluate mid-season, foliar-applied acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen for hemp sesbania control in soybean. Acifluorfen and fomesafen were applied POST at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 140, and 280 g ai ha–1 and lactofen was applied at 60, 80, 110, and 220 g ai ha–1. The data fit a quadratic model and log transformations were made to determine differences between treatments. Hemp sesbania control was highly correlated with herbicide rate for each herbicide. Averaged over rates of application, acifluorfen and fomesafen provided equivalent control of hemp sesbania, which was greater than that achieved with lactofen. The minimum effective rate of acifluorfen or fomesafen for 80 and 100% control of 50- to 60-cm hemp sesbania was 50 and 140 g ha–1, respectively. The minimum effective lactofen rate to provide at least 80% control was 220 g har–1.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baldwin, F. L., Oliver, L. R., and Tripp, T. N. 1988. Arkansas experience with reduced-rate herbicide recommendations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:308.Google Scholar
2. Banks, V. E., Oliver, L. R., and McClelland, M. 1988. Influence of soybean oil carrier and method of application on weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:504509.Google Scholar
3. Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1984. Control of annual morningglories (Ipomoea spp.) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:813818.Google Scholar
4. Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Minimum effective rate of chlorimuron and imazaquin applied to common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium). Weed Technol. 3:126130.Google Scholar
5. Defelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in Soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365374.Google Scholar
6. Dillon, T. L., Baldwin, F. L., Becton, C. M., and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Reduced rate programs for weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:361.Google Scholar
7. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stages of soybean development for soybean (Glycine max L.) Merril. Crop Sci. 11:929931.Google Scholar
8. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. p. 902 in 8th ed., American Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
9. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Reduced rates of selected soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:283.Google Scholar
10. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 30:520526.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:5864.Google Scholar
12. Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37:187195.Google Scholar
13. SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar