Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:50:47.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Technologies and Approaches for Weed Management in Sustainable Agriculture Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald L. Wyse*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

Weed science has a long history of solving weed management problems for farmers. Over the last four decades most of the solutions to weed problems have been based on herbicide technology. Thus, most crop production systems in the United States rely heavily on herbicides as the primary method of weed management. During the last decade environmentalists, farmers, agricultural scientists, policy makers, and the general public have begun to question the long-term sustainability of conventional farming systems. The sustainability of these systems is being questioned because of environmental, social, and economic concerns caused by global competition, cost of production, soil erosion, water pollution, and concern over the quality of rural life. Weeds are the major deterrent to the development of more sustainable agriculture systems. Since weeds dictate most of the crop production practices (e.g., tillage, herbicides, cultivation, row spacing) weed scientists must become the leaders of collaborative integrated approaches to agriculture systems research. New crop production systems must be developed that are less destructive to the environment, are profitable, conserve energy, and support rural community development. The goal is to facilitate the development of ecologically based alternative methods of weed management that will support crop production systems that require less tillage and herbicide inputs. To accomplish this goal, research efforts must be radically expanded in weed/crop ecology and in the development of ecologically based technologies for weed management.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. 1993. Weed science—the step child. Weed Technol. 7:515518.Google Scholar
2. Callaway, M. B. 1990. Crop varietal tolerance to weeds: a compilation. Dep. Plant Breeding and Biometry Pub. Ser. No. 1990-1, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
3. De Haan, R. L., Wyse, D. L., Ehlke, N. J., Maxwell, B. D., and Putnam, D. H. 1994. Simulation of spring-seeded smother plants for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Johnson, D. R. and Wyse, D. L. 1991. Use of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tagetis: for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:14.Google Scholar
5. King, R. L., Lybecker, D. W., Schweizer, E. E., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1986. Bioeconomic modeling to simulate weed control strategies for continuous corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:972979.Google Scholar
6. Power, J. F. 1987. Legumes: their potential role in agricultural production. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 2:7071.Google Scholar
7. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1986. Biological control of Northern jointvetch (Aeschynomene virginica) in rice (Oryza sativa) and soybeans (Glycine max)—a researcher's view. Weed Sci. 34:1723.Google Scholar
8. United States Congress, “Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990,” U.S. House of Representatives Conf. Rep., S-2830, No. 101-916, 1990.Google Scholar
9. Worsham, D. A. 1991. Role of cover crops in weed management and water quality. p. 141145 in Hargrove, W. L., ed. Cover Crops for Clean Water, Soil and Water Conserv. Soc. Ankey, IA.Google Scholar
10. Wyse, D. L. 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technol. 6:162165.Google Scholar