Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-7hjq6 Total loading time: 1.204 Render date: 2021-06-14T22:13:29.944Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Pollen-mediated gene flow and transfer of resistance alleles from herbicide-resistant broadleaf weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2020

Amit J. Jhala
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Zahoor A. Ganie
Affiliation:
Global Research and Development Scientist, Herbicide Discovery Biology, Stine Research Center, FMC Corp., Newark, DE, USA
Lynn M. Sosnoskie
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY, USA
Hugh J. Beckie
Affiliation:
Professor and Director, Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
Jun Liu
Affiliation:
Scientist, School of Information and Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
Wei Wei
Affiliation:
Scientist, State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Changes, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Junming Wang
Affiliation:
Atmospheric Scientist, Illinois State Water Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
David E. Stoltenberg
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF) refers to the transfer of genetic information (alleles) from one plant to another compatible plant. With the evolution of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds, PMGF plays an important role in the transfer of resistance alleles from HR to susceptible weeds; however, little attention is given to this topic. The objective of this work was to review reproductive biology, PMGF studies, and interspecific hybridization, as well as potential for herbicide resistance alleles to transfer in the economically important broadleaf weeds including common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, horseweed, kochia, Palmer amaranth, and waterhemp. The PMGF studies involving these species reveal that transfer of herbicide resistance alleles routinely occurs under field conditions and is influenced by several factors, such as reproductive biology, environment, and production practices. Interspecific hybridization studies within Amaranthus and Ambrosia spp. show that herbicide resistance allele transfer is possible between species of the same genus but at relatively low levels. The widespread occurrence of HR weed populations and high genetic diversity is at least partly due to PMGF, particularly in dioecious species such as Palmer amaranth and waterhemp compared with monoecious species such as common lambsquarters and horseweed. Prolific pollen production in giant ragweed contributes to PMGF. Kochia, a wind-pollinated species can efficiently disseminate herbicide resistance alleles via both PMGF and tumbleweed seed dispersal, resulting in widespread occurrence of multiple HR kochia populations. The findings from this review verify that intra- and interspecific gene flow can occur and, even at a low rate, could contribute to the rapid spread of herbicide resistance alleles. More research is needed to determine the role of PMGF in transferring multiple herbicide resistance alleles at the landscape level.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

The development and commercial cultivation of herbicide-resistant (HR) corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the mid-1990s stimulated intense public awareness and scientific interest in gene flow from HR crops to conventional or organic crops, as well as to their wild and weedy relatives (Snow Reference Snow2002; Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Halfhill and Warwick2003). The frequency of pollination between crops and adjacent sexually compatible species at various spatial scales was an important issue in risk assessment of genetically engineered crops (Jhala and Hall Reference Jhala, Hall, Price and Kelton2013; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Weselake and Hall2009; Wolfenbarger and Phifer Reference Wolfenbarger and Phifer2000). Studies to detect pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF) from genetically engineered crops to conventional or organic crops confirmed that transfer of herbicide-resistance alleles is possible at varying levels under field conditions, even in self-pollinated crops such as flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Bhatt, Keith and Hall2011) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Rieben et al. Reference Rieben, Kalinina, Schmid and Zeller2011). In addition, studies of gene flow from HR crops to closely related species were conducted in several commodities such as canola (Brassica napus L.) (Légère Reference Légère2005; Warwick et al. Reference Warwick, Simard, Legere, Beckie, Braun, Zhu, Mason, Seguin-Swartz and Stewart2003), corn (Ma et al. Reference Ma, Subedi and Reid2004), flax (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Hall and Hall2008), soybean (Kim et al. Reference Kim, Kim, Moon, Pack, Park, Chung, Kim, Nam and Kim2019), and wheat (Gandhi et al. Reference Gandhi, Mallory-Smith, Watson, Isabel Vales, Zemetra and Riera-Lizarazu2006; Hanson et al. Reference Hanson, Mallory-Smith, Price, Shafii, Thill and Zemetra2005; Martins et al. Reference Martins, Leonard, Sun, Zemetra and Mallory-Smith2016) [and see reviews by Gressel (Reference Gressel2015); Ellstrand et al. (Reference Ellstrand, Prentice and Hancock1999); Jhala et al. (Reference Jhala, Sandell, Sarangi, Kruger and Knezevic2017b)].

Herbicides are an important component of weed management in most agronomic crops, particularly in developed countries, including the United States. Reliance on herbicides is especially prevalent in HR corn-soybean cropping systems in the midwestern United States (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Knezevic, Ganie, Singh, Chauhan and Mahajan2014) as well as in several other cropping systems and in noncrop areas. Adoption of no-tillage production practices significantly reduced the use of tillage for weed management and further increased the dependence on herbicides (Bhowmik and Bekech Reference Bhowmik and Bekech1993; Sarangi and Jhala Reference Sarangi and Jhala2018), contributing to the evolution of HR weeds (Beckie Reference Beckie2006). As of 2020, there are 514 unique cases of HR weeds globally in 93 crops in 70 countries (Heap Reference Heap2020a).

Independent evolution of herbicide resistance due to selection pressure from the same herbicide site of action (SOA) in the same field is a primary contributing factor to the regional occurrence of HR weeds (Beckie Reference Beckie2006); however, once resistance has evolved, HR alleles can spread via seed and pollen movement (Jhala and Knezevic Reference Jhala, Knezevic, Thomas, Murray and Murphy2017). Weed-seed dispersal has the potential to affect movement of herbicide-resistance alleles on a much larger scale than pollen flow. Movement of HR seed among fields or regionally via equipment, manure, commercial seed stocks, feed, crop residues, plant byproducts, or irrigation water is often greater than via natural seed dispersal (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Busi, Bagavathiannan and Martin2019a). Farmer et al. (Reference Farmer, Webb, Pierce and Bradley2017) confirmed that migratory waterfowl consume seeds of several agronomically important weed species that can remain viable after passage through digestive tracts and have the potential to be dispersed over long distances. The commercial bird-feed trade has been recognized as a pathway for long-distance weed-seed dispersal to new areas. Recent analysis of commercially available bird-feed mixes in the eastern United States found 29 weed species in the mixes (Oseland et al. Reference Oseland, Bish, Spinka and Bradley2020). Amaranthus species were the most common, found in 96% of the mixes; common lambsquarters seed was identified in 10% of the mixes.

Invasions are usually associated with the movement of regenerative propagules into new habitats; a less commonly explored aspect is the introduction of a unique, but advantageous, allele into a locally adapted genetic pool (Petit Reference Petit2004). Herbicide-resistance alleles from HR weeds can spread, via pollen, both intra- and interspecifically in certain species, such as Amaranthus (Gaines et al. Reference Gaines, Ward, Bekun, Preston, Leach and Westra2012; Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic, Lindquist and Jhala2017; Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, MacRae, Grey and Culpepper2012) and Ambrosia (Ganie and Jhala Reference Ganie and Jhala2017; Vincent et al. Reference Vincent, Lauzer and Cappadocia1988). PMGF of herbicide-resistance alleles in kochia is an important vector for proximal dispersal, such as within fields. The PMGF in kochia can contribute to rapid accumulation of herbicide-resistance alleles in an individual or population. For example, an individual plant may accumulate different target-site mutations conferring resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Warwick, Sauder, Lozinski and Shirriff2011) or multiple mechanisms conferring herbicide resistance to multiple SOAs. A kochia population in Kansas was confirmed to be resistant to four SOA: ALS inhibitors, photosystem-II (PS II) inhibitors, glyphosate, and synthetic auxins (Varanasi et al. Reference Varanasi, Godar, Currie, Dille, Thompson, Stahlman and Jugulam2015).

The spread of HR weeds into new agroecosystems is a concern for growers and includes the potential of pollen-mediated gene introgression of herbicide-resistance traits into indigenous weed species. Beckie et al. (Reference Beckie, Busi, Bagavathiannan and Martin2019a) stated that PMGF from HR weeds is underestimated and underappreciated. To better quantify the nature of pollen movement and transfer of resistance alleles, more information is needed about the reproductive biology, cytogenetics, and occurrence of gene transfer in economically important weed species (Table 1). Our objective for this article was to review reproductive biology, PMGF studies, interspecific hybridization, and potential of herbicide-resistance allele transfer via pollen from HR plants to susceptible plants in economically important and widely distributed broadleaf weeds, including common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, horseweed, kochia, Palmer amaranth, and waterhemp.

Table 1. Economically important broadleaf weed species selected in this study, their family, and chromosome numbers to determine the potential for PMGF and transfer of herbicide-resistance alleles.

a Common lambsquarters and kochia previously were classified in the Chenopodiaceae, which has been reassigned as Amaranthaceae in recent years in the order Caryophyllales.

b Abbreviation: PMGF, pollen-mediated gene flow.

c Likelihood of PMGF as estimated on the basis of reproductive biology and previous studies.

Common Lambsquarters

Common lambsquarters is one of the most widely distributed and economically important weeds in the world (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978; Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). The Chenopodium genus has a worldwide distribution of at least 150 species, with the highest species diversity in temperate areas (Krak et al. Reference Krak, Vit, Belyayev, Douda, Hreusová and Mandák2016). The origin of common lambsquarters is unclear (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). Common lambsquarters has been reported to be native to western Asia, but its native range likely includes most of Europe (Bajwa et al. Reference Bajwa, Zulfiqar, Sadia, Bhowmik and Chauhan2019; CABI-ISC 2019). It is widely naturalized elsewhere, including North America. Common lambsquarters is adapted to many cropping systems and is competitive with at least 40 crop species (Bajwa et al. Reference Bajwa, Zulfiqar, Sadia, Bhowmik and Chauhan2019; Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). In the United States and Canada, common lambsquarters is perceived as the most common and the fifth most troublesome (i.e., difficult to control) weed in corn (Van Wychen Reference Van Wychen2017). In soybean, common lambsquarters is the third most common and sixth most troublesome weed (Van Wychen Reference Van Wychen2019).

Reproductive Biology of Common Lambsquarters

Common lambsquarters has an annual life cycle with peak seed germination and seedling emergence occurring in early to mid spring, but subsequent cohorts can emerge during summer and fall (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). Plants can grow to a height of 2 m or more and have ascending branches and simple, alternate leaves (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). Inflorescences are a spiked panicle in leaf axils or at the terminus of stems and branches, with small, dense flower clusters. Plants are monoecious (i.e., male and female flowers on the same plant); flowers are perfect, green, small, sessile, in irregular spikes and without petals (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978).

Common lambsquarters flowers at any day length, but short days hasten flowering and maturity (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). The time of anthesis varies from a few days to several weeks. Common lambsquarters is self-compatible and reproduces both by self- and cross-pollination (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978). Flowers are mainly wind pollinated, but insects may play a role in pollination. A mature plant produces approximately 20,000 pollen grains in a season (Bajwa et al. Reference Bajwa, Zulfiqar, Sadia, Bhowmik and Chauhan2019). Average-sized plants have been reported to produce more than 70,000 seeds (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978), although large plants have been reported to produce 500,000 seeds (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Plucknett, Pancho, Herberger, Holm, Plucknett, Pancho and Herberger1977). Because common lambsquarters does not have a natural seed dispersal mechanism, most seeds drop to the ground near the mother plant.

Herbicide Resistance in Common Lambsquarters

Common lambsquarters has evolved resistance to PS-II inhibitors, ALS inhibitors, and synthetic auxins (Heap Reference Heap2020a; Warwick and Marriage Reference Warwick and Marriage1982). Resistance to PS-II inhibitors (including atrazine, simazine, metribuzin, and metamitron) is the most widespread resistance (n = 42 cases globally). Resistance to ALS inhibitors in common lambsquarters has been confirmed in a total of six cases (three in Canada, two in the United States, and one in Finland). The only report of resistance to synthetic auxin herbicides (namely, aminopyralid, clopyralid, and dicamba) in common lambsquarters is from New Zealand in 2005.

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) common lambsquarters has not yet been reported; however, some populations have shown variable or inconsistent responses to glyphosate across a wide geographic range in the United States (Hite et al. Reference Hite, King, Hagood and Holtzman2008; Kniss et al. Reference Kniss, Miller, Westra and Wilson2007; Sivesind et al. Reference Sivesind, Gaska, Jeschke, Boerboom and Stoltenberg2011; Westhoven et al. Reference Westhoven, Kruger, Gerber, Stachler, Loux and Johnson2008). Glyphosate efficacy on common lambsquarters can be affected by plant size (DeGreeff et al. Reference DeGreeff, Varanasi, Dille, Peterson and Jugulam2018; Schuster et al. Reference Schuster, Shoup and Al-Khatib2007) and environmental conditions (DeGreeff et al. Reference DeGreeff, Varanasi, Dille, Peterson and Jugulam2018; Sivesind et al. Reference Sivesind, Gaska, Jeschke, Boerboom and Stoltenberg2011), but in other instances, reduced efficacy has been attributed to reduced sensitivity (Hite et al. Reference Hite, King, Hagood and Holtzman2008; Kniss et al. Reference Kniss, Miller, Westra and Wilson2007; Westhoven et al. Reference Westhoven, Kruger, Gerber, Stachler, Loux and Johnson2008). A subsequent investigation showed that reduced translocation of glyphosate plays an important role in conferring reduced sensitivity (Yerka et al. Reference Yerka, Wiersma, Lindenmayer, Westra, Johnson, de Leon and Stoltenberg2013).

PMGF from HR Common Lambsquarters

The PMGF in common lambsquarters decreases rapidly with increasing distance from the pollen source. Gasquez (Reference Gasquez, Jacquard, Heim and Antonovics1985) estimated that PMGF was 50% between plants spaced 0.2 m apart, whereas it decreased logarithmically to 5% at a plant spacing of 2.0 m. The results were likely indicative of common lambsquarter’s PMGF in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), which is a relatively short species, whereas the expected PMGF among common lambsquarters plants in corn would likely be much lower because of the tall stature of crop plants impeding pollen movement by wind (Darmency and Gasquez Reference Darmency and Gasquez1990).

Yerka et al. (Reference Yerka, de Leon and Stoltenberg2012) quantified PMGF in common lambsquarters in field experiments using magenta spreen (Chenopodium giganteum D. Don; 2n = 54), which has a dominant magenta phenotypic marker, as the pollen source. A wild-type accession of common lambsquarters (2n = 54) served as pollen-receptor plants that were grown in a soybean stand and arranged in concentric circles 2 to 15 m from the center that contained 24 pollen-source plants. The concentric circles were divided into eight cardinal directions. Pollen movement was analyzed by determining the percentage of progeny with the magenta phenotype from the pollen-receptor plants. Average PMGF across directions was greatest (3.0%) at 2 m and decreased exponentially to low levels (0.16%) 15 m from the edge of pollen source. The PMGF was greatest in the south-southwest, west-southwest, and west-northwest directions, approximately 180° from the prevailing wind direction during the time of pollen shed (Figure 1). Because common lambsquarters does not have an active seed-dispersal mechanism, the results suggested PMGF may play an important role in the short-distance transfer and frequency of resistance alleles within and between populations.

Figure 1. Empirical model of pollen-mediated gene flow in common lambsquarters under field conditions (Yerka et al. Reference Yerka, de Leon and Stoltenberg2012). The maximum observed cross-pollination percentage between wild-type Chenopodium album and C. giganteum was described by a negative exponential function using the two highest values at each distance from the south-southwest, west-southwest, and/or west-northwest sectors (generally 180° from the prevailing wind direction during the time of pollen shed). Mean values of the maximum cross-pollination percent (±SE) are shown.

Resistance to PS-II inhibitors is the most reported resistance in common lambsquarters (Heap Reference Heap2020a). Consequently, research on gene flow of resistance alleles in this species has focused on PS-II inhibitors. Soon after the first report of triazine resistance in common lambsquarters (Bandeen and McLaren Reference Bandeen and McLaren1976), it was determined that the inheritance of atrazine resistance was uniparental (maternal) (Warwick and Black Reference Warwick and Black1980). This discovery was critical for understanding the importance of seed-mediated gene flow of atrazine-resistance alleles in common lambsquarters.

In a study that assessed the spread of metamitron-resistant common lambsquarters patches in sugar beet and corn fields across four farms, using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, Aper et al. (Reference Aper, Menchant, De Riek, Van Laere, Bulcke and Reheul2012) found significant genetic variation among farm locations and among patches within farm locations. They also found a positive correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance, suggesting isolation by distance. However, the genetic similarity between patches from different fields indicated that seed transport by agricultural machinery and manure was likely to have played an important role in the spread of resistance.

Interspecific Hybridization and Gene Flow in Chenopodium Species

Common lambsquarters is a hexaploid (2n = 54) (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1978). Recent research suggests that hexaploid Chenopodium species originated by hybridization between diploid (2n = 18) and tetraploid (2n = 36) Chenopodium species (Krak et al. Reference Krak, Vit, Belyayev, Douda, Hreusová and Mandák2016; Mandák et al. Reference Mandák, Krak, Vit, Lomonosova, Belyayev, Habibi, Wang, Douda and Štorchová2018). Common lambsquarters hybridizes with other hexaploid Chenopodium species, including the aforementioned magenta spreen (Yerka et al. Reference Yerka, de Leon and Stoltenberg2012) and seaport goosefoot (C. opulifolium Shrad. ex W.D.J. Koch & Ziz) (CABI-ISC 2019; Mandák et al. Reference Mandák, Krak, Vit, Lomonosova, Belyayev, Habibi, Wang, Douda and Štorchová2018). Although experimental evidence suggests that Chenopodium species do not hybridize freely across ploidy levels (Mandák et al. Reference Mandák, Trávníček, Paštová and Kořínková2012), common lambsquarters has been reported to hybridize with diploid and tetraploid species within the Chenopodium genus, including figleaf goosefoot (C. ficifolium Sm.; 2n = 18), Swedish goosefoot (C. suecicum Murr.; 2n = 18), and netseed lambsquarters or pitseed goosefoot (C. berlandieri Moq.; 2n = 36) (CABI-ISC 2019; Mandák et al. Reference Mandák, Krak, Vit, Lomonosova, Belyayev, Habibi, Wang, Douda and Štorchová2018).

Giant Ragweed

Giant ragweed, a native of North America, is a summer annual dicotyledonous weed belonging to the Asteraceae (sunflower) family (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1982). It is widely distributed in the United States, primarily in the eastern Corn Belt, and in southern Canada (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1982) and in several countries in Asia and Europe (Makra et al. Reference Makra, Matyasovszky, Hufnagel and Tusnády2015). Giant ragweed is an economically important weed because of its allergenic pollen and its competitiveness with agronomic crops, including corn, soybean, and wheat (Ganie et al. 2016; Reference Ganie, Lindquist, Jugulam, Kruger, Marx and Jhala2017b; Mahoney et al. Reference Mahoney, McNaughton and Sikkema2015). Early emergence, rapid growth rate, and a high leaf-area index enable giant ragweed to assume a dominant role in the plant community; it often becomes invasive, reducing species diversity in the infested landscape (Abul-Fatih and Bazaz Reference Abul-Fatih and Bazaz1979a). Giant ragweed grows erect, with plasticity evident in branching and plant height according to habitat (crop or noncrop) and competing crop or weed species (Abul-Fatih and Bazaz Reference Abul-Fatih and Bazaz1979b).

Reproductive Biology of Giant Ragweed

Giant ragweed is a monoecious species with imperfect flowers; the main stem and branches of giant ragweed culminate in an inflorescence bearing male flowers; female flowers are usually present at the base of the male inflorescence or at the leaf axils in clusters of three or more sessile seed-bearing involucres (Figure 2) (Abul-Fatih and Bazaz Reference Abul-Fatih and Bazaz1979a; Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1982). Giant ragweed is a protogynous species, meaning stigmas in female flowers protrude and become receptive before the male flowers on the same plant start shedding pollen grains (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1982). Giant ragweed is anemophilous (i.e., wind pollinated) and each plant can produce approximately 1 billion pollen grains during a normal growing season. It has been estimated that during peak flowering time, a single giant ragweed plant can release 1 million pollen grains day−1 (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1982). Ragweed pollen is relatively small (18–25 µm) and flat to nearly spherical, covered with miniature spine-like projections that likely support a low rate of deposition (0.02 to 0.06 m s−1) (Barnes et al. Reference Barnes, Pacheco, Landuyt, Hu and Portnoy2001; Kanter et al. Reference Kanter, Heller, Durner, Winkler, Engel, Behrendt, Holzinger, Braun, Hauser, Ferreira, Mayer and Pfeifer2013). In addition, self-incompatibility has been documented in giant ragweed, which promotes PMGF despite being monoecious. Bassett and Crompton (Reference Bassett and Crompton1982) reported flower heads bagged before flowering produced viable seeds after self-pollination, although plants generated from self-pollinated seeds had reduced vigor compared with seeds resulting from cross-pollination.

Figure 2. Giant ragweed inflorescence. (A) Initiation of male flowers and (B) seed clusters at the base of the flower heads.

Herbicide Resistance in Giant Ragweed

Giant ragweed has evolved resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides (Heap Reference Heap2020a; Marion et al. Reference Marion, Davis and Stoltenberg2017; Patzoldt and Tranel Reference Patzoldt and Tranel2002), 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS)-inhibiting herbicide glyphosate (Harre et al. Reference Harre, Nie, Robertson, Johnson, Weller and Young2017; Regnier et al. Reference Regnier, Harrison, Loux, Holloman, Venkatesh, Diekmann, Taylor, Ford, Stoltenberg, Hartzler, Davis, Schutte, Cardina, Mahoney and Johnson2016) and multiple resistance to ALS and EPSPS inhibitors (Regnier et al. Reference Regnier, Harrison, Loux, Holloman, Venkatesh, Diekmann, Taylor, Ford, Stoltenberg, Hartzler, Davis, Schutte, Cardina, Mahoney and Johnson2016). Resistance to ALS inhibitors in giant ragweed is due to a tryptophan-to-leucine substitution at the 574 amino acid position (W574L position relative to Arabidopsis thaliana) (Marion et al. Reference Marion, Davis and Stoltenberg2017; Patzoldt and Tranel Reference Patzoldt and Tranel2002). The GR giant ragweed biotypes have two distinct phenotypes: a rapid response phenotype in which cell death or necrosis occurs within hours after glyphosate application in fully expanded mature leaves; and a nonrapid response phenotype that results in chlorosis in the meristematic tissues during the first week or cessation of normal growth with no visible symptoms (Moretti et al. Reference Moretti, Van Horn, Robertson, Segobye, Weller, Young, Johnson, Douglas Sammons, Wang, Ge, d’ Avignon, Gaines, Westra, Green, Jeffery, Lespérance, Tardif, Sikkema, Christopher Hall, McLean, Lawton and Schulz2018; Van Horn et al. Reference Van Horn, Moretti, Robertson, Segobye, Weller, Young, Johnson, Schulz, Green, Jeffery, Lespérance, Tardif, Sikkema, Hall, McLean, Lawton, Sammons, Wang, Westra and Gaines2018). The precise mechanism of glyphosate resistance in ragweed is not known (Ganie et al. Reference Ganie, Jugulam, Varanasi and Jhala2017a; Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Takano, Van Horn, Yerka, Westra and Stoltenberg2020); however, in collaborative studies conducted with several GR populations across the United States and Canada, researchers concluded that the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in the rapid-response biotype appears to be different compared with the known target-site or non–target-site resistance mechanisms and involves production of reactive oxygen species (Moretti et al. Reference Moretti, Van Horn, Robertson, Segobye, Weller, Young, Johnson, Douglas Sammons, Wang, Ge, d’ Avignon, Gaines, Westra, Green, Jeffery, Lespérance, Tardif, Sikkema, Christopher Hall, McLean, Lawton and Schulz2018; Van Horn et al. Reference Van Horn, Moretti, Robertson, Segobye, Weller, Young, Johnson, Schulz, Green, Jeffery, Lespérance, Tardif, Sikkema, Hall, McLean, Lawton, Sammons, Wang, Westra and Gaines2018). A recent study revealed that a novel mechanism confers glyphosate resistance in non–rapid-response type giant ragweed from Wisconsin and more investigation is needed (Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Takano, Van Horn, Yerka, Westra and Stoltenberg2020).

PMGF from HR to Susceptible Giant Ragweed

PMGF has been reported in giant ragweed. Ganie and Jhala (Reference Ganie and Jhala2017) used glyphosate resistance (nonrapid-response type) as a selective marker to quantify the PMGF and the dissemination of resistance alleles from a GR population (a pollen source) to a glyphosate-susceptible population (a pollen receptor). In this 2-yr study, PMGF ranged from 43% to 60% at less than 0.5 m and 3% to 4% at 50 m from the edge of pollen source. In the same study, a double exponential-decay model predicted 90% reduction in PMGF at 49.5 m in year 1 and 106.6 m in year 2. Similarly, Brabham et al. (Reference Brabham, Gerber and Johnson2011) reported 31% PMGF between GR (rapid-response type) and glyphosate-susceptible giant ragweed planted in rows at 0.76 m apart. These studies provided empirical gene flow rates and experimental evidence to support the hypotheses of spread of resistance alleles through PMGF. High rates of PMGF explain the high level of phenotypic plasticity and genetic diversity in this species and should be considered when implementing management plans before plants reach the reproductive stage.

With little fitness cost associated with cloransulam or glyphosate resistance in giant ragweed (Glettner and Stoltenberg Reference Glettner and Stoltenberg2015; Marion et al. Reference Marion, Davis and Stoltenberg2017), herbicide-resistance traits may have a greater likelihood for wide dissemination due to PMGF and possible introgression (i.e., permanent fixation of the trait in the gene pool of natural, wild populations) over time (Ellstrand et al. Reference Ellstrand, Prentice and Hancock1999; Stewart et al. Reference Stewart, Halfhill and Warwick2003). Surveys in Indiana showed that GR giant ragweed spread from 15% to 39% of Indiana counties from 2006 to 2014 (Harre et al. Reference Harre, Nie, Robertson, Johnson, Weller and Young2017). Furthermore, it is possible that PMGF between neighboring giant ragweed populations resistant to ALS inhibitors or glyphosate may have resulted in multiple HR populations (Regnier et al. Reference Regnier, Harrison, Loux, Holloman, Venkatesh, Diekmann, Taylor, Ford, Stoltenberg, Hartzler, Davis, Schutte, Cardina, Mahoney and Johnson2016). Harre et al. (Reference Harre, Nie, Robertson, Johnson, Weller and Young2017) reported that in Indiana, 43 of 53 giant ragweed populations were GR where five and 16 populations displayed rapid-response or nonrapid-response phenotypes, respectively; 22 populations had both rapid-response and nonrapid-response phenotypes. Therefore, it is possible that PMGF between rapid-response and nonrapid-response GR giant ragweed biotypes have integrated two mechanisms of glyphosate resistance into a single biotype.

Interspecific Hybridization and Gene Flow in Ambrosia species

Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.; 2n = 36) is a closely related species of giant ragweed. These two species require somewhat similar climatic conditions and grow in common habitats but display some phenological differences such as plant height and leaf shape (Figure 3). They have overlapping flowering times and possess commonalities in their floral biology and breeding systems, both are monoecious and wind pollinated (Bassett and Crompton Reference Bassett and Crompton1975). Interspecific gene flow between giant ragweed and common ragweed is possible, although it is rare in nature (Vincent and Cappadocia Reference Vincent and Cappadocia1987; Vincent et al. Reference Vincent, Lauzer and Cappadocia1988). Vincent and Cappadocia (Reference Vincent and Cappadocia1987) reported that common ragweed × giant ragweed hybrids were easily produced, compared with giant ragweed × common ragweed, due to the postzygotic barrier of interspecific incompatibility in the latter crosses that required embryo rescue to produce viable hybrids. Common ragweed has evolved resistance to several herbicide SOAs including ALS, EPSPS, PS II, and protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicides. Multiple HR biotypes include resistance to ALS + EPSPS, ALS + PPO, and ALS + EPSPS + PPO inhibitors (Heap Reference Heap2020a). Consequently, common ragweed and giant ragweed growing in proximity in the same habitat create the potential for interspecific hybridization and possible transfer of herbicide-resistance alleles.

Figure 3. Coexistence of Ambrosia species, common ragweed and giant ragweed, growing at the same height in a soybean field. Interspecific gene transfer is possible between the species.

Horseweed

Horseweed, also known as marestail, Canada fleabane, and Canadian horseweed, is a forb commonly found in meadows, farmland, orchards (Ford et al. Reference Ford, Soltani, Mcfadden, Nurse, Robinson and Sikkema2014; Shrestha et al. Reference Shrestha, Herbree and Wright2008), and agronomic crops (Bhowmik and Bekech Reference Bhowmik and Bekech1993; Chahal and Jhala Reference Chahal and Jhala2019). The plant has one to several erect stems and can reach a height of 1 to 2 m (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; Regehr and Bazzaz Reference Regehr and Bazzaz1979). Horseweed inflorescences, also known as capitula (a capitulum is a collection of 16 to 22 individual flowers, both ray and disc flowers), are numerous and have very small heads, 2 to 4 mm tall and 2 to 4 mm wide (Ford et al. Reference Ford, Soltani, Mcfadden, Nurse, Robinson and Sikkema2014). In addition to competing with agronomic crops for resources and reducing yields, horseweed is a problematic weed in no-till crop production systems because of the small, wind-dispersed seeds that cannot germinate from soil depths much greater than approximately 3 mm and evolution of resistance to several herbicide chemistries (Davis and Johnson Reference Davis and Johnson2008; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; VanGessel Reference VanGessel2001; Weaver Reference Weaver2001). It can emerge throughout the year, except in winter months when temperature is not favorable (Ford et al. Reference Ford, Soltani, Mcfadden, Nurse, Robinson and Sikkema2014); however, early fall or spring are the seasons when the majority of horseweed emerge, depending on location, moisture, and weather (Buhler and Owen Reference Buhler and Owen1997; Holm et al. Reference Holm, Doll, Holm, Pancho and Herberger1997; Nandula et al. Reference Nandula, Eubank, Poston, Koger and Reddy2006; Regehr and Bazzaz Reference Regehr and Bazzaz1979).

Reproductive Biology of Horseweed

Horseweed is a monoecious species with perfect flowers (Shields et al. Reference Shields, Dauer, Van Gessel and Neumann2006), and when the capitula are closed, self-pollination can occur (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015). After the flowers are fully opened, horseweed releases pollen, largely influenced by its biological characteristics, ambient meteorological conditions, and geographic location (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; Ye et al. Reference Ye, Huang, Alexander, Liu, Millwood, Wang and Stewart2016). As a result, pollen production during the flowering season fluctuates day to day and year to year (Aboulaich et al. Reference Aboulaich, Achmakh, Bouziane, Trigo, Recio and Kadiri2013). Horseweed pollen is lightweight and has a low settling speed (i.e., the downward-motion speed of a pollen particle in still air) and primarily carried by wind (Aylor Reference Aylor2002), although insect pollination has not been ruled out, because insects visit horseweed flower (Davis et al. Reference Davis, Kruger, Hallett, Tranel and Johnson2010). The settling speed of horseweed pollen is 0.019 m s−1; their density is 1,218 kg m−3 (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Huang, Ye, Li and Stewart2017). Horseweed pollen diameter ranges from 16 to 22 µm (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015). The diameter may vary during the flight, because of dehydration (Aylor Reference Aylor2003), which affects the settling velocity of pollen (up to 30%) when moving in the air (Chamecki et al. Reference Chamecki, Gleicher, Dufault and Isard2011). After approximately 10 to 12 d of flowering, the seeds start to mature (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015). A single plant can produce a substantial number of seeds, which subsequently become windborne with the aid of a pappus (Bhowmik and Bekech Reference Bhowmik and Bekech1993; Weaver Reference Weaver2001).

Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015) in Illinois and Ye et al. (Reference Ye, Huang, Alexander, Liu, Millwood, Wang and Stewart2016) in Tennessee reported that the total number of pollen grains generated from horseweed was 2.3 to 5.1 × 106 plant−1 during a pollination season. Diurnal pollen release started around 9 AM and the peak release was around 1:30 PM; little pollen was released after 7 PM. Approximately 79% of pollen was released between 9 AM and 7 PM (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; Ye et al. Reference Ye, Huang, Alexander, Liu, Millwood, Wang and Stewart2016). Seasonal pollen releases were multimodal (i.e., had multiple peaks) and lasted about approximately 60 d (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; Ye et al. Reference Ye, Huang, Alexander, Liu, Millwood, Wang and Stewart2016). A seasonal release pattern of horseweed pollen in a field study concluded that most pollen was deposited close to the source (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015). At 25 m from the source, the pollen deposition rate (pollen grains m−2) decreased to 18% of that at the horseweed source (148 m by 160 m source with a density of 9.5 plants m−2). Because the pollen size was small and the settling speed was slow (1.7 cm s−1), the pollen was lifted 80 to 100 m in the air in field experiments. Thus, pollen can be transported long distances. Smisek et al. (Reference Smisek, Doucet, Jones and Weaver1998) found that an average of 96% of florets were self-pollinated and that the adjacent GR and susceptible horseweed plants had a PMGF of 4%. Within a population, PMGF was reported to range from 1.2% to 14.5% (Loux et al. Reference Loux, Stachler, Johnson, Nice, Davis and Nordby2006).

Herbicide Resistance in Horseweed

The first reported case of herbicide resistance in horseweed was to paraquat in Japan in 1980 (Matsunaka and Ito Reference Matsunaka, Ito, Caseley, Cussans and Atkin1991). As of early 2020, there were 19 HR horseweed biotypes (Heap Reference Heap2020a). GR horseweed population was confirmed in Delaware in the United States in 2001 (VanGessel Reference VanGessel2001). Multiple HR horseweed biotypes, particularly those resistant to glyphosate and ALS inhibitors, have been confirmed and are widespread in corn-soybean cropping systems in the United States (Chahal and Jhala Reference Chahal and Jhala2019; Davis et al. Reference Davis, Kruger, Stachler, Loux and Johnson2009; Heap Reference Heap2020a).

PMGF from HR to Susceptible Horseweed

A field study conducted in Tennessee provided information about the release rate, release pattern, and pollen dispersal pattern of GR horseweed (Ye et al. Reference Ye, Huang, Alexander, Liu, Millwood, Wang and Stewart2016). Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015) conducted a field study in Illinois to measure horseweed pollen production, dispersal, and deposition, coupled with atmospheric data to reveal the release pattern and the factors that affect pollen release and dispersal. Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Qi, Huang, Ye, Li and Stewart2017) modeled the pollen dispersal on the basis of a Lagrangian statistical model. Like other weed species, pollen dispersal of horseweed is affected by many factors, including wind speed, atmospheric stability, size of the pollen source, pollen release rate, and presence of buffer plants. It has been estimated that a single horseweed plant can produce approximately 200,000 seeds (Smisek Reference Smisek1995; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Huang, Ye, Li and Stewart2017; Weaver Reference Weaver2001) with a 4% outcrossing rate (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart, DuBois and Wang2015; Smisek et al. Reference Smisek, Doucet, Jones and Weaver1998). Results revealed that one horseweed plant might be sufficient to spread glyphosate-resistance alleles through pollen movement (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qi, Huang, Ye, Li and Stewart2017). Because of the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in horseweed biotypes, the introgression to herbicide-susceptible plants might have happened relatively quickly (Chapman and Abbott Reference Chapman and Abbott2010; Okada et al. Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2015); however, little information is available concerning various stages of PMGF and introgression (Okada et al. Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2015; Yuan et al. Reference Yuan, Abercrombie, Cao, Halfhill, Zhou, Peng, Hu, Rao, Heck, Larosa and Sammons2010).

Interspecific Hybridization and Gene Flow in Erigeron Species

Adaptive introgression of herbicide resistance from horseweed to closely related species can result from interspecific hybridization (Gaines et al. Reference Gaines, Ward, Bekun, Preston, Leach and Westra2012; Okada et al. Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2013; Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2015). With the aid of microsatellite markers, evidence was obtained of interspecific hybridization between horseweed and a polypoid Erigeron species (syn. Conyza sp.), hairy fleabane [C. bonariensis (L.) Cronq.] (Okada et al. Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2013). However, it remains uncertain whether interspecific hybridization and introgression have occurred in nature between horseweed and hairy fleabane (Okada et al. Reference Okada, Hanson, Hembree, Peng, Shrestha, Stewart, Wright and Jasieniuk2015). Nevertheless, in the study of alleles between the two species, the low genetic structure and high value of genetic identity indicated there were exchanged alleles between hairy fleabane and horseweed. This provides additional evidence of the existence of PMGF between Erigeron species (Soares et al. Reference Soares, Fregonezi, Bassi, Mangolin, Collet, Junior and Machado2015).

Kochia

Kochia is a C4 annual, dicot weed native to Eurasia that is widespread in Europe and parts of temperate Asia, including China and Japan (Jalas and Suominen Reference Jalas and Suominen1980; Shu Reference Shu, Wu and Raven2003). Kochia is also widely naturalized in Africa and South America (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Doll, Holm, Pancho and Herberger1997). The plant was introduced into the Americas from Eurasia in the mid to late 1800s as an ornamental plant (Friesen et al. Reference Friesen, Beckie, Warwick and Van Acker2009). The competitiveness and persistence of kochia in cropland and ruderal (i.e., noncropped, disturbed) areas are aided by its ability to germinate at cool soil temperatures and emerge early in the growing season, grow rapidly, tolerate environmental stresses (e.g., heat, drought, salinity), and evolve resistance to multiple herbicide SOAs (Friesen et al. Reference Friesen, Beckie, Warwick and Van Acker2009). In North America, kochia has expanded northward in the Northern Great Plains of Canada (to 53°N) as well as southward in the High Plains of Texas (to 33°N) over the past 50 yr (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Weiss, Leeson, Olfert, Ivany and Blackshaw2002; Forcella Reference Forcella1985).

Reproductive Biology of Kochia

Kochia is self-compatible with moderate outcrossing; it produces protogynous flowers in which the stigmas emerge before anther development (Guttieri et al. Reference Guttieri, Eberlein and Thill1995; Stallings et al. Reference Stallings, Thill, Mallory-Smith and Shafii1995; Thompson et al Reference Thompson, Thill and Shafii1994). The stigmas usually emerge 1 wk before pollen is shed, are receptive to foreign pollen during that time, and deteriorate before anther dehiscence, thereby preventing self-pollination within the same flower. Pollen grains are spheroidal (20 to 40 μm diam) with a granular surface (Stallings et al. Reference Stallings, Thill, Mallory-Smith and Shafii1995). Pollen viability after dehiscence declines to approximately 30% after 1 d and 10% after 2 d under environmental conditions typically present during the pollination period: mid-day temperatures of 23 to 28 C and relative humidity of not more than 30% (Mulugeta et al. Reference Mulugeta, Fay and Dyer1992; Stallings et al. Reference Stallings, Thill, Mallory-Smith and Shafii1995). Wind is the primary pollination vector, although bees (Colletidae and Halictidae) can contribute to PMGF in kochia (Blackwell and Powell Reference Blackwell and Powell1981). Adult plants produce large amounts of pollen for extended periods (Mulugeta Reference Mulugeta1991), approximately 1 mo (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Hall and Johnson2016).

Herbicide-Resistance in Kochia

The PS-II inhibitor (triazine)-resistant kochia populations were discovered in Kansas and along railroads in Idaho and Iowa in 1976 in the United States (Heap Reference Heap2020a). In 1987, the first kochia biotype resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides was confirmed in a wheat field in Kansas, only 5 yr after introduction of these herbicides (Primiani et al. Reference Primiani, Cotterman and Saari1990; Saari et al. Reference Saari, Cotterman and Primiani1990). In Canada, ALS inhibitor–resistant kochia was first reported in 1988 in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (Morrison and Devine Reference Morrison and Devine1994). Since the mid 2000s, most kochia populations are resistant to ALS inhibitors (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Hall, Shirriff, Martin and Leeson2019b; Varanasi et al. Reference Varanasi, Godar, Currie, Dille, Thompson, Stahlman and Jugulam2015). Thus, area-wide incidence of ALS-inhibitor resistance in this species has progressed rapidly within 20 yr since first reported in the late 1980s (Heap Reference Heap2020a). Kochia populations with multiple herbicide resistance (namely to PS II and ALS inhibitors) were first reported in biotypes from Illinois and Indiana in 1995 (Foes et al. Reference Foes, Liu, Vigue, Stoller, Wax and Tranel1999). The only reported case outside of North America is ALS inhibitor–resistant kochia from the Czech Republic (Chodova and Mikulka Reference Chodova and Mikulka2000; Holá et al. Reference Holá, Kočová, Rothová, Chodová and Mikulka2004).

Kochia populations resistant to auxinic herbicides were first discovered in 1995 in Montana and North Dakota (Nandula and Manthey Reference Nandula and Manthey2002). To date, auxin-resistant biotypes have been reported in corn, wheat, or fallow fields in six states in the United States and two Canadian provinces (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Hall, Shirriff, Martin and Leeson2019b; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Currie, Jha and Stahlman2019a). GR kochia was first reported in Kansas in 2007 and now occurs in 10 states in the United States and three Canadian provinces (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Low, Hall, Sauder, Martin, Brandt and Shirriff2013, Reference Beckie, Hall, Shirriff, Martin and Leeson2019b; Hall et al. Reference Hall, Beckie, Low, Shirriff, Blackshaw, Kimmel and Neeser2014). The mechanism of glyphosate resistance in kochia is increased copy number and expression of the EPSPS enzyme, which is inhibited by glyphosate in susceptible plants (Wiersma et al. Reference Wiersma, Gaines, Preston, Hamilton, Giacomini, Buell, Leach and Westra2015). The EPSPS copy number correlates with level of glyphosate resistance, with four or more copies required for resistance to glyphosate when applied at labelled rates (Godar et al. Reference Godar, Stahlman, Jugulam and Dille2015; Varanasi et al. Reference Varanasi, Godar, Currie, Dille, Thompson, Stahlman and Jugulam2015). Inheritance of increased copy number follows a single-locus Mendelian pattern, because the gene copies are in a tandem array on a single chromosome (Jugulam et al. Reference Jugulam, Niehues, Godar, Koo, Danilova, Friebe, Sehgal, Varanasi, Wiersma, Westra, Stahlman and Gill2014). Therefore, PMGF may contribute to an increase in EPSPS copy number and, therefore, levels of resistance to glyphosate. In Manitoba, where kochia is much less abundant, the incidence of glyphosate resistance in kochia increased from two fields (less than 1% of sites surveyed) in 2013 (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Gulden, Shaikh, Johnson, Willenborg, Brenzil, Shirriff, Lozinski and Ford2015) to 59% of fields in 2018 (Geddes et al. Reference Geddes, Ostendorf, Gulden, Jones, Leeson, Shirriff, Sharpe and Beckie2019). In the 2017 Alberta survey, 18% of kochia populations from nine counties were resistant to dicamba (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Hall, Shirriff, Martin and Leeson2019b) compared with none in 2012 (Hall et al. Reference Hall, Beckie, Low, Shirriff, Blackshaw, Kimmel and Neeser2014). Moreover, 10% of the populations in the 2017 survey were triple resistant to ALS inhibitors, glyphosate, and synthetic auxins. In surveys conducted in Colorado, 14% of fields in 2012, 15% in 2013, and 20% in 2014 had populations resistant to both glyphosate and dicamba (Westra et al. Reference Westra, Nissen, Getts, Westra and Gaines2019).

PMGF from HR to Susceptible Kochia

The PMGF in kochia contributes to short-distance (less than 1 km) propagule dispersal. Studies in the western United States using ALS-inhibitor resistance as a marker have indicated that kochia is primarily self-pollinated, although moderate outcrossing can occur. The PMGF between ALS inhibitor–resistant (donor) and susceptible (receptor) plants occurred at a maximum rate of 13% at a distance of 1.5 m and declined to 1.4% at 29 m, the farthest distance sampled (Mallory-Smith et al. Reference Mallory-Smith, Thill and Stallings1993; Stallings et al. Reference Stallings, Thill, Mallory-Smith and Shafii1995). In another PMGF study, 4% of progeny of susceptible plants transplanted within an ALS inhibitor–resistant kochia field population were resistant (Mulugeta et al. Reference Mulugeta, Fay and Dyer1992).

Although western Canadian kochia populations have greater than expected levels of homozygosity (Martin et al. Reference Martin, Benedict, Sauder, Beckie and Hall2018), moderate levels of PMGF in the species were confirmed. Using glyphosate resistance as a marker, PMGF from resistant to susceptible plants averaged 6.4% at 0-m distance and exponentially declined to 0.25% at 96 m (farthest distance sampled; Figure 4) (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Hall and Johnson2016). The predicted distance for 50% and 90% reduction in PMGF was at 3.3 m and 13.9 m, respectively. However, PMGF was markedly influenced by prevailing wind direction during the pollination period (over 1 mo), with a maximum PMGF of 17% downwind. The PMGF study in the United States was conducted in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) field (Stallings et al. Reference Stallings, Thill, Mallory-Smith and Shafii1995), whereas the Canadian study was conducted in a fallow field (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Hall and Johnson2016) that favored PMGF because of lack of potential crop-pollen competition or the crop canopy acting as a wind break. Nevertheless, PMGF in kochia, using different herbicide resistance markers under cropped and noncropped conditions, were relatively similar in both studies.

Figure 4. Pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF) from a glyphosate-resistant kochia pollen source to varying distances of glyphosate-susceptible receptor plants at a field site at Saskatchewan, Canada, in (A) 2014 and (B) 2015. (Adapted from Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Hall and Johnson2016)

Interspecific Hybridization and Gene Flow in Kochia

Interspecific hybridization has not been reported in kochia. Both green molly [Bassia americana S. Watson) A.J. Scott] and rusty molly [B. californica S. Watson) A.J. Scott] are native perennial subshrubs, whereas forage kochia [B. prostrata (L.) A.J. Scott] is a recently naturalized species found in the western United States (Mosyakin Reference Mosyakin2003). No hybrids were obtained in artificial crosses between B. americana × B. scoparia (female × male) and B. prostrata × B. scoparia (female × male) (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Kim, Wang and Waldron2005).

Palmer Amaranth

Palmer amaranth is an annual, broadleaf species native to the deserts of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico, where the leaves and seeds of the species historically served as a food source for indigenous people (Ehleringer Reference Ehleringer1983; Moerman Reference Moerman1998; Sauer Reference Sauer1957, Reference Sauer1967). Palmer amaranth has since migrated east- and northward across the North American continent, where it has become one of the most problematic weeds in corn, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and soybean, among other crops (Webster and Nichols Reference Webster and Nichols2012); the species can now be found in parts of Africa, Europe, and South America, where its presence is associated with agricultural activities (Kistner and Hatfield Reference Kistner and Hatfield2018; Runquist et al. Reference Runquist, Lake, Tiffin and Moeller2019). Although Palmer amaranth’s range expansion, to date, has largely been driven by human-mediated dispersal events (e.g., contaminated seed, movement on equipment), models predict that climate change will help facilitate its spread into other geographic regions (Kistner and Hatfield Reference Kistner and Hatfield2018; Runquist et al. Reference Runquist, Lake, Tiffin and Moeller2019).

Palmer amaranth is characterized as being erect, tall (1 to 2 m or taller), and frequently branched with elliptical to obovate, hairless leaves arranged in an alternate pattern around the stem (Mosyakin and Robertson Reference Mosyakin and Robertson2008). Plants may appear poinsettia-like when viewed from above, although considerable plasticity in form and structure has been observed (Bravo et al. Reference Bravo, Leon, Ferrell, Mulvaney and Wood2017). Petioles are often longer than the leaf blades, which may display a white or purple chevron on the upper side (Mosyakin and Robertson Reference Mosyakin and Robertson2008). Palmer amaranth has a high photosynthetic rate (81 µmol m−2 s−1) compared with other C4 plants; this allows Palmer amaranth to quickly accumulate significant amounts of biomass, which results in growth rates of more than 5 cm day−1 under optimal growing conditions (Ehleringer Reference Ehleringer1983; Horak and Loughlin Reference Horak and Loughin2000). Keeley et al. (Reference Keeley, Carter and Thullen1987), MacRae et al. (Reference MacRae, Webster, Sosnoskie, Culpepper and Kichler2013), and Sellers et al. (Reference Sellers, Smeda, Johnson, Kendig and Ellersieck2003) reported that thousands to hundreds of thousands of seed could be produced by individual female Palmer amaranth plants depending on emergence time and the intensity of competitive interactions.

Reproductive Biology of Palmer Amaranth

Palmer amaranth is dioecious; male (pistillate) and female (staminate) flowers are produced on separate plants (Figure 5A and 5B) in long, terminal inflorescences (Figure 6) that may be either solitary or branched and may droop with age (Mosyakin and Robertson Reference Mosyakin and Robertson2008). On the basis of flowering morphology, Amaranthus species are placed in two subgenera: Amaranthus and Acnidia (Sauer Reference Sauer1957). Palmer amaranth and waterhemp belong to the subgenus Acnida (L.) Aellen ex K. R. Robertson (Borsch Reference Borsch1998). Male inflorescences can be distinguished from the female flower spikes by touch; male flowers lack the sharp, stiff bracts that subtend female flowers and thus feel softer (Mosyakin and Robertson Reference Mosyakin and Robertson2008). Flowering in Palmer amaranth usually starts in summer and continues into fall, although it may also occur during the spring and winter in the southernmost part of the species’ native range (Mosyakin and Robertson Reference Mosyakin and Robertson2008). Keeley et al. (Reference Keeley, Carter and Thullen1987) demonstrated that Palmer amaranth flowering responses are influenced by day length; shorter days hasten flowering, which, in turn, reduces plant size and seed set.

Figure 5. Palmer amaranth. (left) Anthers and (right) female flowers.

Figure 6. Palmer amaranth inflorescence. (Left) male plants and (right) female plants.

Male Palmer amaranth plants can produce substantial amounts of wind-dispersed pollen grains that are spherical and covered in surface pores (Borsch Reference Borsch1998; Franssen et al. Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib and Horak2001a; Tsukada Reference Tsukada1967; Walkington Reference Walkington1960). Mean pollen-grain diameter is reported to range from 20 to 31 µm depending on pollen collection timing (i.e., from unopened or opened anthers) and visualization or size determination methodology (i.e., using electron or light microscopy or an electronic particle sizer) (Durham Reference Durham1946; Franssen et al. Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib and Horak2001a; Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, Dales, Rains, Grey and Culpepper2009; Vaissière and Vinson Reference Vaissière and Vinson1994). One significant result from Franssen et al. (Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib and Horak2001a) is the observation that pollen size and morphology differed with respect to reproductive biology, with the notable exception of Palmer amaranth, which was more like the monoecious amaranths in appearance (both size and pore density). Sosnoskie et al. (Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, Dales, Rains, Grey and Culpepper2009) estimated the mean density of fully hydrated Palmer amaranth pollen grains to be 1,218 kg m−3. Using Stokes’s law, the estimated settling velocity for individual Palmer amaranth pollen grains ranged from 0.015 to 0.05 m s−1. Results from laboratory studies conducted using a settling chamber showed that most Palmer amaranth pollen grains fell at a rate of 0.05 m s−1. The difference between the theoretical and observed estimates of settling velocity was suggested to be a function of changes in pollen density and shape, due to desiccation postanthesis, as well as the presence of pollen clusters, which may affect the movement of nearby solitary grains (Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, Dales, Rains, Grey and Culpepper2009).

Herbicide Resistance in Palmer Amaranth

As of 2020, there were 65 reported cases of Palmer amaranth with resistance to herbicides across eight SOAs (ALS, microtubule, PS II, EPSPS, PPO, long-chain fatty acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors, and synthetic auxins) in Argentina, Brazil, Israel, and the United States (Heap Reference Heap2020a). The first incidence of herbicide resistance in Palmer amaranth was to trifluralin and other dinitroanilines confirmed in 1989 in South Carolina (Gossett et al. Reference Gossett, Murdock and Toler1992). The first GR Palmer amaranth was confirmed in Georgia (Culpepper et al. Reference Culpepper, Grey, Vencill, Kichler, Webster, Brown, York, Davis and Hanna2006). The most recent documented occurrence was to 2,4-D, with potential cross-resistance to other auxin herbicides in Kansas (Heap Reference Heap2020a). There have been 18 confirmed cases of multiple herbicide resistance in Palmer amaranth, the majority (n = 16) of which are to two SOAs (Heap Reference Heap2020a). Reports have documented multiple resistance to four herbicide SOAs in Kansas (ALS, EPSPS, and PS II inhibitors, and synthetic auxins) (Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Liu, Boyer and Stahlman2019b) and to five SOAs in Arkansas (ALS, EPSPS, long-chain fatty acid, microtubule, and PS-II inhibitors) (Heap Reference Heap2020a).

PMGF from HR to Susceptible Palmer Amaranth

Field experiments were conducted in cotton and soybean fields in Georgia to evaluate PMGF from GR to susceptible Palmer amaranth using a source and receptor experimental design for 2 yr (Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, MacRae, Grey and Culpepper2012). The site was a 30-ha field planted alternately to cotton and soybean with a 0.01-ha center block planted to a GR Palmer amaranth biotype. Glyphosate-susceptible Palmer amaranth plants were planted at distances between 1 and 300 m from the edge of the GR source in the four cardinal and four ordinal directions to account for daily variability in wind flow patterns during peak pollination hours. Across all distances, the mean percentage of GR progeny ranged from 18% to 80%, with a trend toward fewer resistant offspring at the farthest distance from the source. The proportion of resistant individuals at each distance from the GR pollen source was greater in this trial compared with a similar study conducted in Nebraska in waterhemp, a closely related species of Palmer amaranth (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic, Lindquist and Jhala2017). It is unknown if apomixis (i.e., asexual seed formation) may have affected seed set and observed resistance patterns (Ribeiro et al. Reference Ribeiro, Pan, Duke, Nandula, Baldwin, Shaw and Dayan2014; Trucco et al. Reference Trucco, Zheng, Woodyard, Walter, Tatum, Rayburn and Tranel2007).

Waterhemp

Waterhemp is a summer annual, competitive broadleaf weed native to the Great Plains of North America (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Davis and Tranel2012). It is the most abundant and widely distributed weed, particularly in corn-soybean production systems, in the Midwestern United States (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Sarangi, Chahal, Saxena, Bagavathianan, Chauhan, Jha and Jugulam2017a; Prince et al. Reference Prince, Shaw, Givens, Owen, Weller, Young, Wilson and Jordan2012). The interference of waterhemp in corn-soybean cropping systems reduces grain yield and quality, depending on density, as well as hindering harvest (Steckel Reference Steckel2007). Waterhemp was first reported in Oklahoma in 1830 (Sauer Reference Sauer1957) and has since expanded from a rare wetland weed to an economically important weed in several agronomic crops in the Midwestern agriculture landscape (Trucco et al. Reference Trucco, Tatum, Rayburn and Tranel2009). The widespread occurrence and invasion of waterhemp are due to its ability to adapt and survive in a wide range of climatic conditions, including the ability to survive and produce seeds under water-stressed conditions (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Irmak, Lindquist, Knezevic and Jhala2016).

Reproductive Biology of Waterhemp

Waterhemp is a dioecious species with male and female inflorescences present on separate plants (Figure 7A and 7B). Pollen grains of waterhemp are spherical and very small (18.5 μm diam) with golf ball–like aperture arrangement (Franssen et al. Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib and Horak2001a). Franssen et al. (Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib and Horak2001a) reported that pollen grains of waterhemp had more apertures on the visible surface compared with monoecious Amaranthus species. Flowers of waterhemp are contained on long, slender inflorescences (Figure 7A and 7B). The lower pollen settling velocity of waterhemp (0.0185 to 0.021 m s−1) compared with major wind-pollinated crops such as corn (Costea et al. Reference Costea, Weaver and Tardif2005) help pollen grains travel longer distances under pollen competition (Raynor et al. Reference Raynor, Ogden and Hayes1972).

Figure 7. Waterhemp inflorescences of (A) male and (B) female plants.

Herbicide Resistance in Waterhemp

The widespread occurrence of waterhemp in the midwestern United States is partly due to its rapid evolution of resistance to many herbicide SOAs in the past two decades. GR waterhemp in the United States was first reported in Missouri in 2006 (Legleiter and Bradley Reference Legleiter and Bradley2008) and has now been confirmed in 22 states (Heap Reference Heap2020b) and in Ontario, Canada (Schryver et al. Reference Schryver, Soltani, Hooker, Robinson, Tranel and Sikkema2017). In addition, waterhemp biotypes resistant to ALS inhibitors (Horak and Peterson Reference Horak and Peterson1995; Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Sandell, Knezevic, Aulakh, Lindquist, Irmak and Jhala2015), PS-II inhibitors (Anderson et al. Reference Anderson, Roeth and Martin1996), PPO inhibitors (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Stephens, Barker, Patterson, Gaines and Jhala2019; Shoup et al. Reference Shoup, Al-Khatib and Peterson2003), 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors (Hausman et al. Reference Hausman, Singh, Tranel, Riechers, Kaundun, Polge, Thomas and Hager2011; Oliveira et al. Reference Oliveira, Jhala, Ganines, Irmak, Amundsen, Scott and Knezevic2017), and 2,4-D (Bernards et al. Reference Bernards, Crespo, Kruger, Gaussoin and Tranel2012) have been confirmed. Multiple HR biotypes have been identified, including glyphosate, ALS-, and PPO-inhibitor resistance in Nebraska (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Stephens, Barker, Patterson, Gaines and Jhala2019), atrazine, glyphosate, ALS-, and PPO-inhibitor resistance in Illinois (Bell et al. Reference Bell, Hager and Tranel2013), and a six-way SOA-resistant biotype (2,4-D, atrazine, chlorimuron, glyphosate, fomesafen, and mesotrione) in Missouri (Shergill et al. Reference Shergill, Barlow, Bish and Bradley2018).

PMGF from HR to Susceptible Waterhemp

The dioecy and wind-pollinated nature of waterhemp are believed to promote the rapid spread of herbicide-resistance alleles in an agricultural landscape via pollen migration. Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Davis and Tranel2012) conducted greenhouse and field experiments to determine pollen biology and dispersal dynamics in waterhemp and revealed that waterhemp pollen can remain viable up to 120 h and pollen dispersal declined exponentially with distance, with most pollen fertilizing recipient plants within 50 m; however, a rare gene-flow event was observed at 800 m. A multiyear field study was conducted in Nebraska to evaluate PMGF from GR to susceptible waterhemp and role of wind direction (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic, Lindquist and Jhala2017). More than 130,000 waterhemp plants were screened and 26,199 plants were confirmed GR. The PMGF declined by 50% at less than 3 m from the pollen source. The greatest gene flow ranged from 54% to 38% at 0.1-m distance from the pollen source during both years of the study, with gene flow decreasing with increasing distance; however, 5% to 9% gene flow was detected at the farthest distance of 50 m (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic, Lindquist and Jhala2017). Mallory-Smith et al. (Reference Mallory-Smith, Hall and Burgos2015) outlined procedures for conducting a PMGF study and noted that the phenotypic screening of herbicide resistance can be considered an excellent marker, though it should be supplemented with a molecular marker to confirm the resultant hybrid. Therefore, EPSPS gene copy-number analysis was conducted and it was determined that the mechanism of glyphosate resistance was gene amplification in the GR waterhemp parent used in this study, with the mean relative copy number of 5.3 (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic, Lindquist and Jhala2017). The researchers concluded that EPSPS gene amplification is heritable in waterhemp and can be transferred via pollen.

Interspecific Hybridization and Gene Flow in Amaranthus species

Amaranthus is one of the largest groups of weed species native to the Americas, with approximately 60 species present, and additional 25 species are present globally (Sauer Reference Sauer1957). Herbicide-resistance alleles can transfer via pollen and successful hybridization occurs between Amaranthus species, although, the numbers of successful crosses are typically low. For example, Wetzel et al. (Reference Wetzel, Horak, Skinner and Kulakow1999) documented the transfer of ALS-inhibitor resistance between Palmer amaranth and waterhemp, although only 15 potential hybrids resulted from 10 000 pollination events. Franssen et al. (Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib, Horak and Kulakow2001b) reported 35 confirmed hybrid plants from 44 000 seeds generated by crossing 11 female ALS inhibitor–sensitive waterhemp plants with male ALS inhibitor–resistant Palmer amaranth. Oliveira et al. (Reference Oliveira, Ganines, Patterson, Jhala, Irmak, Amundsen and Knezevic2018) conducted field experiments in Nebraska to determine interspecific and intraspecific transfer of metabolism-based mesotrione resistance in dioecious Amaranthus species. Results showed that 0.1% hybridization between waterhemp and Palmer amaranth occurred under field conditions. Gaines et al. (Reference Gaines, Ward, Bekun, Preston, Leach and Westra2012) described the results of a study examining transfer of glyphosate resistance from Palmer amaranth pollen donor to green amaranth (A. hybridus L.), Powell amaranth (A. powellii S. Watson), redroot pigweed (A. retroflexus L.), spiny amaranth (A. spinosus L.), and waterhemp under field and greenhouse conditions. Hybridization was observed between Palmer amaranth and green amaranth (less than0.01% in the field), Palmer amaranth and waterhemp (0.2% in the field), and Palmer amaranth and spiny amaranth (less than 0.01% to 0.4% in the field; 1.4% in the greenhouse). Nandula et al. (Reference Nandula, Wright, Bond, Ray, Eubank and Molina2014) reported that spiny amaranth resistant to glyphosate had a portion of EPSPS amplicon derived from resistant Palmer amaranth, suggesting a naturally occurring hybridization event between the species. The transfer of resistance traits between Palmer amaranth and spiny amaranth is likely because they have the same chromosome number (2n = 34), similar genome size, and produce comparably sized pollen (Franssen et al. Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib, Horak and Kulakow2001b; Rayburn et al. Reference Rayburn, McCloskey, Tatum, Bollero, Jeschke and Tranel2005).

Summary and Research Needs

The widespread occurrence of HR weeds has increased interest in the mechanisms of resistance-allele movement at the landscape level. Seed movement is the greatest contributor of HR allele dispersal; however, PMGF also contributes to HR allele movement, but little attention is usually given to this phenomenon. Reviewing the PMGF literature on common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, horseweed, kochia, Palmer amaranth, and waterhemp confirms that transfer of HR alleles is possible under field conditions and it is not a rare event. The potential for PMGF depends on many factors, including plant reproductive biology. Dioecious species such as Palmer amaranth and waterhemp are obligate-outcrossing, wind-pollinated species, which increases the potential for PMGF and subsequent transfer of resistance alleles compared with monoecious species. There is widespread GR Palmer amaranth in the southern region and GR waterhemp in the midwestern region of the United States, partially attributed to PMGF. In contrast, common lambsquarters has a high degree of self-pollination, which reduces the potential for PMGF. Even though there is relatively low-level PMGF in common lambsquarters, it still may be sufficient to facilitate long-term persistence of resistance allele in a population. Consequently, PMGF may still constitute an important mechanism of resistance-allele transfer in this species, which lacks a natural seed dispersal mechanism.

The species with efficient seed dispersal mechanisms such as horseweed, a monoecious species, has lightweight seeds that become windborne with the aid of pappus; thus, seeds are the primary contributor in transferring resistance alleles among populations compared with PMGF. Kochia populations resistant to glyphosate and synthetic auxins have increased rapidly over the past decade across the western Great Plains. Rapid range expansion of kochia across North America has been facilitated by efficient propagule (both seed and pollen) dispersal. Natural seed dispersal (via tumbling mechanism) aids both short- and long-distance spread of this species. The tumbleweed architecture is an efficient and effective adaptation for the dispersal of susceptible or HR weed seeds over long distances. Similarly, interpopulation PMGF of herbicide-resistance alleles has contributed to rapid area-wide expansion of HR kochia since the late 1980s.

To better quantify the spatial and temporal dynamics of PMGF and transfer of herbicide-resistance alleles, more information is needed about the reproductive biology of economically important HR weeds, including research on the longevity of pollen under different climatic conditions as well as flowering phenology and synchronicity with other compatible species (intra- and interspecific) across latitudes. Multiple HR weeds are of greatest concern for growers, scientists, and regulators. More research is needed on how PMGF transfers multiple HR alleles at a landscape level, particularly in dioecious species. On the basis of computer modeling, it has been estimated that climate change is likely to support the expansion of weed species into new geographic regions; therefore, more research is needed on how climate change may affect PMGF and introgression of herbicide-resistance alleles within and between compatible species.

Acknowledgments

This project was partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, with funding from the Hatch Act through the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Project no. NEB-22-396. Opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Illinois State Water Survey, the Prairie Research Institute, or the University of Illinois. No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Prashant Jha, Iowa State University

References

Aboulaich, N, Achmakh, L, Bouziane, H, Trigo, MM, Recio, M, Kadiri, M (2013) Effect of meteorological parameters on Poaceae pollen in the atmosphere of Tetouan (NW Morocco). Int J Biometeorol 57:197205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazaz, FA (1979a) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. I. Influence of species removal on the organization of plant community. New Phytol 83:813816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazaz, FA (1979b) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. III. Growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol 83:829838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DD, Roeth, FW, Martin, AR (1996) Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:570575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aper, J, Menchant, E, De Riek, J, Van Laere, K, Bulcke, R, Reheul, D (2012) Analysis of local spread of metamitron-resistant Chenopodium album patches in Belgium. Weed Res 52:421429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylor, DE (2002) Settling speed of corn (Zea mays) pollen. J Aerosol Sci 33(11): 16011607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylor, DE (2003) Rate of dehydration of corn (Zea mays L.) pollen in the air. J Exp Bot 54(391):23072312 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, AA, Zulfiqar, U, Sadia, S, Bhowmik, P, Chauhan, BS (2019) A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:53575371 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandeen, JD, McLaren, RD (1976) Resistance of Chenopodium album L. to triazine herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 56:41412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, C, Pacheco, F, Landuyt, J, Hu, F, Portnoy, J (2001) Hourly variation of airborne ragweed pollen in Kansas City. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 86:166171 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1975) The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Can J Plant Sci 55:463476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1978) The biology of Canadian weeds. 32. Chenopodium album L. Can J Plant Sci 58:10611072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci 62:10031010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, RE, Hall, LM, Johnson, EN (2016) Pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow in kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 64:624633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, RE, Low, R, Hall, LM, Sauder, CA, Martin, S, Brandt, RN, Shirriff, SW (2013) Glyphosate- and acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Sci 61:310318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Busi, R, Bagavathiannan, MV, Martin, SL (2019a) Herbicide resistance gene flow in weeds: under-estimated and under-appreciated. Agric Ecosyst Environ 283:106566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Gulden, RH, Shaikh, N, Johnson, EN, Willenborg, CJ, Brenzil, CA, Shirriff, SW, Lozinski, C, Ford, G (2015) Glyphosate-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.) in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Can J Plant Sci 95:345349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Hall, LM, Shirriff, SW, Martin, E, Leeson, JY (2019b) Triple-resistant kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] in Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 99:281285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Sauder, CA, Lozinski, C, Shirriff, S (2011) Occurrence and molecular characterization of acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Technol 25:170175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Weiss, RM, Leeson, JY, Olfert, OO (2002) Range expansion of kochia (Kochia scoparia) in North America under a changing climate. Pages 3346 in Ivany, JA, Blackshaw, RE, eds. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, Vol 8. Climate Change and the Canadian Agricultural Environment. Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada: Canadian Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Bell, MS, Hager, AG, Tranel, PJ (2013) Multiple resistance to herbicides from four site of action groups in waterhemp. Weed Sci 61:460468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Crespo, RJ, Kruger, GR, Gaussoin, R, Tranel, PJ (2012) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population resistant to 2,4-D. Weed Sci 60:379384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhowmik, PC, Bekech, MM (1993) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed production, emergence and distribution in no-till and conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays). Agron Trends Agri Sci 1:6771 Google Scholar
Blackwell, WH, Powell, MJ (1981) A preliminary note on pollination in the Chenopodiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 68:524526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsch, T (1998) Pollen types in the Amaranthaceae: morphology and evolutionary significance. Grana 37:129142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabham, CB, Gerber, CK, Johnson, WG (2011) Fate of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in the presence and absence of glyphosate. Weed Sci 59:506511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, W, Leon, RG, Ferrell, JA, Mulvaney, MJ, Wood, CW (2017) Differentiation of life-history traits among Palmer amaranth populations (Amaranthus palmeri) and its relation to cropping systems and glyphosate sensitivity. Weed Sci 65:339349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD, Owen, MDK (1997) Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 45:98101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CABI-ISC] Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. Invasive Species Compendium. 2019 Chenopodium album (fat hen). https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/12648 Accessed: May 15, 2020Google Scholar
Chahal, PS, Jhala, AJ (2019) Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with tillage and herbicides in soybean. Weed Technol 33:859866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamecki, M, Gleicher, SC, Dufault, NS, Isard, SA (2011) Diurnal variation in settling velocity of pollen released from maize and consequences for atmospheric dispersion and cross-pollination. Agric For Meteorol 151:10551065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, MA, Abbott, RJ (2010) Introgression of fitness genes across a ploidy barrier. New Phytol 186:6371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodova, D, Mikulka, J (2000) Resistance to imazapyr and cross resistance to selected sulfonylurea herbicides in kochia (Kochia scoparia S. L.). Rostl Vyroba 46:4954 Google Scholar
Costea, M, Weaver, SE, Tardif, FJ (2005) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 3. Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer var. rudis (Sauer) Costea & Tardif. Can J Plant Sci 85:507522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A, Grey, T, Vencill, W, Kichler, J, Webster, T, Brown, S, York, A, Davis, J, Hanna, W (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmency, H, Gasquez, J (1990) Appearance and spread of triazine resistance in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technol 4:173177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Johnson, WG (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity in no-till soybean. Weed Sci 56:231236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Hallett, SG, Tranel, PJ, Johnson, WG (2010) Heritability of glyphosate resistance in Indiana horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations. Weed Sci 58:3038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Stachler, JM, Loux, MM, Johnson, WG (2009) Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations resistant to glyphosate, ALS-inhibiting, and multiple (glyphosate + ALS-inhibiting) herbicides. Weed Sci 57:494504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGreeff, RD, Varanasi, AV, Dille, JA, Peterson, DE, Jugulam, M (2018) Influence of plant growth stage and temperature on glyphosate efficacy in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technol 32:448453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, OC (1946) The volumetric incidence of atmospheric allergens III. Rate of fall of pollen grains in still air. J Allergy 17:7078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehleringer, J (1983) Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a Sonoran Desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellstrand, NC, Prentice, HC, Hancock, JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, JA, Webb, EB, Pierce, RA, Bradley, KW (2017). Evaluating the potential for weed seed dispersal based on waterfowl consumption and seed viability. Pest Manag Sci 73:25922603 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foes, MJ, Liu, L, Vigue, G, Stoller, EW, Wax, LM, Tranel, PJ (1999) A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 47:2027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F (1985) Final distribution is related to rate of spread in alien weeds. Weed Res 25:181191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, L, Soltani, N, Mcfadden, A, Nurse, RE, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2014) Control of Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis) with glyphosate DMA/2,4-D choline applications in corn (Zea mays). J Agr Sci 5:7783 Google Scholar
Franssen, AS, Skinner, DZ, Al-Khatib, K, Horak, MJ (2001a) Pollen morphological differences in Amaranthus species and interspecific hybrids. Weed Sci 49:732737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franssen, AS, Skinner, DZ, Al-Khatib, K, Horak, MJ, Kulakow, PA (2001b) Interspecific hybridization and gene flow of ALS resistance in Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 49:598606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, LF, Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Van Acker, RC (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can J Plant Sci 89:141167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, TA, Ward, SM, Bekun, B, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2012) Interspecific hybridization transfers a previously unknown glyphosate resistance mechanism in Amaranthus species. Evol Applic 5:2938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, HT, Mallory-Smith, CA, Watson, CJW, Isabel Vales, M, Zemetra, RS, Riera-Lizarazu, O (2006) Hybridization between wheat and jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) under field conditions. Weed Sci 54:10731079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Jhala, AJ (2017) Modeling pollen-mediated gene flow from glyphosate-resistant to -susceptible giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) under field conditions. Sci Rep 7:17067 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganie, ZA, Jugulam, M, Varanasi, VK, Jhala, AJ (2017a) Investigating the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in a common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) biotype from Nebraska. Can J Plant Sci 97:11401151 Google Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Lindquist, JL, Jugulam, M, Kruger, GR, Marx, DB, Jhala, AJ (2017b). An integrated approach to control glyphosate-resistant Ambrosia trifida with tillage and herbicides in glyphosate-resistant maize. Weed Res 57:112122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Sandell, LD, Jugulam, M, Kruger, GR, Marx, DB, Jhala, AJ (2016) Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) with tillage and herbicides in soybean. Weed Technol 30:4556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasquez, J (1985) Breeding system and genetic structure of a Chenopodium album population according to crop and herbicide rotation. Pages 5766 in Jacquard, P, Heim, G, and Antonovics, J, eds. Genetic Differentiation and Dispersal in Plants. NATO ASI Series Vol G5. Berlin: Springer-Verlag CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, CM, Ostendorf, TE, Gulden, RH, Jones, T, Leeson, JY, Shirriff, SW, Sharpe, SM, Beckie, HJ (2019) Rapid spread of glyphosate-resistant kochia [Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scott] in Manitoba. In Proceedings, 2019 Canadian Weed Science Society Annual Meeting, Pinawa, Manitoba. https://www.weedscience.ca. Accessed: March 15, 2020.Google Scholar
Glettner, CE, Stoltenberg, DE (2015) Noncompetitive growth and fecundity of Wisconsin giant ragweed resistant to glyphosate. Weed Sci 63:273281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godar, AS, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M, Dille, JA (2015) Glyphosate-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in Kansas: EPSPS gene copy number in relation to resistance levels. Weed Sci 63:587595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossett, BJ, Murdock, EC, Toler, JE (1992) Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Technol 6:587591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J (2015) Dealing with transgene flow of crop protection traits from crops to their relatives. Pest Manag Sci 71:658667 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttieri, MJ, Eberlein, CV, Thill, DC (1995) Diverse mutations in the acetolactate synthase gene confer chlorsulfuron resistance in kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotypes. Weed Sci 43:175178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, LM, Beckie, HJ, Low, R, Shirriff, SW, Blackshaw, RE, Kimmel, N, Neeser, C (2014) Survey of glyphosate-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.) in Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 94:127130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, BD, Mallory-Smith, CA, Price, WJ, Shafii, B, Thill, DC, Zemetra, RS (2005) Interspecific hybridization: potential for movement of herbicide resistance from wheat to jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Technol 19:674682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harre, NT, Nie, H, Robertson, RR, Johnson, WG, Weller, SC, Young, BG (2017) Distribution of herbicide-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Indiana and characterization of distinct glyphosate-resistant biotypes. Weed Sci 65:699709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, NE, Singh, S, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Kaundun, SS, Polge, ND, Thomas, DA, Hager, AG (2011) Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Illinois, United States. Pest Manag Sci 67:258261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, IM (2020a) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/In.asp. Accessed: May 20, 2020Google Scholar
Heap, IM (2020b) Herbicide resistant tall waterhemp globally. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://weedscience.org/summary/species.aspx?WeedID=219. Accessed: May 16, 2020Google Scholar
Hite, GA, King, SR, Hagood, ES, Holtzman, GI (2008) Differential response of a Virginia common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) collection to glyphosate. Weed Sci 56:203209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holá, D, Kočová, M, Rothová, O, Chodová, D, Mikulka, J (2004) The effect of low growth temperature on Hill reaction and photosystem I activities in three biotypes of Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. with different sensitivity to atrazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Plant Soil Environ 50:1017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, LR, Doll, J, Holm, E, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1997) World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: J Wiley. Pp 226235 Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1977) Chenopodium album L. Pages 84-91 in Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP, eds. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, MJ, Peterson, DE (1995) Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol 9:192195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, H, Ye, R, Qi, M, Li, X, Miller, DR, Stewart, CN, DuBois, DW, Wang, J (2015) Wind-mediated horseweed (Conyza canadensis) gene flow: pollen emission, dispersion, and deposition. J Ecol Evol 5:26462658 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalas, J, Suominen, J, eds (1980) Atlas Florae Europaeae – Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe. Vol 5 (Chenopodiaceae to Basellaceae). Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Printing House. 119 pGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Bhatt, H, Keith, A, Hall, LM (2011) Pollen mediated gene flow in flax: can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist? Heredity 106:557566 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jhala, AJ, Hall, LM (2013) Risk assessment of herbicide resistant crops with special reference to pollen mediated gene flow. Pages 237254 in Price, AJ and Kelton, JA (eds.) Herbicides- Advances in Research. New York: In Tech Scientific Publisher Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Hall, LM, Hall, JC (2008). Potential hybridization of flax with wild and weedy species: an avenue for movement of engineered genes? Crop Sci 48:825840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Knezevic, SZ (2017) Gene flow and herbicide resistance. Pages 447449 in Thomas, B, Murray, BG, Murphy, DJ (eds.) Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences. 2nd edn. Vol 3. Waltham, MA: Academic Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Knezevic, SZ, Ganie, ZA, Singh, M (2014) Integrated weed management in corn (Zea mays L.). Pages 177196 in Chauhan, B. and Mahajan, G. (eds.) Recent Advances in Weed Management. New York: Springer Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Sarangi, D, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2017b) Control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in glufosinate-tolerant soybean. Weed Technol 31:3245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sarangi, D, Chahal, P, Saxena, A, Bagavathianan, M, Chauhan, B, Jha, P (2017a) Inter-specific gene flow from herbicide-tolerant crops to their wild relatives. Pages 87122 in Jugulam, M (ed) Biology, Physiology, and Molecular Biology of Weeds. Boca Raton, FL: Tylor and Francis Group CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Weselake, RJ, Hall, LM (2009). Genetically engineered flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): potential benefits, risks, regulations and mitigation of transgene movement. Crop Sci 49:19431954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jugulam, M, Niehues, K, Godar, AS, Koo, DH, Danilova, T, Friebe, B, Sehgal, S, Varanasi, VK, Wiersma, A, Westra, P, Stahlman, PW, Gill, BS (2014) Tandem amplification of a chromosomal segment harboring 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase locus confers glyphosate resistance in Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol 166:12001207 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanter, U, Heller, W, Durner, J, Winkler, JB, Engel, M, Behrendt, H, Holzinger, A, Braun, P, Hauser, M, Ferreira, F, Mayer, K, Pfeifer, Ernst D (2013) Molecular and immunological characterization of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) pollen after exposure of the plants to elevated ozone over a whole growing season. PLoS One 8:e61518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, HJ, Kim, DY, Moon, YE, Pack, IS, Park, KW, Chung, YS, Kim, YJ, Nam, KH, Kim, CG (2019) Gene flow from herbicide resistant transgenic soybean to conventional soybean and wild soybean. Applied Biological Chemistry 62: Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-019-0461-1. Accessed: August 15, 2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistner, EJ, Hatfield, JL (2018) Potential geographic distribution of Palmer amaranth under current and future climates. Ag Environ Lett 3:15 Google Scholar
Kniss, AR, Miller, SD, Westra, PH, Wilson, RG (2007) Glyphosate susceptibility in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) is influenced by parental exposure. Weed Sci 55:572577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krak, K, Vit, P, Belyayev, A, Douda, J, Hreusová, L, Mandák, B (2016) Allopolyploid origin of Chenopodium album s. str. (Chenopodiaceae): a molecular and cytogenetic insight. PLoS One 11(8):e0161063 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, V, Currie, RS, Jha, P, Stahlman, PW (2019a) First report of kochia (Bassia scoparia) with cross-resistance to dicamba and fluroxypyr in western Kansas. Weed Technol 33:335341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Liu, R, Boyer, G, Stahlman, PW (2019b) Confirmation of 2,4-D resistance and identification of multiple resistance in a Kansas Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) population. Pest Manag Sci 75:29252933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, BS, Kim, MY, Wang, R R-C, Waldron, BL (2005) Relationships among 3 Kochia species based on PCR-generated molecular sequences and molecular cytogenetics. Genome 48:11041115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Légère, A (2005) Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study. Pest Manag Sci 61:292300 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J, Davis, AS, Tranel, PJ (2012) Pollen biology and dispersal dynamics in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci 60:416422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M, Stachler, J, Johnson, B, Nice, G, Davis, V, Nordby, D (2006) Biology and Management of Horseweed. The Glyphosate, Weeds and Crops Series. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Extension. GWC-9. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Ma, BL, Subedi, KD, Reid, LM (2004) Extent of cross fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci 44:12731282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, AW, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Kichler, JM (2013) Cotton yield loss potential in response to length of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference. J Cotton Sci 17:227232 Google Scholar
Mahoney, KJ, McNaughton, KE, Sikkema, PH (2015) Control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in winter wheat. Weed Technol 29:868873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makra, L, Matyasovszky, I, Hufnagel, L, Tusnády, GE (2015) The history of ragweed in the world. Appl Ecol Env Res 13:489512 Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C, Hall, LM, Burgos, NR (2015) Experimental methods to study gene flow. Weed Sci 63:1222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C, Thill, DC, Stallings, GP (1993) Survey and gene flow in acetolactate synthase resistant kochia and Russian thistle. In Brighton Crop Prot Conf – Weeds. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council. Pp. 555558 Google Scholar
Mandák, B, Krak, K, Vit, P, Lomonosova, MN, Belyayev, A, Habibi, F, Wang, L, Douda, J, Štorchová, H (2018) Hybridization and polyploidization within the Chenopodium album aggregate analyzed by means of cytological and molecular markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol 129:189201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandák, B, Trávníček, P, Paštová, L, Kořínková, D (2012) Is hybridization involved in the evolution of the Chenopodium album aggregate? An analysis based on chromosome counts and genome size estimation. Flora 207:530540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, SM, Davis, VM, Stoltenberg, DE (2017) Characterization of Wisconsin giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) resistant to cloransulam. Weed Sci 65:4151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, SL, Benedict, L, Sauder, CA, Beckie, HJ, Hall, LM (2018) Kochia population genetics: panmictic prairie populations. Page 34 in Proceedings, 2018 Canadian Weed Science Society Annual Meeting. Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada: http://www.weedscience.ca. Accessed: April 10, 2019Google Scholar
Martins, BAB, Leonard, Jm, Sun, L, Zemetra, RS, Mallory-Smith, C (2016) Selection pressure effects on the proportion and movement of resistance alleles introgressed from wheat to Aegilops cylindrica . Weed Res 56:293303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsunaka, S, Ito, K (1991) Paraquat resistance in Japan. Pages 7786 in Caseley, JC, Cussans, G, Atkin, R (eds): Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, DE (1998) Native American Ethnobotany. Portland, OR: Timber. 927 pGoogle Scholar
Moretti, ML, Van Horn, CR, Robertson, R, Segobye, K, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Johnson, WG, Douglas Sammons, R, Wang, D, Ge, X, d’ Avignon, A, Gaines, TA, Westra, P, Green, AC, Jeffery, T, Lespérance, MA, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH, Christopher Hall, J, McLean, MD, Lawton, MB, Schulz, B (2018) Glyphosate resistance in Ambrosia trifida: Part 2. Rapid response physiology and non-target-site resistance. Pest Manag Sci 74:10791088 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, IN, Devine, MD (1994) Herbicide resistance in the Canadian Prairie provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75(Suppl):516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosyakin, S (2003) Kochia. Pages 310–312 in Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds). Flora of North America, North of Mexico, Vol 4: Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, part I http://www.efloras.org/volume_page.aspx?volume_id=1004&flora_id=1 Accessed: March 15, 2020Google Scholar
Mosyakin, SL, Robertson, KR (2008) 39. Amaranthaceae, 3. Amaranthus. Flora of North America http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=101257. Accessed: May 5, 2020Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D (1991) Management, inheritance, and gene flow of resistance chlorsulfuron in Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. M.Sc. thesis. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 134 pGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D, Fay, PK, Dyer, WE (1992) The role of pollen in the spread of sulfonylurea-resistant Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Page 16 in WSSA Abstracts, Vol. 32, Proceedings of the 1992 Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Nandula, VK, Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2006) Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 54:898902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Manthey, FA (2002) Response of kochia (Kochia scoparia) inbreds to 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Technol 16:5054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Wright, AA, Bond, JA, Ray, JD, Eubank, TW, Molina, WT (2014). EPSPS amplification in glyphosate-resistant spiny amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus): a case of gene transfer via interspecific hybridization from glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Pest Manag Sci 70:19021909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, NC, Wright, SD, Jasieniuk, M (2013) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis in California. J Evol Appl 6:761777 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, CN, Wright, SD, Jasieniuk, M (2015) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis in California and a comparison with closely related Conyza canadensis . Weed Res 55:173184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, MC, Ganines, T, Patterson, EL, Jhala, AJ, Irmak, S, Amundsen, K, Knezevic, SZ (2018) Interspecific and intraspecific transference of metabolism based mesotrione resistance in dioecious weedy Amaranthus . Plant J 96:10511063 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, MC, Jhala, AJ, Ganines, T, Irmak, S, Amundsen, K, Scott, JE, Knezevic, SZ (2017) Confirmation and control of HPPD-inhibiting herbicide-resistant waterhemp in Nebraska. Weed Technol 31:6779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oseland, E, Bish, M, Spinka, C, Bradley, K (2020) Examination of commercially available bird feed for weed seed contaminants. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 13:1422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ (2002) Molecular analysis of cloransulam resistance in a population of giant ragweed. Weed Sci 50:299305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, RJ (2004) Biological invasions at the gene level. Divers Distrib 10:159165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primiani, MM, Cotterman, JC, Saari, LL (1990) Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol 4:169172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, JM, Shaw, DR, Givens, WA, Owen, MDK, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Jordan, DL (2012) Benchmark study: I. Introduction, weed population, and management trends from the benchmark survey 2010. Weed Technol 26:525530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayburn, AL, McCloskey, R, Tatum, TC, Bollero, GA, Jeschke, MR, Tranel, PJ (2005) Genome size analysis of weedy Amaranthus species. Crop Sci 45:25572562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynor, GS, Ogden, EC, Hayes, JV (1972) Dispersion and deposition of corn pollen from experimental sources. Agron J 64:420427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regehr, DL, Bazzaz, FA (1979) The population dynamics of Erigeron canadensis, a successional winter annual. J Ecol 67:923933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK, Loux, MM, Holloman, C, Venkatesh, R, Diekmann, F, Taylor, R, Ford, RA, Stoltenberg, DE, Hartzler, RG, Davis, AS, Schutte, BJ, Cardina, J, Mahoney, KJ, Johnson, WG (2016) Certified crop advisors’ perceptions of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) distribution, herbicide resistance, and management in the corn belt. Weed Sci 64:361377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, DN, Pan, Z, Duke, SO, Nandula, VK, Baldwin, BS, Shaw, DR, Dayan, FE (2014). Involvement of facultative apomixis in inheritance of EPSPS gene amplification in glyphosate-resistant Amaranthus palmeri. Planta 239:199212 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieben, S, Kalinina, O, Schmid, B, Zeller, SL (2011) Gene flow in genetically modified wheat. PLoS One 6:e29730 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runquist, RDB, Lake, T, Tiffin, P, Moeller, DA (2019) Species distribution models throughout the invasion history of Palmer amaranth predict regions at risk of future invasion and reveal challenges with modeling rapidly shifting geographic ranges. Sci Rep 9:112 Google Scholar
Saari, LL, Cotterman, JC, Primiani, MM (1990) Mechanism of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistance in the broadleaf weed, Kochia scoparia . Plant Physiol 93:5561 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarangi, D, Irmak, S, Lindquist, JL, Knezevic, SZ, Jhala, AJ (2016) Effect of water stress on the growth and fecundity of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 64:4252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Jhala, AJ (2018) Comparison of a premix of atrazine, bicyclopyrone, mesotrione, and S-metolachlor with other pre-emergence herbicides for weed control and corn yield in no-tillage and reduced-tillage production systems in Nebraska, USA. Soil Tillage Res 178:8291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Sandell, LD, Knezevic, SZ, Aulakh, JS, Lindquist, JL, Irmak, S, Jhala, AJ (2015) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 29:8292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Stephens, T, Barker, AL, Patterson, EL, Gaines, TA, Jhala, AJ (2019) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitor–resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Nebraska is multiple herbicide resistant: confirmation, mechanism of resistance, and management. Weed Sci 67:510520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Tyre, AJ, Patterson, EL, Gaines, TA, Irmak, S, Knezevic, SZ, Lindquist, JL, Jhala, AJ (2017) Pollen-mediated gene flow from glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer): consequences for the dispersal of resistance genes. Sci Rep 7:article 44913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:1131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, JD (1967) The grain amaranths and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann Mo Bot Gard 54:103137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schryver, MG, Soltani, N, Hooker, DC, Robinson, DE, Tranel, PJ, Sikkema, PH (2017) Glyphosate-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) in Ontario, Canada. Can J Plant Sci 97:10571067 Google Scholar
Schuster, CL, Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K (2007) Response of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) to glyphosate as affected by growth stage. Weed Sci 55:147151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG, Kendig, JA, Ellersieck, MR (2003). Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Sci 51:329333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shergill, LS, Barlow, BR, Bish, MD, Bradley, KW (2018) Investigations of 2,4-D and multiple herbicide resistance in a Missouri waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population. Weed Sci 66:386394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, Van Gessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:10631067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2003) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 51:145150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A, Herbree, K, Wright, S (2008) Biology and management of horseweed and hairy fleabane in California. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources publication No.8314. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8314.pdf. Accessed: July 15, 2020Google Scholar
Shu, DF (2003) Kochia. Pages 384386 in Wu, ZI, Raven, PH, eds. Flora of China Vol 5 –Ulmaceae through Basellaceae. St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Google Scholar
Sivesind, EC, Gaska, JM, Jeschke, MR, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE (2011) Common lambsquarters response to glyphosate across environments. Weed Technol 25:4450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smisek, AJ (1995) The evolution of resistance to paraquat in populations of Erigeron canadensis L. London, Ontario, Canada: University of Western OntarioGoogle Scholar
Smisek, AJ, Doucet, C, Jones, M, Weaver, SE (1998) Paraquat resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and Virginia pepperweed (Lepidium virginicum) from Essex County, Ontario. Weed Sci 46:200204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, AA (2002) Transgenic crops – why gene flow matters. Nature Biotechnol 20:542 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, AAF, Fregonezi, AMDT, Bassi, D, Mangolin, CAM, Collet, SAOC, Junior, RSO, Machado, MFPS (2015) Evidence of high gene flow between samples of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) as revealed by isozyme polymorphisms. Weed Sci 63:604612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Dales, D, Rains, GC, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2009) Pollen grain size, density, and settling velocity for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 57:404409 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, MacRae, AW, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2012) Pollen-mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistance in Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, GP, Thill, DC, Mallory-Smith, CA, Shafii, B (1995) Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 43:95102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay. Weed Technol 21:567570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, CN, Halfhill, M, Warwick, S (2003) Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nat Rev Genet 4:806817 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, CR, Thill, DC, Shafii, B (1994) Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci 42:172179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trucco, F, Tatum, T, Rayburn, AL, Tranel, PJ (2009) Out of the swamp: unidirectional hybridization with weedy species may explain the prevalence of Amaranthus tuberculatus as a weed. New Phytol 184:819827 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trucco, F, Zheng, D, Woodyard, AJ, Walter, JR, Tatum, TC, Rayburn, AL, Tranel, PJ (2007) Nonhybrid progeny from crosses of dioecious amaranths: implications for gene-flow research. Weed Sci 55:119122 Google Scholar
Tsukada, M (1967) Chenopod and amaranth pollen: electron-microscopic identification. Science 157:8082 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaissière, BE, Vinson, SB (1994) Pollen morphology and its effect on pollen collection by honeybees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special reference to upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Malvaceae). Grana 33:128138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Horn, CR, Moretti, ML, Robertson, RR, Segobye, K, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Johnson, WG, Schulz, B, Green, AC, Jeffery, T, Lespérance, MA, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH, Hall, JC, McLean, MD, Lawton, MB, Sammons, RD, Wang, D, Westra, P, Gaines, TA (2018) Glyphosate resistance in Ambrosia trifida: part 1. Novel rapid cell death response to glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci 74: 10711078 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wychen, L (2017) 2017 survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in grass crops, pasture and turf in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci Soc Am National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2017-Weed-Survey_Grass-crops.xlsx Accessed: May 25, 2020Google Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2019) 2019 Survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in broadleaf crops, fruits and vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci Soc Am National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2019-Weed-Survey_broadleaf-crops.xlsx. Accessed: May 25, 2020Google Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Godar, AS, Currie, RS, Dille, AJ, Thompson, CR, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M (2015) Field-evolved resistance to four modes of action of herbicides in a single kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.) population. Pest Manag Sci 71:12071212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, G, Cappadocia, M (1987) Interspecific hybridization between common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (A. trifida). Weed Sci 35:633636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, G, Lauzer, D, Cappadocia, M (1988) Characterization of reciprocal hybrids of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, and giant ragweed, A. trifida . Weed Sci 36:574576 Google Scholar
Walkington, DL (1960) A survey of the hay fever plants and important atmospheric allergens in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. J Allergy 31:2541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Qi, M, Huang, H, Ye, R, Li, X, Stewart, CN (2017) Atmospheric pollen dispersion from herbicide-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L). J Aerobiologia 33:393406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Black, L (1980) Uniparental inheritance of atrazine resistance in Chenopodium album . Can J Plant Sci 60:751753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Marriage, PB (1982) Geographical variation in populations of Chenopodium album resistant and susceptible to atrazine. I. Between- and within-population variation in growth and response to atrazine. Can J Bot 60:483493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Simard, MJ, Legere, A, Beckie, HJ, Braun, L, Zhu, B, Mason, P, Seguin-Swartz, G, Stewart, CN (2003) Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz. Theor Appl Genet 107:528539 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, SE (2001) The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can J Plant Sci 81:867875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Nichols, RL (2012) Changes in the prevalence of weed species in the major agronomic crops of the Southern United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci 60:145157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westhoven, AM, Kruger, GR, Gerber, CK, Stachler, JM, Loux, MM, Johnson, WG (2008) Characterization of selected common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes with tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Sci 56:685691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, EP, Nissen, SJ, Getts, TJ, Westra, P, Gaines, TA (2019) Survey reveals frequency of multiple resistance to glyphosate and dicamba in kochia (Bassia scoparia). Weed Technol 33:664672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, DK, Horak, MJ, Skinner, DZ, Kulakow, PA (1999) Transferal of herbicide resistance traits from Amaranthus palmeri to Amaranthus rudis. Weed Sci 47:538543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiersma, AT, Gaines, TA, Preston, C, Hamilton, JP, Giacomini, D, Buell, CR, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2015) Gene amplification of 5-enol-pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase in glyphosate-resistant Kochia scoparia . Planta 241:463474 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, CE, Takano, HK, Van Horn, CR, Yerka, MK, Westra, P, Stoltenberg, DE (2020) Physiological and molecular analysis of glyphosate resistance in non-rapid response Ambrosia trifida from Wisconsin. Pest Manag Sci 76:150160 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfenbarger, LL, Phifer, PR (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290:20882093 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, R, Huang, H, Alexander, J, Liu, W, Millwood, RJ, Wang, J, Stewart, CN (2016) Field studies on dynamic of pollen production, deposition, and dispersion of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 64:101111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerka, MK, de Leon, N, Stoltenberg, DE (2012) Pollen-mediated gene flow in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) Weed Sci 60:600606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yerka, MK, Wiersma, AT, Lindenmayer, RB, Westra, P, Johnson, WG, de Leon, N, Stoltenberg, DE (2013) Reduced translocation is associated with tolerance of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) to glyphosate. Weed Sci 61:353360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, JS, Abercrombie, LL, Cao, Y, Halfhill, MD, Zhou, X, Peng, Y, Hu, J, Rao, MR, Heck, GR, Larosa, TJ and Sammons, RD (2010) Functional genomics analysis of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with special reference to the evolution of non-target-site glyphosate resistance. Weed Sci 58:109117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Economically important broadleaf weed species selected in this study, their family, and chromosome numbers to determine the potential for PMGF and transfer of herbicide-resistance alleles.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Empirical model of pollen-mediated gene flow in common lambsquarters under field conditions (Yerka et al. 2012). The maximum observed cross-pollination percentage between wild-type Chenopodium album and C. giganteum was described by a negative exponential function using the two highest values at each distance from the south-southwest, west-southwest, and/or west-northwest sectors (generally 180° from the prevailing wind direction during the time of pollen shed). Mean values of the maximum cross-pollination percent (±SE) are shown.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Giant ragweed inflorescence. (A) Initiation of male flowers and (B) seed clusters at the base of the flower heads.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Coexistence of Ambrosia species, common ragweed and giant ragweed, growing at the same height in a soybean field. Interspecific gene transfer is possible between the species.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF) from a glyphosate-resistant kochia pollen source to varying distances of glyphosate-susceptible receptor plants at a field site at Saskatchewan, Canada, in (A) 2014 and (B) 2015. (Adapted from Beckie et al. 2016)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Palmer amaranth. (left) Anthers and (right) female flowers.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Palmer amaranth inflorescence. (Left) male plants and (right) female plants.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Waterhemp inflorescences of (A) male and (B) female plants.

You have Access
Open access
2
Cited by